Among School Children Yeats wrote “Among School Children” in 1926, by which time he was famous as a Nobel Prize winning poet and as a senator of the Irish Free State. It is a fairly long, complex poem and might be best understood by being approached stanza by stanza. It is an example of a philosophical poem – a poem that considers the type of questions asked by philosophers. The poem actually names three Greek philosophers: Plato, Aristotle and Pythagoras. He wrote the poem after visiting a Montessori school in Dublin. As a publishe poet and winner of the Nobel prize, Yeats was often asked to visit such institutions to provide encouragement to students. Yeats considers various questions in the poem and each stanza takes a step forward in his thinking. He considers the importance of the philosophy of thought, science and aesthetics (represented by the three named philosophers). However, he considers how even these great men grew old and died and may at times be held up to ridicule. Yeats reflects upon their and his own impermanence. He also contemplates the arts: music, dance, theatre, poetry, painting and sculpture. He considers them all as one art – all attempting to find the perfect Pythagorean aesthetic ratios. The third area of this reflection is his view of himself as a lover. He was in love with one woman for many years and describes the intimate feeling of when his beloved grants him a vision of the life she led prior to their meeting. According to Plato’s myth of creation, everyone was originally half a sphere. Upon birth, the spheres split in two and the divided parts are thrown into the world, thus explaining the phenomenon of human sexual attraction. As he looks over the girls in the classroom, his mind wanders and he imagines what Maud may have looked like as a girl. He imagines her as a type of Mary Magdalene – evoking a figure similar to Donatello’s 15th century emaciated, ravaged Magdalene. The final questions of the poem have been interpreted in many different ways. They can be looked at in terms of identity: The “dancer” could be our inner self, which may differ from our “dance” which could be our outer actions. Is it possible to separate the two? To what extent are we defined as individuals by our outward actions? It appears that Yeats is asking whether any one thing or person can be defined by its parts. For example: Can we define this poem by its words, its form or its tone? The answer is – we need to look at all the parts to define it. Yeats applies this idea to education by suggesting that a holistic approach, which balances intellect, emotion, body and soul in a creative expression of self, is the ideal. This is a fairly utopian ideal of joyful learning. The poem is written in octava rima form, with each stanza consisting of 8 lines of verse. Each stanza contains a unit of 6 lines followed by a unit of two lines, giving the poem an ABABABCC form. He often used this form for his meditative poems. To Yeats, life is a series of fluid and self-invented steps, not governed by time but rather invented against time. This poem appears to have a stream-of consciousness feel, with no one apparent focus but ends with the ultimate questions: What is life worth once someone has grown old?