Learning Outcomes Assessment

advertisement
North Texas Library
Assessment Group
From Micro to Macro:
Correlating Instruction with
Student Learning & Success
through Local and National
Initiatives
Zoltán Szentkirályi, Director of Assessment
Hollie Gardner, User Experience Librarian
Central University Libraries
Southern Methodist University
Spring Meeting
2015
March 20, 2015
Student Outcomes Research
GWLA Learning Outcomes
Conference & Workshop
November 13-15, 2013 at UNLV, Las Vegas
33 GWLA member universities, each encouraged to
send a team of three people to discuss SLO’s.
SMU Team:

“Manager in Charge of Library Instruction Program”
Elizabeth Killingsworth

“Assessment Representative”
Zoltán Szentkirályi

“Instruction Librarian”
Hollie Gardner
Student Outcomes Research
GWLA
Greater Western Library Alliance
The Greater Western Library Alliance (GWLA) is a consortium of
33 research libraries located in the central and western United States.
Arizona State University
Baylor University
Brigham Young University
Colorado State University
Iowa State University Library
Kansas State University
Oklahoma State University
Oregon State University
Rice University
Southern Illinois University
Southern Methodist University
Texas A&M University
Texas Tech University
University of Arizona
University of Arkansas
University of Colorado at Boulder
University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
University of Houston
University of Illinois at Chicago
University of Kansas
University of Missouri
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
University of New Mexico
University of Oklahoma
University of Oregon
University of Southern California
The University of Texas at Austin
University of Utah
University of Washington
University of Wyoming
Utah State University
Washington State University
Washington University in St. Louis
Student Outcomes Research
GWLA Student Learning Task Force
Initial Charge Established Spring 2011
Goals for the GWLA Student Learning Task Force:

To investigate and share
local evaluation/assessment practices
and evidence obtained, across GWLA institutions

To create a research question and identify ways
to assess students, using all GWLA universities
as a possible sample population
Student Outcomes Research
GWLA Student Learning Task Force
First Phase of the Charge

To investigate and share
local evaluation/assessment practices
and evidence obtained, across GWLA institutions
2011 – 2014
Report Compiled and Submitted
Student Outcomes Research
GWLA Student Learning Task Force
Second Phase of the Charge

To investigate and share
local evaluation/assessment practices
and evidence obtained, across GWLA institutions

