ACTIVE ANKLE FOOT ORTHOTIC (AFO) VOICE OF CUSTOMER Design Project Management Table of Contents • • • • • • • Objective Tree Needs Prioritization Constraints Functional Decomposition Flow Diagram Summary/Conclusions Questions Objective Tree Objective Tree Needs Prioritization Customers ranked categories of objective tree for importance directly, group members ranked every objective and category rankings were calculated: Customer Rank Safe 26% Group rank Perform on Flat Terrain 18.6% Perform on Flat Terrain 21% Perform on Special Terrain 17.3% Portable 19% Portable 16.4% Comfortable 12% Safe 16.2% Durable 10% Convenient 11.9% Perform on Special Terrain 7% Comfortable 10.3% Convenient 5% Durable 9.3% Constraints Low Weight (of AFO) High Comfort Easy patient interface with sensing system Waterproof Fits into normal shoe size Safe Method of Actuation? Functional Decomposition Determine Ideal State Identifies phase of gait Determin es foot position Senses Terrain Utilizes terrain sensing system Interprets sensor data Utilizes terrain sensing system Identifies phase of gait Applys force to foot Removable Allows plantar flexion and dorsiiflexion Accomodates Range of Users Easily Adjustable Determine Current State Support Portability Safely Regulate Energy Controls Foot Position Compares current and ideal states Allows adequate motion Safely store Energy Modifies Foot Behavoir Safely Receive Energy The active ankle foot orthotic must mitigate the effects of foot drop. Reduce/ eliminate custom fitting process Flow Diagram The active ankle foot orthotic must mitigate the effects of foot drop. Record Data ON/OFF Micro-Controller Terrain Type Determine Actual State Phase of Gait Determine Ideal State Compare Real and Ideal States Check for Errors Identify Action Monitor System Status Actuate Device Apply Force or Allow Movement Health of System Monitor Energy Level Power Receive Power Store Energy Regulate Power Waste Energy (Noise, Heat, Vibration, etc) Summary/Conclusions Stakeholders need a convenient active ankle foot orthotic to mitigate the effect of foot drop while not constraining user’s motion in ways that force unnatural gait. Moving forward it is likely that the scope will be limited to: An untethered active AFO using an actuation source other than air muscles A tethered rehabilitation active AFO using air muscles Questions?