CITR Annual Islet Report Exhibits Collaborative Transplant Registry (CITR) 2009 Annual Report Exhibits Prepared by: CITR Coordinating Center The EMMES Corporation Rockville, MD Sponsored by: National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases National Institutes of Health Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Datafile Closure: April 1, 2009 Insulin Dependent 46.5 Insulin Independent 17.6 No Graft Function 20.8 No Data 15.0 Insulin Dependent 37.9 Insulin Independent 25.9 No Graft Function 21.6 No Data 14.5 Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry 2009. Follow-up time after initial infusion for each recipient. Top: islet after kidney (N=65), bottom: islet alone (N=347). Yellow: insulin independence; green: insulin-using with graft function (70% average reduction in daily insulin use from baseline); black: no islet function; gray: missing data. Red marks indicate reinfusions. Pie charts show percent of all follow-up time with insulin independence. Table of Contents Chapter 1: Islet Transplant Activity Chapter 2: Recipient and Donor Characteristics Chapter 3: Pancreas Procurement, Islet Processing, and Infusion Characteristics Chapter 4: Immunosuppression and Other Medications Chapter 5: Graft Function Chapter 6: Liver, Kidney, Lipid, and PRA Effects Chapter 7: Adverse Events Chapter 8: Registry Data Quality Review CITR Coordinating Center CITR Committees Chapter 1: Islet Transplant Activity Islet Transplant Centers Reporting Data to CITR: Participating North American Centers 1999-2008 A - CITR Centers with at least one islet allograft infusion procedure conducted in 2008 C - CITR Centers with no islet allograft infusions in 2008 D - CITR Coordinating Center Islet Transplant Centers Reporting Data to CITR Participating European Centers 1999-2008 A - CITR Centers with at least one islet allograft infusion procedure conducted in 2008 B - CITR Centers with data reports pending Islet Transplant Centers Reporting Data to CITR Participating Australian Centers 1999-2008 A - CITR Centers with at least one islet allograft infusion procedure conducted in 2008 C - CITR Centers with no islet allograft infusions in 2008 Number of Islet Transplantation Centers Performing Islet Allografts per Year and Number with Data Entered in CITR Database All North American Islet Transplant Centers 1999-2008 Number of Centers 25 23 20 20 16 20 16 15 16 14 11 15 11 10 9 10 6 15 14 9 6 5 2 0 1999-2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 All North American Centers Performing Islet Allografts (N=32) CITR-Participating Centers with Data Entered (N=27) 2008 Total Number of Islet Allograft Recipients, Recipients at CITR-Participating Centers, and Recipients with Detailed Data Reported to CITR by Year of First Islet Allograft Infusion All North American Islet Transplant Centers 1999-2008 90 82 Number of Recipients 80 75 71 70 65 58 60 53 50 45 44 40 30 20 45 45 38 37 36 55 41 36 32 31 30 30 30 28 25 20 19 19 15 10 0 1999-2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 All North American Recipients (N=408) All North American CITR Recipients (N=368) Recipients with Detailed Data Reported to CITR (N=329) The Islet Transplant Summary (ITS) questionnaire is completed by all North American Islet Transplant Programs regardless of their participation in the Registry. Of 46 North American islet transplant programs polled, all have provided this information through 2007. Total Number of Islet Allograft Recipients and Recipients with Detailed Data Reported to CITR by Year of First Islet Allograft Infusion CITR-Participating European and Australian JDRF Centers 1999-2008 40 Number of Procedures 36 35 30 25 25 23 22 21 20 16 15 13 12 13 12 10 10 5 17 16 7 11 7 4 1 0 1999-2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 All European and Australian CITR Recipients (N=183) Recipients with Detailed Data Reported to CITR (N=83) 2007 2008 Total Number of Islet Allograft Infusion Procedures Performed and Number with Data Reported to CITR CITR-Participating North American Islet Transplant Centers 1999-2008 Number of Procedures 160 142 132 125 140 120 110 106 100 125 113109 91 88 95 87 78 80 60 40 50 50 66 65 65 64 63 49 51 49 42 34 34 31 20 0 1999-2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 All Infusions for North American Recipients (N=783) All Infusions for North American CITR Recipients (N=694) Infusions with Data Reported to CITR (N=637) 2007 2008 Total Number of Islet Allograft Infusion Procedures Performed and Number with Data Reported to CITR CITR-Participating European and Australian JDRF Centers 1999-2008 Number of Procedures 60 50 52 50 43 42 38 40 34 30 32 29 27 28 24 27 22 23 20 12 10 12 9 4 0 1999-2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 All Infusions for European and Australian CITR Recipients (N=326) Infusions with Data Reported to CITR (N=182) 2008 Total Number (N=828) of Islet Allograft Infusion Procedures Conducted and Entered in CITR Database, by Year and Infusion Procedure Number CITR-Participating North American and JDRF Centers, 1999-2008 Number of Islet Infusions 150 141 137 135 115 120 111 105 94 90 72 75 60 45 56 53 40 30 9 15 0 1999-2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 First infusion Second Infusion Third Infusion Fourth Infusion 2006 2007 2008 2009 Number (N=828) of Islet Allograft Infusion Procedures Per Recipient: CITR-Participating North American and JDRF Centers, 1999-2008 Number of Recipients 220 202 200 180 160 140 120 107 95 100 80 60 40 20 8 0 1 2 3 4 Total Number of Infusions Received Islet Alone Recipients Islet After Kidney Recipients Number of Islet Allograft Infusions Total Number (N=905) of Deceased Donors per Islet Allograft Infusion Procedure CITR-Participating North American and JDRF Centers, 1999-2008 800 750 700 650 600 550 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 754 71 3 1 2 3 Total Number of Donors Received Islet Alone and Islet After Kidney Recipients CITR-Participating North American and JDRF Centers, 1999-2008 Islet Alone 347 Islet After Kidney 65 Chapter 2: Recipient and Donor Characteristics Recipient Demographics Transplant Recipient Primary Funding Information CITR-Participating US Centers Recipient Characteristics at First Infusion Recipient Diabetes Characteristics at First Infusion Recipient Autoantibodies at First Infusion Recipient Infectious Disease Testing at First Infusion Recipient Characteristics at First Infusion by Total Number of Infusions Received Recipient Demographics and Characteristics at First Infusion by Total Number of Infusions Received Recipient Laboratory Values at First Infusion Donor Demographics All Allograft Donors Donor Characteristics All Allograft Donors Donor Characteristics All Allograft Donors (continued) Characteristics of Organ Procurement and Donor Cause of Death All Allograft Donors Treatments Given to Donor During Hospitalization All Allograft Donors Treatments Given to Donor During Hospitalization All Allograft Donors (continued) Donor Serology All Allograft Donors Donor Laboratory Data All Allograft Donors Organ Crossmatch Results All Allograft Donors Chapter 3: Pancreas Procurement, Islet processing and Infusion Characteristics Pancreas Procurement and Islet Processing Pancreas Procurement and Islet Processing (continued) Cold Ischemia Information Islet Equivalents and Timing of Count Islet Product Characterization Islet Product and Infusion Characteristics by Infusion Sequence Univariate Analysis of Islet Characteristics by Pancreas Preservation Method Significant Relationships (p<0.05) between Islet Outcomes and Categorical Predictors Univariate Analysis Significant Relationships (p<0.05) between Islet Outcomes and Categorical Predictors Univariate Analysis (continued) Significant Relationships (p<0.05) between Islet Outcomes and Categorical Predictors Univariate Analysis (continued) Significant Relationships (p<0.05) between Islet Outcomes and Categorical Predictors Univariate Analysis (continued) Univariate Correlation of Islet Characteristics with