Cryptic Impact: Visual Detection of Corona Light and Avoidance of

advertisement
Cryptic Impact: Visual Detection of Corona Light and Avoidance of Power Lines by
Reindeer
Rrf: Tyler et al. • Avoidance of Power Lines by Reindeer
Nicholas J. C. TYLER,1 Centre for Saami Studies, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N9037 Tromsø, Norway
Karl-Arne STOKKAN, Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, UiT The Arctic
University of Norway, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway
Christopher R. HOGG, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London EC1V 2PD, United Kingdom
Christian NELLEMANN, 2 UNEP GRID Arendal, N-2615 Lillehammer, Norway
Arnt Inge VISTNES, Department of Physics, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
1
E-mail: nicholas.tyler@uit.no
2
Present address: RHIPTO Rapid Response - Norwegian Center For Global Analyses,
Løkkegate 9, N-2615 Lillehammer, Norway
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Contents

Barrier effects and avoidance.

List of crepuscular/nocturnal mammalian predators of reindeer/caribou (Rangifer
tarandus).

Table 1. Documented incidences of barrier effects and avoidance involving mammals at
high voltage power lines.

Literature cited.
1
BARRIER EFFECTS AND AVOIDANCE
Linear infrastructure may influence movement through barrier effects (i.e., hindrance to
passage) and avoidance:
Barrier Effects
Barrier effects are apparent at fences (Fynn and Bonyongo 2010, Kaczensky et al. 2011, Gadd
2012, Davies-Mostert et al. 2013), pipelines (Dunne and Quinn 2009), and artificial bodies of
water (Rautenstrauch and Krausman 1989, Nellemann et al. 2003), which completely block
the passage of animals. Roads, railways, and linear cuttings (though not necessarily
insurmountable obstacles) may nevertheless restrict movement (Skogland 1986, Mader et al.
1990, Chubbs et al. 1993, Goosem and Marsh 1997, Forman and Alexander 1998, Smith et al.
2000, Trombulak and Frissell 2000, Vistnes et al. 2004, Cameron et al. 2005, Epps et al.
2005, Kuehn et al. 2007, Wilson et al. 2007, Xia et al. 2007, Strevens et al. 2008, Carthew et
al. 2013, Ito et al. 2013, Courbin et al. 2014). Barrier effects are attributed to animals’
suspicion of noise or movement (Kight and Swaddle 2011, Montgomery et al. 2012, LeBlond
et al. 2013, McClure et al. 2013, Lima et al. 2015) and their reluctance to move across
unfamiliar surfaces or to expose themselves in the open, or a combination of these factors
(Keller and Largiadèr 2003, Jaeger et al. 2005, McGregor et al. 2008, Panzacchi et al. 2013).
Avoidance
Avoidance, evident as a reduction in the abundance of focal species near infrastructure, is a
behavioral response induced by the sight, sound, or smell of humans–human artefacts either
directly perceived or associated through learning with infrastructure (Dyer et al. 2001, Barber
et al. 2011, Brown et al. 2012, Shannon et al. 2014). It is a graded response: levels of
avoidance, which may exceed 90% at source (Mahoney and Schaefer 2002, Panzacchi et al.
2
2013), decrease with increasing distance from source (Laurance et al. 2006) but increase with
density of infrastructure (Vistnes et al. 2001) and with the level of disturbance (LeBlond et al.
2013, but see McGregor et al. 2008). Zones of avoidance around infrastructure range from
tens of meters in birds and small mammals (Pruett et al. 2009, Planillo and Malo 2013,
Roedenbeck and Voser 2008) to between 0.1 and 5 km in large mammals (Mahoney and
Schaefer 2002; Laurance et al. 2006; Nellemann et al. 2003, 2007; Weir et al. 2007; Helle et
al. 2012; Laurian et al. 2012; Leblond et al. 2013) and sometimes substantially more (Johnson
et al. 2005, Dahle et al. 2008, Boulanger et al. 2012). Avoidance results in functional loss of
habitat that is frequently several-hundred-fold greater than the real loss caused by the
infrastructure per se (i.e., owing to ground clearance, etc.; see James and Stuart-Smith 2000,
Dyer et al. 2001, Anttonen et al. 2011, Polfus et al. 2011).
3
LIST OF CREPUSCULAR/NOCTURNAL MAMMALIAN PREDATORS OF
REINDEER/CARIBOU (Rangifer tarandus)
Bear (Ursus ssp.; Boertje et al. 1988, Mowat and Heard 2006).
Cougar (Puma concolor; Wittmer 2004).