To create a research question and identify ways
to assess students, using all GWLA universities
as a possible sample population
Spring 2014 - Call For Participants
for Research Project
Student Outcomes Research
GWLA Libraries Impact on Student
Learning Task Force
Research Project started in 2014
Melissa Bowles-Terry
Head of Educational Initiatives, UNLV Libraries
Chair of Student Learning Outcomes Task Force
Patty Iannuzzi, Dean of UNLV Libraries, Dean Liaison
Joni Blake, Executive Director GWLA, GWLA Liaison
32 Task Force Members from 20 Participating
Institutions
GWLA Student Learning Taskforce
Student Outcomes Research
GWLA Student Learning Research Project
Roster of Participating Institutions & Representatives
GWLA Student Learning Research Project & Task Force
Institution
Name
Arizona State University
Lisa Kammerlocher
Baylor University
John Bales
Brigham Young University
Suzanne Julian
Brigham Young University
Holt Zaugg
GWLA
Anne McKee
GWLA
Joni Blake
Kansas State University
Sara Kearns
Kansas State University
Melia Fritch
Oregon State University
Cheryl Middleton
Oregon State University
Laurie Bridges
Southern Methodist University
Zoltan Szentkiralyi
Texas A&M University
Stephanie Graves
Texas Tech University
Laura Heinz
University of Arkansas
Norma Johnson
University of Hawaii
Vicky Lebbin
University of Houston
Christina Gola
University of Illinois-Chicago
Paula Dempsey
University of Illinois-Chicago
Annie Armstrong
University of Missouri
Goodie Bhullar
University of Missouri
Navadeep Khanal
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Melissa Bowles-Terry
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Patty Iannuzzi
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Greg Voelker
University of New Mexico
Mark Emmons
University of Southern California
Jade Winn
University of Southern California
Carolyn Caffrey Gardner
University of Utah
Lorelei Rutledge
University of Utah
Alfred Mowdood
University of Washington
Jackie Belanger
University of Washington
Amanda Hornby
Utah State University
Britt Fagerheim
Washington State University
Steve Borrelli
Position
Social Sciences Librarian
Liaison Librarian
Library Instruction Coordinator
Assessment Librarian
Program Officer for Resource Sharing
Executive Director
Head of Undergraduate and Community Services
Instruction Team Lead
Associate University Librarian for Learning & Engagement
Instruction and Emerging Technologies Librarian
Director of Assessment
Coordinator of Learning & Outreach
Head of Research, Instruction & Outreach
Reference Librarian
Social Sciences Librarian
Head of Liaison Services for Instruction & Outreach
Research Services & Resources Librarian
Coordinator of Bibilographic Instruction
Head of Instructional Services
E-Learning Librarian
Head of Educational Initiatives
Dean
Resources Workflow Manager
Director of Instruction & Assessment
Assistant Dean for Instruction, Assessment and Engagement
Info Literacy & Educational Technology Librarian
Research and Information Services Librarian
Head of Research and Information Services
Assessment Coordinator
Teaching and Learning Program Librarian
Head of Reference Services
Strategic Assessment Librarian
GWLA Student Learning Taskforce
Student Outcomes Research
Timeline for Research Project
May 2014 - Task Force starts meeting every 2 weeks
Research Design subgroup – prepare research design
Grants subgroup – seek & prepare grant applications
Fall 2014 – Institutions begin tracking Library Instruction
activity, per the specifications of the Research Design
Spring 2015 – each participating institution work with their
Institutional Research office to make sure they can get
student data, and submit IRB application for the study
GWLA Student Learning Taskforce
Student Outcomes Research
Timeline for Research Project
Fall 2015 – Request Institutional Data, e.g. student grades &
retention, per the specifications of the Research Design
Fall 2015 – Spring 2016
Merge Library Instruction Data w/ Institutional Data
for all 20 participating institutions, data cleaning,
analysis and report of first year results
Leverage first year results to secure grant and continue
research project as longitudinal study over the next 4-6
years
GWLA Student Learning Taskforce
Student Outcomes Research
Research Design
Two-Tiered Approach
Library Instruction Variables - (teaching methods)
 Logs of instruction sessions
 Librarian contribution to design
 Methods and characteristics
Institutional Variables - (student success)
 Student Demographics
 Courses, Credit Hours, Grades
 GPA and Retention
GWLA Student Learning Taskforce
Student Outcomes Research
Library Instruction Variables
INDIVIDUAL SESSIONS (data collection tool): Session by session level data collection for
library instruction activity, entered by librarian/library-instructor after a session.
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
Course number (#) associated with this library instruction session
Course section (#) associated with this library instruction session
Instructor (last, first) – In most cases, a non-librarian.
Session Librarian/Library-Instructor (last, first) – Name of person providing the library
instruction for this session.
The person listed as Session Librarian/Library-Instructor is:
○ A faculty or staff librarian with a library degree
○ A faculty or staff without a library degree
○ A student or graduate assistant who has not yet completed a library degree
Date of this library instruction session
Duration of this library instruction session in minutes
Number of students present during this library instruction session
The class meeting format for this library instruction session was:
○ Online only
○ In-person only
Teaching Method for this library instruction session:
○ Lecture only – a presentation and/or demonstration, with or without the help of
projection of the active website, powerpoint slides, handouts, etc., with students
listening/watching but not actively practicing the methods.
○ Flipped – Students were assigned material to complete in advance (modules,
videos, tutorials, assignments, etc.), then followed by library instruction which