Donor, Recovery, and Processing Characteristics Univariate Correlation of Islet Characteristics with Donor, Recovery, and Processing Characteristics (continued) Univariate Correlation of Islet Characteristics with Donor, Recovery, and Processing Characteristics (continued) Univariate Correlation of Islet Characteristics with Donor, Recovery, and Processing Characteristics (continued) Pre Infusion Portal Pressure by Infusion Sequence 30 25 mmHg 20 15 10 5 0 348 248 77 1 2 3 Infusion Sequence Peak Portal Pressure by Infusion Sequence 40 mmHg 30 20 10 0 328 239 75 1 2 3 Infusion Sequence Values greater than 40 mmHg are not displayed (One at infusion 1) Closure Portal Pressure by Infusion Sequence 40 mmHg 30 20 10 0 343 246 1 76 2 Infusion Sequence 3 Change from Pre Infusion to Closure Portal Pressure by Infusion Sequence 20 15 mmHg 10 5 0 -5 340 245 1 2 75 -10 Infusion Sequence Values greater than 20 mmHg are not displayed (One at infusion 1) 3 Change from Pre Infusion to Peak Portal Pressure by Infusion Sequence 20 15 mmHg 10 5 0 327 237 1 2 72 -5 -10 Infusion Sequence Values greater than 20 mmHg are not displayed (One at infusion 1) 3 Cell Volume Infused per Infusion by Infusion Year 16.0 Cell Volume (mL) 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 15 1999 24 2000 49 2001 121 2002 95 91 120 83 2003 2004 2005 2006 Infusion Year This graph represents either settled or packed cell volumes depending on center procedure. Higher volumes typically represent unpacked cells. 46 2007 50 2008 IEQs Infused per Infusion by Infusion Year 1250000 1000000 IEQs 750000 500000 250000 0 15 24 50 123 106 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 104 134 93 55 65 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Infusion Year Values greater than 1250000 are not displayed (One at 2005) Chapter 4: Immunosuppression and other Medications Immunosuppression Regimen at Time of First Infusion Immunosuppression Regimen at Time of First Infusion (continued) Biologic Agents Used Peri First Infusion for Induction Therapy Biologic Agents Used Peri First Infusion for Induction Therapy Year of 1s t I nf us i on 07- 08 67 41 16 05- 06 111 88 30 03- 04 100 86 36 01- 02 115 62 9 99- 00 19 1 13 2 I nf us i on Sequenc e Ant i CD3* Ant i I L2Al one Ant i I L2+DSG Ant i I L2+TNFB MonoTCDAl one 4 3 MonoTCD+Ant i I L2/ TNFB Pol y TCD al one Pol y TCD+TNFB Pol y TCD+AI L2( +/ - TNFB) Unr epor t ed Induction immunosuppression combinations given to allograft recipients, according to infusion sequence (horizontal axis), and transplantation era (1999-2000, 01-02. etc, perspective axis). Substantial shifts away from Anti-IL2 alone (blue) to other combinations is evident in recent time periods. Immunosuppression Therapy Use at Specified Times Post Last Infusion Allograft Recipients without Reported Graft Failure at the Time of Follow-Up Immunosuppression Therapy Use at Specified Times Post Last Infusion Allograft Recipients without Reported Graft Failure at the Time of Follow-Up (continued) Maintenance Immunosuppression Therapy Use Post Initial Infusion by Transplantation Era Year of 1st I nf usi on 07- 08 67 50 39 5 05- 06 111 111 111 111 75 6 03- 04 100 100 100 100 100 91 46 01- 02 115 115 115 115 115 115 113 99- 00 19 0 19 6 Cal ci Cal ci Cal ci mTOR 19 19 19 12 24 36 48 Mont hs Post Fi r st I nf usi on neur i nI nh+mTOR neur i nI nh+I nosi neI nh ner i nI nh+mTOR+I nosi neI nh Al one/ +I nosi neI nh/ +St er oi d 19 19 60 Al l Ot her Combi nat i ons Gr af t Fai l ur e No Dat a Maintenance immunosuppression combinations given to allograft recipients, according to time (months from initial infusion, horizontal axis), and transplantation era (1999-2000, 01-02. etc, perspective axis). The total number expected at each follow-up time point is accounted for. Complete graft loss trumps any immunosuppression. Substantial shifts away from the Calcineurin+mTOR combination (yellow) to other combinations is evident from the start in recent time periods )2007-2008), as well as among those infused in earlier eras (e.g., 2001-2006) and still on immunosuppression at long-term follow-up (2-5 years). Sirolimus Trough (ng/mL) Sirolimus Recipient Trough Level (ng/mL) Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 292 Inf 1 218 Inf 2 66 225 178 113 71 37 Inf 3 Month 6Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Day 30 Day 30 Day 30 Follow-Up Values greater than 60 ng/mL are not displayed (One at inf 1 day 30 and one at inf 3 day 30) Tacrolimus Trough (ng/mL) Tacrolimus Recipient Trough Level (ng/mL) Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 301 Inf 1 222 Inf 2 69 238 206 142 87 57 Inf 3 Month 6Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Day 30 Day 30 Day 30 Follow-Up Anti-Hypertensive Medications Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients Total Number of Anti-Hypertensive Medications Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients Percent of Recipients 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Infusion 1 Month 6 Year 1 Total Number of Medications Year 2 Year 3 4 3 2 1 Year 4 Lipid Lowering Medications Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients Total Number of Lipid Lowering Medications Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients Percent of Recipients 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Infusion 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Total Number of Medications Year 3 2 1 Visit Year 4 Adjunctive Therapy Used at Time of First Infusion All Allograft Recipients Antibiotics Antifungals Antivirals Aspirin Enoxaparin Iron Supplements Metformin Nicotinamide Ondansetron Hydrochloride Pantoprazole Pentoxifylline Pioglitazone Rosiglitizone Vitamins 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Percent of Recipients 70 80 90 100 Adjunctive Therapy Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients Chapter 5: Graft Function Insulin Independence, Insulin Dependence, Absence of Fasting C-peptide, or Re-Infusion Post First Infusion A. Islet Alone Recipients 80 Percent of Recipients 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Day 30 N=347 Recipient Status Day 75 N=346 Month 6 N=328 Year 1 N=318 Year 3* N=257 Re-Infused Prior to Follow-Up Insulin Independent Insulin Dependent with Detectable Fasting C-peptide No Detectable Fasting C-peptide or Known Graft Loss Missing Data *Year 3 status regardless of re-infusion Insulin Independence, Insulin Dependence, Absence of Fasting C-peptide, or Re-Infusion Post First Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 80 Percent of Recipients 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Day 30 N=65 Recipient Status Day 75 N=65 Month 6 N=65 Year 1 N=61 Year 3* N=47 Re-Infused Prior to Follow-Up Insulin Independent Insulin Dependent with Detectable Fasting C-peptide No Detectable Fasting C-peptide or Known Graft Loss Missing Data *Year 3 status regardless of re-infusion Insulin Independence, Insulin Dependence or Absence of Fasting C-peptide Post Last Infusion A. Islet Alone Recipients 70 Percent of Recipients 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Month 6 N=314 Recipient Status Year 1 N=298 Year 2 N=266 Year 3 N=216 Year 4 N=155 Insulin Independent Insulin Dependent with Detectable Fasting C-peptide No Detectable Fasting C-peptide or Known Graft Loss Missing Data Insulin Independence, Insulin Dependence or Absence of Fasting C-peptide Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 70 Percent of Recipients 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Month 6 N=63 Recipient Status Year 1 N=59 Year 2 N=49 Year 3 N=42 Year 4 N=35 Insulin Independent Insulin Dependent with Detectable Fasting C-peptide No Detectable Fasting C-peptide or Known Graft Loss Missing Data Insulin Independence, Insulin Dependence, or Absence of Fasting C-peptide Post Last Infusion by Total Number of Infusions Received Islet Alone Recipients A. Recipients of 1 Infusion 70 Percent of Recipients 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Month 6 N=81 Recipient Status Year 1 N=77 Year 2 N=63 