SB678
Chief Mack Jenkins, San Diego
This was created over the last 5 years through important
legislation
2009:
SB678
AB1
Pass
2010:
AB1 Seed
Money
2011:
SB678
Funds
2011:
AB109 and
AB118
Realignment
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
# of People in State Prison
Prison population change over time
180,000
160,000
140,000
120,000
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
-
Decline in Probation Revocations to
State Prison
30,000
# of Prison Revocations
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
$220 million over the first 2 years was reinvested in
strategies proven to lower recidivism
• Risk/Need Tools
• Smaller Caseloads
• Targeted intervention for High Risk Offenders
These tools and funding allowed Probation to
deal with the new Realignment population
successfully
In 2012, money may not be available if SB678 is
reduced
SB678 Funding Scenarios Based on Marginal Funding Rates
160,000,000
$136,889,280
140,000,000
Amount Funded by SB678
120,000,000
$88,929,225
$102,494,700
100,000,000
Jan
Budget
80,000,000
60,000,000
40,000,000
$34,792,000
20,000,000
0
2010
Enacted Marginal Funding Level ($9,000)
2011
2012
Orginal Marginal Funding Level ($29,000)
Probation Data Overview
Chief Michael Daly, Marin
Kevin O’Connell
Adult probation supervises 350,000
convicted felons
35,000
5500
310,000
Felony Probation
PRCS
Mandatory Supervision
There are 40,000 offenders being supervised under
realignment
Active Realigned Supervision Population
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Active PRCS
Active Mandatory Supervision
Underuse of split sentences mean 75% of
Local Prison terms will leave incarceration
with no re-entry plan
2,500
Local Prison Offenders Sentenced
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
Split Sentence
Jail Only
Diversity in
sentencing
practices has
result in varying
levels of policy
implementation
Darker Green Counties have higher levels of
split sentencing
Actual Local prison terms were above
original estimates by 20%
160%
140%
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Early Outcome Measurement
Warrants and Failures to Appear
– 7% of PRCS failed to Appear
– 8% are on active warrants
Recidivism Definition:
– At the closure of the supervision term, was there a
new felony conviction while under supervision
• Too early to tell in terms of recidivism
Where to go for data
• www.cpoc.org
• Presentation
Materials
County Panels
Supervision and Collaboration
Evidence Based Practices and Treatment
Sentencing
Supervision and Collaboration
Chief Linda Penner, Fresno
Chief Michelle Scray Brown, San Bernardino
Chief Robert Ochs, Sonoma
Fresno County
• Felony Probation:
• 8,711
• Active PRCS:
• 1,304
• Local Prison Terms:
• 902
• Split Sentence %:
• 33%
San Bernardino County
• Felony Probation:
– 19,540
• Active PRCS:
– 3,380
• Local Prison Terms:
– 3,471
• Split Sentence %:
– 18%
Sonoma County
• Felony Probation:
– 2,270
• Active PRCS:
– 229
• Local Prison Terms:
– 186
• Split Sentence %:
– 56%
Evidence Based Practices and
Treatment
Chief Steve Bordin, Butte
Chief Michael Daly, Marin
Chief Mack Jenkins, San Diego
Butte County
• Felony Probation:
– 1,442
• Active PRCS:
– 277
• Local Prison Terms:
– 310
• Split Sentence %:
– 7%
Marin County
• Felony Probation:
– 1,304
• Active PRCS:
– 43
• Local Prison Terms:
– 25
• Split Sentence %:
– 52%
San Diego County
• Felony Probation:
– 16,531
• Active PRCS:
– 2,082
• Local Prison Terms:
– 1,399
• Split Sentence %:
– 24%
Sentencing
Chief Jill Silva, Stanislaus
Chief Philip Kader, Contra Costa
Chief Mary Butler, Napa
Stanislaus County
• Felony Probation:
– 5,826
• Active PRCS:
– 620
• Local Prison Terms:
– 506
• Split Sentence %:
– 86%
Contra Costa County
• Felony Probation:
– 3,451
• Active PRCS:
– 239
• Local Prison Terms:
– 199
• Split Sentence %:
– 86%
Napa County
• Felony Probation:
– 1,261
• Active PRCS:
– 63
• Local Prison Terms:
– 68
• Split Sentence %:
– 68%