Lynx (Lynx lynx; Andrén et al. 2011, Mattisson et al. 2014).
Wolf (Canis lupus; Dale et al. 1994, Kojola et al. 2004, Hebblewhite et al. 2007).
Wolverine (Gulo gulo; Wittmer 2004, Andrén et al. 2011).
4
Table 1. Documented incidences of barrier effects and avoidance involving mammals at high-voltage power lines.
Species
Common name
Infrastructure
kV
Site
Effecta
Habitat
Attributed cause
Source
Structural changes
Joyal et al. 1984
changeb
Alces alces
moose
power line
230, 735
Quebec, Canada
Av.
Yes
in vegetation.
Antechinus
brown antechinus
power line
33, 132
stuartii
Currambene State
Bar.
Yes
Forest,
Structural changes
Strevens 2007
in vegetation.
Jerrawangala
National Park,
Australia
Rattus fuscipes
Australian bush rat
power line
33, 132
Currambene State
Bar.
Yes
Forest,
Structural changes
Strevens 2007
in vegetation.
Jerrawangala
National Park,
Australia
Equus hemionus
Asiatic wild ass
railway, power
380
Av. and
line
Procapra
Mongolian gazelle
gutturosa
Pantholops
Tibetan antelope
hodgsonii
Rangifer tarandus
railway, power
No
Ito et al. 2013
No
Ito et al. 2013
Bar.
380
Av. and
line
Bar.
power line
Bar.
No
railway, road,
reindeer/caribou
power line
Human activity,
Xia et al. 2007
traffic.
66
Repparfjord,
Av.
No
Norway
Presence of
Vistnes and Nellemann 2001
infrastructure
alone, even in the
absence of human
activity or traffic.
Rangifer tarandus
reindeer/caribou
power line, road
300, 420
Setesdal-
Av.
No
Ryfylkeheiene,
Presence of
Nellemann et al. 2003
infrastructure.
Norway
Rangifer tarandus
reindeer/caribou
power line
66
North Ottadalen
Av.
No
Reimers et al. 2007
(north, south),
Norway
5
Rangifer tarandus
reindeer/caribou
power lines, roads
n.d.c
Six populations in
Av.
No
southern Norway
Integrated effects
Panzacchi et al. 2013
of the presence of
infrastructure and
human activity
adjusted to local
ecological
conditions.
Rangifer tarandus
reindeer/caribou
power line
66, 132,
300
Nord Ottadalen
Bar.
No
Potential
(east, west),
psychological
Norway
effect of danger
Vistnes et al. 2004
associated with
man-made
structures.
Rangifer tarandus
reindeer/caribou
power line
132, 300
Snøhetta (east,
west), Norway
Bar.
No
Potential
Vistnes et al. 2004
psychological
effect of danger
associated with
man-made
structures.
a
Av. = avoidance; Bar. = Barrier effect.
b
Habitat change: whether construction of the power line involved substantial modification of habitat such as a linear cutting through forest or jungle.
c
n.d. = no data.
6
LITERATURE CITED
Andrén, H., J. Persson, J. Mattisson, and A. C. Danell. 2011. Modelling the combined effect
of an obligate predator and a facultative predator on a common prey: lynx Lynx lynx
and wolverine Gulo gulo predation on reindeer Rangifer tarandus. Wildlife Biology
17:33-43. doi: 10.2981/10-065.
Anttonen, M., J. Kumpula, and A. Colpaert. 2011. Range selection by semi-domesticated
reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) in relation to infrastructure and human activity
in the boreal forest environment, Northern Finland. Arctic 64:1-14.
Barber, J. R., C. L. Burdett, S. E. Reed, K. A. Warner, C. Formichella, K. R. Crooks, D. M.
Theobald, and K. M. Fristrup. 2011. Anthropogenic noise exposure in protected
natural areas: estimating the scale of ecological consequences. Landscape Ecology
26:1281-1295. doi: 10.1007/s10980-011-9646-7.
Boertje, R. D., W. C. Gasaway, D. V. Grangaard, and D. G. Kelleyhouse. 1988. Predation on
moose and caribou by radio-collared grizzly bears in east central Alaska. Canadian
Journal of Zoology 66:2492-2499.
Boulanger, J., K. G. Poole, A. Gunn, and J. Wierzchowski. 2012. Estimating the zone of
influence of industrial developments on wildlife: a migratory caribou Rangifer
tarandus groenlandicus and diamond mine case study. Wildlife Biology 18:164-179.
Brown, C. L., A. R. Hardy, J. R. Barber, K. M. Fristrup, K. R. Crooks, and L.M. Angelloni.