Year 3 N=48 Year 4 N=37 Insulin Independent Insulin Dependent with Detectable Fasting C-peptide No Detectable Fasting C-peptide or Known Graft Loss Missing Data Insulin Independence, Insulin Dependence, or Absence of Fasting C-peptide Post Last Infusion by Total Number of Infusions Received Islet Alone Recipients B. Recipients of 2 Infusions 70 Percent of Recipients 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Month 6 N=155 Recipient Status Year 1 N=147 Year 2 N=133 Year 3 N=112 Year 4 N=77 Insulin Independent Insulin Dependent with Detectable Fasting C-peptide No Detectable Fasting C-peptide or Known Graft Loss Missing Data Insulin Independence, Insulin Dependence, or Absence of Fasting C-peptide Post Last Infusion by Total Number of Infusions Received Islet Alone Recipients C. Recipients of 3 Infusions 70 Percent of Recipients 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Month 6 N=78 Recipient Status Year 1 N=74 Year 2 N=70 Year 3 N=56 Year 4 N=41 Insulin Independent Insulin Dependent with Detectable Fasting C-peptide No Detectable Fasting C-peptide or Known Graft Loss Missing Data Prevalence of Insulin Independence Post Last Infusion Islet Alone Recipients 70 Percent Insulin Independent 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Months Post Last Infusion Best Case Reported Worst Case Prevalence of Insulin Independence Post Last Infusion By Total Number of Infusions Received Islet Alone Recipients 70 Percent Insulin Independent 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Months Post Last Infusion Total Number of Infusions Received One Two Three+ Achievement of Insulin Independence Persistence of Insulin Independence Allograft Recipients Achieving Insulin Independence Average Daily Insulin (Units) Baseline and Post Last Infusion A. Islet Alone Recipients Average Daily Insulin Use (Units) 100 80 60 40 20 0 330 279 Pre Infusion 1 Month 6 258 221 171 114 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Average Daily Insulin (Units) Taken By Recipients on Insulin Baseline and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients Average Daily Insulin Use (Units) 100 80 60 40 20 0 62 51 Pre Infusion 1 Month 6 48 Year 1 38 Year 2 Follow-Up 32 23 Year 3 Year 4 Average Daily Insulin (Units/Kg) Baseline and Post Last Infusion A. Islet Alone Recipients Average Daily Insulin Use (Units/kg) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 326 279 Pre Infusion 1 Month 6 258 221 170 114 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Average Daily Insulin (Units/Kg) Baseline and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients Average Daily Insulin Use (Units/kg) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 60 51 Pre Infusion 1 Month 6 48 38 32 23 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Percent of Baseline Insulin Follow-Up Post Last Infusion A. Islet Alone Recipients Percent of Recipients 100 80 60 40 20 0 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=314 N=298 N=266 N=216 N=155 0% <25% 25-49% 50-74% >=75% Missing Data Percent of Baseline Insulin Follow-Up Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients Percent of Recipients 100 80 60 40 20 0 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=63 N=59 N=49 N=42 N=35 0% <25% 25-49% 50-74% >=75% Missing Data Complete Islet Graft Failure Post Last Infusion A. Islet Alone Recipients 100 90 Percent of Recipients 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Day 30 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 N=347 N=314 N=298 N=266 N=216 Complete Graft Failure Missing Data Graft Function Year 4 N=155 Complete Islet Graft Failure Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 100 90 Percent of Recipients 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Day 30 Month 6 Year 1 N=65 N=63 N=59 Year 2 N=49 Year 3 N=42 Complete Graft Failure Missing Data Graft Function Year 4 N=35 Persistence of Graft Function All Allograft Recipients Outcomes Post First Infusion Outcomes Post Second Infusion Outcomes Post Third Infusion Primary Outcomes Post First Infusion Up to Re-Infusion, Complete Islet Failure, or Last Follow-Up According to Pre-Infusion Recipient, Donor, Procurement, and Islet Characteristics Islet Alone Recipients Primary Outcomes Post First Infusion Up to Re-Infusion, Complete Islet Failure, or Last Follow-Up According to Pre-Infusion Recipient, Donor, Procurement, and Islet Characteristics Islet Alone Recipients (continued) Primary Outcomes Post First Infusion Up to Re-Infusion, Complete Islet Failure, or Last Follow-Up According to Pre-Infusion Recipient, Donor, Procurement, and Islet Characteristics Islet Alone Recipients (continued) Primary Outcomes Post First Infusion Up to Re-Infusion, Complete Islet Failure, or Last Follow-Up According to Pre-Infusion Recipient, Donor, Procurement, and Islet Characteristics Islet Alone Recipients (continued) Primary Outcomes Post First Infusion Up to Re-Infusion, Complete Islet Failure, or Last Follow-Up According to Pre-Infusion Recipient, Donor, Procurement, and Islet Characteristics Islet Alone Recipients (continued) Primary Outcomes Post First Infusion Up to Re-Infusion, Complete Islet Failure, or Last Follow-Up According to Pre-Infusion Recipient, Donor, Procurement, and Islet Characteristics Islet Alone Recipients (continued) Primary Outcomes Post First Infusion Up to Re-Infusion, Complete Islet Failure, or Last Follow-Up According to Pre-Infusion Recipient, Donor, Procurement, and Islet Characteristics Islet Alone Recipients (continued) Achievement of Insulin Independence Post First Infusion Forest Plot (Hazard Ratio ± 95% Confidence Interval) Of Factors Univariately Significant p < 0.10 Factors -1 Recipient gender (0=M 1=F) Baseline daily insulin use (Units) Baseline weight (10-kg) Baseline BMI Baseline number of daily insulin injections Baseline HbA1c (%) Baseline fasting glucose (mg/dL) Donor race (0=W 1=Non-white) Donor(s) blood type (1=A,B,AB 2=O) Donor(s) given vasopressors (0=N 1=Y) Donor(s) given steroids (0=N 1=Y) Donor(s) weight (10-kg) Donor(s) BSA Donor(s) BMI Procurement/infusion teams (0-Unrelated 1-Related) Gradient type Donor(s)-recipient age difference (x10-yrs) Donor(s)-recipient BMI difference (x10) Donor(s) CMV+ / Recipient CMV- (0=N 1=Y) Death to pancreas recovery (hrs) Cold ischemia time (hrs) Islet Viability (%) Viability > 87% (0=N 1=Y) T otal IEQs at time of islet count (1000s) T otal volume infused over all infusions (ml) Cumulative IEQs infused (1000s) Cumulative IEQs infused/kg recipient (100s) Anti-CD3 Etanercept 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 2 4 8 Loss of Insulin Independence Post First Infusion Forest Plot (Hazard Ratio ± 95% Confidence Interval) Of Factors Univariately Significant p < 0.10 Factors -1 Cohort 1999-2004/05-08 Diabetes Duration (years) Baseline HbA1c (%) Baseline C-peptide (ng/mL) Donor(s) Hispanic (0=N 1=Y) Donor(s) ET OH (0=N 1=Y) Donor(s) given vasopressors (0=N 1=Y) Donor(s) insulin (0=N 1=Y) Donor(s) AST Donor(s) ALT Procurement/infusion teams (0-Unrelated 1-Related) Processing/infusion center (0-Unrelated 1-Related) Cultured >6 hrs (0=N 1=Y) Culture time (hrs) Genders match (0=N 1=Y) Cold ischemia time (hrs) Stimulation index Stimulation index <2/2-3.5/>=3.5 T otal beta cells/kg donor T otal insulin content of islets T otal endotoxin infused T otal endotoxin infused/kg donor T otal volume infused over all infusions (ml) Anti-Il2 Daclizumab Sirolimus Poly or mono T -cell AB + calc inh + (mtor OR inosine) Monoclonal anti-IL2R + calc inh + (mtor OR inosine) 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 2 4 8 Complete Islet Failure Post First Infusion Forest Plot (Hazard Ratio ± 95% Confidence Interval) Of Factors Univariately Significant p < 0.10 Factors -1 Recipient age (years) Diabetes Duration (years) Baseline BMI Years intensive therapy Intensive therapy <10/10-25/>=25 yrs Baseline HbA1c (%) Baseline GAD 65 AABs (0,1) Baseline IA-2 AABs (0,1) Baseline insulin AABs (0,1) Baseline total positive AABs (0,1,2,3) Donor race (0=W 