Refreshing Companies Act,2013 Nipun Singhvi Legal Advisor B.Com.(Hons.), BCCD, LLB, LCS, ACA, IFRS Certified, Forensic Certified, Con. Bank Audit Certified 19-Mar-16 1 Disclaimer • All the views presented here are my personal and doesn’t in any way are the views of organisations owned or controlled by me. Their similarity in any way doesn’t purport to the views of Institutions and any action taken based on these views should be your personal domain with professional advice. No legal action can be taken for the loss incurred on action taken relying on the opinion ,advice or comments made during the presentation. 19-Mar-16 2 Define the un-defined 19-Mar-16 3 (12) “book and paper” and “book or paper” include books of account, deeds, vouchers, writings, documents, minutes and registers maintained on paper or in electronic form; (18) “Chief Executive Officer” means an officer of a company, who has been designated as such by it; (19) “Chief Financial Officer” means a person appointed as the Chief Financial Officer of a company; 19-Mar-16 4 (51) “key managerial personnel”, in relation to a company, means— (i) the Chief Executive Officer or the managing director or the manager; (ii) the company secretary; (iii) the whole-time director; (iv) the Chief Financial Officer; and (v) such other officer as may be prescribed; To Appoint (i to iv) Form No. MR-1 Form No. GNL-3 19-Mar-16 5 (60) “officer who is in default”, for the purpose of any provision in this Act which enacts that an officer of the company who is in default shall be liable to any penalty or punishment by way of imprisonment, fine or otherwise, means any of the following officers of a company, namely:— (i) whole-time director; (ii) key managerial personnel; (iii) where there is no key managerial personnel, such director or directors as specified by the Board in this behalf and who has or have given his or their consent in writing to the Board to such specification, or all the directors, if no director is so specified; (iv) any person who, under the immediate authority of the Board or any key managerial personnel, is charged with any responsibility including maintenance, filing or distribution of accounts or records, authorises, actively participates in, knowingly permits, or knowingly fails to take active steps to prevent, any default; 19-Mar-16 6 (v) any person in accordance with whose advice, directions or instructions the Board of Directors of the company is accustomed to act, other than a person who gives advice to the Board in a professional capacity; (vi) every director, in respect of a contravention of any of the provisions of this Act, who is aware of such contravention by virtue of the receipt by him of any proceedings of the Board or participation in such proceedings without objecting to the same, or where such contravention had taken place with his consent or connivance; (vii) in respect of the issue or transfer of any shares of a company, the share transfer agents, registrars and merchant bankers to the issue or transfer; 19-Mar-16 7 6. Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act— (a) the provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the memorandum or Shareholders Agreement articles of a company, or in any agreement executed by it, or in any resolution passed by the company in GM or by its Board of Directors, whether the same be registered, executed or passed, as the case may be, before or after the commencement of this Articles of Association Act; and (b) any provision contained in the memorandum, articles, agreement or resolution shall, to the extent to which it is repugnant to the provisions of this Act, become or be void, as the Companies Act case may be. 19-Mar-16 8 RANA KAPOOR ASHOK KAPUR •Shareholders agreement Vs. AOA •Shareholders agreement definition “Indian Partners” •Whether Right to nominate assignable or inheritable ?? 19-Mar-16 9 OYO Rooms raises Rs 630 cr in funding led by SoftBank 19-Mar-16 10 Disqualification of Directors He had not been sentenced to imprisonment for any period, or to a fine exceeding one thousand rupees, for the conviction of an offence under any of the following Acts, namely:— (i) the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899); (ii) the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944); (iii) the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (65 of 1951); (iv) the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (37 of 1954); (v) the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (10 of 1955); (vi) the Companies Act, 2013; (vii) the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (42 of 1956); (viii) the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (27 of 