Chemistry 125: Lecture 43 January 24, 2011 Solvation & Water Dissocation Brønsted Acidity Nucleophilic Substitution and its Components This For copyright notice see final page of this file The Importance of Solvent for Ionic Reactions E±Coulomb = -332.2 / dist (Å) [long-range attraction; contrast radical bonding] kcal/mol 400 300 H+ + OH- 392 (g) H+ :OH2 bonding plus close proximity 164 ! of + to eight electrons e transfer OH- (aq) similar (polarizability shifts e-cloud) H3O+ (g) etc, etc, etc 106 28 Sum = 370 18 200 100 H3O+ (aq) 100 0 -(3/4 386) 10-290 K 10 BDE HO-H 120 H2O (g) 6.3 H2O (aq) From small difference of large numbers! pKa = 15.8 21.5 H+(aq) + OH-(aq) Brønsted Acidity Substitution at Hydrogen ABN ABN AON ABN F F InMake a Solvent! Two CH2 F H :OH2 + CH2 F H H:OH Break Two OH2 CH2 CH2 H OH "E2 Elimination" Make & Break (Cf. Lecture 16) Fortunately solvation energies of analogous compounds are similar enough that we can often make reasonably accurate predictions (or confident rationalizations) of relative acidities in terms of molecular structure. When pH = pKa Why should organic chemists bother about pH and pKa, which seem like topics for general chemistry? a) Because whether a molecule is ionized or not is important for predicting reactivity (HOMO/LUMO availability), conformation, color, proximity to other species, mobility (particularly in an electric field), etc. b) Because the ease with which a species reacts with a proton might predict how readily it reacts with other LUMOs (e.g. *C-X or *C=O). [H+] [B-] Ka = [HB] [B-] pH = pKa + log [HB] = pKa, when HB is half ionized With known pKa, measure pH by measuring [B-] / [HB]. Single indicators work best over ~2.5 pH units (95:5 - 5:95). Bootstrap with overlapping indicators for wide coverage. Factors that Influence Brønsted Acidity 16 HOH 15.7 (BDE 119) 12 + H3NH 9.2 HSH 7.0 (BDE FH 3.2 (BDE 136) pKa 8 91) 4 0 + H2OH -4 -1.7 Learning from pKa Values E-Mismatch Decrease of Overlap (e-negativity difference) Ease of Heterolysis, Ka Ease of Homolysis pKa BDE H CH3 ~55 105 H NH2 ~35 108 H OH H F 16 119 3 136 H SH H Cl 7 91 ~ -3 103 H Br ~ -5 88 H I ~ -9 71 16 HOH Learning from pKa Values 15.7 12 + O H3NH 9.2 HSH 7.0 9 pKa 8 4 3.2 0 + H2OH -4 -1.7 CH3-C-CH-C-CH3 H O 4.8 FH O 2.9 CH3-COH O ClCH2-COH CH3 O H3NCH-COH + Titration of Alanine CH3 O H2NCH-CO- 12 slow 10 (buffered) 8 pH CH3 O HH H23NCH-CO+ 6 4 It requires 0.50 equivalents to change the ratio 9-fold (from 75/25 to 25/75) slow 2 CH3 O H3NCH-COH 0 (buffered) And only 0.03 equivalents to change the ratio 9-fold (from 3/100 to 1/300) But only 0.22 equivalents to change the ratio 9-fold (from 25/75 to 3/97) + 0.5 1.0 1.5 Equivalents of OH- added 2.0 Titration of Alanine 12 Then proximity of negative charge should make it ~300 times harder to remove H+ from alanine “zwitterion” than from H3N+-CH2CH3 ( ). Actually it is 5 times easier! pK2 9.87 10 8 Ar O H3NCH-COCH3 But it is 400 times harder than the corresponding ester. pH + CH3 O HH H23NCH-CO+ 6 4 pK1 2.35 (pKa 7.3) Apparently the CO2 group without charge is sufficiently electron withdrawing to destabilize the cation more than the negative charge stabilizes it. Reasonable that proximity of positive charge makes it ~300 times easier to remove H+ from alanine cation than from acetic acid (pKa 4.5) 2 CH3 O H3NCH-COH 0 CH3 O H2NCH-CO- + 0.5 1.0 1.5 Equivalents of OH- added 2.0 Approximate “pKa” Values 50 CH3-CH2CH2CH2H ~ 52 pKa * 40 CH3-C C-CH2H CH3-CH=C=CHH (best E-match C-H) _ 2 sp C (no overlap) : CH3-CH2CH=CHH ~ 44 _ 3 sp C (allylic) _ C HOMO - overlap (better E-match N-H) ~ 34 H2NH ~ 38 30 CH3-CH2C CH : ~ 25 _ sp C (no overlap) 20 16 HOH 10 (bad E-match O-H) * Values are approximate because HA1 + A2- = A1- + HA2 equilibria for bases stronger that HO- cannot be measured in water. One must “bootstrap” by comparing acid-base pairs in other solvents. 1st of 6 pages from http://evans.harvard.edu/pdf/evans_pKa_table.pdf Cf. http://research.chem.psu.edu/brpgroup/pKa_compilation.pdf Problems for Wednesday: 1) List factors that help determine pKa for an acid. 2) Choose a set of several related acids from one of the pKa Tables or from your text (inside back cover of J&F), and explain what they teach about the relative importance of these factors. 2) Explain your conclusions to at least one other class member and decide together how unambiguous your lesson is. Feel free to consult a text book and its problems or the references at the end of the Tables. Hint: this could provide a good exam question. Nucleophilic Substitution and -Elimination Chapter 7 ABN (Cf. Lecture 16) ABN AON ABN Make Two F CH2 F H :OH F CH3 :OH CH2 H :OH Break Two CH2 F FH OH F CH3 OH "E2 Elimination" CH H OH "SN2 Substitution" 2 "Acid-Base" Same Make & Break All are Nucleophilic Generalization Substitution Williamson Ether Synthesis (1852) * EtBr + + O- Na HOMO + OEt + Na Br LUMO Finkelstein Reaction (1910) acetone * + + RCl Na I also RBr RI + Na+ Cl- () Na+ Br - Exchange Ions (Double Decomposition) Menschutkin Reaction (1890) + * Et3N + RI Et3N-R + I- Create Ions Meerwein Reagent (1940s) * + (CH ) O BF + + 3 3 4 RO Na Destroy Ions Solvolysis * (CH3)3C-Br EtOH ROCH3 + (CH3)3O + Na+ BF4 (CH3)3C-OEt + HBr Breaking apart by solvent Generality of Nucleophilic Substitution Solvent Nu: R-L Nucleophile Substrate But there are different mechanisms! + METHIONINE Substitute NHR2 for SR2 at C L Product Leaving Group Substitute SR2 for “OH” at C + OH CH3 ARGININE H Nu-R - : + (-) (+) RIBOSE Substitute Biological Methylation Base for NR3 (Protein Modification by Methyl etc.) at Transferase, H H OH ADENINE Substitute ADENOSINE NR2 for “OH” at C S-Adenosylmethionine End of Lecture 43 Jan. 24, 2011 Copyright © J. M. McBride 2011. Some rights reserved. Except for cited third-party materials, and those used by visiting speakers, all content is licensed under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0). Use of this content constitutes your acceptance of the noted license and the terms and conditions of use. Materials from Wikimedia Commons are denoted by the symbol . Third party materials may be subject to additional intellectual property notices, information, or restrictions. The following attribution may be used when reusing material that is not identified as third-party content: J. M. McBride, Chem 125. License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0