1=Non-white) Donor(s) insulin (0=N 1=Y) Processing/infusion ctr (0-Unrelated 1-Related) Cultured >6 hrs (0=N 1=Y) Culture time (hrs) Donor(s)-recipient age difference (x10-yrs) T otal beta cells/kg donor IEQ/islet particle ratio Isletsize (0-small 1-large) T NF blocker Etanercept Calcineurin inhibitor T acrolimus MonoAntiIL2R+T NFa+CalcInh+mT OR/inosine 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 2 4 8 Reinfusion Post First Infusion Forest Plot (Hazard Ratio ± 95% Confidence Interval) Of Factors Univariately Significant p < 0.10 Factors -1 Cohort 1999-2004/05-08 Recipient gender (0=M 1=F) Baseline daily insulin use (Units) Baseline weight (10-kg) Baseline use of insulin pump (0=N 1=Y) Baseline HbA1c (%) Donor age (x10 yrs) Donor(s) blood type (1=A,B,AB 2=O) Donor(s) ET OH (0=N 1=Y) Donor(s) insulin (0=N 1=Y) Donor(s) weight (10-kg) Donor(s) BSA Donor(s) BMI Donor(s) serum lipase Any positive crossmatch (0=N 1=Y) Collagenase (1=Liberase alone 2=Other) Donor(s)-recipient age difference (x10-yrs) Donor(s)-recipient BMI difference (x10) Recipient insulin day 0 (0=N 1=Y) Death to pancreas recovery (hrs) Recovery to transplant (hrs) Death to cross-clamp (hrs) Death to transplant (hrs) Islet Viability (%) Viability > 87% (0=N 1=Y) T otal beta cells (1000s) T otal beta cells/kg donor Endotoxin/kg <0.6/.06-3.0/>=3.0 T otal IEQs at time of islet count (1000s) T otal volume infused over all infusions (ml) Cumulative IEQs infused (1000s) Cumulative IEQs infused/kg recipient (100s) IEQ/islet particle ratio Poly T -cell depleting Rabbit thymoglobulin Anti-Il2 Daclizumab Anti-CD3 T NF blocker Infliximab Etanercept Calcineurin inhibitor T acrolimus Sirolimus or Everolimus Sirolimus Inosine: MMF or mycophenolic acid MMF Prednisone, Methylprednisolone, or other steroid Poly/mono T -cell AB + CalcInh + mT OR/nosine) Poly/mono T -cell AB + T NF-a + CalcInh + mT OR/Inosine Monoclonal anti-IL2R + calc inh + (mtor OR inosine) 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 2 4 8 Primary Outcomes Post Last Infusion According to Pre-Infusion Recipient, Donor, Procurement, and Islet Characteristics Primary Outcomes Post Last Infusion According to Pre-Infusion Recipient, Donor, Procurement, and Islet Characteristics (continued) Primary Outcomes Post Last Infusion According to Pre-Infusion Recipient, Donor, Procurement, and Islet Characteristics (continued) Primary Outcomes Post Last Infusion According to Pre-Infusion Recipient, Donor, Procurement, and Islet Characteristics (continued) Primary Outcomes Post Last Infusion According to Pre-Infusion Recipient, Donor, Procurement, and Islet Characteristics (continued) Primary Outcomes Post Last Infusion According to Pre-Infusion Recipient, Donor, Procurement, and Islet Characteristics (continued) Achievement of Insulin Independence Post Last Infusion Forest Plot (Hazard Ratio ± 95% Confidence Interval) of Factors Univariately Significant p < 0.10 Factors Baseline HbA1c (%) Donor(s) Hispanic (0=N 1=Y) Donor race (0=W 1=Non-white) Donor(s) ET OH (0=N 1=Y) Donor(s) given steroids (0=N 1=Y) Donor(s) height (cm) Donor(s) creatinine Donor(s) BUN Procurement/infusion teams (0-Unrelated 1-Related) Processing/infusion center (0-Unrelated 1-Related) Gradient type Recipient insulin day 0 (0=N 1=Y) T ime from admission to death (hrs) Recovery to transplant (hrs) Viability > 87% (0=N 1=Y) Poly T -cell depleting Rabbit thymoglobulin Anti-Il2 Daclizumab Calcineurin inhibitor T acrolimus Inosine: MMF or mycophenolic acid MMF Poly/MonoT -cellAB + T NF-aAnt + CalcInh + mT OR/Inosine MonoAntiIL2R + CalcInh + mT OR/Inosine Number of A locus mismatches Number of B locus mismatches Number of Class I locus mismatches Number of A/B/DR locus mismatches Number of A/B/DR/DQ locus mismatches Reexposed to B locus mismatch 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 2 4 8 Loss of Insulin Independence Post Last Infusion Forest Plot (Hazard Ratio ± 95% Confidence Interval) of Factors Univariately Significant p < 0.10 Factors Diabetes Duration (years) Baseline daily insulin use (Units) Baseline use of insulin pump or >=3 insulin inject Baseline C-peptide (ng/mL) Baseline GAD 65 autoantibodies (0,1) Donor age (x10 yrs) Donor(s) given vasopressors (0=N 1=Y) Donor(s) insulin (0=N 1=Y) Donor(s) bilirubin Processing/infusion center (0-Unrelated 1-Related) Donor(s)-recipient age difference (x10-yrs) Isletsize (0-small 1-large) Rabbit thymoglobulin Anti-Il2 Daclizumab Infliximab Sirolimus Inosine: MMF or mycophenolic acid MMF Prednisone, Methylprednisolone, or other steroid MonoAnti-IL2R + CalcInh + mT OR/Inosine 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 2 4 8 Complete Islet Failure Post Last Infusion Forest Plot (Hazard Ratio ± 95% Confidence Interval) of Factors Univariately Significant p < 0.10 Factors Recipient age (years) Employment impacted by dx Diabetes Duration (years) Baseline use of insulin pump (0=N 1=Y) Years prior to first inf using ins pump or >= 3 in Intensive therapy <10/10-25/>=25 yrs Baseline HbA1c (%) Baseline C-peptide (ng/mL) Baseline IA-2 autoantibodies (0,1) Baseline total positive autoantobodies (0,1,2,3) T otal donors Donor race (0=W 1=Non-white) Donor(s) BMI Procurement/infusion teams (0-Unrelated 1-Related) Processing/infusion center (0-Unrelated 1-Related) Cultured >6 hrs (0=N 1=Y) Culture time (hrs) Donor(s)-recipient age difference (x10-yrs) Recovery to transplant (hrs) Death to transplant (hrs) Stimulation index Islet Viability (%) Viability > 87% (0=N 1=Y) T otal beta cells/kg donor Horse thymoglobulin Anti-Il2 Daclizumab T NF blocker Etanercept Calcineurin inhibitor T acrolimus MMF MonoAnti-IL2R + T NF-aAnta + CalcInh + mT OR/Inosine Reexposed to A locus mismatch 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 2 4 8 C-peptide 0.5 ng/mL A. Post First Infusion (Censored at Re-Infusion before Visit) Islet Alone Recipients 90 80 Percent of Recipients 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Inf 1 N=347 Month 6 152 C-peptide < 0.5 ng/mL or Known Graft Loss C-peptide >= 0.5 ng/mL Missing data Year 1 112 C-peptide 0.5 ng/mL A. Post First Infusion (Censored at Re-Infusion before Visit) Islet After Kidney Recipients 90 80 Percent of Recipients 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Inf 1 N=65 Month 6 24 C-peptide < 0.5 ng/mL or Known Graft Loss C-peptide >= 0.5 ng/mL Missing data Year 1 16 C-peptide 0.5 ng/mL B. Post Last Infusion Islet Alone Recipients 90 80 Percent of Recipients 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Inf 1 N=347 Month 6 314 Year 1 298 Year 2 266 Year 3 216 C-peptide < 0.5 ng/mL or Known Graft Loss C-peptide >= 0.5 ng/mL Missing data Year 4 155 C-peptide 0.5 ng/mL B. Post Last Infusion Islet After Kidney Recipients 90 80 Percent of Recipients 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Inf 1 N=65 Month 6 63 Year 1 59 Year 2 49 Year 3 42 C-peptide < 0.5 ng/mL or Known Graft Loss C-peptide >= 0.5 ng/mL Missing data Year 4 N35 C-peptide 0.3 ng/mL C. Post Last Infusion With or Without Missing Data Basal Plasma C-Peptide (ng/mL) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 6 6 5 5 4 4 ng/mL ng/mL A. Islet Alone Recipients 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 325 229 78 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 291 276 239 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 182 Year 3 120 Year 4 Follow-Up Values greater than 6 ng/ml are not displayed or used in boxplot values (One at pre-inf 2, three at month 6, one at year 1, and one at year 3) 0 57 46 11 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 56 53 39 32 22 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Values greater than 6 ng/ml are not displayed or used in boxplot values (One at year 2) Association of Islet Graft Function with Insulin Independence: Percent Insulin Independent by C-peptide Level Post Last Infusion Basal Plasma C-Peptide (ng/mL) Pre and Post First Infusion Insulin Independent Recipients B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 6 6 5 5 4 4 ng/mL ng/mL A. Islet Alone Recipients 