1957); (ix) the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961); (x) the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962); (xi) the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003); (xii) the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999); (xiii) the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (1 of 1986); (xiv) the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992); (xv) the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1922 (22 of 1922); (xvi) the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003); 19-Mar-16 11 SEBI slaps Rs 2 crore fine on NDTV for IncomeTax violations 19-Mar-16 12 Disqualification of Directors •Convicted by a court •6 mnths or > 5 yrs •7 yrs or > Life Ban •Insolvent undischarged or applied •Conviction RPT-188 •Not filed Annual Returns or and F/S for 3 yrs continously •Deposits, Dividend, Debentures - > 1yr 19-Mar-16 5 yrs 13 19-Mar-16 14 CLASS ACTION SUITS 19-Mar-16 © Chir Amrit Corporate School 15 India's 640-Crore Class Action Suit Against Maggi 19-Mar-16 16 Satyam to pay $125 million to settle US suit Mahindra Satyam's $125-mn class action suit settlement taxable Satyam scam triggers biggest D&O claim- 75m$ TATA AIG 19-Mar-16 © Chir Amrit Corporate School 17 Ultra –vires AOA/MOA Resolution void by suppressing facts or mis-statement Application Restrain Directors/Company from acting contrary to act or any other law for time being in force Resolution by Members Claim damages/ Compensation/ Demand Company/Directors Auditor/Audit Firm Expert/Advisor/ Consultant/Any other person 19-Mar-16 © Chir Amrit Corporate School 18 Penalty Company - Rs.5 lakhs to Rs.25 lakhs Frivolous Complainant – Rs.1 lakh (Max.) Insurance Cover •Professional insurance for Auditors •Directors & Officers (D & O) policy 19-Mar-16 © Chir Amrit Corporate School 19 Policing Policies !!! Policy Private Public Related Party Transactions CSR Vigilance Mechanism Nomination & Remuneration Ethics Fraud Prevention Risk Management 19-Mar-16 20 VIGILANCE MECHANISM Vs. WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY 1. The company shall establish a vigil mechanism for directors and employees to report concerns about unethical behaviour, actual or suspected fraud or violation of the company’s code of conduct or ethics policy. 2. This mechanism should also provide for adequate safeguards against victimization of director(s) / employee(s) who avail of the mechanism and also provide for direct access to the Chairman of the Audit Committee in exceptional cases. 3. The details of establishment of such mechanism shall be disclosed by the company on its website and in the Board’s report. 19-Mar-16 21 What is Fraud? Section 447 of CA,13 (i) “fraud” in relation to affairs of a company or any body corporate, includes any act, omission, concealment of any fact or abuse of position committed by any person or any other person with the connivance in any manner, with intent to deceive, to gain undue advantage from, or to injure the interests of, the company or its shareholders or its creditors or any other person, whether or not there is any wrongful gain or wrongful loss; (ii) “wrongful gain” means the gain by unlawful means of property to which the person gaining is not legally entitled; (iii) “wrongful loss” means the loss by unlawful means of property to which the person losing is legally entitled. 19-Mar-16 22 False Statement If in any return, report, certificate, financial statement, prospectus, statement or other document required by, or for, the purposes of any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made there under, any person makes a statement,— (a)which is false in any material particulars, knowing it to be false; or (b) which omits any material fact, knowing it to be material, Shall be liable under Section 447. 19-Mar-16 23 India's 640-Crore Class Action Suit Against Maggi to be Heard on Friday 19-Mar-16 24 MODIFIED OPINION QUALIFIED ADVERSE DISCLAIMER Material Misstatements + Pervasive Confined? Yes Disclosures No Specific Items, Elements, Accounts of the F/S Substantial Portion of the Financial Statements Basic Understanding Material but not pervasive Sufficient & Appropriate Audit Evidence Yes No Qualified Opinion Qualified Opinion Material Misstatements + Pervasive Sufficient & Appropriate Audit Evidence Yes No Adverse Opinion Disclaimer of Opinion Nature of matter giving Auditor’s Judgment about the pervasiveness of rise to the modification the effects or possible effects on the F/S Material but not pervasive Material and Pervasive Financial statements Qualified Opinion are materially misstated Adverse Opinion Inability to obtain sufficient appropriate Audit Evidence Disclaimer of Opinion Qualified Opinion Basis for qualified opinion As more detailed in note 34 (a) (i) of the financial statements, no provision has been made for interest of Rs.74.71 million up to March 31, 2014 (Rs. 74.71 million in the previous year), relating to earlier years, on the outstanding intercorporate deposits taken by the Company. Had the same been accounted for, the net loss for the year ended March 31, 2014 and accumulated losses as at that date would have been higher by Rs. 74.71 million (Rs. 74.71 million in the previous year). Our audit report for the year ended March 31, 2013 was also qualified in respect of the above matter. 