Are (exogenous) interferons really necessary? Peter Ferenci Medical University of Vienna Effect of interferon on experimental vaccinia and herpes-simplex virus infections in rabbits' eyes. CANTELL K, TOMMILA V. Lancet. 1960 Sep 24;2(7152):682-4 Treatment of chronic non-A,non-B hepatitis with recombinant human alpha interferon. A preliminary report JH Hoofnagle, KD Mullen, DB Jones, V Rustgi, A Di Bisceglie, M Peters, JG Waggoner, Y Park, and EA Jones Volume 315:1575-1578 December 18, 1986 Role of interferon-alfa in treatment of hepatitis? Mode of action • immune-modulatory (dose dependent!) • antiviral • antiproliferative IFN-sensitivity • IL28B • Nullresponse…. Time Course of Virological Response to IFN Therapy in Patients With CHC HCV RNA 100% Induction phase 0% 1st dose Maintenance phase Detection limit 14–28 Days ? Ferenci P 1999 NK cells and response to IFN therapy in patients with CHC Ahlenstiehl et al, Gastroenterology 2011 HCV Life Cycle and DAA Targets Receptor binding and endocytosis Transport and release Fusion and uncoating (+) RNA ER lumen LD LD Translation NS3/4 and protease polyprotein inhibitors processing Virion assembly LD Membranous web ER lumen NS5A* inhibitors *Role in HCV life cycle not well defined Adapted from Manns MP, et al. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:991-1000. NS5B polymerase RNA replication inhibitors Nucleoside/nucleotide Nonnucleoside INFORM-1 study: proof of concept study, combination of a PI (danoprevir, DNV) with the polymerase inhibitor mericitabine (MCB) 1d 4d 7d 14d 48w Active/placebo A 500 mg BID MCB n=8/0 n=8/0 B 100 mg TID DNV 100 mg TID DNV P/R (Peg-IFN + RBV) 500 mg BID MCB n=8/2 500 mg BID MCB 100 mg TID DNV C 500 mg BID MCB 200 mg TID DNV Naive n=16/2 1000 mg BID MCB 100 mg TID DNV D 1000 mg BID MCB 200 mg TID DNV n=8/4 TF (non-null) E n=8/2 F TF (null) n=8/2 Naive n=8/2 G TF = IFN-treatment failures 1000 mg BID MCB 600 mg BID DNV 1000 mg BID MCB 900 mg BID DNV 1000 mg BID MCB 900 mg BID DNV Gane EJ et al. Lancet 2010 Median change from baseline by treatment group Cohorts B–G 1 Median Log10 HCV RNA Change from Baseline (IU/mL) 0 MCB (mg BID) / DNV (mg) –1 Placebo 500 BID / 100 TID 1000 BID / 100 TID 500 BID / 200 TID 1000 BID / 200 TID 1000 BID / 600 BID (pEVR) 1000 BID / 900 BID (TF - Null) 1000 BID / 900 BID (Naive) –2 –3 –4 –5 –6 0 2 4 6 Days 8 10 12 14 Gane EJ et al. Lancet 2010 Naive and Null Responders with a BID Oral Regimen of RG7128 and RG7227 100 6 88 90 RG7128 1000 mg BID + RG7227 900 mg BID 80 5 70 63 60 4 50 50 TF - Nulls 40 20 2 10 Limit of Detection 1 0 1 3 5 7 Days 9 11 13 25 <LLOD Gane et al, Lancet 2010 Naives 30 Nulls Naives Naives 3 Nulls Median Log10 HCV RNA (IU/mL) 7 <LLOQ GS-9256 + Tegobuvir Alone, With RBV, or With PegIFN/RBV in GT1 Tx-Naive Patients – Phase II study of tegobuvir (GS-9190), an NS5B nonnucleoside polymerase inhibitor, and GS-9256, an NS3 protease inhibitor as part of HCV therapy Wk 48 Wk 4 Treatment-naive patients with GT1 HCV Part A Part B (nonrandomized) GS-9256 75 mg BID + Tegobuvir 40 mg BID (n = 16)† PR* (n = 16) GS-9256 75 mg BID + Tegobuvir 40 mg BID + RBV*† (n = 15) PR* (n = 15) GS-9256 75 mg BID + Tegobuvir 40 mg BID + PR* (n = 15) PR* (n = 15) *PegIFN alfa-2a 180 µg/wk; weight-based RBV 1000-1200 mg/day. †PegIFN/RBV started early if virologic