User and Venue Survey Final Report Template
General instructions for completing this report:
1. Please answer all questions
2. Do not combine the answers to questions. Provide your answers to each question in the space provided.
3. All tables should be submitted as different worksheets within the Excel file accompanying this document.
Country: Philippines
Date Prepared: November 29, 2010
Prepared by:
ideacorp
Survey Start Date: August 7, 2010
Survey End Date: November 6, 2010
Methods
1.
Final venue selection strategy (attach the final sampling strategy that was approved by George)
a. Provide the list of venues initially selected for the sample
The Philippine sampling included five cluster areas, namely: Metro Manila or the National Capital Region (NCR); Luzon I (Cordillera
Administrative Region, Regions I, II, and III; Luzon II (Regions IV-A, IV-B, and V); Visayas (Regions VI, VII, and VIII); and Mindanao
(Regions IX, X, XI, XII, and XIII). The sampling areas did not include towns and cities considered as conflict riddled areas, and election
hot spots.
The sampling was based on the population and geographic location and size of the area clusters Specific cities and towns were selected on
the bases of population density and income classification of the cities and towns (based on the data of the Philippine National Statistics
Coordinating Board) to distinguish the urban and rural areas. The list of venues initially selected for the sample is specifically provided as
attached. See proposed sampling design.
b.
Briefly discuss how the inventory was used to build the sample and the extent to which other avenues were used to
select venues.
The venue inventory was used in selecting the specific venues located in the sampling areas. Using random numbers system from the
inventory list of internet cafes, a specific venue in a city was selected and from there the other venues were identified and clustered for
efficiency and cost in the survey implementation. If the randomly selected areas have telecenters, these were purposively taken to represent
the rural areas; however, if there were none or non operational, an internet café is randomly selected in the inventory list.
2.
Venues visited
a. Attach a copy of Table B in the “Venue Survey” section of the bi-weekly report (see below). The table should include all
venues visited during the course of the survey implementation.
1
The number of sampled venues on the list rose to an additional 63% from the original sample total of 250 venues. The completed survey
summed up to 261 venues and 1,044 users. The venues covered and visited are found in Table 2B attached herewith.
b.
For the venues in which surveys took place, provide the following information (This information should be on the cover
page of the venue survey. For the rare instances where user surveys were done at venues without a corresponding
operator survey, enumerators’ notes should be used to provide address and taxonomy details.):
From the completed nationwide survey, 88% of the venues were internet cafes, 6.5% libraries, and 5% telecenters. Most of these venues
are located at the urban centers; they are privately owned with the business mode for profit. The internet access fee is paid and mobility is
fixed.
c.
Provide a summary of the data in 2a (by venue type) using the table below. Please also provide a narrative describing
issues encountered when attempting to sample the list. (E.g. venues not being where they were supposed to be, owners
not allowing surveys to take place.)
From the table below, it can be gleaned that there were a total of 427 venues covered, of which 375 or 88% consisted of cybercafés, 4%
were libraries, and 8% were telecenters.
Consolidated reports gathered from the enumerators showed that there were about 22% of the cyber cafe venues that have already closed.
The information about the existence of the venues in the actual location was provided by key informants, such as neighbors or persons
from the vicinity who were knowledgeable about the business establishments operating in the area. There were some venues which were
not found in the given addresses or within the surrounding areas. Informants disclosed that the venues did no longer exist or that the
venue address had another business establishment (pawnshop, restaurants, water station, and delivery services) operating in the area.
Reports also show that the building location of some venues was under construction or was allegedly demolished.
A good number of internet cafes operators (24 or 6%) refused to participate in the survey. On the other hand, libraries and telecenter
operators tend to be more open and responsive to the survey.
In the meanwhile, previously selected libraries and telecenter venues that were not included in the sample fell in one of the following
categories (i) venues which were temporarily closed (two months and over), (ii) venues that were not open to public computing at the time
of visit, (iii) venues that do not provide public access computing, (iv) and venues not included for other reasons.
