John D. Foubert, Ph.D. National President, One in Four Professor, Higher Education and Student Affairs Oklahoma State University Principal, John D. Foubert, LLC For copies of PowerPoint: https://okstate.academia.edu/JohnFoubert/ACPA-2015 John.Foubert@gmail.com 405-338-8046 @JohnFoubert 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Key Elements of Campus SAVE Prevalence of Sexual Violence Characteristics of Targeted Women Perpetrator Behavior Title IX vs. Yes Means Yes Helpful Theories & Research re: Prevention 4 Approaches to Prevention Q&A and Discussion Every institution who uses federal financial aid Annual Security Report Available programs for DV, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking Standard of evidence Possible sanctions Provide programs: rape, acquaintance rape, domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. Primary prevention and awareness programs for incoming students, new employees, ongoing prevention and awareness programs for students and faculty. Must include: ▪ statement prohibiting 6 crimes above ▪ Definition (state) of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking ▪ Definition of consent ▪ Bystander Intervention ▪ Risk reduction to recognize warning signs of abusive behavior A prompt, fair, and impartial investigation and resolution of cases Annual training for investigators/hearing officers about: domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking, how to conduct an investigation and hearing process that protects the safety of victims and promotes accountability The Campus SaVE Act codifies mandate for prompt and impartial internal investigation and resolution procedures requirement that alleged sexual assault victims be advised of their right to file internal complaints, criminal complaints, or both. DCL mandates “preponderance of the evidence” standard SaVE Act states only that institutions must specify the standard of evidence they will use Congress did not disavow preponderance standard Checklist from United Educators: https://www.ue.org/Libraries/Corporate/The_Cam pus_SaVE_Act_A_Compliance_Guide.sflb.ashx Title IX & Sexual Assault Guidance from OCR http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/qa -201404-title-ix.pdf • 3.1% of college women survived rape or attempted rape during a 6-7 month academic year. • 10.1% survived rape before then. • 10.9% survived attempted rape before then. • Fisher, Cullen & Turner; US Department of Justice, 2006 3.1 10.1 + 10.9 24.1% Current College Women: 673,000 women have experienced rape at some point in their lifetime (Kilpatrick, Resnick, Riggiero, Conoscenti & McCauley, 2007). Annually: In one year 300,000 college women, over 5% of women enrolled in colleges and universities, experienced rape or attempted rape. (Kilpatrick, Resnick, Riggierio, Conoscenti, & McCauley, 2007; American College Health Association, 2013). 3% of college men report surviving rape or attempted rape (Tjaden & Thoennes, 2006). 16% of males were sexually abused by the age of 18 (Dube et al., 2005). Between 6 and 9% of men admit committing rape in anonymous surveys (Abbey & McAuslan, 2004; Lisak & Miller, 2002). Breaking News: It is on the way up… On an average campus of 10,000 students 10,000 students, if ½ are women: 5,000 women 5% experience rape/attempted rape per academic year 250 women annually about 1 per day. Those who have experienced rape are 20x more likely to report difficulty being assertive Some demonstrate delayed response to cues to dangerous situations 2 x or more weekly binge drinking Peer support Emotional Physical Sexual violence (DeKeseredy & Schwartz, 2014) “Women lie about not wanting sex” Low empathy. More sexually active Women are sexual objects to be conquered Women and men should have separate and proper roles Needs to control women. Behave in rigidly and stereotypically masculine ways Hate perceived slight to their masculine identities. Aggression and violence marker of his adequacy. (Lisak & Miller, 2002) Title IX requires proof of “unwelcomeness” Easier to prove than lack of “affirmative consent.” Acquiescence in the conduct or failure to complain does not mean the conduct was welcome. Conduct is unwelcome if a student acts out of fear, or because her capacity is diminished due to alcohol or drugs. “Yes means yes” -- if a person does not want sex, a forcible attack is allowed so long as the offender claims he made a “mistake” about “affirmative consent.” Under Title IX “unwelcomeness,” standard such “mistakes” are not allowed. ”Unwelcome” a person subjectively does not want sex. a student did not "request