Sexualities & Higher Education October 30th, 2006. Why study sexuality? Sexuality is a significant political and public issue as well as a private concern ‘Sex’ refers to biological differences between being male and being female – genetic and physiological make-up. ‘Sexuality’ refers to one’s sexual desires and participation in sex acts. This is understood as a cultural process. Theorizing Sexuality Social Constructionism Essentialism Social Constructionism Sexuality is socially constructed: sexuality (i.e., promiscuity, homosexuality, flirting, polygamy, sexual attractiveness and sexual explicitness in the media) is expressed and organized in a variety of ways across different societies, classes, gender and ethnicities. They ask… Why and how does our culture privilege one form of sexuality (say heterosexuality) and marginalize others? Why does our culture attach such importance to sexuality and how has this come about? Social constructionists recognize that social context (culture and history) affects how we express and organize sexuality. Jeffrey Weeks no natural meaning is inherent to sexuality sexuality gains meaning through social interaction no fixed meaning can be attached to sexuality, or to how people perceive "their own" sexuality sexuality is interwoven with discourses of gender, class, race, and other social categories Essentialism Sexuality = biology or natural instinct an inner truth or essence is explained by psychic drive and impulse is fixed and unchanging there is normal sexuality and deviant sexes How people become sexualized Kinship/family system Economic and social changes Control, surveillance and policing shifted from the Church to medical and social workers, psychiatrists and the welfare state Political interventions industrialization and urbanization affect sexual behaviour and attitudes Social regulation social rules about marriage and incest Interventions in sexual life reflect current balance of social and political forces Identities and cultures of resistance A history of opposition and resistance to moral codes; i.e., social struggle and activism, not imposed sexual identities upon minority groups Question… In what ways do social institutions create and reproduce heterosexuality for women & men? Sexuality & Deviant Behaviour Homosexuality ‘new’ term It’s always been around - for example: Greeks (Men’s relationships with younger men) Victorian Age (Women’s close relationships with other women) Homosexuality deemed deviant to protect the interests of dominant elite Compulsory Heterosexuality A term used by Adrienne Rich 1986 heterosexuality is imposed, managed, organized, propagandized, and maintained by society. women receive messages every day that promote heterosexual normativity in the form of myths and norms perpetuated by society. Institutional Issues Macro perspective – structural inequalities Does the university curriculum adequately address the needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans & queer students? Course Content Visibility Resources Facilities Administration Course Content Do university courses properly incorporate material & research concerning sexual diversity? How many students here have learned about Queer Theory? Course Content: Issues relating to GLBTQ people should be formally and permanently integrated into existing courses across the curriculum Visibility Is homosexuality treated as invisible or visible? How many guest speakers have you had that talk about GLBTQ issues? Visibility: Guest Speakers: Speakers on GLBTQ topics, and particularly those who present scholarly research on GLBTQ topics, should be brought to campus regularly. A visiting scholar position in GLBTQ studies should be created and supported on a continuing basis Resources Are there adequate resources on campus for research concerning GLBTQ issues? Resources - Libraries: College and university libraries should increase their holdings of GLBTQ books, periodicals, and computer networking systems Facilities How ‘tolerant’ is your university? Campus Facilities: Should be available for regional GLBTQ studies conferences, with administrative support provided. Safe spaces An archive and history of GLBTQ organizations on campus should be created. Administration Are there research opportunities for queer researchers? Is there funding? Administration: Fellowship opportunities should be created and funded for teaching and research of GLBTQ topics. Scholarship and research into GLBTQ history, culture, and theory should be encouraged and supported in faculty and students Tolerance Tolerance implies reluctant and limited acceptance, acceptance granted by those in power, acceptance conditioned on good behavior, rather than full unconditional participation negotiated on principles of justice and equity. (They are always in my face) Tolerance continues to be the predominant response of the mainstream to challenges from oppressed and marginalized communities. This is true in our communities both on and off campus. What’s wrong with ‘tolerance’? Discrimination Takes many forms it exists between and within individuals, and across institutions and cultures. It is most commonly referred to as homophobia and heterosexism. It is manifested through the denial of human rights, through the violence and verbal abuse experienced on a daily basis. Heterosexism The assumption by individuals, institutions, and societal customs that everyone is heterosexual. It is the belief that the normal, natural, healthy, mature way for humans to bond sexually, affectionally, and