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 325 14 36 150 154 Pre Inf 1 Day 7 Day 30 Month 6 Year 1 Follow-Up Values greater than 6 ng/mL are not displayed or used in boxplot values (One at month 6 and one at year 1) 0 57 1 Pre Inf 1 Day 7 6 25 19 Day 30 Month 6 Year 1 Follow-Up Basal Plasma C-Peptide (ng/mL) Pre and Post First Infusion Insulin Dependent Recipients B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 6 6 5 5 4 4 ng/mL ng/mL A. Islet Alone Recipients 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 325 266 280 141 135 Pre Inf 1 Day 7 Day 30 Month 6 Year 1 Follow-Up Values greater than 6 ng/mL are not displayed or used in boxplot values (One at day 7) 0 57 40 46 28 30 Pre Inf 1 Day 7 Day 30 Month 6 Year 1 Follow-Up Values greater than 6 ng/mL are not displayed or used in boxplot values (One at day 30) Percent of Insulin Dependent Recipients with Basal C-Peptide 0.5 ng/mL Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 70 70 60 60 50 50 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients A. Islet Alone Recipients 40 30 40 30 20 20 10 10 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 N=347 131 147 Year 2 148 Year 3 122 Year 4 96 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 N=65 22 30 Year 2 30 Year 3 33 Year 4 23 Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 400 400 300 300 mg/dL mg/dL A. Islet Alone Recipients 200 100 0 200 100 320 242 84 300 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 281 237 179 116 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Values greater than 400 mg/dL are not displayed or used in boxplot values (Five at pre-inf 1, one at month 6, one at year 1, tw o at year 2, one at year 3 and tw o at year 4) 0 56 48 13 57 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 54 42 37 23 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Values greater than 400 mg/dL are not displayed or used in boxplot values (Tw o at pre-inf 1, one at year 2 and one at year 4) Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL) Pre and Post First Infusion Insulin Independent Recipients B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 400 400 300 300 mg/dL mg/dL A. Islet Alone Recipients 200 100 0 200 100 320 18 38 144 145 Pre Inf 1 Day 7 Day 30 Month 6 Year 1 Follow-Up Values greater than 400 mg/dL are not displayed or used in boxplot values (Five at pre-inf 1) 0 56 2 7 24 18 Pre Inf 1 Day 7 Day 30 Month 6 Year 1 Follow-Up Values greater than 400 mg/dL are not displayed or used in boxplot values (Tw o at pre-inf 1) Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL) Pre and Post First Infusion Insulin Dependent Recipients B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 400 400 300 300 mg/dL mg/dL A. Islet Alone Recipients 200 100 0 200 100 320 284 285 153 142 Pre Inf 1 Day 7 Day 30 Month 6 Year 1 Follow-Up Values greater than 400 mg/dL are not displayed or used in boxplot values (Five at pre-inf 1) 0 56 47 47 32 34 Pre Inf 1 Day 7 Day 30 Month 6 Year 1 Follow-Up Values greater than 400 mg/dL are not displayed or used in boxplot values (Tw o at pre-inf 1) Percent of Recipients with Fasting Blood Glucose 126 mg/dL Post Last Infusion by Insulin Status B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 100 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients A. Islet Alone Recipients 60 50 40 30 60 50 40 30 20 20 10 10 0 Pre Infusion 1 N=0:320 Insulin Status Month 6 N=171:126 Year 1 N=137:142 Year 2 N=90:139 Independent Year 3 N=54:119 Year 4 N=23:91 Dependent 0 Pre Infusion 1 N=0:56 Insulin Status Month 6 N=33:22 Year 1 N=23:30 Year 2 N=12:29 Independent Year 3 N=4:31 Year 4 N=3:19 Dependent Composite Outcome (Hypoglycemia and HbA1C) Post Last Infusion A. Islet Alone Recipients 80 70 Percent of Recipients 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Infusion 1 N=347 Day 30 347 Month 6 314 Year 1 298 Year 2 266 Year 3 216 No severe hypoglycemic episodes and HbA1c < 6.5% No severe hypoglycemic episodes and 6.5% <= HbA1c < 7.0% Severe hypoglycemic episode or HbA1c >= 7.0% with detectable fasting c-peptide Severe hypoglycemic episode or HbA1c >= 7.0% without detectable fasting c-peptide Missing data for recipient with islet graft failure Other missing data Year 4 155 Composite Outcome (Hypoglycemia and HbA1C) Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 80 70 Percent of Recipients 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Infusion 1 N=65 Day 30 65 Month 6 63 Year 1 59 Year 2 49 Year 3 42 No severe hypoglycemic episodes and HbA1c < 6.5% No severe hypoglycemic episodes and 6.5% <= HbA1c < 7.0% Severe hypoglycemic episode or HbA1c >= 7.0% with detectable fasting c-peptide Severe hypoglycemic episode or HbA1c >= 7.0% without detectable fasting c-peptide Missing data for recipient with islet graft failure Other missing data Year 4 35 Severe Hypoglycemia A. Post First Infusion (Censored at Re-Infusion before Visit) Islet Alone Recipients 100 90 Percent of Recipients 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Inf 1 N=347 Month 6 N=152 No severe hypoglycemic episodes Severe hypoglycemic episode Missing data for recipient with islet graft failure Other missing data Year 1 N=112 Severe Hypoglycemia B. Post First Infusion (Censored at Re-Infusion before Visit) Islet After Kidney Recipients 100 90 Percent of Recipients 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Inf 1 N=65 Month 6 N=24 No severe hypoglycemic episodes Severe hypoglycemic episode Missing data for recipient with islet graft failure Other missing data Year 1 N=16 Severe Hypoglycemia C. Post Last Infusion Islet Alone Recipients 100 90 Percent of Recipients 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Inf 1 N=347 Day 30 N=347 Month 6 N=314 Year 1 N=298 Year 2 N=266 No severe hypoglycemic episodes Severe hypoglycemic episode Missing data for recipient with islet graft failure Other missing data Year 3 N=216 Year 4 N=155 Severe Hypoglycemia D. Post Last Infusion Islet After Kidney Recipients 100 90 Percent of Recipients 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Inf 1 N=65 Day 30 N=65 Month 6 N=63 Year 1 N=59 Year 2 N=49 No severe hypoglycemic episodes Severe hypoglycemic episode Missing data for recipient with islet graft failure Other missing data Year 3 N=42 Year 4 N=35 Severe Hypoglycemia E. Post Last Infusion Islet Alone Recipients with Detectable Fasting C-peptide 100 90 Percent of Recipients 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Inf 1 N=65 Day 30 N=325 Month 6 N=278 Year 1 N=237 Year 2 N=170 Severe hypoglycemic episode Missing data Year 3 N=114 Year 4 N=68 Severe Hypoglycemia F2.(Subset of F1): Islet Alone Recipients with No Detectable Fasting C-peptide or Known Graft Loss and Known Information on Occurrence of Severe Hypoglycemic Episodes Post Last Infusion 100 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients F1. All Islet Alone Recipients with No Detectable Fasting C-peptide or Known Graft Loss Post Last Infusion 60 50 40 30 60 50 40 30 20 20 10 10 0 Pre Inf 1 N=260 Day 30 N=22 Month 6 N=39 Year 1 N=54 Year 2 N=81 Severe hypoglycemic episode Missing data No severe hypoglycemic episode Year 3 N=76 Year 4 N=67 0 Pre Inf 1 N=354 Day 30 N=20 Month 6 N=32 Year 1 N=29 Year 2 N=38 Severe hypoglycemic episode No severe hypoglycemic episode Year 3 N=22 Year 4 N=13 Hypoglycemia Status Pre First Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients 70 Per cent of Reci pi ent s 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pr e I nf 1 N=412 Mont h 6 N=377 Year 1 N=357 Year 2 N=315 Year 3 N=258 No hypogl ycemi c epi sodes Havi ng epi sodes and awar e Par t i al awar eness Hypogl ycemi a unawar eness Mi ssi ng dat a f or r eci pi ent wi t h i sl et gr af t f ai l ur e Ot her mi ssi ng dat a Year 4 N=190 HbA1C A. Post First Infusion (Censored at Re-Infusion before Visit) Islet Alone Recipients 80 70 Percent of Recipients 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Inf 1 N=347 Month 6 152 HbA1c < 6.5% 6.5% <= HbA1c < 7.0% HbA1c >= 7.0% Missing data for recipient with islet graft