MedEdPortal 101: Introduction and Next Steps Paola Palma Sisto, MD Visiting Associate Professor, University of Connecticut School ofMedicine Connecticut Children’s Medical Center May 24, 2012 Disclosure No financial interests to disclose Grateful appreciation to Dr Deborah Simpson, MCW Associate Dean for Educational Affairs 2 Workshop Objectives Describe the MedEdPortal repository and its usefulness for disseminating scholarship Identify key elements/tasks (with a timeline) needed to transform item into MedEdPORTAL submission Walk through the steps from concept to submission Draft selected sections of a submission form to a peer reviewed repository Revisiting Education as Scholarship Literature: Boyer (1990), Glassick (1997), etc AAMC - Group on Educational Affairs Project on Scholarship What is Scholarship Scholarship is that which advances knowledge in one’s field Judged by members of one’s field – One’s community of peers Earnest Boyer Scholarship Reconsidered 1990 Discovery Integration Teaching Application / Engagement Glassick’s Scholarship Assessed Clear Goals = Objectives Adequate Preparation = Current in educ + Appropriate Methods = subject matter Methods match obj Significant Results = Evaluation Effective Presentation = Dissemination to Peers Reflective Critique = Revise/Improve Community of Engaged Educators Q2 = Quantity & Quality Draw From Field, Inform Own Work Contribute to Field, Inform Others Work Reviewer Form Approved Dec 2007 – MedEdPORTAL Editorial Board MedEdPORTAL Growth/Use Submission Stats (Jan 2010) – 7,600+ Submissions since 2005; 50+ New submissions per mo Publication Stats (Jan 2012) – – – – 18% Accepted 53% Revisions Required 29% Rejected >2000 resources Utilization Stats (Jan 2012) – ALL 148 US and Canadian AAMC member medical schools utilizing MedEdPORTAL 10,000+ Teaching hospitals, international medical and dental schools, and other health education institutions (e.g. osteopathic, nursing, veterinary, etc.) utilizing MedEdPORTAL 190+ Countries utilizing MedEdPORTAL – 1,000+ publications accessed each WEEK www.mededportal.org Steps (7) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Identify resource Literature search GET HELP Instructor’s guide Prepare materials Legal stuff SUBMIT 12 MedEdPORTAL Search How are they =/≠ from your own – Identify key features (e.g., Primary Care, hospital focused, geriatrics focused) – The unique features are “showcased” Training the Trainer Successful use of your product Key elements associated with successfully “training” someone ELSE to use your product Training the Trainer Elements of an Instructor’s Guide 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Description: Background/Need/Overview of Product Learner Audience Session Objectives Session Time What packet contains (e.g., PowerPoint) Detailed plan (what happens when, lead by who) Evaluation/Assessment Instructor Qualifications & Responsibilities Facilities (Space, room set up) Required Resources/ Instructional Materials Advance Preparation Relationship to Other Educational Materials/Activities References Learner Audience Who do you teach with this material NOW? – Third Year Medical Students? – Residents/fellows? – Allied Health Trainees? – CME physicians? Who else have you used the material with/would it be appropriate to use the materials with? Relationship of This Session to Other Educational Materials/Activities Do a search of the literature, repositories, and resources so that you can describe how your work builds on, relates to, and is different from what is currently available to the educator community. 18 19 Resource Description What need/problem/learning gap were addressing? Why did you create the material? What was your purpose? You checked AAMC MedEdPORTAL, Literature and did not find appropriate materials for your objectives - there was a Gap (e.g., you looked for materials , nothing soo...) 20 Resource Description What is it? What do I get? – Learner Assessment Tool (Faculty Rating Form, Patient Satisfaction)? – Curriculum (Syllabus for EBM Course)? Instructional Materials (PBL Case, Workshop on EBM, CD ROM). 21 22 23 Objectives - REMINDERS How will be learner be different (KSA) after experiencing the instruction? Action Verb: Interpret, apply, analyze, compare, distinguish, recognize, determine, integrate, formulate, specify, design. Reminder: Engagement with the community of educators is demonstrated by delineating clear goals and objectives (Glassick) Description: detailed plan Session Run Time – BIG PICTURE In this packet we have presented all materials needed for running this workshop accessible as PDF documents, Microsoft Word documents, or PowerPoint’s with annotated speaker notes. Required readings and/or other resource material is referenced and typically available from your library’s holdings or universal web-based access. 25 Detailed Plan Glassick: Appropriate Methods – Make Tacit Knowledge - Explicit How: Visualize a session walk through – What would you see happening when – Who would be doing it – What materials/resources need Alternative Schedule 26 27 28 29 30 Training the trainer Materials you want? Need to know? It is late at night Tomorrow AM you are teaching a session on “(fill in the blank)” Searched a peer reviewed repository and found what you think is the “perfect” (good enough) material Worksheet: Small Group Write down resource you are considering submitting (10 minutes) Work in groups of 2-3 to discuss ideas Choose 1 to present to large group for discussion (hint: one that has structure, evaluation results, unique, etc) (15 minutes) 32 Submission Options 33 Additional considerations Authorship Copyright/Usage license HIPPA 34 Principles of Authorship Authorship Responsibilities Who’s who? Authorship is a Relationship – Who's the senior author? Who is last? – Sometimes responsibilities shift. Make an Agreement at the Beginning – Determine the authorship role & responsibilities – Making an initial plan, before the work begins, Make a Series of Milestones – Responsibilities may shift during a project Make a Fair Final Decision 1st Author – If there are issues, listen to arguments, fairly decide http://www.research.psu.edu/orp/outreach/publications/newsletter/issue12/story1.asp Author Order Convention versus clear agreement Last Author – Tradition: last author = senior member team, department or division director Encourages honorary authorship. – Recent: last author is allocated to the person who contributed least Recommendation: Author order determined by relative contributions to the most critical intellectual aspects of the work Gaeta, T. J. Gaeta TJ. Authorship Law & Order. Acad Emerg Med 1999;6(4): 297-301. http://www.aemj.org/cgi/content/full/6/4/297 Multiple Products within a Packet Copyright & HIPPA AAMC MedEdPORTAL Robbie Reynolds From MedEdPORTAL Training Materials http://services.aamc.org/jsp/mededportal/goLinkPage.do?link=about#Promoting Usage License Questionnaire Allow commercial uses of your work? Yes No Allow modifications of your work? Yes Yes, as long as others share alike No Jurisdiction of your license Source: www.creativecommons.org Copyright Permission MedEdPORTAL Does Not Adhere to “Fair Use” Copyright permission must be obtained from copyright owners of all third-party materials included in submissions. Copyright Violations MedEdPORTAL staff screen each submission for potential third-party materials which include: Photos Graphs Images Cartoons Charts Text (large quotes) Published Articles U.S. Government materials HIPAA Violations Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act MedEdPORTAL staff screen each submission for potential identifiable “protected health information” such as: Patient Photographs Images Charts Graphs Lab Values Medical Records Radiographs Biometric Identifiers Next Steps Review literature/repositories for similar resources FIND HELP Instructor’s guide Annotate slides Complete application SUBMIT 45 Submitting Your Product Submission Forms 1. 2. 3. Copy and Paste Instructor’s guide! Make sure no copyrighted materials! (DELETE them or reference) Register on the site and then follow the steps!