Temporary closure was brought about by the following reasons: computers were used by employees of the local government, there was no
signal (for internet use); the new local government administration fired previous staff and was hiring new ones; computers for repair or
replacement; the telecenter was not able to pay internet service provider. There were one or two cases in Mindanao where there were no
telecenters operating in the area contrary to official reports. There was also a case where there were no users of the telecenter because it
was found that the place was not accessible and the fees were more expensive than those charged by cybercafés in the nearby areas.
d.
Provide a geographic distribution of the number of venues sampled using the following table.
Region
Metro Manila
or National
Capital Region
Luzon 1
# of venues
in the
sampling
strategy
1
Venue type
Library
# of venue
surveys
completed
2
Telecenter
0
0
Cybercafé
70
71
Other
0
0
Library
4
6
Telecenter
4
5
Cybercafé
32
32
0
0
Other
2
Luzon 2
Visayas
Mindanao
Library
2
2
Telecenter
7
3
Cybercafé
31
36
Other
0
0
Library
3
4
Telecenter
6
4
Cybercafé
41
44
Other
0
0
Library
3
3
Telecenter
7
2
Cybercafé
39
47
0
0
250
261
Other
Total
3.
Describe the user-selection strategies employed. Were any of the strategies that you tried unsuccessful? If so please describe the
strategies and explain why they did not work. What strategies did you ultimately settle upon?
During the Enumerators' Workshops, the proposed user selection strategies were presented and it was agreed upon that these selection
strategies be followed. Enumerators may choose to ask the first male/female who finishes using the Internet/computer to be interviewed.
They may also choose to randomly select a user from the ones in venue (nth male/female).
The strategy for user selection, however, depended on the number of users in the venue and the number of computers in the venue as well
as the willingness of respondents to participate in the survey interview. Initially enumerators had difficulty in getting respondents to
participate. It took some time to get the respondents to complete the surveys, the reason being the length of the interview time. With
more practice in the use of the questionnaire, the enumerators later on were able to make the interviews more efficient. Most of the
enumerators preferred the user selection strategy - the first male/female that finished using the internet/computers.
The agreement with the enumerators that the user sampling for time of day be: 1 – morning, 1 – afternoon, 2 – evening. However, there
were Internet cafés that opened at 11:00 AM. This quite affected the morning sample since there were a few users who come to the venue
until noon time. In the case of telecenters and public libraries which are government run, most surveys were undertaken during weekdays
unless these venues had special schedules different from the official working hours of government offices. Since most of the public access
venues in the sample are Internet cafés, the importance of conducting surveys during the weekends was emphasized. It was also stressed
that for areas where there were fewer venues that there should be Internet café interviews made during the weekdays and not just reserve
these days for conducting surveys in CeCs and/or libraries.
4.
Provide a summary of users sampled using the table below
Venue
Type
Library
Number of surveys completed
during each time of day
Number of surveys completed during day of the
week
Morning
Afternoon
Eve./Night
M
T
W
Th
F
Sa
18
46
4
6
14
20
19
8
Telecenter
19
33
4
4
16
19
5
12
Cybercafé
Gender
Su
1
241
454
225
140
126
89
95
133
206
131
Other
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
278
533
233
150
156
128
119
153
207
131
5.
M
30
F
38
25
31
516
397
0
571
Other
0
466
Describe the method used for mapping cybercafés. Provide a list showing the following: 1) cybercafés selected through the
inventory and 2) cybercafés selected through the mapping exercise. Include copies of all maps created, as instructed in the venue
selection sampling strategy guidelines (see pages 4 and 5 of the guidelines. Scanned copies are OK).
3
7
0
7
The sampled cybercafés were initially selected through the inventory list. The sampling areas were matched with the inventory list of cyber
cafes. Using the random numbers system the cyber cafes were selected with their corresponding business addresses. The latter were the
starting point of the mapping in the area specifically where cybercafés selected are no longer found or existing in the sampled locality. See
generated maps annex
4
Survey Implementation
1.
Enumerators for each region
a. Number of enumerators
The Philippine venue and user survey was supported by a total of 38 enumerators. Metro Manila having the largest sampling total had 15
enumerators; Luzon I had 5 enumerators; Luzon II had 7 enumerators, Visayas had 6 enumerators, and Mindanao had 5 enumerators.