3/19/2016 Emphasis of Matter Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 2 (a) which indicates that the Company has incurred a net loss of Rs 10,032.44 million during the year ended March 31, 2014 and as of that date, the Company’s total liabilities exceed its total assets by Rs 10,194.76 million. These conditions, along with other matters as set forth in Note 2 (a), indicate the existence of a material uncertainty regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in this regard are more fully described in the said note. 30 Matter Para Emphasis of Matter Para Other Matter There is uncertainty relating to a pending exceptional litigation matter. This is highlighted in the auditor’s report by an Emphasis of Matter paragraph. Directors’ Responsibility Statement (DRS) Section 134(5) The DRS shall state that the directors had taken proper and sufficient care for the maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of this Act for safeguarding the assets of the company and for preventing and detecting fraud and other irregularities; Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause, the term “internal financial controls” means the policies and procedures adopted by the company for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to company’s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information 19-Mar-16 33 Risk Perception Auditing Standards now a law!! SA 300 Planning an audit of Financial Statements SA 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment SA 320 Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit SA 330 The Auditor’s Responses to Assessed Risks SA 450 Evaluation of Misstatements Identified During the Audit 19-Mar-16 34 Risk Perception ... A statement indicating development and implementation of a risk management for the company including identification therein of elements of risk, if any, which in the opinion of the Board may threaten the existence of the company; [Section-134 clause (n) : Financial statement, Board's report, etc.] Management’s perception of risk factors [Form PAS 4] Evaluation of internal financial controls and risk management systems; [Section-177 (4) clause (vii) : Audit Committee] 19-Mar-16 35 Disclosures Details of any litigation or legal action pending or taken by any Ministry or Department of the Government or a statutory authority against any promoter of the offeree company during the last three years immediately preceding the year of the circulation of the offer letter and any direction issued by such Ministry or Department or statutory authority upon conclusion of such litigation or legal action shall be disclosed [PAS4 Clause 3(ii) ] 19-Mar-16 36 Summary of reservations or qualifications or adverse remarks of auditors in the last five financial years immediately preceding the year of circulation of offer letter and of their impact on the financial statements and financial position of the company and the corrective steps taken and proposed to be taken by the company for each of the said reservations or qualifications or adverse remark [PAS 4 Clause 3(v) ] Details of any inquiry, inspections or investigations initiated or conducted under the Companies Act or any previous company law in the last three years immediately preceding the year of circulation of offer letter in the case of company and all of its subsidiaries. Also if there were any prosecutions filed (whether pending or not) fines imposed, compounding of offences in the last three years immediately preceding the year of the offer letter and if so, section-wise details thereof for the company and all of its subsidiaries [PAS 4 Clause 3(vi) ] 19-Mar-16 37 19-Mar-16 38 Financial Statements, Board’s Report etc. (Sec. 134) (c) Directors’ Responsibility Statement; .... (f) There shall be attached to statements laid before a company in general meeting, a report by its Board of Directors, which shall include the directors had devised proper systems to ensure compliance with the provisions of all applicable laws and that such systems were adequate and operating effectively ... 