emotionally is with a partner of the opposite sex. Heterosexism is the systemic and social promotion of heterosexuality, and the simultaneous stigmatization of all other sexual orientations (lesbian, gay, bisexuality) Phobias Lesbophobia/Homophobia: The conscious or unconscious hatred and irrational fear of lesbians and gay men. Based in a belief system and set of priorities that asserts heterosexuality is “normal” and superior, and that lesbianism and homosexuality is deviant, abnormal, criminal or sinful. Lesbophobic/homophobic feelings can be described as fear, hatred, and disgust. Bi-phobia: The conscious or unconscious hatred or irrational fear of bisexual men and women, which is experienced in the heterosexual and lesbian and gay communities. Transphobia: The fear and hatred of cross dressers, transsexuals, transgenderists and other forms of gender benders. Typically demonstrated through disrespect, denial of rights and needs, sometimes involves harassment and violence. Heterocentrism is an (often subconscious) assumption that everyone is heterosexual, and the attitudes associated with that assumption As a result, LGBTQ people have been forced into conforming to a heterocentric model, an experience that has had far reaching effect on their well-being What does heterosexism look like in the classroom? Lack of inclusion (in curriculum, silence, invisibility) The one-off “exotic” lecture hetero-centric content In class discussion is managed poorly by instructor/faculty Students Homophobic comments in classroom by students Being shunned by others – ignored etc Risk of violence towards them on campus – gay-bashing Defacing positive space posters Anti-gay Graffiti on campus What happens if your professor is homophobic? What if you’re opening out – how will this influence the relationship? Example Another example… Statistics Involving LGBTQ Students The Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network’s (GLSEN) 2003 National School Climate Survey: 84% of LGBT students reported being verbally harassed because of their sexual orientation; 91.5% of LGBT students reported hearing homophobic remarks such as “faggot,” “dyke,” or the expression, “that’s so gay,” frequently or often; 82.9% of LGBT students reported that faculty never intervened or intervened only some of the time when present and homophobic remarks were made; 39.1 % of LGBT students reported being physically harassed because of their sexual orientation; 57.9% of LGBT students reported having property stolen or deliberately damaged at school 64.3% of LGBT students reported feeling unsafe at their school because of their sexual orientation; Faculty Homosexuality is still treated as deviant or a psychiatric illness, with associated stereotypes of gay people as “dangerous” or “promiscuous”. Discrimination - where gay teachers have been unfairly associated with being poor role models or even sexually motivated towards the impressionable people in their charge Losing credibility with students and other faculty members because of your sexuality For faculty members who are partnered, there may not be proper insurance benefits in place Others? What about U of T? LGBTQ – Jude Tate coordinator http://lgbtq.sa.utoronto.ca Student Climate Survey: to gain information and insight into the climate and environment perceived, felt and experienced by LGBTQ graduate and undergraduate students on all 3 campuses at U of T Survey says… Students reported: experiencing derogatory remarks pressure to be silent about their sexual orientation/gender identity direct or indirect threats Other students were the largest source of this harassment 44% of respondents reported the climate uncomfortable 63% of respondents are visible minorities Student Experiences Derogatory notes, graffiti, email messages or web sites Homophobic/anti-gay comments, in class or elsewhere Verbal or physical harassment Defacement or tearing down of posters, including Positive Space posters Threats or actual assault by a known or unknown perpetrator, including a same-sex date or domestic partner Any act that makes you feel uncomfortable around issues of sexual orientation or gender identity. Aims of LGBTQ: The challenge is educating faculty, staff and students on how to implement practices that endorse, encourage and establish consistent messages and behaviours supporting an environment that is inclusive, moving beyond intolerance and tolerance to acceptance Increase the teaching skills and standards of faculty to improve handling of queer material and address sexualities in the classroom Address the reluctant and or resistant learner Develop capacities for student peers to raise homophobia and heterosexism in the classroom Put into practice what the policies frame Some questions to think about To what extent are schools responsible for maintaining and therefore addressing homophobic attitudes and structures in society? What is the connection between gender and compulsory heterosexuality? How does sexuality relate to other categories of oppression such as class, race and disability? Who should be the focus of anti-homophobic educational initiatives? How should schools address the rights of religious groups when they conflict with the rights of sexual minorities? Why is it important that school curriculum, resources, programs and services reflect and address the needs and experiences of gay, lesbian and bisexual students? What is the cost of not doing so? What are the pros and cons associated with providing a separate education for gay, lesbian and bisexual youth?