breakthrough. Zeuzem S, et al. AASLD 2010. Abstract LB-1. GS-9256 + Tegobuvir Alone, With RBV, or With PegIFN/RBV: Virologic Response HCV RNA Response GS-9256 + Tegobuvir (n = 15) GS-9256 + Tegobuvir + RBV (n = 13) GS-9256 + Tegobuvir + PegIFN/RBV (n = 14) Median maximal change from baseline, log10 IU/mL -4.1 -5.1 -5.7 Achieved nadir ≤ 25 IU/mL, % 13 62 100 Day 14 HCV RNA ≤ 25 IU/mL, % 7 46 71 Day 28 HCV RNA ≤ 25 IU/mL (RVR), % 7 38 100 Tegubovir requires both pegIFN and RBV program terminated due to safety issues Zeuzem S, et al. AASLD 2010. Abstract LB-1. ZENITH: telaprevir (PI) + VX-222 (NNI) ± Peg-IFN/RBV in treatment-naive G1 patients Week 0 12 A Telaprevir 1125 mg bid N=18 VX-222 100 mg bid* B Telaprevir 1125 mg bid N=29 VX-222 400 mg bid* Telaprevir 1125 mg bid RVR2-guided C VX-222 100 mg bid* N=29 Peg-IFN alfa-2a Peg-IFN alfa-2a RBV RBV Week 36 Telaprevir 1125 mg bid D VX-222 400 mg bid* N=30 Peg-IFN alfa-2a RBV DDI = drug-drug interaction; NNI = non-nucleoside inhibitor; Peg-IFN = peginterferon alfa; PI = protease inhibitor; RBV = ribavirin * Based on a 10 day healthy volunteer DDI study; when combined with telaprevir, VX-222 doses of 100 mg and 400 mg provide VX-222 plasma exposures equivalent to 250 mg and 750 mg bid. Nelson D, et al. AASLD 2011. Abstract LB-14. ZENITH: telaprevir (PI) + VX-222 (NNI) ± Peg-IFN/RBV in treatment-naive G1 patients Week 0 12 A Telaprevir 1125 mg bid N=18 VX-222 100 mg bid* B Telaprevir 1125 mg bid N=29 VX-222 400 mg bid* • DUAL regimens terminated Telaprevir 1125 mg bid RVR2-guided C VX-222 100 mg bid* N=29 Peg-IFN alfa-2a Peg-IFN alfa-2a RBV RBV Week 36 Telaprevir 1125 mg bid D VX-222 400 mg bid* N=30 Peg-IFN alfa-2a RBV * Based on a 10 day healthy volunteer DDI study; when combined with telaprevir, VX-222 doses of 100 mg and 400 mg provide VX-222 plasma exposures equivalent to 250 mg and 750 mg bid. Nelson D, et al. AASLD 2011. Abstract LB-14. ZENITH: telaprevir (PI) + VX-222 (NNI) ± Peg-IFN/RBV in treatment-naive G1 patients Week 0 12 A Telaprevir 1125 mg bid N=18 VX-222 100 mg bid* B Telaprevir 1125 mg bid N=29 VX-222 400 mg bid* • DUAL regimens terminated Telaprevir 1125 mg bid RVR2-guided C VX-222 100 mg bid* N=29 Peg-IFN alfa-2a Peg-IFN alfa-2a RBV RBV Week 36 Telaprevir 1125 mg bid D VX-222 400 mg bid* N=30 Peg-IFN alfa-2a RBV E/F (E G1b N=23; F G1a N=23) Telaprevir 1125 mg bid * Based on a 10 day healthy volunteer DDI study; when combined with telaprevir, VX-222 doses of 100 mg and 400 mg provide VX-222 plasma exposures equivalent to 250 mg and 750 mg bid. VX-222 400 mg bid* RBV Enrolment complete Nelson D, et al. AASLD 2011. Abstract LB-14. ZENITH: telaprevir + VX-222 ± Peg-IFN/RBV SVR12 data Arm C 100 mg VX-222 Arm D 400 mg VX-222 100 93 90 83 90 83 82 SVR12, % 80 60 40 20 24 29 27 30 9 11 14 15 15 13 0 Overall – Patients eligible for 12 weeks treatment Patients eligible for 24 weeks treatment No patient in either QUAD arm experienced viral breakthrough. However, 2 patients relapsed in Arm C (7%) and 2 patients (including 1 patient who received only 1 week of treatment) in Arm D (7%) Nelson D, et al. AASLD 2011. Abstract LB-14. MATTERHORN: study design N= 420 (70 pts/arm) IFN free: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + R F/U Triple: DNVr 100/100mg + P/R F/U A3 Quad: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + P/R F/U B1 IFN free: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + R F/U Cohort B: Null B2 Responders Quad: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + P/R F/U B3 Quad: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + P/R A1 Cohort A: Partial A2 Responders 12 Stratification by: » IL28B (CC, CT, TT) » G1a/1b P/R 24 weeks Phase 2, randomized within cohort, open-label, parallel study of 2 cohorts F/U 48 72 MATTERHORN: study design N= 420 (70 pts/arm) GT1a IFN free: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + R F/U Triple: DNVr 100/100mg + P/R F/U A3 Quad: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + P/R F/U B1 IFN free: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + R F/U Cohort B: Null B2 Responders Quad: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + P/R F/U B3 Quad: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + P/R A1 Cohort A: Partial A2 Responders Stratification by: » IL28B (CC, CT, TT) » G1a/1b GT1a 12 P/R 24 weeks Phase 2, randomized within cohort, open-label, parallel study of 2 cohorts F/U 48 72 Phase 2b SOUND-C2: BI201335 (PI) + BI207127 (NNI) ± RBV in treatment naive G1 patients BI207127 600 mg tid BI201335 120 mg qd RBV Follow-up Naive, CHC, G1 N=362 BI207127 600 mg tid BI201335 120 mg qd RBV Follow-up BI207127 600 mg tid BI201335 120 mg qd RBV BI207127 600 mg bid BI201335 120 mg qd RBV Follow-up BI207127 600 mg tid BI201335 120 mg qd Follow-up Randomization 0 16 Weeks 28 40 – Randomization stratified by HCV subtype (G1a vs G1b) and IL28B genotype (rs12979860 CC vs non-CC) – 52% of patients were male, 98% White, 38% G1a, 85% had baseline HCV RNA ≥800,000 IU/mL, 10% had compensated cirrhosis, and 25% had IL28B genotype CC Zeuzem S, et al. AASLD 2011. Abstract LB-15 SOUND-C2: preliminary SVR in treatment Arm A (16 week treatment duration, BI201335 + BI207127 + RBV in treatment naive G1 patients) (n=81) G1a Proportion of patients (%) 100 G1b 86 80 70 69 60 43 40 23 20 10 0 ETR SVR12 Relapse Zeuzem S, et al. AASLD 2011. Abstract LB-15 BMS-790052 + BMS-650032 Alone or With PegIFN/RBV in GT1 Null Responders Open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled phase IIa trial BMS-790052: NS5A polymerase inhibitor Wk 24 Prior null responders with GT1 HCV (N = 21) BMS-790052 60 mg QD + BMS-650032 600 mg BID (n = 11) Follow-up BMS-790052 60 mg QD + BMS-650032 600 mg BID + PR* (n = 10) Follow-up *PegIFN alfa-2a 180 µg/wk; weight-based RBV 1000-1200 mg/day. Lok A, et al. NEJM 2012. Wk 72 HCV RNA Levels in Groups A and B. Lok AS et al. N Engl J Med 2012;366:216-224 BMS-790052/BMS-650032 in Japanese G1b null responders: virological response Patients (%) Below LLOQ Undetectable 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Week 4 Week 8 RVR Week 12 Week 24 Post-treatment week 12 Post-treatment week 24 cEVR EOTR SVR12 SVR24 – 1 subject discontinued at Week 2; HCV RNA was undetectable after 24 weeks’ follow-up – No apparent association between detection of baseline RAVs and virological outcome LLOQ = lower limit of quantification (15 IU/mL); RAV = resistance-associated variants Chayama K, et al. Hepatology 2011; DOI:10.1002/hep.24724. PSI-7977 ELECTRON: PSI-7977 + RBV study design for treatment-naive G2/3 – – – – – Treatment-naive, non-cirrhotic, age ≥18 years HCV