covers the material in greater depth or covers other additional material
○ Directed practice – Students followed along on their computers and performed
GWLA
○ A faculty or staff without a library degree
○ A student or graduate assistant who has not yet completed a library degree
Student Outcomes Research
● Date of this library instruction session
Student
Learning
Taskforce
● Duration
of this library
instruction session in minutes
● Number of students present during this library instruction session
● The class meeting format for this library instruction session was:
○ Online only
○ In-person only
● Teaching Method for this library instruction session:
○ Lecture only – a presentation and/or demonstration, with or without the help of
projection of the active website, powerpoint slides, handouts, etc., with students
listening/watching but not actively practicing the methods.
○ Flipped – Students were assigned material to complete in advance (modules,
videos, tutorials, assignments, etc.), then followed by library instruction which
covers the material in greater depth or covers other additional material
○ Directed practice – Students followed along on their computers and performed
tasks, e.g. using certain search terms and strategies suggested by the librarian.
○ Active Learning/Assignments – Students worked in groups or individually to
complete in-depth activities and tasks assigned by librarian instructions or to
capture learning.
○ Other_________________________
○ None – there was no instruction for this session, only orientation or tour.
● One-shot instruction session (yes/no) – Was this session a one-time library instruction
for this class, with no other meeting planned?
● Course-integrated (yes/no) – Was the library instruction for this session integrated with,
or directly related to, the course content?
● Session Librarian helped design content or assignment (yes/no) – Session Librarian
collaborated with instructor to develop the content or assignment related to this
instruction session.
Library Instruction Variables
GWLA Student Learning Taskforce
Student Outcomes Research
Library Instruction Variables 2
SYSTEM-WIDE CHARACTERISTICS: Library instruction program-level data that may
apply broadly across courses or sections at the institution, which can be added to the data afterthe-fact by someone knowledgeable at each institution, e.g. instruction coordinator and/or
GWLA task force member librarian, prior to submitting.
Confirm or fill in Course/Section level data collection (compiled and cross-checked by library
representative):
● Campus or university
○ Sub level Campus (for institutions that wish to report on more than one campus)
● Course number (#)
● Course section (#)
● Instructor (last, first) – In most cases, a non-librarian.
● Librarian (last, first) – If a single librarian is associated with this course/section. If the
librarian is the only instructor of record, put librarian’s name as both instructor and
librarian.
● Librarian helped design course (yes/no) – A librarian helped develop the overall course
assignments and/or syllabus through collaboration with the instructor of record for the
course.
● Librarian helped design course/section only (yes/no) – A Librarian collaborated with the
instructor of record for this section to develop the assignments for the course/section.
● Librarian helped design assignment for course/section (yes/no) – Librarian collaborated
with instructor to develop at least one major credit-bearing assignment for the
course/section.
● Online Library Tutorial or Learning Objects (yes/no) – Did this course/section have an
online library tutorial or learning objects that were integrated as assignment(s) or
GWLA
● Librarian helped design course (yes/no) – A librarian helped develop the overall course
assignments and/or syllabus through collaboration
with the instructor
of record for
the
Student
Outcomes
Research
course.
Student
Learning Taskforce
● Librarian helped design course/section only (yes/no) – A Librarian collaborated with the
instructor of record for this section to develop the assignments for the course/section.
● Librarian helped design assignment for course/section (yes/no) – Librarian collaborated
with instructor to develop at least one major credit-bearing assignment for the
course/section.
● Online Library Tutorial or Learning Objects (yes/no) – Did this course/section have an
online library tutorial or learning objects that were integrated as assignment(s) or
assessment(s)?
● Course/section is co-taught by librarian/instructor team (yes/no) – A librarian and at least
one non-librarian are both instructors of record for the course/section.
● Credit-bearing library class, taught by librarian(s) (yes/no) – Librarian(s) is/are the only
instructor(s) of record.
○ Number of units or credit hours (#)
○ Full-credit course or partial-credit course
○ Quarter, semester, or other
Library Instruction Variables 2
ANALYST: course/section level variables created from the individual library instruction session
data logged by the librarians. Counts of sessions per, librarians per, combinations of teaching
methods used, confirming one-shot status for a course/section (i.e. not more than one session was
logged), general data groupings and data management based on data that was logged.
● Count of number of class meetings with a librarian (#) – The number of times a librarian
met with the course/section as a class.
● Count of number of individual librarians/library-instructors that interacted with this
course/section (#)
● Confirm: One-shot instruction for this course/section (yes/no) – Did only one (1) library
instruction session occur for this course/section?
● Confirm: The class meeting format for this course/section was:
○ In-person only sessions (yes/no) – The IL instruction session(s) happened inperson only, and never online.
○ Online only sessions (yes/no) – The IL instruction session(s) happened online
only, and never in-person.
GWLA Student Learning Taskforce
Student Outcomes Research
Institutional Variables