Sampling Area
Metro Manila/National Capital Region
Luzon I
Luzon II
Visayas
Mindanao
No. of Enumerators
15
5
7
6
5
38
Total
b.
What organizations did they come from and what prior training and experience do they have?
The Enumerators tapped for this research project are all College graduates and professionals. They have fluency in communication of
major languages used in the sampling areas. Each belonged to an organization like an educational institution (Concordia College Social
Work Department, University of Baguio/Baguio Colleges Foundation, Batangas State University, St. Theresa’s College Cebu); a non
government organization (Ayala Foundation, ECPAT Philippines, Social Weather Station, a women’s organization, ideacorp, KSP, Child
Alert); or a social development network involved with children’s education, protection and welfare, such as the Philippines against Child
Trafficking (PACT), and the community development and the environment such as the Philippine Rural Reconstruction Movement
(PRRM).
Sampling Area
Metro Manila/
National Capital Region
Luzon I
Luzon II
Visayas
Mindanao
2.
Enumerators’ Background
11 – Philippines Against Child Trafficking (PACT)
3 – Concordia College Makati City Social Welfare Office
1 – Formerly with the Ayala Foundation
2 – Formerly with the Philippine Rural Reconstruction Movement (PRRM)
1 – Formerly with University of Baguio/Baguio Colleges Foundation
1 – Formerly with a Social Research organization (Social Weather Station)
1 – Batangas State University
1 - Formerly with ECPAT Philippines(End Child Prostitution, Child
Pornography and the Trafficking of children for sexual purposes)
4 – a Bicol women’s organization
1 – ideacorp
1 – Kahublagan Sang Panimalay (KSP)
3 – St. Theresas College Cebu
2 – Formerly with a call center in Cebu and later with a research project
4 – Child Alert (NGO for Children and youth based in Davao City)
1 – Formerly a head nurse from a Davao City hospital
Training for enumerators
a. When were the training sessions held? Who was present and what was covered?
Schedule
August 5, 2010
held at ECPAT Philippines
Meeting Room Quezon
City
Area
Mix of Metro Manila/National
Capital Region and Luzon 1
and 2
Enumerators:
Sally Ujano
Nancy Trani
Sheila Formento
Mellanie Olano
Jinky Sidocon
Jeffrey Horca
Alma Mendez
Bernard Pollero
5
Attendance
Ideacorp
Mina Peralta
Maui Dulce
Mayette Macapagal
Mariamir Baldoz
Claudine Atienza
Christian Sagun
Michael Quilala
Razzel Morona
Ismael Crisostomo
August 6, 2010 held at
Macapagal Office in Pasay
City
Mix of Metro Manila/National
Capital Region and Luzon 1
and 2
August 10, 2010 held at St.
Theresas College in Cebu
City
Visayas
Emynita Tapiru
Maria Remedios Olivares
Irene Solmirano
Imelda Logronio
Cecilia Gandol
Clarita Yanson
Janylyn T. Moreno
Virgil Fuentes III
Ideacorp
Mina Peralta
Maui Dulce
Mayette Macapagal
Ideacorp
Mina Peralta
Marilou Gallarde
Maura Senosa
August 12, 2010 held at
Talikala Office in Davao
City
Mindanao
Noreen Tormis
Almira P. Andong
Wilmelyn D. Gambong
Florie May Tacang
Jeanette L. Ampog
Rose Clave
Bernardo Mondragon
Ideacorp
Mina Peralta
The training workshop for Enumerators covered the following topics and processes.
 Rationale
The introduction and reasons for conducting the survey were taken and excerpted from the literature on research Global Impact Study.
Highlights were also on why we need enumerators preparation for this survey.

-
Objectives
To ensure quality of data gathering work through the preparation of enumerators prior to field deployment;
To demonstrate techniques and actual strategies to facilitate data gathering and ensure data quality;
To provide an opportunity to practice and discuss issues on field.