RNA >50,000 IU/mL Allowed concurrent methadone use Stratified by HCV genotype and IL28B genotype Randomized 1:1:1:1 into IFN sparing or IFN-free N=10 PSI-7977 + RBV + Peg-IFN N=10 PSI-7977 + RBV + Peg-IFN N=10 PSI-7977 + RBV + Peg-IFN N=10 PSI-7977 + RBV PSI-7977 + RBV SVR12 PSI-7977 + RBV 4 8 12 24 Weeks Gane EJ, et al. AASLD 2011. Abstract 34 PSI-7977 ELECTRON: IFN-free PSI-7977 + RBV achieves 100% SVR12 PSI-7977 RBV 12 weeks PEG Time, week PSI-7977 RBV 8 weeks PEG PSI-7977 RBV 4 weeks PEG PSI-7977 RBV NO PEG N %<LOD N %<LOD N %<LOD N %<LOD 2 9/11 82 7/8 88 8/9 89 8/10 80 4 11/11 100 10/10 100 9/9 100 10/10 100 8 11/11 100 10/10 100 9/9 100 10/10 100 12 11/11 100 10/10 100 9/9 100 10/10 100 Gane EJ, et al. AASLD 2011. Abstract 34 CYCLOPHILIN A IS ESSENTIAL FOR HCV REPLICATION AND IS INHIBITED BY ALISPORIVIR Replication of new viral RNA Inhibition of replication CypA CypA ALISPORIVIR NS3 NS5B NS3 NS5B NS5A NS5A NS4B NS2 Gallay PA. Clin Liver Dis 2009;13:403–417 NS4B NS2 26 Phase 2b VITAL-1: alisporivir IFN-free therapy in G2/3 treatment-naive patients Screening ALV1000 Randomization Loading RVR HCV RNA 1 week ALV 600 mg bid EVR EOTR SVR12 SVR24 36 48 ALV 1000 mg qd ALV 600 mg qd+ RBV 400 mg bid + Peg-IFN sc weekly ALV600R ALV 600 mg bid + RBV 400 mg bid ALV 600 mg qd + RBV 400 mg bid ALV 600 mg qd+ RBV 400 mg bid + Peg-IFN sc weekly ALV800R ALV 600 mg bid + RBV 400 mg bid ALV 800 mg qd + RBV 400 mg bid ALV 600 mg qd+ RBV 400 mg bid + Peg-IFN sc weekly ALV-P ALV 600 mg bid + Peg-IFN sc weekly ALV 600 mg qd + Peg-IFN 180 mg sc weekly ALV 600 mg qd+ RBV 400 mg bid + Peg-IFN sc weekly PR RBV 400 mg bid + Peg-IFN 180 mg sc weekly BL 1 Viral response defined by HCV RNA < 25 IU/mL; sc = subcutaneous injection 4 6 Week 12 24 Pawlotsky JM, et al. AASLD 2011. Abstract LB-11 Phase 2b VITAL-1: ALV IFN-free treatment maintains HCV RNA negative response to week 12 Non-RCR patients with Add-on IFN from week 6 100 80 60 ALV 1000 mg (n=22) 40 ALV 600 mg + RBV (n=30) 20 ALV 800 mg + RBV (n=37) Proportion of patients (%) Proportion of patients (%) RCR patients On IFN-free treatment 0 100% 98% 92% 100 80 60 ALV 1000 mg (n=55) 40 ALV 600 mg + RBV (n=49) 20 ALV 800 mg + RBV (n=51) 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Week Week IFN-free week 12 results: ALV1000 26%; ALV800R 37%; ALV600R 41% Add-on IFN to non-RVR patients shows rapid response Viral response by <LOQ; Analysis for patients who had Week 12 HCV RNA assessment Pawlotsky JM, et al. AASLD 2011. Abstract LB-11 Summary IFN-free therapy – All combinations in early development – SVR close to 100% in G1b – SVR 100% Genotype 2/3 patients – RBV required – Shortening of treatment – role of IL28B Polymorphisms? Outlook IFN-free therapy – If no new safety signals are detected IFN-free therapy of hepatitis C may became reality in 2015 Outlook IFN-free therapy – If no new safety signals are detected IFN-free therapy of hepatitis C may became reality in 2015 and we have reached the “holy grail” of hepatology NK cells in HCV infection and response to IFN therapy in patients with CHC NK cells and response to IFN therapy in patients with CHC Ahlenstiehl et al, Gastroenterology 2011 cellular response to HCV infection IFN production HCV IFN receptor antiviral proteins IRF-3 IRF-7 IFN responding genes virus activated kinase