or invite" it and if she "regarded the conduct as undesirable or offensive.” (Wendy Murphy, 2014, personal communication) DOESN’T WORK AS FOCUS Getting men to focus on respecting women’s “no” Not having sex with women who are intoxicated Not expecting sex (i.e. as a payment for dinner) Not interpreting women’s flirting, dress, and behaviors as an invitation to sex Challenging gender stereotypes and belief of rape myths WHAT WORKS Teaching men to support survivors Teaching men to act as allies to women. Men don’t see information on left as relevant to them. They see information on right as relevant. To produce lasting attitude change, interventions must be designed to maintain people's existing self-conceptions (Grube, Mayton & Ball-Rokeach, 1984). Behavior Change is Most Likely When People Are: Motivated to hear the message Can Understand it Well Perceive it as Personally Relevant (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986) Motivated Understand Relevant No Yes Central Route Processing Peripheral Route Processing Lasting Change Experts Trustworthy Attractive? Yes No Short Term Change Likely No Change Single Sex (Brecklin & Forde, 2001) Empathy Based (Schewe, 2002) Describes Male-on-Male Rape (Schewe) Includes Bystander Education (Banyard, Plante & Moynihan, 2004) Goal is to give everyone the skills to intervene and reach out to help others. Hard to say “this doesn’t apply to me.” Conditions Necessary to Intervene: Notice a Situation Interpret as emergency Decide it is your responsibility to act Know what to do Act 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Make prior commitment to help Sense of responsibility for situation Believing the victim has not caused it. Self-efficacy about what to do See others modeling bystander behavior Perceiving that the victim is a member of your group. Banyard, V. L., Plante, E. G., & Moynihan, M. M. (2004). Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, (1), 6179. Bring in the Bystander (Victoria Banyard, UNH) Bystander efficacy, willingness, rape myth acceptance Mentors in Violence Prevention (Jackson Katz) Lower levels of sexism, increased belief that they could prevent violence against women Green Dot (Dorothy Edwards) Rape myth acceptance and increased bystander intervention The Men’s and Women’s Programs (John Foubert) Decline in sexual assault behavior, rape myth acceptance, increase bystander willingness and efficacy, increase in empathy (Banyard, Moynihan & Plante, 2007; Banyard, Plante & Moynihan, 2004; Cissner, 2009; Coker, Cook-Craig, Williams, Fisher, Clear, Garcia & Hegge, 2011; Foubert, Newberry & Tatum, 2007; Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Foubert, Brasfield, All-Male Primary Focus: Empathy How to Help Survivor Bystander Intervention Lowers the rate of sexually coercive behavior among high risk men by 40%. Decreases the severity of sexually coercive behavior among high risk men eight fold. Increases empathy toward female rape survivors. Two years after program participation, 79% of participants reported either attitude or behavior change due to the program’s effects or that the program reinforced their current beliefs. Increases bystander intervention. (Foubert, Godin & Tatum, 2010; Foubert & Newberry, 2006; Foubert, Newberry & Tatum, 2007; LanghinrichsenRohling, Foubert, Brasfiled, Hill, & Shelley-Tremblay, 2011). Video interviewing perpetrator. How to help friends avoid guys like him How to help a friend who survives rape. Interactive exercise about intervening as bystanders. Commitment to intervening. Significant increases in bystander efficacy Significant increases in bystander willingness to help Greater ability to recognize risk cues Greater willingness to engage in self-protective behaviors Greater level of self-efficacy in handling threatening dating situations Foubert, J.D. & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Brasfield, H., & Hill, B. (2010). Effects of a rape awareness program on college women: Increasing bystander efficacy and willingness to intervene. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 813-827. Bannon, R. S. (2014). The bystander approach to sexual assault risk reduction: Effects on risk recogniation, perceived selfefficacy, and protective behavior. Doctoral Dissertation. Resources Foubert, J.D. (2011). The men’s and women’s programs: Ending rape through peer education. New York: Routledge. Foubert, J. D. (2011). The women’s program: Peer educator’s guide. New York: Routledge. Foubert, J. D. (2011). The men’s program: Peer educator’s guide. New York: Routledge. Thoughts? Questions? Comments?