-
Methodology
Lecture on background and rationale
Lecture on techniques
Case examples and participatory strategy planning
Simulation and hands-on training to practice on the survey interview and the sequencing of the questions

-
Requirements:
Each enumerator must have a kit that contains the following:
o Copy of the survey questionnaires (local language and English),
o Sample letters and protocol instructions,
o Reporting instructions,
o Other logistical instructions.
-
An activity room that will accommodate 5 to 15 pax.
Equipment required: laptop, projector, screen, whiteboard paraphernalia (optional)
Meals/Snacks
Total Duration
About six (6) hours
6
Duration
20 min
Activity
Introduction
- Lecture on Background and Rationale of the
Global Impact Study (GIS) project
- About ideacorp and the Research Team,
- Introduction of Facilitators and Enumerators
30 min
30 min
40 min
40 min
Review and Case Examples
- Review of the Enumerators Terms of
Reference (TOR)
- Review of the sampling method
- Presentation on the GIS project
- Presentation on ideacorp
- Facilitator
- Presentation on the TOR
- Presentation on sampling method
- Review of the instruments
- Presentation on survey instruments
- Review of field techniques on data gathering
- Enumerators who did the field testing to share
their experiences
- ideacorp research team to discuss sampling and
questionnaire
90 min
90 min
Practice on the use of Survey Questionnaire
- Venue Survey
- User Survey
20 min
Synthesis and Closing
3.
Resources Required
- Copies of the survey questionnaires
- Enough participants to practice with one
another
General discussion on implementation methods, including the following:
a. Were gifts given to respondents? If yes, what were the gifts and what was the approximate value?
User respondents were given gifts or tokens - two-hour worth (PhP 30.00) of internet use at the venue where the operators and the users
were interviewed.
b.
How long did it take to recruit respondents? Include a discussion of any issues getting participants and the approximate
number of people enumerators needed to approach before recruiting one respondent.
The enumerators found it quite difficult to recruit respondents during the first few days of the survey roll out. They were refused several
times. From all the bi-monthly reports submitted to TASCHA, a total of 167 respondents did not want to be surveyed. Most of these
people were from Cebu City, Metro Manila, Davao City and Cagayan de Oro. Some of the reasons for refusal were loss of time, loss of
patience, they were in a hurry, shy, suspicious of the purpose of the survey or of the enumerator’s presence. A few respondents did not
finish the interview because they found the survey questions too long and repetitious. Some enumerators had to wait for an hour or more
to get a respondent to agree and participate. However, as time went by, it was observed that the number of refusals had decreased. One
of the strategies used by the respondents was to work in tandem with another enumerator or in a small group assigned in the area. While
one enumerator was recruiting, another was already conducting the interviews.
Number of Respondents Who Refused the Survey based on Bi-weekly Reports
Bi-weekly
reports
24-Aug
5-Sep
21-Sep
5-Oct
19-Oct Total
Rank
NCR
12
5
28
0
0
45
2
Luzon I
10
0
4
0
0
14
5
Luzon I
15
6
0
0
0
21
4
Visayas
15
11
19
4
0
49
1
0
0
3
22
13
38
3
52
22
54
26
13
167
Mindanao
Total
7
Challenges
1. Discuss any challenges faced in the following areas
a. Venue sample design. Discuss your experience developing the venue sample based on the guidelines provided. From this
exercise, did you learn anything about generating a country-wide, statistically-valid sample in your country?
What was found difficult in the venue sampling design was the identification of rural areas in the Philippines. The official urban-rural
definition in the Philippines was found problematic. To address this issue, the research team had to use the income classification of cities
and towns as basis of identifying the rural areas. Those that belonged to the second to fifth class municipalities were regarded as rural
areas.
The sampling design exercise was found useful since it provided a scientific basis in the selection process of the sample sites. It was
relevant to use a list of criteria in the pre selection with ample consideration of the country context. It was also helpful to have some
flexibility in the selection process should there be valid reasons to modify the sampling area. For example at Valencia City in Mindanao, the
enumerators were supposed to conduct interviews at Barangay Batangan and Barobo. The latter at that time was encountering political
conflicts and situation was considered critical and the area a hot spot. It was an advantage that the enumerators are knowledgeable about
the situations on ground and have language facility for local communication. The enumerators opted to proceed to Batangan for the
surveys. Likewise in another area in Cagayan de Oro City, the enumerators did not proceed to the interiors of Lapasan which was not
considered safe at that time.
b.