failure Other missing data Year 1 112 HbA1C A. Post First Infusion (Censored at Re-Infusion before Visit) Islet After Kidney Recipients 80 70 Percent of Recipients 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Inf 1 N=65 Month 6 24 HbA1c < 6.5% 6.5% <= HbA1c < 7.0% HbA1c >= 7.0% Missing data for recipient with islet graft failure Other missing data Year 1 16 HbA1C B. Post Last Infusion Islet Alone Recipients 80 70 Percent of Recipients 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Inf 1 N=347 Month 6 314 Year 1 298 Year 2 266 Year 3 216 HbA1c < 6.5% 6.5% <= HbA1c < 7.0% HbA1c >= 7.0% Missing data for recipient with islet graft failure Other missing data Year 4 155 HbA1C B. Post Last Infusion Islet After Kidney Recipients 80 70 Percent of Recipients 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Inf 1 N=65 Month 6 63 Year 1 59 Year 2 49 Year 3 42 HbA1c < 6.5% 6.5% <= HbA1c < 7.0% HbA1c >= 7.0% Missing data for recipient with islet graft failure Other missing data Year 4 35 HbA1C (%) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 12.5 12.5 10.0 10.0 % % A. Islet Alone Recipients 7.5 5.0 2.5 7.5 5.0 329 225 82 291 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 275 231 180 116 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up 2.5 59 47 12 55 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 51 42 35 23 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up HbA1C (%) Pre and Post First Infusion Insulin Independent Recipients B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 12.5 12.5 10.0 10.0 % % A. Islet Alone Recipients 7.5 5.0 5.0 2.5 7.5 329 29 138 142 Pre Inf 1 Day 30 Month 6 Year 1 Follow-Up 2.5 59 4 Pre Inf 1 Day 30 22 17 Month 6 Year 1 Follow-Up HbA1C (%) Pre and Post First Infusion Insulin Dependent Recipients B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 12.5 12.5 10.0 10.0 % % A. Islet Alone Recipients 7.5 5.0 5.0 2.5 7.5 329 178 145 138 Pre Inf 1 Day 30 Month 6 Year 1 Follow-Up 2.5 59 24 30 30 Pre Inf 1 Day 30 Month 6 Year 1 Follow-Up Recipients with HbA1C < 6.5% Percent of Post Last Infusion by Insulin Status A. Islet Alone Recipients 100 90 Percent of Recipients 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pre Infusion 1 N=0:329 Insulin Status Month 6 N=169:120 Year 1 N=135:138 Year 2 N=88:137 Independent Year 3 N=54:119 Year 4 N=23:90 Dependent Complications of Diabetes Pre First Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients with Documented Graft Function Autonomic Neuropathy 100 100 80 80 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients Peripheral Neuropathy 60 40 20 0 60 40 20 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=383 N=263 N=216 N=147 N=96 N=52 Disabling Symptomatic Asymptomatic None 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=371 N=266 N=216 N=144 N=96 N=53 Disabling Symptomatic Asymptomatic None Complications of Diabetes (continued) Pre First Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients with Documented Graft Function Coronary Artery Disease 100 100 80 80 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients Nefropathy 60 40 20 60 40 20 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=380 N=280 N=236 N=151 N=93 N=54 Stable Allograft ESRD Macroalbuminuria Microalbuminuria None 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=386 N=276 N=230 N=154 N=104 N=54 Yes No Complications of Diabetes (continued) Pre First Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients with Documented Graft Function Peripheral Vascular Disease 100 100 80 80 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients Stroke 60 40 40 20 20 0 60 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=373 N=275 N=231 N=152 N=104 N=54 Yes No 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=367 N=273 N=226 N=152 N=101 N=54 Yes No Complications of Diabetes (continued) Pre First Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients with Documented Graft Function Foot Ulcers 100 100 80 80 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients Treated Hypertension 60 40 40 20 20 0 60 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=387 N=295 N=248 N=157 N=104 N=56 Yes No 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=347 N=275 N=229 N=151 N=104 N=55 Yes No Complications of Diabetes (continued) Pre First Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients with Documented Graft Function Foot Deformity 100 100 80 80 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients Lower Limb Amputation 60 40 20 0 60 40 20 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=379 N=283 N=237 N=155 N=105 N=58 Yes No 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=354 N=278 N=230 N=154 N=105 N=57 Yes No Complications of Diabetes (continued) Pre First Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients with Documented Graft Function Orthostatic Hypotension 100 100 80 80 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients Dysesthesia 60 40 40 20 20 0 60 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=350 N=262 N=219 N=145 N=99 N=51 Yes No 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=316 N=246 N=212 N=133 N=97 N=53 Yes No Complications of Diabetes (continued) Pre First Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients with Documented Graft Function Constipation 100 100 80 80 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients Gastroparesis 60 40 40 20 20 0 60 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=342 N=267 N=223 N=140 N=99 N=51 Yes No 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=340 N=270 N=228 N=147 N=99 N=51 Yes No Complications of Diabetes (continued) Pre First Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients with Documented Graft Function Fecal Incontinence 100 100 80 80 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients Diabetic Diarrhea 60 40 40 20 20 0 60 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=345 N=257 N=220 N=145 N=99 N=52 Yes No 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=342 N=268 N=228 N=149 N=100 N=53 Yes No Complications of Diabetes (continued) Pre First Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients with Documented Graft Function Sexual Dysfunction 100 100 80 80 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients Diabetic Bladder Dysfunction 60 40 20 0 60 40 20 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=341 N=268 N=226 N=144 N=99 N=52 Yes No 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=316 N=233 N=200 N=124 N=85 N=44 Yes No Complications of Diabetes (continued) Pre First Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients with Documented Graft Function Diabetic Macular Edema 100 100 80 80 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients Retinopathy 60 40 20 0 60 40 20 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=376 N=239 N=190 N=114 N=80 N=43 Proliferative Non Proliferative None 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=352 N=238 N=189 N=114 N=83 N=38 Severe Moderate Mild None Complications of Diabetes (continued) Pre First Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients with Documented Graft Function Laser Photocoagulation Surgery for Diabetic Macular Edema 100 100 80 80 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients Laser Photocoagulation Surgery for Proliferative Retinopathy 60 40 20 0 60 40 20 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=372 N=287 N=241 N=153 N=105 N=55 Yes No 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=357 N=287 N=241 N=153 N=105 N=54 Yes No Complications of Diabetes (continued) Pre First Infusion and Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients with Documented Graft Function Other Eye Surgery 100 100 80 80 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients Vtirectomy 60 40 20 0 60 40 20 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=379 N=287 N=241 N=153 N=105 N=54 Yes No 0 Pre Inf 1 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=366 N=287 N=241 N=154 N=105 N=54 Yes No Chapter 6: