certain Important provisions
under the income-tax act, 1961
Scope
S.
Particulars
No
1 Section 56(2)(viia)
2
Section 56(2)(viib)
3
Section 43CA
4
Section 50C
5
Questions and Answers
SECTION 56(2)(viia)
Object of the Amendment
 The Finance Act 2010 amended section 56(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
(Act) by inserting a new clause (viia) to section 56(2). The amendment
was effective from 1 June 2010.
 The Memorandum explaining the provisions of the Finance Bill, 2010
explains the reason and objective behind introduction of clause (viia) of
section 56(2) in the following terms:
“These are anti-abuse provisions which are currently applicable
only if an individual or HUF is the recipient. Therefore, transfer of
shares of a company to a firm or a company, instead of an
individual or HUF, without consideration or at a price lower than
the fair market value does not attract the anti-abuse provision.
Object of Amendment
In order to prevent the practice of transferring unlisted shares at
price much below their fair market value, it is proposed to amend
section 56 to also include within its ambit transaction undertaken
in shares of a company (not being a company in which the public
are substantially interested) either for inadequate consideration or
without consideration where the recipient is a firm or a company
(not being a company in which the public are substantially
interested).”
Section 5 6 (2)(viia)
[(viia) where a firm or a company not being a company in which the public are
substantially interested, receives, in any previous year, from any person or
persons, on or after the 1st day of June, 2010, any property, being shares of a
company not being a company in which the public are substantially interested,—
(i) without consideration, the aggregate fair market value of which exceeds fifty
thousand rupees, the whole of the aggregate fair market value of such property;
(ii) for a consideration which is less than the aggregate fair market value of the
property by an amount exceeding fifty thousand rupees, the aggregate fair
market value of such property as exceeds such consideration :
Provided that this clause shall not apply to any such property received by way of
a transaction not regarded as transfer under clause (via) or clause (vic) or clause
(vicb) or clause (vid) or clause (vii) of section 47.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause, "fair market value" of a property,
being shares of a company not being a company in which the public are
substantially interested, shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Explanation
to clause (vii);]
Analysis
 Transfer of shares of a company without consideration or inadequate
consideration would attract the provisions of section 56(2)(viia), if the
recipient is a firm or a company.
 If such shares are received without consideration, the aggregate fair
market value on the date of transfer would be taxed as the income of the
recipient firm or company, if it exceeds Rs 50,000.
 If such shares received for inadequate consideration , the difference
between the aggregate fair market value and the consideration would be
taxed as the income of the recipient firm or company, if such difference
exceeds Rs 50,000.
Analysis
 ‘Fair market value’ of a property, being shares of a closely held company,
shall have the meaning assigned to it in Explanation to section 56(2)(vii).
Thus, FMV of shares of a closely held company shall mean FMV
determined in accordance with rules 11U and 11UA.
 ‘Firm’ includes LLP. [Section 2(23)(i) of the Act].
 ‘Closely held company’ - Section 2(18) defines ‘company in which public
are substantially interested’ (i.e. widely-held companies).
 ‘Receive’ - As per the Advanced Law Lexicon dictionary, the term “receive”
has been defined as “To receive means to get by a transfer, as, to receive a
gift, to receive a letter, or to receive money and involves an actual receipt”.
Applicability
 However, the provisions of section 56(2)(viia) would not apply in the case
of transfer of shares –
 Of a company in which the public are substantially interested; or
 To a company in which the public are substantially interested.
 Certain transactions are exempted from the application of this provisionSection
Transaction
47(via)
Transfer of shares held in an Indian company, in a scheme of
amalgamation, by the amalgamating foreign company to an
amalgamated foreign company
47(vic)
Transfer of shares held in an Indian company, in a scheme of
demerger, by the demerged foreign company to a resulting
foreign company
Applicability
Section
Transaction
47(vicb)
Transfer by a shareholder, in a business reorganisation, of shares
held in the predecessor co-operative bank, in consideration of the
allotment of shares in the successor co-operative bank.
47(vid)
Transfer or issue of shares by the resulting company, in a scheme
of demerger, to the shareholders of the demerged company in
consideration of demerger of the undertaking
47(vii)
Transfer by a shareholder, in a scheme of amalgamation, of shares
in the amalgamating company in consideration of allotment to
him of shares in the amalgamated Indian company.
Comparison of section 56(2)(viia) read with
section 56(2)(vii)(c)
Points of comparison
Taxability in the hands of
individuals/HUFs under
section 56(2)(vii)(c)
Taxability in the hands of
closely
held companies/firms under
section
56(2)(viia)
Introduced by
Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009
Finance Act, 2010
Effective from
1-10-2009
1-6-2010
Shares covered
Shares of both listed and
unlisted companies
Shares of only unlisted
companies
Whether receipt of other
securities taxable?