2012. The effect of human activities and their associated noise on ungulate behavior.
PLoS ONE 7(7): e40505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040505.
Cameron, R., W. T., Smith, R. G. White, and B. Griffith. 2005. Central Arctic caribou and
petroleum development: distributional, nutritional, and reproductive implications.
Arctic 58:1-9.
Carthew, S. M., K. M. W. Jones, and M. Lawes. 2013. Responses of small vertebrates to
linear clearings in a South Australian Woodland. Ecological Research 28:1003–1010.
doi: 10.1007/s11284-013-1082-5.
Chubbs, T. E., L. B. Keith, S. P. Mahoney, and M. J. McGrath. 1993. Responses of woodland
caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) to clear-cutting in east-central Newfoundland.
Canadian Journal of Zoology 71:487-493.
Courbin, N., D. Fortin, C. Dussault, and R. Courtois. 2014. Logging-induced changes in
habitat network connectivity shape behavioral interactions in the wolf–caribou–moose
system. Ecological Monographs 84:265-285.
Dahle, B., E. Reimers, and J. E. Colman. 2008. Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) avoidance of a
highway as revealed by lichen measurements. European Journal of Wildlife Research
54:27-35. Doi: 10.1007/s10344-007-0103-5.
Dale, B. W., L. G. Adams, and R. T. Bowyer. 1994. functional-response of wolves preying on
barren-ground caribou in a multiple-prey ecosystem. Journal of Animal Ecology
63:644-652.
Davies-Mostert, H. T., M. G. L. Mills, and D. W. Macdonald. 2013. Hard boundaries
influence African wild dogs’ diet and prey selection. Journal of Applied Ecology
50:1358-1366. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12129.
Dunne, B. M., and M. S. Quinn. 2009. Effectiveness of above-ground pipeline mitigation for
moose (Alces alces) and other large mammals. Biological Conservation 142:332-343.
Dyer, S. J., J. P. O'Neill, S. M. Wasel, and S. Boutin. 2001. Avoidance of industrial
development by woodland caribou. Journal of Wildlife Management 65: 531-542.
Epps, C. W., P. J. Palsbøll, J. D. Wehausen, G. K. Roderick, R. R. Ramey, and D. R.
McCullough. 2005. Highways block gene flow and cause a rapid decline in genetic
7
diversity of desert bighorn sheep. Ecology Letters 8:1029-1038. doi: 10.1111/j.14610248.2005.00804.x.
Forman, R. T. T., and L. E. Alexander. 1998. Roads and their major ecological effects.
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:207-231.
Fynn, R. W. S., and M. C. Bonyongo. 2010. Functional conservation areas and the future of
Africa’s wildlife. African Journal of Ecology49:175-188.
Gadd, M. E. 2012. Barriers, the beef industry and unnatural selection: a review of the impact
of veterinary fencing on mammals in southern Africa. Pages 153-186 in M. J. Somers
and M. W. Hayward, editors. Fencing for conservation: restriction of evolutionary
potential or a riposte to threatening processes? Springer, New York, New York, USA.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0902-1_9.
Goosem, M., and H. Marsh.1997. Fragmentation of a small-mammal community by a
powerline corridor through tropical rainforest. Wildlife Research 24:613-629. doi:
10.1071/WR96063.
Hebblewhite, M., J. Whittington, M. Bradley, G. Skinner, A. Dibb, and C. A. White.2007.
Conditions for caribou persistence in the wolf-elk-caribou systems of the Canadian
Rockies. Rangifer, Special Issue 17:79-91. doi: 10.7557/2.27.4.322.
Helle, T., V. Hallikainen, M. Särkelä, M. Haapalehto, A. Niva, and J. Puoskari. 2012. Effects
of a holiday resort on the distribution of semidomesticated reindeer. Annales
Zoologici Fennici 49:23-35.
Ito, T. Y., B. Lhagvasuren, A. Tsunekawa, M. Shinoda, S. Takatsuki, B. Buuveibaatar, and B.
Chimeddorj. 2013. Fragmentation of the habitat of wild ungulates by anthropogenic
barriers in Mongolia. PLoS ONE 8:e56995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056995. Note:
This paper does not mention power lines but evidently they were present: power line
masts are clearly apparent beside the road and the railway line in Google Earth®
images of the study site.
Jaeger, J. A. G., J. Bowman, J. Brennan, L. Fahrig, D. Bert, J. Bouchard, N. Charbonneau, K.
Frank, B. Gruber, and K. Tluk von Toschanowitz. 2005. Predicting when animal
populations are at risk from roads: an interactive model of road avoidance behavior.
Ecological Modelling 185:329-348.
