Stanford GSB Sloan Program Stramgt 258 Strategic Management 7: Introduction to Industry Analysis Airborne Express Accounting for Performance Overall Performance = Industry Effect + Business Unit Effect + Corporate Effect January 28, 2003 John Roberts 2 Industry Analysis Objectives • Understand industry’s role in (potential and actual) performance. – Hard to do really well in a bad industry • Identify environmental factors to be addressed in setting strategy, building competitive advantage – Leverage and overcome January 28, 2003 John Roberts 3 Four Questions • If a firm were a monopolist, how profitable would it be? (How big is PIE?) • If potential profits are high, can they be retained? (Are buyers or suppliers powerful?) • If potential profits are realized, can they be sustained? (Are there entry barriers?) • Now what if the firm is not a monopolist? (Does competition erode profits?) January 28, 2003 John Roberts 4 Potential Industry Earnings • Increase in price of substitutes (complements): – Shifts demand curve out (in) • Substitutes also constrain firms’ ability to set price: – With close substitutes even a monopolist in the industry will not enjoy high margins • Growth in demand increases P.I.E.: – Income growth – Changes in consumer preferences January 28, 2003 John Roberts 5 Buyer Power Buyer Impact On Industry = Profitability Questions Issues/Hints January 28, 2003 Buyer Negotiating * Advantage How easily can buyer vs. individual firm in focal industry be replaced? Buyer Stake in Transaction * What percentage of buyer’s costs are comprised of purchases from focal industry? Concentration ratios Determines buyer’s Ability to coordinate incentive to use Backward power integration. John Roberts Focal Industry Stake in Transaction What percentage of focal industry’s sales are to buyer segment? Given buyer has power and incentive to use it, determines impact on industry 6 Example: Impact of Passenger Airlines as Buyer Varies Airline Buyer’s Buyer Buyer Impact On Industry = Negotiating * Stake in * Profitability Advantage Transaction Focal Industry Focal Industry Stake in Transaction Caterers High High Med High Aircraft Med/High Low/Med High High Ticket Jackets Low/Med High Low High Low High Med Low Uniforms January 28, 2003 John Roberts 7 Supplier Power Supplier Impact On Industry = Profitability Questions Issues/Hints January 28, 2003 Supplier Negotiating * Advantage Supplier Stake in Transaction * Focal Industry Stake in Transaction How easily can What percentage of supplier vs. indiv. suppliers’s sales are firm in focal industry to focal industry? be replaced? What percentage of focal industry’s costs are purchases from supplier? Concentration ratios Determines Ability to coordinate supplier’s incentive Forward integr. to use power Given supplier has power and incentive to use it, determines impact on industry John Roberts 8 Switching Costs & Power • Switching costs for focal industry firm magnify the effect of buyer/supplier power: – – – – Location specificity Relationship-specific investments Linkages between systems (formal or informal) Reputation January 28, 2003 John Roberts 9 Potential Entrants • Barrier: Anything that makes an industry less attractive to an entrant than an existing firm. • Examples: – – – – Reputation/brand Learning curve (steepness matters) Switching costs Access to distribution channels • Judge height of barrier relative to most likely entrant January 28, 2003 John Roberts 10 Potential Entrants • Capital investment barrier to entry only if both: – MES is large relative to demand – Investment is sunk (exit costs) January 28, 2003 John Roberts 11 Example Scale Effects Industry 7 Paints Petroleum Refining Integrated Steel Works Storage Batteries 10 10 11 14 Glass Bottles 41 Cement January 28, 2003 MES Plant Share per Market John Roberts 12 Rivalry • Even with high barriers to entry and no buyer/supplier power firms might compete away profits: – Structure (composition of firms) – Conduct (firm behavior) • Structure: – Higher concentration makes (tacit or explicit) coordination easier – But not sufficient January 28, 2003 John Roberts 13 Rivalry • Conduct: – Even two firms can compete away profits – Highly differentiated products diminish rivalry – Coordinated pricing (helped by visibility of prices) – Effect of excess capacity (scale penalty) January 28, 2003 John Roberts 14