Provide a discussion of challenges in the survey implementation in the following areas:
i. Locating venues in the pre-selected sample list
Venues that were pre-selected did not necessarily mean that these venues still existed or if the conduct of the survey will be successful. The
challenge was in choosing the replacement, the next venue in the area where a successful interview can take place.
ii. Getting operators to participate
Most of the operators posed to be busy especially if they were alone managing the facility. They were also suspicious about the purpose of
the survey, what the survey will be used for and also the presence of the enumerators. There were non-owner operators who would prefer
to get their bosses’ approval first before they cooperate with the enumerators.
iii. Getting users to participate
The venue users as mentioned earlier were not easy to recruit. Some of the reasons for refusal were loss of time, loss of patience, they
were in a hurry, shy, suspicious of the purpose of the survey or of the enumerator’s presence. A few respondents did not finish the
interview because they found the survey questions too long and repetitious.
iv. Finding private spaces in venues to conduct interviews
The enumerators and the interviewees experienced some discomfort during the interviews especially if the level of privacy is low due to the
size and lay out of most of the venues where there were no private spaces for the conduct of the interview.
v. Length of surveys
It was a common complaint among interviewees that the interview questions were quite long and repetitious.
vi. Other implementation challenges
In the users sampling, male and female respondents were alternately selected and interviewed in each of the venue in the morning,
afternoon and evening. The numbers of users per venue were usually divided in the morning, afternoon and evening. However, it was
observed that majority of the users came in the afternoon; thus, there was greater number of user respondents interviewed in the
afternoon. In the evening, there were only very few female users interviewed. Likewise, in Mindanao it was observed that majority of the
internet cafes were frequented by male users which limited the selection of girls or women during the survey implementation.
A few other challenges included the following: additional costs due to change in scope and timelines of the project.
c.
How did you address the above challenges, to what extents were they resolved, and what recommendations would you
give for future surveys?
8
As mentioned earlier, one of the advantages that the research team found very important was the deployment of enumerators who have the
local language facility, working knowledge in the selected areas and open attitude towards the research. The enumerators were able to cope
well with the challenges especially those dealing with communication issues with venue operators and users.
The Enumerators training and role playing workshop was also a plus factor in the preparation of the enumerators. It was able to put the
enumerators focused and ready for any eventualities that they may encounter during the interviews.
The tokens or gifts for the respondents were very useful during the interview. It was able to provide incentives for users (and to some
extent the venue operators) to participate in the survey interviews.
The change in the scope and timelines of the survey incurred additional costs for the research team. However this was resolved by a
discussion with the Project managers and coordinators and a request for additional budget.
9
Data
1.
Summarize the results for each of the demographics questions using frequency tables. Please comment on any interesting
findings, in particular those that stand out as contrary to your expectations or the literature or known demographic distributions
in your country. You are also encouraged to provide a discussion on results that seemed to follow traditional literature.
The data summary on demographics is provided below. Other data summary is provided as attachments.
Frequency Table
W hat is your Gender
Valid
Frequency
571
466
7
1044
Male
Female
Ot her
Total
Percent
54.7
44.6
.7
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
54.7
99.3
100.0
Valid Perc ent
54.7
44.6
.7
100.0
Other (spe cify)
Valid
gay
Gay
Total
Frequency
1036
2
6
1044
Percent
99.2
.2
.6
100.0
Valid Percent
99.2
.2
.6
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
99.2
99.4
100.0
What is your age?