Student's unique de-identified code (permanently assigned for longitudinal purposes)
Student's Gender, Ethnicity, Class Level (fr, so, jr, sr), Age, ESL required
Student's total # of credits earned (cumulative at 1st year, 2nd year, 3rd year, etc.)
Student's Fall 2014 to Fall 2015 Retention designation (Yes/No)




Student's Fall 2014 term GPA, # credits attempted & completed
Student's Winter 2015 term GPA (if applicable), # credits attempted & completed
Student's Spring 2015 term GPA, # credits attempted & completed
Student's Summer 2015 term GPA (if applicable) , # credits attempted & completed

Student's First-Year GPA (2014-2015 Academic Year), # credits attempted & completed


All Courses Taken by the Student during the 2014-2015 Academic Year:
Course Number & Department, Course Section, Course Name, Term taken, Course
Grade
GWLA Student Learning Taskforce
Student Outcomes Research
Data Merged by Course-Section
Library Instruction:
Course-Sections taught
Teaching Method Used
First Year, First Time Students
Student Grades by Course-Section
Student Retention after the first year
All student & library data de-identified
in order to obtain IRB approval
GWLA Student Learning Taskforce
Student Outcomes Research
Sample Library Instruction Data Collection Form
GWLA Student Learning Taskforce
Student Outcomes Research
Sample Library Instruction Data
Library Instructor 1 Session Date Session Duration
Participants
(in minutes)
Professor / Subject Instructor (Lastname,
Course Subject
Course
Firstname)
Number Course Section
libr_nam
sessdate
sessdura students
inst_nam
crs_subj crs_numb
crs_sect
SMU01
10/9/2014
90
18 Harvell
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
003
SMU01
7/14/2014
60
15 Grumbles (Blackman)
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
0012
SMU01
6/17/2014
60
8 Lange
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
0011
SMU02
9/16/2014
80
17 Hall, Alane
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
022
SMU02
9/16/2014
80
17 Hall, Alane
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
023
SMU02
9/29/2014
60
17 Kolberg, Stephanie
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
028
SMU02
9/29/2014
60
17 Kolberg, Stephanie
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
032
SMU02
9/29/2014
60
17 Kolberg, Stephanie
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
033
SMU02
10/2/2014
80
17 Mueller, Mary Katherine
DISC - Discernment
1312
& Discourse
055
SMU02
10/2/2014
80
15 Mueller, Mary Katherine
DISC - Discernment
1312
& Discourse
056
SMU02
10/2/2014
80
16 Mueller, Mary Katherine
DISC - Discernment
1312
& Discourse
057
SMU02
10/9/2014
30
20 Umobong, Rebecca
HDEV - Human
1110 Development
006Studies
SMU02
10/9/2014
80
16 Newton, Pauline
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
017
SMU02
10/9/2014
80
15 Newton, Pauline
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
027
SMU03
9/16/2014
80
17 Newton, Pauline
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
011
SMU03
9/16/2014
80
17 Newton, Pauline
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
012
SMU04
11/4/2014
75
17 Whitehead, Barbara
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
006
SMU01
11/4/2014
90
16 Levy
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
007
SMU01
11/12/2014
60
10 Lange
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
008
SMU01
11/12/2014
60
16 Lange
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
009
SMU01
11/12/2014
60
15 Lange
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
010
SMU02
11/6/2014
80
16 Wood, Angela
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
036
SMU02
11/7/2014
50
7 Maitland, Annie
ENGL - English
1400
001
SMU02
11/10/2014
50
9 Maitland, Annie
ENGL - English
1400
001
SMU02
11/11/2014
80
16 Wood, Angela
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
036
SMU02
11/14/2014
50
17 Seaney, Ona
DISC - Discernment
1312
& Discourse
010
SMU02
11/14/2014
50
15 Seaney, Ona
DISC - Discernment
1312
& Discourse
011
SMU02
11/12/2014
50
17 Diaconoff, Cara
DISC - Discernment
1312
& Discourse
023
SMU02
11/17/2014
50
9 Maitland, Annie
ENGL - English
1400
001
SMU02
11/18/2014
80
17 Polster, Kristen
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
004
SMU02
11/18/2014
90
17 Polster, Kristen
DISC - Discernment
1313
& Discourse
005
SMU04
11/21/2014
60
23 Cloward, Karisa
PLSC - Political
1340 Science
001
SMU02
11/21/2014
50
7 Maitland, Annie
ENGL - English
1400
001
SMU02
11/24/2014
50
9 Maitland, Annie
ENGL - English
1400
001
SMU05
7/29/2014
90
7 Pocklington
DISC - Discernment
1312
& Discourse
2545
SMU05
7/22/2014
90
7 Pocklington
DISC - Discernment
1312
& Discourse
2545
SMU05
7/15/2014
90
7 Pocklington
DISC - Discernment
1312
& Discourse
2545
Session: Lecture
Session: Flipped
Session:
Instruction
Directed
Session:
Practice
Active
Session:
Learning
One
Session:
Shot Session:
Online
Instruction
Tutorial
Research
Session:
Used
Guide
Helped
Session:
Used
Design
LibraryAssign
Tour
tm_lect tm_flipd tm_pract tm_activ oneshot tutorial resguide libassgn libtour
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
GWLA Student Learning Taskforce
Student Outcomes Research
Massive Dataset of all first year
students across 20 institutions
Planned Analysis



Stratified Control Samples
Instruction vs. No Instruction: Effect?
Instruction Methods: Effects?
Likely analysis will consist of hierarchical
model, taking into account groupings of
similar institutions, similar student groups
GWLA Student Learning Taskforce
Student Outcomes Research
First Year Students
With Instruction vs. No Instruction
Control Group
matched on key
demographics:
Students with
Library
Instruction
Students without
Library
Instruction
GWLA Student Learning Taskforce
Student Outcomes Research
Effect of Specific Teaching
Methods
Students with
Instruction
Method C
Students with
Instruction
Method A
Students with
Instruction
Method B
Student Outcomes Research
GWLA Student Learning Task Force
Research Project – progress made in 2015
Primary Investigator has been named:
Dr. Jade Winn
Asst. Dean of Instruction, Assessment & Engagement
University of Southern California
IRB approval obtained at USC, UNLV, ASU
GWLA member university deans & directors
recently approved funding to hire data analyst
Southern Methodist University will play a key role in
data analysis and secure storage of data for
all 20 participating institutions
GWLA Student Learning Taskforce
Student Outcomes Research
Questions?
Thank you!

Download