Liver, Kidney, Lipid and PRA Effects ALT (IU/L) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 150 150 125 125 100 100 IU/L IU/L A. Islet Alone Recipients 75 75 50 50 25 25 0 307 211 70 234 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 193 128 79 45 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Values greater than 150 IU/L are not displayed or used in boxplot values (Tw o at pre-inf 2, one at month 6, one at year 1, and one at year 2) 0 57 49 13 52 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 46 34 27 15 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Values greater than 150 IU/L are not displayed or used in boxplot values (One at pre-inf 2, one at month 6, and one at year 2) AST (IU/L) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 120 120 100 100 80 80 IU/L IU/L A. Islet Alone Recipients 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 320 233 77 272 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 229 148 95 51 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Values greater than 120 IU/L are not displayed (One at pre-inf 1, one at pre-inf 2, one at month 6, one at year 1, and one at year 2) 0 58 49 12 52 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 46 34 27 15 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Values greater than 120 IU/L are not displayed (One at month 6, and one at year 2) Alkaline Phosphatase (IU/L) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 350 350 300 300 250 250 200 200 IU/L IU/L A. Islet Alone Recipients 150 150 100 100 50 50 0 317 229 75 260 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 229 144 95 50 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Values greater than 350 IU/L are not displayed (Tw o at pre-inf 2, one at month 6, one at year 1, and one at year 2) 0 56 49 12 48 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 46 34 27 15 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Values greater than 350 IU/L are not displayed (Four at pre-inf 1, four at pre-inf 2, tw o at year 1, and one at year 2) Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 2.0 mg/dL mg/dL A. Islet Alone Recipients 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 2.0 0.5 319 221 75 251 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 214 145 94 48 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Values greater than 3.5 mg/dL are not displayed (One at pre-inf 1 and one at year 1) 0.0 57 47 13 45 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 45 34 26 13 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 350 350 300 300 250 250 mg/dL mg/dL A. Islet Alone Recipients 200 200 150 150 100 100 50 50 0 327 196 69 248 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 230 152 98 49 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up 0 56 39 9 48 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 43 34 28 15 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up HDL (mg/dL) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 200 200 150 150 mg/dL mg/dL A. Islet Alone Recipients 100 50 0 100 50 319 179 59 228 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 218 139 93 47 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up 0 49 28 5 35 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 34 27 24 11 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up LDL (mg/dL) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 300 300 250 250 200 200 mg/dL mg/dL A. Islet Alone Recipients 150 150 100 100 50 50 0 313 178 57 225 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 214 138 92 47 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up 0 47 28 5 35 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 34 27 24 11 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Triglycerides (mg/dL) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 450 450 400 400 350 350 300 300 mg/dL mg/dL A. Islet Alone Recipients 250 250 200 200 150 150 100 100 50 50 0 327 194 69 246 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 229 150 98 50 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up 0 55 39 9 48 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 43 34 27 14 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Serum Creatinine (mg/dL) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 mg/dL mg/dL A. Islet Alone Recipients 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 338 234 78 280 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 243 169 104 56 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up 0.0 62 48 14 54 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 49 34 28 16 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Values greater than 4.0 mg/dL are not displayed (Tw o at pre-inf 1, one at month 6 and one at year 2) Percent of Recipients with a 30% Increase in Serum Creatinine at Each Follow-up Time Point B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 100 100 80 80 Percent of Recipients Percent of Recipients A. Islet Alone Recipients 60 40 40 20 20 0 60 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=277 N=240 N=167 N=103 N=55 >=30% Increase In Serum Creatinine <30% Increase In Serum Creatinine 0 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 N=52 N=47 N=34 N=27 N=15 >=30% Increase In Serum Creatinine <30% Increase In Serum Creatinine Cockgroft-Gault Calculated Creatinine Clearance (mL/min/1.73m2) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 250 250 200 200 mL/min/1.73m2 mL/min/1.73m2 A. Islet Alone Recipients 150 100 50 0 150 100 50 271 114 35 146 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 146 66 39 19 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up 0 42 18 5 22 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 27 19 15 10 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up “Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Estimated GFR (mL/min/1.73m2) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion B. Islet After Kidney Recipients 180 180 150 150 ml/min/1.73 m2 ml/min/1.73 m2 A. Islet Alone Recipients 120 90 120 90 60 60 30 30 0 338 234 78 280 243 169 104 56 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Values greater than 180 ml/min/1.73 m2 are not displayed or used in boxplot values (One at pre-inf 1 and one at pre-inf 3) 0 60 47 14 53 48 34 28 16 Pre Inf 1 Pre Inf 2 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Follow-Up Class I PRA (%) Pre Infusion and Post Last Infusion Islet Alone Recipients 100 90 80 70 % 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 303 Pre Inf 1 206 Pre Inf 2 73 200 174 135 Pre Inf 3 Month 6 Year 1 Year 2 Follow-Up 98 Year 3 63 Year 4 % Change in Class I PRA from Pre First Infusion Pre Subsequent Infusion and Post Last Infusion Islet Alone Recipients Change from Pre Infusion 1 100 75 50 25 0 -25 203 Pre Inf 2 71 199 Month 6 173 134 Year 2 Follow-Up Values less than -25 are not displayed (One at pre-inf 3 and one at year 1) 96 63 Year 4 Class I PRA Post Last Infusion Islet Alone Recipients with Complete Graft Loss 100 90 80 70 % 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 11 Month 6 15 26 18 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Follow-Up 9 Year 4 Class I PRA Post Last Infusion Islet Alone Recipients without Complete Graft Loss 100 90 80 70 % 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 189 Month 6 159 109 80 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Follow-Up 54 Year 4 Class I PRA Post Last Infusion Non-Immunosupressed Islet Alone Recipients 100 90 80 70 % 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 4 Month 6 7 12 7 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Follow-Up 3 Year 4 Class I PRA Post Last Infusion Immunosupressed Islet Alone Recipients 100 90 80 70 % 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 191 Month 6 164 119 87 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Follow-Up 57 Year 4 Chapter 7: Adverse Events Percent of Recipients with an Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) in Year 1 Post First Infusion Total Number