The purpose of this lesson is twofold – One idea is to dispel the notion that Britain was ruled by a tyranny in the mid-18th century whereby ordinary citizens had no say in their government and had few rights protected by the government. The second idea is dismiss the mantra “No taxation, without representation” which became a rallying cry for colonists fighting for independence from Britain. As you will see, settlers in the colonies had more representation and greater rights than Englishmen living in mainland Great Britain at the time of the Revolution. I can explain how constitutional government developed in England with reference to the importance of the Magna Carta, the Model Parliament, the Petition of Right, and the English Bill of Rights. I can describe the goals of American Colonists in establishing their own governments and describe five keys ideas which influenced the creation of colonial governments. I can describe the differences between Royal, Proprietary and Charter Colonies. I can describe the role and function of the executive and legislative branches in American colonial government. I can explain why colonists challenged the rule of Edmund Andros and the importance of the Zenger trial verdict. A constitution is a legal framework for government which outlines how a government is to be organized and run. Having a constitution does not mean that a nation has a constitutional government. A constitutional government means that there are limits on the powers of the person or people running the government. The word limits means things that government may not do or actions that it may not take. For example, limits to the power of our government are written into the Constitution. In some nations, the power of government is not limited: the constitution in those nations may allow for the use of unlimited power. In other cases, the constitution might say that the power of government is limited but neglect to say how those limits are to be enforced. Turn to a partner and in 2 minutes discuss the following question: What is a constitutional government? The powers of the government are limited. Often times these limitations are written down in a legal framework. Constitutional government developed in Great Britain over several centuries Feudalism was a system of social, economic, and political organization The king could not rule all the land effectively so he gave some responsibility for managing the land to the nobles In exchange, the nobles pledged to be loyal to the king and to fight for him in times of war The nobles further divided the land into smaller areas among vassals In turn, the vassals owed the noblemen loyalty and military service For the system to work, it depended on a series of agreements or contracts There had to be contracts between the monarch and nobles and between the nobles and vassals Each contract included rights and responsibilities that the different groups owed to each other Therefore, feudalism introduced the idea of government based on a contract Those in power pledged to respect the rights of the people who gave them loyalty Turn to a partner and in 2 minutes discuss the following question: How did feudalism spread to England? William the Conqueror invaded England but realized that he could not govern all the land effectively therefore, in return for their loyalty nobles were given portions of land to manage. King John I faced numerous problems He faced challenges to his throne, lost England’s empire in France, argued with the Pope, and taxed his nobles excessively As a consequence he was forced to sign the Magna Carta in 1215 A.D. Remember, the Magna Carta limited the powers of the monarch and forced him to recognize the rights of the nobles Among these rights are the following ideas: 1. Habeas Corpus - Accused persons cannot be held in jail without the consent of a court 2. Rule of Law - The king’s powers are limited and clearly defined. The king must obey the law 3. Due Process - Individuals shall not be deprived of life, liberty or property without advance warning or the opportunity to defend themselves Later on, in 1295 A.D., Edward I established the Model Parliament Initially, Parliament reinforced royal authority since it was designed to advise the king but over the next few centuries the role of Parliament grew By 1296 A.D., nobles began to air their grievances with the king Members of Parliament were no longer simply advising the king but were instead representing the interests of their regions For hundreds of years after the creation of Parliament, royalty, nobility, and ordinary people, struggled for power No one group was able to gain complete control Parliament consisted of two chambers; a lower chamber (The House of Commons) and an upper chamber (The House of Lords) Between 1754 and 1790 the House of Commons consisted of 558 members elected by 314 constituencies 245 English constituencies (40 counties, 203 boroughs, 2 universities) returned 489 Members 24 Welsh constituencies and 45 Scottish constituencies returned one Member each. Those who owned property worth £2 or more were eligible to vote Roughly, only 10% of the population of Great Britain was eligible to vote in the mid-1700s Edward I receiving advice from his nobles. Turn to a partner and in 2 minutes discuss the following question: What rights did