Darren T. Nielsen, M.Ad., CISA,
CPP, PCI, PSP, CBRA, CBRM
Senior Compliance Auditor, Cyber Security
Salt Lake City, UT Office
CIP-006 V3 to CIP-006 V5 Transition Overview
5/14/2014
V5 Outreach
Salt Lake City, UT

2
• Lessons Learned updates to slide deck
CIP-006
R1
Change History
Added R1.10
Date
5/8/2014 NERC SDT addition per FERC Order

3
Darren T. Nielsen, CISA, CPP, PCI, PSP,
• 24 years Physical Security Experience o Marine Corps Veteran (PRP) o Retired Law Enforcement Officer o 7 years Critical Infrastructure Protection Program o ASIS Utilities Security Council – Chairman o ASIS Physical Security Council o Education: M.Ad. (Leadership Emphasis) w/Distinction
- Northern Arizona University o BA- Police Science- Ottawa University
(Summa Cum Laude)

4
Provide a basic overview of the changes
• Share WECC audit approach
• Provide examples of Best Practices
• Answer questions to assist your compliance efforts

5
Physical Security Program o Must define the operational or procedural controls to restrict physical access o Removed current “6 wall” wording to instead require a Physical Border- PSP o For High Impact, added the need to utilize two or more different and complementary physical access controls to restrict physical access o Testing changed to a 24-month cycle http://www.nerc.com/pa/Stand/Project20086CyberSecurityOrder706Version5CIPStanda/Mapping_D ocument_for_CIP_V5_Clean_(2012-0911).pdf

6
• A new Purpose….and some new language
• To manage physical access to “BES Cyber
Systems” by specifying a physical security plan in support of protecting BES Cyber
Systems against compromise that could lead to misoperation or instability in the
BES.

7
• High Impact BES Cyber Systems –
• Medium Impact BES Cyber Systems–
• Medium Impact BES Cyber Systems without
External Routable Connectivity –
• Medium Impact BES Cyber Systems with External
Routable Connectivity – o This also excludes Cyber Assets in the BES Cyber System that cannot be directly accessed through External Routable Connectivity
.

8
• Physical Access Control Systems (PACS) –
Applies to each Physical Access Control
System associated with a referenced high impact BES Cyber System or medium impact BES Cyber System.

9
• Locally mounted hardware or devices at the
Physical Security Perimeter – Applies to the locally mounted hardware or devices (e.g. such as motion sensors, electronic lock control mechanisms, and badge readers) at a Physical Security Perimeter associated with a referenced high impact BES Cyber System or medium impact BES Cyber System with External Routable
Connectivity, and that does not contain or store access control information or independently perform access authentication. These hardware and devices are excluded in the definition of Physical Access Control Systems.

10
You're now bilingual CIP personnel (end of new language)
• Protected Cyber Assets (PCA) – Applies to each Protected
Cyber Asset associated with a referenced high impact
BES Cyber System or medium impact BES Cyber System.
• Electronic Access Control or Monitoring Systems
(EACMS) – Applies to each Electronic Access Control or
Monitoring System associated with a referenced high impact BES Cyber System or medium impact BES Cyber
System. Examples may include, but are not limited to, firewalls, authentication servers, and log monitoring and alerting systems
.

11
CIP-006-5 —R1
A new look- Requirements and Measures
• A substantive change to your Plan.. now becomes a program. No Annual Approval.

12
CIP-006-5 —R1.2
A new look- Requirements and Measures
• Methods to control, log and monitor access remain the same as CIP-006-3 R4, R5, and R6

13
CIP-006-5 —R1.2
A new look- Requirements and Measures o Aligns to old V3 for CCA’s and protecting PACS assets
.

CIP-006-5 —R1.3
A new look- Requirements and Measures
• Major Change- Physical Access control to
High Impact BES Cyber Systems assets
14
For physically layered protection, a locked gate in combination with a locked controlbuilding could be acceptable, provided no single authenticator (e.g., key or card key) would provide access through both.

15
CIP-006-5 —R1.3 – Audit Approach
• Two forms of access control means access needs to require two of the following:
1. Something you know (PIN, password, etc.)
2. Something you are (biometrics, security guard identity verification, etc.)
3. Something you have (Hard key, token, card key, etc.)

CIP-006-5 —R1.3 – Audit Approach
Methods of physical access control include:
• Card Key: A means of electronic access where the access rights of the card holder are predefined in a computer database.
Access rights may differ from one perimeter to another.
• Special Locks: These include, but are not limited to, locks with
“restricted key” systems, magnetic locks that can be operated remotely, and “man ‐ trap” systems.
• Security Personnel: Personnel responsible for controlling physical access who may reside on ‐ site or at a monitoring station.
• Other Authentication Devices: Biometric, keypad, token, or other equivalent devices that control physical access into the Physical
Security Perimeter.
16

17
CIP-006-5 —R1.4
A new look- Requirements and Measures
 This is the old CIP-006-3 R5 Monitoring
Requirement

18
CIP-006-5 —R1.5
A new look- Requirements and Measures
More of the old R5 for High Impact and
Medium with ERC within 15 minutes

19
CIP-006-5 —R1.6
A new look- Requirements and Measures
• Specific to PACS associated with….this is the old CIP-006 R2.1 with a twist. PACS must now be monitored in addition to the
Physical Security Perimeter.

20
CIP-006-5 —R1.7
A new look- Requirements and Measures
NOTE: within 15 minutes for “detected” UA access to a PACS.
Added notification emphasis to contact identified in CSIRP.

21
CIP-006-5 —R1.8
A new look- Requirements and Measures
• Logs requirement (old CIP-006-3 R6)

22
CIP-006-5 —R1.9
A new look- Requirements and Measures
• Log retention stays the same (Old V3- R7)

23
CIP-006-5 —R1.10 (in work SDT)

24
CIP-006-5 —R2
A new look- Requirements and Measures
• Visitor Control Program Old (V3 R1.6)
• Added CIP Exceptional Circumstances

25
CIP-006-5 —R2.2 & 2.3
A new look- Requirements and Measures
Major change: log visitor only once per day.
(Initial entry and exit)- Point of Contact req.
• maintain logs for 90 days (R2.3)

26
CIP-006-5 —R3
A new look- Requirements and Measures
• Testing & Maintenance (CIP-006-3 R8) changed from 3 year to 2 year cycle

27
• Key Control Program o Who has them?
o How do you log the use of a hard key?
o Is an alarm triggered when the door is opened? o Do they have a PRA?
o Training

28
• Visitor/escort forgets to log out.
• Are you in a Possible Violation situation?
o Can you retrieve data via Cameras?
o Other Logs?
o Ask and update to ensure completeness of logs.

• PSWG- Get plugged in!
• http://www.wecc.biz/committees/StandingCommittees/OC/
CIIMS/PSWG/default.aspx
• Phone call away-
 We want to help.
29
• Always willing to provide our “audit approach”

Darren T. Nielsen, M.Ad, CISA,
CPP, PCI, PSP, CBRA, CBRM
Senior Compliance Auditor, Cyber Security
Western Electricity Coordinating Council
155 North 400 West, Suite 200
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
(801) 857-9134 dnielsen@wecc.biz