Theorist Durkheim concept Normal & pathological Modern Normal/healthy= similar conditions in similar stage in other societies. Justice Social justice= more equitable social relations which “assure the free development of all socially useful forces”. Anomie Anomie-Normlessness/normative ambiguity/Lack of consensus of values/goals Humans=unlimited desires/need society to limit/control Anomic {Anomie=Lack of regulation that celebrates individuality & doesn’t tell people what to do}. > Specialization=> anomie Forced {outdated norms and expectations can force people into positions for which they are ill suited.} Tradition/power/status rather than talent and qualifications result in job (almost Marxian) Poorly conditioned {Poor coordination between specializations} “Homo Duplex” Two beings within: The isolated individual and the social being. We have two beings/two states of consciousness The two beings are in constant tension and connected. Our sense of individuality develops socially with the division of labor. Egoism= individualism Non-social needs Moral individualism= collective representation/ commonality Modern form of collective conscience is the “cult of the individual”- moral individualism is the new link to society. Abnormal forms of the D.O.L Cult of the individual (Not in 6th edition of Ritzer) Postmodern /postindustrial Does the presence of similar conditions in numerous societies necessarily denote societal health today? What does ‘similar stage’ mean today? Is there such a thing as unhealthy “contagion” being responsible for similar societal conditions? How does Durkheim’s measure of “healthy” contrast with that of Martineau? Where do we now see an emphasis on social justice and where do we not see this focus? How does Durkheim’s apparent goal for social justice differ from Martineau’s vision and that of Marx? How might Marx and Durkheim’s differing assumptions about human nature affect their ideas of social justice? What forces today promote a homogeneity of norms globally and a heterogeneity of norms domestically? How is the concept of anomie relevant today and what forces reduce its contemporary relevance? Is there anything about contemporary society that counters the trend of anomie arising from the increased specialization in the division of labor? In what ways are the less powerful being subject to a forced division of labor in the U.S. and how is that linked to education? What evidence do you see of poor coordination between specializations and why do you see this as happening more in the post industrial world? What is the current balance between egoism and moral individualism and what contemporary forces foster egoism and moral individualism? What are the societal and individual costs and benefits of egoism over moral individualism? Of moral individualism over egoism? How does the contemporary division of labor promote egoism and how does it promote a moral individualism? Moral Education & Social Reform Marx Human nature & labor Alienation Modern problems are temporary aberrations not problems inherent in the structure of modern society. Humans are selfish; society is the source of morality. Morality is relativist but grows out of collective traditions. Morality has three components: Discipline, Attachment, Autonomy o Discipline-constrains egoistic impulses o Attachment-social responsibility o Autonomy-fully grounded in science Human nature=variable not static changes historically & societally Species being: o Ability for objectification o Full of potential, o inherently productive labor= objectification of purpose, relationship between need and objects of need, transformation of human nature (specific to time & place), emergence of human as an individual in society Alienation=Relationship between humans and labor perverted in capitalism Labor NOT expression of purpose Labor = means to end Forced to sell time to capitalists Alienated from o Productive activity, o product, o fellow workers, o human potential. According to Ritzer, Durkheim proposes that “ Autonomy only comes to full force in modernity with the decline of the myths and symbols that previous moral systems used to demand discipline and encourage attachment, Durkheim believed that now that these myths have passed away, only scientific understanding can provide the foundation for moral autonomy”. In our contemporary world, what are some of the myths and symbols of moral systems than continue to be central? What are some examples of science providing a moral foundation? Durkheim saw education as the vehicle for modern morality. What role does education now play in morality and what role does morality play in education? What are the key structural aspects of labor in the contemporary U.S. and what are the consequential characteristics of human nature in this time and place? How, if at all, do individuals and cultures in the postindustrial period apply the means–end nature of labor to other spheres of life that produce additional forms of alienation outside the realm of labor? What is the effect of that on individuals and on cultures? Fetishism of commodities And Reification Weber Simmel Rationalization & the Iron Cage Money/reification Value float free of commodity Objects & market have appear to have independent existence Labor acquires exchange value that is separate from us. • Thingification” Reification=Creations perceived as External to and Coercive over us Rationalization=two key types Subjective effects of formal rationality Bureaucracy w/ legal authority o Efficiency o Predictability o Calculability o Control Over-rationalization= goals lost Focus becomes Efficiency Predictability, Calculability Control fir its own sake People become complicit in their own imprisonment/ see rationalization as imposed on them from without (reified) Subjective effects: “specialists without spirit, sensualists without heart” Money= larger problem of alienation of subj. and obj. Value a function of distanceMost value= not too easily attained but not too impossible Money creates distance between ind. & object & provides means to bridge the distance. Money essential to modern capitalism. o Reification o Rationalization o Quantitative>qualitative o Intellectuality <Significance of individual as >reified structures expand. 1. What structural aspects of the postindustrial world intensify the apparent independent existence of commodities? What are some contemporary example of cultural reification in the U.S.? What developments in contemporary society have furthered this inevitable (according to Weber) over-rationalization in which means supersede goals? What strategies or alternatives can you propose for opposing, supplanting , or ameliorating the objective structure of bureaucracy and its over-rationalization What strategies or alternatives can you propose for opposing, supplanting , or ameliorating the subjective effects? How have credit cards in the contemporary U.S. functioned in terms of Simmel’s key theoretical points about money? Money, reification, rationalization Tragedy of culture Devaluation of the non-rational-that which is most meaningful to us (love, faith, feeling, ) Increase in cynicism and blasé attitude, calculating character Decrease in personal relations Individual enslavement-atomized and isolate Everything reduced to causal connections to be comprehended intellectually but not emotionally. >ability to create components of the whole < sense of the whole >objective culture < individual culture ?impoverished ind. culture >language <individual ability >technology < ind. skills > knowledge < intellectuals >mechanical world < spirituality > impersonal relationships >meaningless consumption < uncertainty < natural rhythm / > leveling > freedom (of a sort) >relativistic mode- money allows for disparate things to be compared UPSIDE > # of people to interact < obligations > gratification develop individuality protect subjective center > freedom from productive forces > freedom from constraints of social group 2. How is the devaluation of the non-rational perpetuated in contemporary society? 3. What evidence do you see in contemporary U.S. society that we are experiencing this tragedy of culture? What evidence do you see that people are beginning to resist and oppose this tragedy? 4.