Magna Carta guarantee? Accused persons cannot be held in jail without the consent of a court, the king must obey the law, and individuals could not have their property seized without advance warning. In 1628 A.D., Charles I tried to raise money from “his subjects” without the consent of Parliament As a result, Parliament forced him to agree to the Petition of Right which stated that the king could only raise taxes through the consent of Parliament The Petition of Right strengthened the idea that English subjects had certain rights that government could not violate Charles I, King of England, at the Hunt by Anthony van Dyck In 1629 A.D., Charles dissolved Parliament stating that he would rule without its backing As a consequence, a series of Civil Wars were fought between those who supported the king and those who supported Parliament Eventually, Parliament secured victory in the English Civil Wars, executed Charles I, and ruled England from 1649 before restoring the monarchy in 1660 A.D. Contemporary image depicting execution of Charles I Turn to a partner and in 2 minutes discuss the following question: How did the Petition of Right limit the powers of the monarch? It stated that the king had to secure approval from Parliament before raising taxes. By 1688 A.D. Parliament and the monarchy were quarrelling once more King James I, a Catholic, had been trying to pack his next Parliament with officials who would overturn anti-Catholic laws He dismissed Parliament in 1685, which angered their Protestant leaders They offered the throne to James’s Protestant daughter, Mary, and her husband, William of Orange who was the ruler of the Netherlands Having little support from the people, James fled the country at the end of 1688 James I of England by Daniel Mytens Parliament named William and Mary the new monarchs of England. This change in leadership was called England’s Glorious Revolution. After accepting the throne, William and Mary agreed in 1689 to uphold the English Bill of Rights. This was an agreement to respect the rights of English citizens and of Parliament. William and Mary from the Painted Hall at the Royal Naval College, Greenwich; London Furthermore the agreement stated: that free elections to be held regularly frequent meetings of Parliament must be held excessive fines and cruel punishments were forbidden people had the right to complain to the king or queen in Parliament without being arrested. The English Bill of Rights built upon the Magna Carta and established an important principle: government was to be based on laws made by Parliament, not on the desires of a ruler. By the end of the 1600s, British government was more regulated and the rights and responsibilities of both the king and Parliament were clearly defined and limited This was at the same time that Britain was establishing colonies in North America The colonists brought these ideas about government with them to the New World and expected certain rights that came from living under an British government Turn to a partner and in 2 minutes discuss the following question: What was the English Bill of Rights? A list of freedoms that the government promised to protect. To establish a colony, one generally needed to have a charter from the king A charter was a legal document which granted land to a person or company along with the right to start a colony on that land Most charters said little about what kind of government a colony should have As a result, the settlers were relatively free to develop their own form of government Each of Britain’s thirteen colonies had a government of their own In creating their own governments, the colonists tried to do two things: First, they tried to protect themselves from abuse of power by the British government Second, they tried to protect themselves from abuse of power by their colonial governments To achieve these goals the colonists used the basic ideas of constitutional government Turn to a partner and in 2 minutes discuss the following question: In creating their governments what two goals did the colonists hope to achieve? To protect themselves from abuse of power by Parliament and their own colonial assemblies. Five key ideas influenced the creation of Colonial governments: Colonial governments were based on the idea that the purpose of government is to protect the people’s natural rights to life, liberty, and property. 2. The colonists elected representatives to their colonial legislatures. 3. The people who made and enforced the laws did not have unlimited power and they, too, had to obey the laws. 4. The colonial governments recognized the idea of higher law which meant that they could not pass laws that violated the British constitution. 5. The powers of the colonial governments were divided among three branches. 1. 