19-Mar-16 39 Consideration of Laws and Regulations (SA 250) Maintaining a register of significant laws and regulations with which the entity has to comply within its particular industry and a record of complaints (¶ 11). 19-Mar-16 40 Consideration of Laws and Regulations (SA 250) Maintaining a register of significant laws and regulations with which the entity has to comply within its particular industry and a record of complaints (¶ 11). 19-Mar-16 41 LABOUR (16) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ENVIRONMENT (3) GENERAL LAWS CAPITAL MARKETS COMPETITION LAW FEMA 19-Mar-16 TAX LAW 42 19-Mar-16 43 Dormant Company ? Investment Company? Intellectual Property Rights Structuring Company IPR Holding 19-Mar-16 Operating Investment 44 Sebi imposes Rs 86 cr penalty on DLF (Feb 2015) Separately, in June 2007, Kimsuk Krishna Sinha had complained to Sebi saying he was cheated of Rs.34 crore by Sudipti Estates in relation to a transaction between them for the purchase of land, and that he had registered a first information report (FIR) against Sudipti. This was also not disclosed in the DRHP. 19-Mar-16 45 DRUGS & COSMETICS LAW FOREIGN LAWS eg. USFDA,UKCPA SME LAWS INDUSTRIES SPECIFIC LAWS FOOD SAFTY & STANDARDS ACT LEGAL METROLOGY ACT STAMP LAW 19-Mar-16 46 Only 6% Maharashtra organisations have sexual harassment cells The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention,Prohibiton and Redressal) Act, 2013 19-Mar-16 47 19-Mar-16 48 SECTION 143(2) : PERSONS REQUIRED TO REPORT FRAUD STATUTORY AUDITOR COST AUDITOR SECRETARIAL AUDITOR BRANCH AUDITOR INTERNAL AUDITOR TAX AUDITOR IT ACT VAT ACT SECTION 143(2) : PERSONS REQUIRED TO REPORT FRAUD ATTEST FUNCTIONS STATUTORY AUDITOR OTHER THAN STATUTORY AUDITOR SILENT (G. N.)* * REPORT TO STATUTORY AUDITOR LANGUAGE AMBIGUITY SECTION 143(12) RULE 13 FORM ADT-4 COMPANIES (AUDIT& AUDITOR) RULES,2014 REASONS TO BELIEVE SUFFICIENT REASONS TO BELIEVE KNOWLEDGE SUSPECTED OFFENCE INVOLVING FRAUD SECTION 143(12) BRIBERY CORRUPTION MONEY LAUNDERING INTENTIONAL NON-COMPLIANCE SA-250 CONSIDERATION OF LAWS &REGULATIONS IN AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FRADULENT ITR TO EVADE TAX ---- REPORT U/s 143(12) COAL COMPANIES TELECOM COMPANIES – 2G SCAM SA - 240 FRAUD MANAGEMENT FRAUD EMPLOYEE FRAUD INTENTIONAL MISSTATEMENT FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING MISSTATEMENTS RESULTING FROM MISAPPROPRIATION OF ASSETS Sources of info AUDIT COMMITTEE MINUTES BOARD MEETING MINUTES ENQUIRE FROM MANAGEMENT/TCG WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS (sa 580) Accounting Financial control Disclosed suspected fraud/fraud Assessment of risks disclosed Illustrative MRL – Appendix 7(GN) IMMUNISED SECTION 143(13) SECTION 456 IMMUNITY – ACT DONE IN GOOD FAITH NO SUIT , PROSECUTION OR LEGAL PROCEEDING SHALL LIE SECTION 143(15) 143(12) NONCOMPLIANCE Rs.1- 25 LAKHS Saradha Scam SFIO Added •107 Abetment of Crime SIT - Indian Penal Code • 406 Criminal Breach of trust •409 Criminal Breach of trust by public servant •403 Dishonest misappropriation of property •415 Cheating •420 Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property •418 Cheating with knowledge that wrongful loss would be caused •120B Criminal Conspiracy • 419 Impersonation •477A Falsification of accounts 19-Mar-16 57 Fine – Upto 3 times the amount involved Imprisonment – 6 months to 10 yrs Public interest involved – Min 3 yrs 19-Mar-16 58 Section 447 is applicable in 18 sections, 12 out of 18 are active Section Description of Section 7,8 Incorporation and Formation 34 Criminal liability for misstatements in prospectus 36 Punishment for fraudulently inducing persons to invest money 38 Punishment for personation for acquisition, etc., of Securities 46 Certificate of shares. 56 Transfer and transmission of securities. 140 Removal, resignation of auditor and giving of special notice 206 Power to call for Information, inspect books and conduct inquiries. 212 Investigation into affairs of Company by Serious Fraud Investigation Office 229 Penalty for furnishing false statement, mutilation, destruction of Documents 448 Punishment for false Statement 19-Mar-16 59 Sec. 22 The Companies Act, 1956. Rectification of name of company.