Yes
No
Whether shares received
must
be the capital asset of the
recipient assessee?
Yes
No such requirement. This
is probably
because no one would hold
unlisted
shares as stock-in-trade
Allotment of ‘additional shares’
 Recent ruling of the Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Authority in the case
of Sudhir Menon (HUF) [ITAT No. 4887/Mum/2013] on whether
allotment of ‘additional’ shares, on the basis of existing shareholding and
at a value less than the fair value , results in taxation under the Gift Tax
under the Act.
 The ITAT analysed the tax implications under the following categories –
 Where the allotment is on a proportionate basis; and
 Where the allotment is on a disproportionate basis.
 The ITAT ruled that as regards ‘proportionate’ allotment there should be
no adverse tax implications as it is similar to the issue of bonus shares
whereby a share is split and the total value ,post issue of additional shares
in the hands of the shareholder remains the same.
Allotment of ‘additional shares’
 However, in the case of ‘disproportionate’ issue of additional shares
provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(c) will apply.
 This decision may also help firm or closely held companies to mitigate
the tax liability under section 56(2)(viia) of the Act on receipt of shares
of a closely held company.
SECTION 56(2)(viib)
Section 5 6 (2)(viib)
[(viia) where a company, not being a company in which the public are substantially
interested, receives, in any previous year, from any person being a resident, any
consideration for issue of shares that exceeds the face value of such shares, the aggregate
consideration received for such shares as exceeds the fair market value of the shares:
Provided that this clause shall not apply where the consideration for issue of shares is
received—
(i) by a venture capital undertaking from a venture capital company or a venture capital
fund; or
(ii) by a company from a class or classes of persons as may be notified by the Central
Government in this behalf.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause,—
(a) the fair market value of the shares shall be the value—
(i) as may be determined in accordance with such method as may be prescribed48a; or
(ii) as may be substantiated by the company to the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer,
based on the value, on the date of issue of shares, of its assets, including intangible assets
being goodwill, know-how, patents, copyrights, trademarks, licences, franchises or any
other business or commercial rights of similar nature,
whichever is higher;
(b) "venture capital company", "venture capital fund" and "venture capital undertaking"
shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in clause (a), clause (b) and clause
(c) of 48b[Explanation] to clause (23FB) of section 10;]
Analysis
 S.56(2)(viib) brings to charge consideration received by a company which
is not a Widely Held Company (WHC) towards issue of shares in excess of
Fair Market Value (FMV) of its shares.
 Section is an anti – abuse provision (SAAR) aimed at arresting circulation
of unaccounted money in the economy.
Section is triggered when:
 CHC issues shares (including preference shares) to a resident at a
premium and receives consideration which is in excess of FMV of shares.
If section is triggered - amount in excess of the FMV of the shares is
assessed as income from other sources. FMV for the purpose of this
section is higher of:
► Normative value as may be prescribed or
► FMV substantiated to the satisfaction of Assessing Officer (ie value
with respect to assets including intangible assests as of the date of issue).
Analysis
 Status of relevance is person to whom shares are issued and not from
whom consideration is physically received. Hence, section would not
apply when shares are issued to a NR but consideration is received from a
Resident.
 Resident includes Not Ordinary Resident (NOR). Section applies equally to
Residents and NOR
 Initial onus of proving fairness of values would be on the taxpayer.
However, once reasonable clarification is provided, onus of adducing
evidence and proof shifts back on the tax officer.
 Valuation for the purpose of S.56(2)(viib) would need to be done on the
date of issue of share. It may not be proper for the company to rely
merely on the last audited balance sheet date.
 Consideration could be monetary or non monetary. Section does not put
any restriction on nature of consideration.
Exclusions
Issue of shares by WHC
Issue of shares to NR
Issue by Venture Capital Units to Venture Capital
Company / Venture Capital Fund
Issue of shares to class of persons notified by
Central Government
Issue of shares at par
Transactions or Situation NOT likely to be
impacted
 Transactions involving transfer / receipt of existing shares buyback, forfeiture, capital reduction, liquidation etc.
 Transactions where issuing company does not receive any
consideration - bonus issue, consolidation / subdivision of existing
shares etc.
 Transactions where consideration received is admittedly less than
FMV - rights issue, ESOPs etc.
 Sweat shares if documentation supports that fair value of
consideration is not higher compared to fair value of shares issued.
 Issue and conversion of CCDs / Bonds / CCPS etc.
Issues
Year of taxability – Consideration received in year one but actual
allotment happens in subsequent year/s. Is the assessment
triggered in the year of receipt of consideration or in the year of
issue of shares?
 S. 56(2)(viib) is triggered in the year of issue of shares and date of receipt
of share application money is not relevant.