1. All Colonial governments operated using the following basic structure: A governor headed the executive branch The governor represented the Crown (British) in the colony The governor carried out and enforced the law 2. The legislative branch made the laws The Assembly was elected by, and therefore represented, the citizens of the towns and counties 3. The judicial branch was made up of judges or magistrates Judges were responsible for settling conflicts, presiding over criminal trials, and ensuring that colonial laws did not violate the British constitution 1. By 1775, there were three types or systems of government used within the colonies: Royal Colonies were ruled directly by the British monarchy These governments were appointed by the King, and carried out the orders and wishes of the Crown as opposed to private or local interests By 1775 the Royal Colony system of government was in the Carolina's, Virginia, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Hampshire and New York. 2. In a Proprietary Colony, an individual, or small elite group, essentially owned the colony They controlling all of the actions and institutions of government, for which they would receive political or financial favors The governors of the proprietary colonies reported directly to the king By 1775 the Proprietary system of government was in Delaware, Maryland, and Pennsylvania 3. Charter Colonies were generally selfgoverned, and their charters were granted to the colonists via a joint-stock company When created, the British king granted these colonies a charter establishing the rules of government, but he allowed the colonists a great amount of freedom within those rules The Charter system of government was in Rhode Island and Connecticut. In order to rule the colonies from a long distance a governor was appointed by the monarch The role of the Governor was to oversee the colony and was the head of the colonial administration He was in charge of laws, taxes and made decisions which affected the colony To fulfil his political duties he had the authority to appoint various government officials He had the power to convene, or dissolve the legislature He also had the power to veto any of its laws He had command of the militia so was able to enforce government policies Despite the differences in the types of Colonial Government all of the colonies had a legislature (law making body) elected by the people The legislature consisted of two branches: The lower house, to which the people elected delegates The upper house, or council, that was appointed by the governor The powers of the legislatures in Colonial Government were limited and their acts were subject to review: They could do nothing contrary to the laws of England Their actions and bills could be vetoed by the governors All laws passed by a colonial legislature and approved by a governor, had to be examined by the King who could veto the law at any time within 3 years (except for CT, RI, and MD who were self-governed Charter Companies) To avoid the Royal veto, the legislatures would pass laws to run for just 2 years, and when that time expired would re-enact them for 2 more years Turn to a partner and in 2 minutes discuss the following question: What ideas did the colonists use to create their governments? Natural rights, Representative government, Rule of law, Higher law, and Separation of powers. In many ways, the colonies offered settlers greater political rights than they would have enjoyed in England. Around 50 to 70% of white males in the American colonies could vote Women, even those who owned property, could not vote in any of the colonies Native Americans who still lived on land claimed by the colonists were not permitted to vote No Africans, whether free or enslaved, could vote When the first colonists landed in Jamestown, Virginia in 1607 they brought the English Common Law with them The term "common law" was the name given to the law that emerged as "common" throughout the realm of England and was extended to include the Thirteen Colonies to be used by Colonial Government Colonial Government represented an extension of the English government The court systems and courts in the colonies enforced the Common Law of England For much of the colonial period, Great Britain paid little attention to the colonies Britain had become a world power and was often busy fighting wars in Europe The government in Britain did not have much time to devote to the colonies The colonies were a long distance away and communication between the colonies and Britain was slow because news had to travel by ship so orders from the government to the colonies took months to arrive This hands-off policy was called salutary neglect. Parliament passed many laws regulating trade, the use of money, and even apprenticeships in the colonies But governors rarely enforced these laws and the colonists got used to acting on their own. In addition, The British government used the policy of Virtual Representation to justify taxes imposed upon the colonies which the colonists would have to pay. Prime Minister George Grenville argued that Parliament could legally tax the colonists even though the colonists could not elect any members of Parliament because Members of Parliament (MPs) represented not only their specific geographical constituencies, but also took into consideration the well being of all British subjects when deliberating on legislation. Turn to a partner and in 2 minutes discuss the following prompt: Explain what is meant by the term salutary neglect. Two key events also helped to increase the idea of democracy in the colonies The reign of James I threatened the colonies’ tradition of self-government James I wanted to rule England and its colonies with total authority One of his first orders changed the way the Northern colonies were governed These colonies, especially