(1) If, through inadvertence or otherwise, a company on its first registration or on its registration by a new name, is registered by a name which, in the opinion of the Central Government, is identical with, or too nearly resembles, the name by which a company in existence has been previously registered, whether under this Act or any previous companies law, the first- mentioned company(a) may, by ordinary resolution and with the previous approval of the Central Government signified in writing, change its name or new name; and (b) shall, if the Central Government so, directs within twelve months of its first registration or registration by its new name, as the case may be, or within twelve months of the commencement of this Act, whichever is later, by ordinary resolution and with the previous approval of the Central Government signified in writing, change its name or new name within a period of three months from the date of the direction or such longer period as the Central Government may think fit to allow. Provided that no application under clause (ii) made by a registered proprietor of a trade mark after five years of coming to notice of registration of the Company shall be considered by the Central Government.) Sec. 22 The Companies Act, 1956. (2) If a company makes default in complying with any direction given under clause (b) of sub- section (1), the company, and every officer who is in default, shall be punishable with fine which may extend to one hundred rupees for every day during which the default continues. Sec. 16 The Companies Act, 2013. 6. (1) If, through inadvertence or otherwise, a company on its first registration or on its registration by a new name, is registered by a name which,— (a) in the opinion of the Central Government, is identical with or too nearly resembles the name by which a company in existence had been previously registered, whether under this Act or any previous company law, it may direct the company to change its name and the company shall change its name or new name, as the case may be, within a period of three months from the issue of such direction, after adopting an ordinary resolution for the purpose; (b) on an application by a registered proprietor of a trade mark that the name is identical with or too nearly resembles to a registered trade mark of such proprietor under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, made to the Central Government within three years of incorporation or registration or change of name of the company, whether under this Act or any previous company law, in the opinion of the Central Government, is identical with or too nearly resembles to an existing trade mark, it may direct the company to change its name and the company shall change its name or new name, as the case may be, within a period of six months from the issue of such direction, after adopting an ordinary resolution for the purpose. Sec. 16 The Companies Act, 2013. (2) Where a company changes its name or obtains a new name under sub-section (1), it shall within a period of fifteen days from the date of such change, give notice of the change to the Registrar along with the order of the Central Government, who shall carry out necessary changes in the certificate of incorporation and the memorandum. (3) If a company makes default in complying with any direction given under sub-section (1), the company shall be punishable with fine of one thousand rupees for every day during which the default continues and every officer who is in default shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than five thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees. Common Law Remedy Vs. CA 2013 Civil Remedy in case of Unregistered Trademark • Prior User • Cogent and Continues user Evidence • Approch Highcourt/District Court(AA) • Time Consuming and Costly • Remedy Under Civil Law (Passing off) and Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Infringement) is always available subject to Limitation Act. Remedy in Case of Registered Trademark • Application U/S 16 of CA 2013 • Trademark Registration Certificate As Powerful Evidence • Cost effective Vardhaman Crop Nutrient Pvt Ltd Vs. UOI •Vardhaman Fertilizers and Seeds Pvt. Ltd incorporated in 1987 •Using Brand “Vardhaman” Since 1991 for It’s Products •Registered Trademark Since 2007 •Vardhaman Crop Incorporated in 2009 •Using Brand Since 2011 •Effects of the same Name •Confusion and Deception •Loss of Business •Loss of Reputation and Goodwill •421 Companies with prefix Vardhaman (Def. Plea) •Remedy •Filed Application U/S 22 of CA 1956 •RD ordered in favour of Applicant •Order confirmed by SB and DB in High Court 19-Mar-16 66 Illustrative Engagement letter NOC from previous auditor SA 720 – Consideration of other documents containing financial statements Internal Financial Control - Audit fee separate Networking firms/affiliated partners Pending litigations & forseeable losses Peer Review 19-Mar-16 67 111-112, University Plaza, Nr Vijay Cross Roads, Navrangpura 380 009 +91 79 30615933 +91 93275 55933 +91 98290 31411 nipunsinghvi@yahoo.com nipun@cogitolegal.com Ahmedabad | Mumbai |Delhi |Jodhpur |Jaipur Nipun Singhvi B.Com.(Hons.), BCCD, LLB, LLM (Corporate), LCS, ACA, IFRS Certified, Forensic Certified, Con. Bank Audit Certified 19-Mar-16 68