Implications of S.56(2)(viib) when shares are issued for cash
consideration but there is a transaction of asset purchase which is
consummated on a contemporaneous basis
 Transaction of sale needs to be contra distinguished from a transaction of
exchange.
 In a bonafide sale transaction, the amount agreed to be paid and agreed
to be received between parties constitutes value of the consideration as
between parties.
 S.56(2)(viib) needs to be evaluated based on this proposition.
Applicability of Section 56(2)(viib) to issuance of shares by the
amalgamated company where appointed date of merger is prior
1 April 2012 though record date / date of issuance is after 1 April
2012
 One view, likely to be indicated by the tax department is that, for
the purpose of S.56(2)(viib), what is relevant is the effective date,
on the ground that amalgamation is given effect to only in the year
in which High Court order is received.
 Another view is that S.56(2)(viib) needs to be evaluated with
reference to the appointed date on the ground that there is vesting
of property on the appointed date. The commitment to issue shares
is a binding obligation with effect from the appointed date.
 Better view is that section will not apply to amalgamations where
appointed date is prior to 1 April 2012.
CHC allots shares at premium during the year but acquires listing
status at the end of the year and thus becomes a WHC as per
section 2(18). Would section 56(2)(viib) still apply as the
company was a CHC at the time of allotment?
 S.2(18)(b)(A) confers WHC status to a company if its shares are
listed on Recognized Stock Exchange (RSE) as on last day of previous
year.
 Once shares of company are listed on RSEs at end of the year, a
company would be WHC for whole of the financial year.
 Once company, by force of statutory provision, is regarded as WHC
for whole of the financial year, section does not get triggered.
 Hence, reference to date of issue or date of receipt of consideration
loses its significance.
Impact of S.56(2)(viib) in hands of a CHC (being a foreign
company) issuing shares to residents.
 No impact as income cannot be regarded as accruing or arising in
India or deemed to be accruing or arising in India.
 Also, when remittance is made from India, there would be no tax
trigger as receipt would be outside of India.
Would different considerations apply for transaction covered by
S.47(xiii)/ (iv) such that shares may be issued by CHC but the seller is
eligible for exemption under the provisions of S.47?
 Since share issue is part of a business restructuring which is tax
neutralized under any provisions of the Act does not provide any
immunity from applicability of S.56(2)(viib) which needs
independent evaluation.
Section 43CA
Pre Amendment
 The High Court ruling in the case of Kan Construction and Colonizers
(P) Ltd.[TS-252-HC-2012-ALL] held that stamp duty valuation
provisions u/s 50C of the Act do not apply to sale of plot of land held
as ‘Stock-in-trade’.
Section 50C applies only to capital assets
It further ruled that in order to apply the provisions of section 50C of
the Act, the asset should be ‘Capital Asset’ as defined under section
2(14) of the Act which excludes assets held as ‘Stock-in-trade’.
Section 43CA – w.e.f 1st April, 2014
(1) Where the consideration received or accruing as a result of the transfer by
an assessee of an asset (other than a capital asset), being land or building or
both, is less than the value adopted or assessed or assessable by any authority
of a State Government for the purpose of payment of stamp duty in respect of
such transfer, the value so adopted or assessed or assessable shall, for the
purposes of computing profits and gains from transfer of such asset, be
deemed to be the full value of the consideration received or accruing as a
result of such transfer.
(2) The provisions of sub-section (2) and sub-section (3) of section 50C shall, so
far as may be, apply in relation to determination of the value adopted or
assessed or assessable under sub-section (1).
Contd..
(3) Where the date of agreement fixing the value of consideration for transfer
of the asset and the date of registration of such transfer of asset are not the
same, the value referred to in sub-section (1) may be taken as the value
assessable by any authority of a State Government for the purpose of payment
of stamp duty in respect of such transfer on the date of the agreement.
(4) The provisions of sub-section (3) shall apply only in a case where the
amount of consideration or a part thereof has been received by any mode
other than cash on or before the date of agreement for transfer of the asset.
Taxability in case of receipt of immovable property for
inadequate consideration [S. 56(2)(vii)(b)](w.e.f. 1st April 2014)
W.e.f AY 2014-15, consideration which is less than the stamp
duty value of the property by an amount exceeding fifty
thousand rupees the stamp duty value of such property as
exceeds such consideration will be taxable.
 This will lead to double taxation of the same income in the
hands of two different person i.e. section 43CA or section 50C
and be taxed as IFOS under section 56(2)(vii) of the Act. Like it
will be taxed in the hands of transferor and under section 56 in
the hands of transferee.
Issues
 Currently, there is controversy on scope of ‘land’ and ‘building’ u/s.
50C whether it includes items like TDR, grant of development rights,
long term tenancy/leasehold rights, etc. Same will extend to 43CA
also.