of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events in Year 1 Post First Infusion IA: Incidence of Post-Transplant Adverse Events Related to Infusion Procedure IAK: Incidence of Post-Transplant Adverse Events Related to Infusion Procedure IA: Incidence of Post-Transplant Adverse Events Related to Immunosupression Therapy Follow-up Based on Completed Scheduled Visits IAK: Incidence of Post-Transplant Adverse Events Related to Immunosupression Therapy Follow-up based on completed scheduled visits Percent of Recipients with a Serious Adverse Event in Year 1 Post First Infusion by Year of First Infusion All Allograft Recipients 60 Percent of Recipients 50 40 30 20 10 0 1999-2000 N=19 2001-2002 N=115 2003-2004 N=100 2005-2006 N=111 2007-2008 N=67 Year of First Infusion Any SAE SAE related to either the infusion procedure or immunosuppression SAE related to the infusion procedure SAE related to immunosuppression Serious Adverse Event Criteria by Relatedness to Islet Infusion or Immunosuppression Outcome of Serious Adverse Events by Relatedness to Islet Infusion or Immunosuppression Serious Adverse Events MedDRA System/Organ Class by Relatedness to Islet Infusion or Immunosuppression Serious Adverse Events MedDRA System/Organ Class by Relatedness to Islet Infusion or Immunosuppression (continued) Most Common Serious Adverse Events MedDRA Preferred Term Islet Alone Recipients Most Common Serious Adverse Events MedDRA Preferred Term Islet After Kidney Recipients Most Common Serious Adverse Events Reported Within One Year of Any Infusion MedDRA Preferred Term All Allograft Recipients Most Common Serious Adverse Events Reported More than One Year after Any Infusion MedDRA Preferred Term All Allograft Recipients Listing of Reported Neoplasms All Allograft Recipients Listing of Reported Neoplasms (continued) All Allograft Recipients Listing of Reported Neoplasms (continued) All Allograft Recipients Listing of Reported Hemorrhages and Portal Vein Thromboses All Allograft Recipients Listing of Reported Hemorrhages and Portal Vein Thromboses (continued) All Allograft Recipients Listing of Reported Hemorrhages and Portal Vein Thromboses (continued) All Allograft Recipients Listing of Reported Hemorrhages and Portal Vein Thromboses (continued) All Allograft Recipients Number of Days Hospitalized at Infusion (from Admission to Discharge) by Infusion Sequence Islet Alone Recipients 20 Number of Days 15 10 5 0 330 233 75 1 2 3 Infusion Sequence Values greater than 20 days are not displayed (Three at infusion 1 and one at infusion 3) Number of Days Hospitalized at Infusion (from Admission to Discharge) by Infusion Sequence Islet After Kidney Recipients 20 Number of Days 15 10 5 0 62 47 13 1 2 3 Infusion Sequence Values greater than 20 days are not displayed (Three at infusion 1 and one at infusion 3) Hospitalization Experienced Post Last Infusion by Total Number of Infusions Received Islet Alone Recipients Hospitalization Experienced Post Last Infusion by Total Number of Infusions Received Islet After Kidney Recipients Chapter 8: Registry Data Quality Review Expected and Submitted Forms by Infusion Sequence Expected and Submitted Follow-Up Forms Post Last infusion All Allograft Recipients Extent of Follow-Up Post Last Infusion All Allograft Recipients Appendices CITR Coordinating Center (July 2008 – July 2009) PI: Franca Benedicty Barton Co-PI: Donald Stablein Yamini Babu Ruth Danoff Jodi DeStefano Andrew Heitman Krista Huang Steve Wease Tina Winters Islet Transplant Centers Baylor College of Medicine/ The Methodist Hospital Houston, Texas, USA PI: John A. Goss Baylor Regional Transplant Institute Dallas, Texas, USA PI: Marlon Levy Benaroya Research Institute Seattle, Washington, USA PI: Carla Greenbaum Carolinas Medical Center Charlotte, North Carolina, USA PI: Paul Gores Center for Islet Transplantation at Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA PI: Enrico Cagliero Columbia University New York, New York, USA PI: Mark A. Hardy Emory Transplant Center Atlanta, Georgia, USA PI: Mark Rigby GenevaGRAGIL Network Geneva, Switzerland PI: Thierry Berney Lille University Hospital Lille Cedex, France PI: Francois Pattou Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota, USA PI: Yogish Kudva NIH Clinical Transplant Center Bethesda, Maryland, USA PI: David Harlan Northwestern University Chicago, Illinois, USA PI: Dixon Kaufman San Raffaele Institute Milan, Italy PI: Antonio Secchi Scripps Health La Jolla, California, USA PI: Christopher Marsh The University of Tennessee, Memphis Memphis, Tennessee, USA PI: A. Osama Gaber University of Miami Miami, Florida, USA PI: Rodolfo Alejandro Co-PI: Camillo Ricordi UMass Memorial Hospital Worcester, Massachusetts, USA PI: Aldo Rossini University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA PI: Bernhard J. Hering University of Alabama Birmingham, Alabama, USA PI: Juan Luis Contreras University of Nebraska Omaha, Nebraska, USA PI: R. Brian Stevens University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA PI: A. M. James Shapiro Co-PI: Peter Senior Parastoo Dinyari University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA PI: Ali Naji University of Virginia Charlottesville, Virginia, USA PI: Kenneth Brayman Southern California Islet Consortium (SCIC) Duarte, California, USA PI: Fouad Kandeel University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, California, USA PI: Peter Stock Co-PI: Andrew Posselt St. Vincent’s Institute Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia PI: Tom Kay University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois, USA PI: Marc Garfinkel Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia, USA PI: Adrian Cotterell Swedish Medical Center Seattle, Washington, USA PI: William Marks University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Auora, Colorado, USA PI: Alexander Wiseman University of Pennsylvania Washington University, St. Louis St. Louis, Missouri, USA PI: Niraj Desai Toronto General Hospital Toronto, Ontario, CANADA PI: Mark Cattral University of Illinois, Chicago Chicago, Illinois, USA PI: Jose Oberholzer Co-PI: Enrico Benedetti Co-PI: James Bui Co-PI: Charles Owens University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin, USA PI: Jon Odorico Westmead Hospital Wentworthville, NSW, Australia PI: Philip Oconnell CITR Committees Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) Compliance Committee (2008) Data Elements Committee (2008) Publications/Presentations Committee (2008) Transplant Coordinators’/Data Managers’ Committee (2008) CITR Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) Chair: Bernhard J. Hering Michael Appel Franca Benedicty Barton Michael Cecka Philip E. Cryer Olle Korsgren Maureen McBride Jerry P. Palmer Camillo Ricordi Gordon Weir CITR Compliance Committee (2008) Chair: Fouad Kandeel Michael Appel Parastoo Dinyari Albert Hwa Carol Kramer Joan Martellotto Violetta Raverdi Marti Sears Elyse Stuart CITR Data Elements Committee (2008) Chair: Marti Sears David Baidal Enrico Cagliero Marc Garfinkel Fouad Kandeel Dixon Kaufman Robert Ketchum Francois Pattou David Sutherland CITR Publications/Presentations Committee (2008) Chair: Rodolfo Alejandro Michael Appel Nancy Bridges Shari Messinger Cayetano Brian Flanagan Elizabeth Holbrook Robert Ketchum Bashoo Naziruddin Craig Smith CITR Transplant Coordinators’/ Data Managers’ Committee (2008) Chair: Parastoo Dinyari Robin Jevne Nancy Radke Jarrett Anderson Jenny Joseph Violeta Raverdy David Baidal Debra Kemp Marilyn Reeve LeAnn Batterson Mark Lockwood Kristi Schneider Meyer Belzer Eileen Markmann Marti Sears Elsa Boely Joan Martellotto Jill Sheedy Jane Fasbender Marli McCulloch-Olson KD Shiang Courtney Garbee Joan McElroy Elyse Stuart Susan George Melissa McGraw Pat Swanson Debbie Grice Suzanne Miller Heather Turgeon Darrell Grimes Bashoo Naziruddin Patricia Wilson Jeannette Hacker Lori Otken Dona Winborne Celia Hartigan Maral Palanjian Piotr Witkowski Elizabeth Holbrook Jamen Parkey CITR Allografts Recipients with C-Peptide ≥ 0.3 Pre-Infusion