Massachusetts, had been smuggling goods and ignoring the Navigation Acts When challenged, the people of Massachusetts had claimed that England had no right to make laws for them King James combined Massachusetts and the other Northern colonies into one Dominion of New England, ruled by royal governor Edmund Andros Andros angered the colonists by ending their representative assemblies and allowing town meetings to be held only once a year With their assemblies outlawed, some colonists refused to pay taxes They said that being taxed without having a voice in government violated their rights Andros jailed the loudest complainers The colonists sent Increase Mather to England to plead with King James The Rev. Increase Mather by Joan van der Spriet, 1688 However, the Glorious Revolution swept James I and Governor Andros from power When the people of Boston heard of King James’s fall, they jailed Governor Andros and asked Parliament to restore their old government After the Glorious Revolution, the Massachusetts colonists regained some selfgovernment Turn to a partner and in 2 minutes discuss the following question: How did James I weaken self-government in the colonies? He put the New England colonies under one royal governor, abolished their assemblies, and limited town meetings. While the colonies were largely left to establish and run their own governments, colonists still expected to enjoy the traditional rights of English subjects In 1735, a notable court case helped to establish another important right: the freedom of the press, or the right of journalists to publish the truth without restriction or penalty John Peter Zenger, publisher of the New-York Weekly Journal, stood trial for printing criticism of New York’s governor The governor had removed a judge and tried to fix an election Zenger was charged with libel, or the publishing of statements that damage a person’s reputation At that time, it was illegal to criticize the government in print Andrew Hamilton defended Zenger at his trial, claiming that people had the right to speak the truth The jury agreed, and Zenger was released The Zenger case later helped to establish a fundamental principle – a democracy depends on well-informed citizens Therefore, the press has a right and responsibility to keep the public informed of the truth A Brief Narrative of the Cafe and Tryal of John Peter Zenger, by James Alexander, 1 736. Turn to a partner and in 2 minutes discuss the following question: Why was the Zenger trial important? It established the idea that the press had both the right and the responsibility to inform the public of the truth. You may work with a partner for the duration of this activity. List all the democratic and undemocratic features they can think of in relation to the Thirteen Colonies. Most of these characteristics have been explained during this lesson although there are some features of colonial life which we have covered previously that could be included on this graphic organizer. Democratic Characteristics Freedom of the Press Freedom of religion Extension of British government Established to protect natural rights Delegates voted on issues Greater suffrage – 50-70% adult white males could vote Elected legislatures existed in almost all colonies. Separation of Powers Salutary Neglect Virtual Representation Magna Carta ▪ Rule of Law/Due Process/Habeas Corpus English Bill of Rights ▪ Free elections/Regular meetings of Parliament/No excessive fines or cruel punishments/ Undemocratic Characteristics King appointed the governor Parliament imposes its will on the colonies ▪ Navigation Acts ▪ Proclamation of 1763 Governor chooses the upper chamber in the legislature Slavery Sedition laws Must respect higher law Ruled by a king ▪ Hereditary power not elected ▪ Colonists had to swear their loyalty to him Colonial existence ▪ Colonies were created in order to serve the economic needs and desires of the homeland (Great Britain) What is constitutional government? How did constitutional government develop in England? List four rights the colonists expected as English subjects? What five ideas influenced early colonial governments? Why did colonists challenge the rule of Edmund Andros? Why was verdict in the trial of John Peter Zenger important to the colonists? This lesson is important today because in creating their governments the colonists incorporated democratic ideas from Britain introduced through centuries of political reform. Those democratic ideas included limits to the power of government and individual rights which could not be violated by the government. Although the colonies were established to serve the economic needs of Great Britain, the Colonists expected to enjoy the same democratic rights and freedoms as those living in Britain. In dealing with the Colonies, Parliament failed to understand that there was a spirit of democracy in the Colonies that did not exist in Britain. The colonists had come for many reasons, not the least of which was to get away from England. Whether their goal was economic opportunity or religious freedom it was a goal that required a certain amount of independence from the King. Lastly, as you will see in the next lesson, when they felt that their rights had been violated the Colonists were quick to protest and acted accordingly to ensure restitution.