Valid
Mis sing
Total
12-15
16-19
20-24
25-34
35-49
50-65
21
Total
System
Frequency
238
385
262
106
47
4
1
1043
1
1044
Percent
22.8
36.9
25.1
10.2
4.5
.4
.1
99.9
.1
100.0
Valid Percent
22.8
36.9
25.1
10.2
4.5
.4
.1
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
22.8
59.7
84.9
95.0
99.5
99.9
100.0
What is your nationality
Valid
Filipino
Frequency
1044
Percent
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
10
What is the highest level of formal education you have completed
Frequency
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Pre-primary education
(no formal s chooling)
Primary education/First
stage of basic
education (grade scho
Secondary education
(high s chool or
equivalent)
Post-secondary
non-tertiary education
(vocational or trade s
Tertiary education
(college/univers ity
degree) or higher
Total
System
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
4
.4
.4
.4
51
4.9
4.9
5.3
409
39.2
39.3
44.5
70
6.7
6.7
51.2
508
48.7
48.8
100.0
1042
2
1044
99.8
.2
100.0
100.0
Do you have any type of physical disability
Valid
Missing
Total
Yes
No
Don't Know
No res pons e
Total
System
Frequency
23
988
3
29
1043
1
1044
Percent
2.2
94.6
.3
2.8
99.9
.1
100.0
Valid Percent
2.2
94.7
.3
2.8
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
2.2
96.9
97.2
100.0
In what ways does your diability affect you - Seeing
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
System
Frequency
12
1032
1044
Percent
1.1
98.9
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
In what ways does your diability affect you - Hearing
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
System
Frequency
3
1041
1044
Percent
.3
99.7
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
11
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
In what ways does your diability affect you - Using Arms
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
System
Frequency
3
1041
1044
Percent
.3
99.7
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
In what ways does your diability affect you - Using Legs
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
System
Frequency
3
1041
1044
Percent
.3
99.7
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
In what ways does your diability affect you Combination of the above
Missing
System
Frequency
1044
Percent
100.0
In what ways does your diability affect you - Other
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
System
Frequency
2
1042
1044
Percent
.2
99.8
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
Other (spe cify)
Valid
Cerebral palsy
Fingers
Total
Frequency
1042
1
1
1044
Percent
99.8
.1
.1
100.0
Valid Perc ent
99.8
.1
.1
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
99.8
99.9
100.0
Which of the following best describes your home
Frequency
Valid
Missing
Total
It is owned by you or
by someone in your
household
You rent it
You occupy it without
payment of rent
Don't have a home
Total
System
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
730
69.9
70.3
70.3
203
19.4
19.6
89.9
103
9.9
9.9
99.8
2
1038
6
1044
.2
99.4
.6
100.0
.2
100.0
100.0
12
Do you have the following at home - Computer
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
System
Frequency
441
603
1044
Percent
42.2
57.8
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
Do you have the following at home - Internet connection
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
System
Frequency
260
784
1044
Percent
24.9
75.1
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
Do you have the following at home - Television
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
No
Total
System
Frequency
1016
1
1017
27
1044
Percent
97.3
.1
97.4
2.6
100.0
Valid Percent
99.9
.1
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
99.9
100.0
Do you have the following at home - Satellite for television
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
System
Frequency
297
747
1044
Percent
28.4
71.6
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
Do you have the following at home - Radio
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
System
Frequency
940
104
1044
Percent
90.0
10.0