James, A. R. C., and A. K. Stuart-Smith. 2000. Distribution of caribou and wolves in relation
to linear corridors. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:154-159.
Johnson, C. J., M. S. Boyce, R. L. Case, H. D. Cluff, R. J. Gau, A. Gunn, and R. Mulders.
2005. Cumulative effects of human developments on Arctic wildlife. Wildlife
Monographs 160.
Joyal, R., P. Lamothe, and R. Fournier 1984. L'utilisation des emprises de lignes de transport
d'énergie électrique par l'orignal (Alces alces) en hiver. Canadian Journal of Zoolology
62:260-266. [In French].
Kaczensky, P., R. Kuehn, B. Lhagvasuren, S. Pietsch, W. Yang, and C. Walzer. 2011.
Connectivity of the Asiatic wild ass population in the Mongolian Gobi. Biological
Conservation 144:920-929.
Keller, I., and C. R. Largiadèr. 2003. Recent habitat fragmentation caused by major roads
leads to reduction of gene flow and loss of genetic variability in ground beetles.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270:417-423. doi:
10.1098/rspb.2002.2247.
Kight, C. R., and J. P. Swaddle. 2011. How and why environmental noise impacts animals: an
integrative, mechanistic review. Ecology Letters 14:1052-1061. doi: 10.1111/j.14610248.2011.01664.x.
Kojola, I., O. Huitu, K. Toppinen, K. Heikura, S. Heikkinen, and S. Ronkainen. 2004.
Predation on European wild forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) by wolves (Canis
8
lupus) in Finland. Journal of Zoology (London) 263:229-235. doi:
10.1017/S0952836904005084.
Kuehn, R., K. E. Hindenlang, O. Holzgang, J. Senn, B. Stoeckle, and C. Sperisen. 2007.
Genetic effect of transportation infrastructure on roe deer populations (Capreolus
capreolus). Journal of Heredity 98:13–22. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esl056.
Laurance, W. F., B. M. Croes, L. Tchignoumba, and S. A. Lahm. 2006. Impacts of roads and
hunting on Central African rainforest mammals. Conservation Biology 20:1251-1261.
doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00420.x.
Laurian, C., C. Dussault, J.-P. Ouellet, R. Courtois, and M. Poulin. 2012. Interactions between
a large herbivore and a road network. Ecoscience 19:69-79.
Leblond, M., C. Dussault, and J.-P. Ouellet. 2013. Avoidance of roads by large herbivores and
its relation to disturbance intensity. Journal of Zoology 289:32-40.
Lima, S. L., B. F. Blackwell, T. L. DeVault, and E. Fernández-Juricic. 2015. Animal reactions
to oncoming vehicles: a conceptual review. Biological Reviews 90:60-76. doi:
10.1111/brv.12093.
Mader, H. J., C. Schell, and P. Kornacker. 1990. Linear barriers to arthropod movements in
the landscape. Biological Conservation 54:209-222.
Mahoney, S. P., and J. A. Schaefer. 2002. Hydroelectric development and the disruption of
migration in caribou. Biological Conservation 107:147–153.
Mattisson J., G. B. Arntsen, E. B. Nilsen, L. E. Loe, J. D. C. Linnell, J. Odden, J. Persson, and
H. Andrén. 2014. Lynx predation on semi-domestic reindeer: do age and sex matter?
Journal of Zoology (London) 292:56-63.
McClure, C. J. W., H. E. Ware, J. Carlisle, G. Kaltenecker, and J. R. Barber. 2013. An
experimental investigation into the effects of traffic noise on distributions of birds:
avoiding the phantom road. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London, Series B
280:20132290. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2290.
McGregor, R. L., D. J. Bender, and L. Fahrig. 2008. Do small mammals avoid roads because
of the traffic? Journal of Applied Ecology 45:117–123. doi: 10.1111/j.13652664.2007.01403.x.
Montgomery, R. A., G. J. Roloff, and J. J. Millspaugh. 2012. Importance of visibility when
evaluating animal response to roads. Wildlife Biology 18:393-405.
doi.org/10.2981/11-123.
Mowat, G., and D. C. Heard. 2006. Major components of grizzly bear diet across North
America. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84:473-489. doi: 10.1139/Z06-016.
Nellemann, C., O.-G. Støen, J. Kindberg, J. E. Swenson, I. Vistnes, G. Ericsson, J. Katajisto,
B. P. Kaltenborn, J. Martin, and A. Ordiz. 2007. Terrain use by an expanding brown
bear population in relation to age, recreational resorts and human settlements.
Biological Conservation 138:157-165.