 Whether once the income is deemed in section 43CA, can it be
deferred over a period of project, based on percentage of completion
method. As per the accounting standard of ICAI and proposed
accounting standard in income tax Act, the income from real estate
can be offered to tax on percentage completion method (also known
as work in progress method).
 Whether 43CA can apply to slump sale?
 Whether bearer cheque will be considered as mode other than cash
Section 50C
Section 50C - Applicability
 Section 50C is applicable if the following conditions are
satisfied –
 Condition 1: There is a transfer of land or building or both.
The assets may be long-term capital asset or short term
capital asset. It may be depreciable or non-depreciable asset.
 Condition 2: The sale consideration is less then value
adopted (or assessed) by any authority of a State
Government for the purpose of payment of stamp duty
(hereinafter referred to as “Stamp duty Authority”) in
respect of such transfer.
CONSEQUENCES IF THE ABOVE CONDITION ARE
SATISFIED
Different situations
Full value of consideration
for the purpose of capital
gains
Where
the
assessee Value adopted by Stamp
accepts the value adopted duty authority is taken as
by Stamp duty authority.
full value of consideration.
Contd..
Different situations
Full value of consideration for the
purpose of capital gains.
Where the assessee claims that value
adopted by Stamp duty authority is
more than the fair market value (but he
has not disputed such valuation in
stamp duty proceeding.)
Fair market value determined by the
Department Valuation Officer (if it is less
than the stamp duty valuation) is taken
as full value of consideration.
Stamp duty valuation (if the fair market
value determined by the Department
Valuation Officer is more than the stamp
duty valuation) is taken as full value of
consideration.
Issues
Issues
Applicability of section 50C in case of transfer of
lease hold rights
 Provisions of section 50C would not apply in case of transfer of
‘lease rights’ in land. The deeming provisions of section 50C would
apply only in case of transfer of land and building and not in case of
transfer of lease hold rights in land or building – Atul G. Puranik
[TS-197-ITAT-2011(Mum)]
 However, in case of Hari Om Gupta [TS–207-ITAT-2014(LKW)] it
was held that transfer of Lease Hold Rights for 99 years on land
amounts to transfer of “Capital Asset” and thus it would attract
the provisions of section 50C
Issues
Applicability of section 50C in case of Assets hold for Stock
in trade
 Section 50C is applicable only in respect of capital asset, being land
and/ or building, and held as not stock-in-trade. Champaben C
Patel [TS-92-ITAT-2014(Mum)]
However, it is pertinent to note that w.e.f.1st April, 2014 any transfer
of assets other than capital asset, being land and building, the
provisions of section 43CA would apply.
Issues Contd..
Whether addition u/s. 50C in the hands of the seller, means that the
buyer has paid “on-money” and addition u/s. 69 for unexplained
investment shall be made in the hands of the buyer?
Section 50C creates a deeming fiction and provides that the guideline
value shall be treated as the full value of consideration in the hands
of the seller No presumption can be made against the buyer that he
paid “on-money”. Unless the AO has evidences against the buyer that
he has paid “on-money”, no addition can be made in his hands.
- Harley Street Pharmaceuticals Ltd. 38 SOT 486 (Ahd.);
- Sangam Tower 130 TTJ 104 (Jp.)
Issues Contd..
Whether addition u/s. 50C would necessarily mean that assessee has
“concealed” the income or “furnished inaccurate particulars thereof”
and therefore penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) should be levied?
As held in ACIT vs N. Meenakshi (2009) 125 TTJ 856 (Chennai),
penalty cannot be levied in such a case, as there is no
‘concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars’.
Issues Contd..
Deeming provisions as mentioned in section 50C will not be
applicable to section 54F so far as meaning of ‘full value of
consideration’ is concerned, as deeming provision mentioned in
section 50C is for specific asset and for purpose of section 48.
The words ‘full value of consideration’ as mentioned in other
provisions of the Act are not governed by the meaning of ‘full
value of consideration’ as contained in section 50C. The natural
meaning of full value of consideration refers to consideration
specified in the sale deed. - Gyan Chand Batra v/s. ITO - [2010]
133 TTJ 482(JP)
Issues Contd..
 Prior to Oct 2009, Section 50C was attracted only when property was
transferred through registered sale deed and not merely through a
sale agreement. Amendment to Section 50C is not retrospective.
Thus, Transfers after October 2009 would attract Section 50C even if
sale deed is not "registered" for stamp duty purposes - Shri Gurdip
Singh Sidhu TS-69-ITAT-2012(ASR)
 AO is required to make a reference to Valuation Officer if assessee
objects to the adoption of stamp duty valuation u/s 50C. AO’s action
in not making reference to Valuation Officer has violated the Sec
50C(2). Further, AO not required to provide opportunity to assessee
before invoking provisions of Sec. 50C – TV Nagasena [TS-383-ITAT2012(Bang)]
43