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
Do you have the following at home - Car
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
System
Frequency
238
806
1044
Percent
22.8
77.2
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
13
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
Do you have the following at home - Electricity
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
System
Frequency
1019
25
1044
Percent
97.6
2.4
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
Do you have the following at home - Landline phone
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
System
Frequency
288
756
1044
Percent
27.6
72.4
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
Do you have the following at home - Mobile phone
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
System
Frequency
1003
41
1044
Percent
96.1
3.9
100.0
Valid Percent
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
100.0
What is your source of fresh water at home
Valid
Missing
Total
Privale well
Public well
Piped into hous e
Other
Total
System
Frequency
175
58
805
5
1043
1
1044
Percent
16.8
5.6
77.1
.5
99.9
.1
100.0
Valid Percent
16.8
5.6
77.2
.5
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
16.8
22.3
99.5
100.0
Other (specify)
Valid
Creek
deep well pump
none
water pump
Total
Frequency
1040
1
1
1
1
1044
Percent
99.6
.1
.1
.1
.1
100.0
Valid Percent
99.6
.1
.1
.1
.1
100.0
14
Cumulative
Percent
99.6
99.7
99.8
99.9
100.0
Including self, how many adults live in your home
Valid
Mis sing
Total
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
15
Total
System
Frequency
5
38
218
209
241
178
66
50
20
3
10
1
2
1041
3
1044
Percent
.5
3.6
20.9
20.0
23.1
17.0
6.3
4.8
1.9
.3
1.0
.1
.2
99.7
.3
100.0
Valid Percent
.5
3.7
20.9
20.1
23.2
17.1
6.3
4.8
1.9
.3
1.0
.1
.2
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
.5
4.1
25.1
45.1
68.3
85.4
91.7
96.5
98.5
98.8
99.7
99.8
100.0
How many children live in your home
Valid
Mis sing
Total
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
20
Total
System
Frequency
129
209
316
198
100
49
14
8
3
3
3
1
1
1034
10
1044
Percent
12.4
20.0
30.3
19.0
9.6
4.7
1.3
.8
.3
.3
.3
.1
.1
99.0
1.0
100.0
Valid Percent
12.5
20.2
30.6
19.1
9.7
4.7
1.4
.8
.3
.3
.3
.1
.1
100.0
15
Cumulative
Percent
12.5
32.7
63.2
82.4
92.1
96.8
98.2
98.9
99.2
99.5
99.8
99.9
100.0
What is your primary language of communication
Valid
Missing
Total
Tagalog
Cebuano
Ilocano
Others
Total
System
Frequency
537
279
59
168
1043
1
1044
Percent
51.4
26.7
5.7
16.1
99.9
.1
100.0
Valid Percent
51.5
26.7
5.7
16.1
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
51.5
78.2
83.9
100.0
W hat is your reading abil ity i n your prim ary language
Valid
Missing
Total
Frequency
None
2
Poor
46
Fair
420
Good
434
Very Good
141
Total
1043
Sy stem
1
1044
Percent
.2
4.4
40.2
41.6
13.5
99.9
.1
100.0
Valid Percent
.2
4.4
40.3
41.6
13.5
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
.2
4.6
44.9
86.5
100.0
W hat is your w riti ng a bili ty in your prima ry l anguage
Valid
Missing
Total
Frequency
None
2
Poor
52
Fair
448
Good
408
Very Good
132
Total
1042
Sy stem
2
1044
Percent
.2
5.0
42.9
39.1
12.6
99.8
.2
100.0
Valid Percent
.2
5.0
43.0
39.2
12.7
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
.2
5.2
48.2
87.3
100.0
W hat is your reading abi lity i n your national langua ge
Valid
Missing
Total
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Not applicable
Total
Sy stem
Frequency
13
256
172
66
468
975
69
1044
Percent
1.2
24.5
16.5
6.3
44.8
93.4
6.6
100.0
Valid Percent
1.3
26.3
17.6
6.8
48.0
100.0
16
Cumulative
Percent
1.3
27.6
45.2
52.0
100.0
W hat is your w riti ng a bili ty in your national language
Valid
Missing
Total
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Not applicable
Total
Sy stem
Frequency
12
254
176
64
468
974
70
1044
Percent
1.1
24.3
16.9
6.1
44.8
93.3
6.7
100.0
Valid Percent
1.2
26.1
18.1
6.6
48.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
1.2
27.3
45.4
52.0
100.0
W hat is your Engl ish Proficie ncy
Valid
Missing
Total
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Not applicable
Total