Nellemann, C., I. Vistnes, P. Jordhoy, O. Strand, and A. Newton. 2003. Progressive impact of
piecemeal infrastructure development on wild reindeer. Biological Conservation
113:307-317. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00048-X.
Panzacchi, M., B. van Moorter, P. Jordhøy, and O. Strand. 2013. Learning from the past to
predict the future: using archaeological findings and GPS data to quantify reindeer
sensitivity to anthropogenic disturbance in Norway. Landscape Ecology 28:847-859.
doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9793-5.
Planillo, A., and J. E. Malo. 2013. Motorway verges: paradise for prey species? A case study
with the European rabbit. Mammalian Biology 78:187-192.
Polfus, J. L., M. Hebblewhite, and K. Heinemeyer. 2011. Identifying indirect habitat loss and
avoidance of human infrastructure by northern mountain woodland caribou. Biological
Conservation 144:2637-2646. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.023.
9
Pruett, C., M. A. Patten, and D. H. Wolfe.2009. Avoidance behavior by prairie grouse:
implications for development of wind energy. Conservation Biology 23:1253-1259.
Rautenstrauch, K. R., and P. R. Krausman.1989. Preventing mule deer drowning in the
Mohawk canal, Arizona. Wildlife Society Bulletin 17:280-286.
Reimers, E., B. Dahle, S. Eftestøl, J. E. Colman, and E. Gaare. 2007. Effects of a power line
on migration and range use of wild reindeer. Biological Conservation 134:484–494.
Roedenbeck, I. A., and P. Voser. 2008. Effects of roads on spatial distribution, abundance and
mortality of brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in Switzerland. European Journal of
Wildlife Research 54:425-437. doi: 10.1007/s10344-007-0166-3.
Shannon, G., L. M. Angeloni, G. Wittemyer, K. M. Fristrup, and K. R. Crooks. 2014. Road
traffic noise modifies behaviour of a keystone species. Animal Behaviour 94:135-141.
doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.06.004.
Skogland, T. 1986. Movements of tagged and radio-instrumented wild reindeer in relation to
habitat alteration in the Snøhetta region, Norway. Rangifer Special Issue 1:267-272.
Smith, K. G., E. J. Ficht, D. Hobson, T. C. Sorensen, and D. Hervieux. 2000. Winter
distribution of woodland caribou in relation to clear-cut logging in west-central
Alberta. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78:1433-1440.
Strevens, T. C. 2007. Powerline easements: ecological impacts and effects on small mammal
movement. Dissertation, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales,
Australia. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/691/. Accessed 2nd. May 2014.
Strevens, T. C., M. L. Puotinen, and R. J. Whelan. 2008. Powerline easements: ecological
impacts and contribution to habitat fragmentation from linear features. Pacific
Conservation Biology 14:159-168.
Trombulak, S. C., and C. A. Frissell. 2000. Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial
and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology 14:18-30.
Vistnes, I., C. Nellemann, P. Jordhoy, and O. Strand. 2001. Wild reindeer: impacts of
progressive infrastructure development on distribution and range use. Polar Biology
24:531-537. doi: 10.1007/s003000100253.
Vistnes, I., C. Nellemann, P. Jordhoy, and O. Strand. 2004. Effects of infrastructure on
migration and range use of wild reindeer. Journal of Wildlife Management 68:101108. doi: 10.2193/0022-541x.
Weir, J. N., S. P. Mahoney, B. McLaren, and S. H. Ferguson. 2007. Effects of mine
development on woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus distribution. Wildlife Biology
13:66-74.
Wilson, R. F., H. Marsh, and J. Winter. 2007. Importance of canopy connectivity for home
range and movements of the rainforest arboreal ringtail possum (Hemibelideus
lemuroides). Wildlife Research 34:177-184. doi: 10.1071/WR06114.
Wittmer, H. U. 2004. Mechanisms underlying the decline of mountain caribou (Rangifer
tarandus caribou) in British Columbia. Dissertation, University of British Columbia,
Canada. http://circle.ubc.ca/bitstream/handle/2429/15839/ubc_2004902870.pdf?sequence=1.
Xia, L., Q. S. Yang, Z. C. Li, Y. H. Wu, and Z. J. Feng. 2007. The effect of the Qinghai-Tibet
railway on the migration of Tibetan antelope Pantholops hodgsonii in Hoh-xil
National Nature Reserve, China. Oryx 41:352-357. doi:
10.1017/S0030605307000116. Note: This paper does not mention power lines but
evidently they were present: power line masts are clearly apparent beside the road and
the railway line in Google Earth® images of the study site.
10
Download