Sy stem
Frequency
92
637
249
60
1
1039
5
1044
Percent
8.8
61.0
23.9
5.7
.1
99.5
.5
100.0
Valid Percent
8.9
61.3
24.0
5.8
.1
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
8.9
70.2
94.1
99.9
100.0
What is your current occupational status
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Self employed
Employed part time
Employed full time
Unemployed
looking for a job
Unemployed not
looking for a job
Retired
Student
Homemaker
Other
Total
System
Frequency
58
121
150
Percent
5.6
11.6
14.4
Valid Percent
5.6
11.6
14.4
Cumulative
Percent
5.6
17.2
31.6
46
4.4
4.4
36.1
17
1.6
1.6
37.7
275
362
6
5
1040
4
1044
26.3
34.7
.6
.5
99.6
.4
100.0
26.4
34.8
.6
.5
100.0
64.1
98.9
99.5
100.0
17
Other (specify)
Valid
out of School
Out of s chool youth
volunteer nurse
Volunteer nurse
Total
Frequency
1040
1
1
1
1
1044
Percent
99.6
.1
.1
.1
.1
100.0
Valid Percent
99.6
.1
.1
.1
.1
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
99.6
99.7
99.8
99.9
100.0
What sector do you work in
Frequency
Valid
Missing
Total
Government or
public sector
Agriculture
Education
Health services
Construction
Manufacturing
Transportation
Wholes ale or retail
Financial s ervices
Business s ervices
Personal s ervices
Other trades
Other
Total
System
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
55
5.3
17.6
17.6
3
44
24
9
16
12
31
8
55
24
8
24
313
731
1044
.3
4.2
2.3
.9
1.5
1.1
3.0
.8
5.3
2.3
.8
2.3
30.0
70.0
100.0
1.0
14.1
7.7
2.9
5.1
3.8
9.9
2.6
17.6
7.7
2.6
7.7
100.0
18.5
32.6
40.3
43.1
48.2
52.1
62.0
64.5
82.1
89.8
92.3
100.0
18
Other (specify)
Valid
BPO industry
call center
Call Center
consultancy
contractual
Entertainment
fas tfood
games checker
Home-based
telecommunications
Househelp
IT
none
Private Co.
Restaurant
Sales
tele communications
Telecommunications
Total
Frequency
1024
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Percent
98.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
Valid Percent
98.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
Cumulative
Percent
98.1
98.2
98.3
98.4
98.5
98.6
98.7
98.8
98.9
1
.1
.1
98.9
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
2
1044
.1
.1
.3
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
100.0
.1
.1
.3
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
100.0
99.0
99.1
99.4
99.5
99.6
99.7
99.8
100.0
What is your personal monthly income
Valid
Mis sing
Total
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Total
System
Frequency
9
527
124
85
51
20
3
5
2
1
2
3
832
212
1044
Percent
.9
50.5
11.9
8.1
4.9
1.9
.3
.5
.2
.1
.2
.3
79.7
20.3
100.0
Valid Percent
1.1
63.3
14.9
10.2
6.1
2.4
.4
.6
.2
.1
.2
.4
100.0
19
Cumulative
Percent
1.1
64.4
79.3
89.5
95.7
98.1
98.4
99.0
99.3
99.4
99.6
100.0
What is your household monthly income
Valid
Mis sing
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
Total
System
Frequency
37
106
148
122
99
68
55
28
16
15
11
14
719
325
1044
Percent
3.5
10.2
14.2
11.7
9.5
6.5
5.3
2.7
1.5
1.4
1.1
1.3
68.9
31.1
100.0
Valid Percent
5.1
14.7
20.6
17.0
13.8
9.5
7.6
3.9
2.2
2.1
1.5
1.9
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
5.1
19.9
40.5
57.4
71.2
80.7
88.3
92.2
94.4
96.5
98.1
100.0
Do you have any immediate family members living or working in another
country?
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
No
Total
System
Frequency
365
464
829
215
1044
Percent
35.0
44.4
79.4
20.6
100.0
Valid Percent
44.0
56.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
44.0
100.0
Continuing with the survey?
Valid
Mis sing
Total
Yes
No
Total
System
Frequency
694
340
1034
10
1044
Percent
66.5
32.6
99.0
1.0
100.0
Valid Percent
67.1
32.9
100.0
20
Cumulative
Percent
67.1
100.0
General Comments
1.
Anything to share about the entire survey process
The survey research design was well thought about and the process was consultative which was well appreciated by the research team.
2.
Other general comments
For internet cafes that offer gaming, more males were seen, female users were difficult to find. In some venues that do not offer gaming
services or VOIP, but research and social networking only, more female users were observed in these establishments.
21