Technology Presentation Tech Committee Findings and Recommendations Technology Committee Members School Committee Members Middle Darlene Lipczynski, Jen Therens, Judy Ryan, Kathy Tragasz, Vickie Marble, Michelle O’Connell, Andrea Perrin, Jan Paulson, Scott Snyder, Carrie LaPorte Intermediate Lilli Melamed, Sandra Shinn, Lisa West, Jessie Poremba, Jan Lasky, Mike Witkowski, Stephanie Shaffer Elementary East Ken Hyllberg, Kara Nawrocki, Allison Schmitt, Erica Myers, Ro Henson, Peter Lasko, Susan Hansen Elementary West David Brown, Kate Bush, Jen Strawniak, Traci Strieter, Brook Ward, Kirsten VanDyke Primary Sharis Stork, Allison Coltman, Rian Bogdala, ESC Steve Thomas, Donna VandenBroek, Cindy Hooper, Angela Walker, Dann Giesey Goals Goal 5-1B – Expand Equal Technology Access for all Students Goal 5-2 – Acquire and Reallocate Technology based on Common Core Standards. Students Use of Technology in the Classroom and School Need as Part of the Overall Leasing Strategy Committee Timeline November 12, 2014 – Review current district inventory and leasing program. December 16, 2014 – Survey of gathered data on other school districts regarding what they are doing with 1:1 or other technology. January 21, 2015 – Complete Woodland staff survey regarding technology use in the classroom and identify both present and future requirements. February 18, 2015 – Review curriculum, common core, and PARCC requirements. February 26, 2015 – Apple Briefing March 10, 2015 – Host Microsoft on site to see/hear demonstration on their use in education. April 14, 2015 – Host Apple on site to see/hear demonstration on their use in education. Committee Timeline April 23, 2015 – Host Google on site to see/hear demonstration on their use in education. May 5 – May 12, 2015 – Staff went on site visits hosted at 20 School Districts May 12, 2015 – Review vendor presentations. Finalize goals and review technology requirements for district absent the referendum. June 2, 2015 – As a committee, make final recommendations for new technology use plan and implementation schedule. Committee Research School Survey Data Staff Survey Data Common Core Requirements PARCC Requirements Parent Recommendations Curriculum Adoptions and 5 year plan Vendors (Technologies) Microsoft, Apple and Chrome Equal Access Goal 5-1B Technology Access 1:1 initiative at all grades would ensure access to technology for all students Create loaner pool for checkout by students in FY16 Summer Wonders Program Pilot Fall 2015 review Pilot and make recommendations for process and communication Make technology checkout available throughout the school year and summer Create agreement for families to sign for home use Equal Access Goal 5-1B Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Options Technology Group Met with Sprint, AT&T, T-Mobile and Comcast All have Internet Access available and programs for free and reduced students starting at $10.00 per month All have hot spot devices for Internet Access Committee researched a sample of local businesses who are willing to allow Woodland Students access to their Internet Recommend partnering with business who will not require our students to purchase food Equal Access Goal 5-1B Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Partners Gurnee Park District, Warren Teen Center and Warren Newport Library Internet access Put Woodland Wi-Fi Logo in local businesses Woodland “Hot Spots” Recommend each School have a parking lot created Internet “Hot Spot” Clearly marked on the outside poles using our Wi-Fi logo Review our bus Internet Options Equal Access Goal 5-1B LRC and Lab Access Expand Use of LRC and Labs for Students After Hours Middle School had both before and after school programs for technology access for at risk students Intermediate had after school programs for at risk students All staffed by teachers using stipends Elementary will expand after school programs to add technology similar to Middle School and Intermediate in FY16 Review additional access as part of curriculum Teaching and Learning review in FY17 Transportation biggest limitation for expanding use before and after school Internal Committee reviewing and recommending additional services Goal 5-2 Woodland Inspires An initiative of this magnitude needs a way to distinguish itself as excellent or above others A name that is also a vision which drives the efforts of the students, staff and community This initiative is a vision for how Woodland can Inspire the communication and problem solving of our students through choices supported by technology and traditional means Hence the name: Woodland Inspires What would Woodland Inspires instruction look like? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5b6y7DJuYk What is Woodland’s Instructional Vision for 1 to 1 Technologies? Woodland Inspires Woodland strives for personalized instruction to foster effective problem solvers and communicators empowered with the freedom of student choice while encouraging students to explore their own thinking through traditional and digital technologies Woodland Inspires is NOT It is NOT about teaching technology: It is about transforming and increasing student independence through technology to elevate student ownership for learning and 21st Century skills It is NOT about making kids type papers instead of handwriting them: Technology is not a new pencil, the technology allows for greater differentiation and the ability of students to explore new ideas and solutions. Woodland will continue to teach handwriting and cursive Woodland Inspires is NOT It is NOT about leaving traditional means behind: We will blend the best of both. A term “TraDigital” is used to semantically describe the process of using the best method, technological or traditional, dependent upon what is needed for the task. It is NOT how to solely use an iPad or Chromebook: As students grow and spend more time in a digital curriculum, the actual device becomes less important. You do not take specific drivers when switching cars for a Toyota Camry or a Chevrolet Impala. Driving lessons allow you to generalize very quickly to any new vehicle The skills we teach students will generalize to any device. Why Apple and Google’s Chrome Community feedback through the Strategic Planning process and the PTA recommended a blended platform approach Lake county is split, mostly Apple, though Chrome is increasing Consistent with other districts, we developed a 4 year plan. What will be the best hardware in 4 years? No one knows. Consider: iPads were just released 5 years ago Chromebooks were released only 4 years ago Why Not a Physical Keyboard K-5? Based on the numerous site visits, once a keyboard is introduced, the devices become heavily text entry devices, which is not necessary at the lower grades iPads provide a more dynamic and easily accessible range of communication: video and speech options and offer great portability Class sets of plug in keyboards will be available for check out at all grade levels iPads in the lower grades is consistent with numerous 1:1 districts How will Woodland Inspires Change Instruction? The SAMR Model is a way to describe the level of technology integration There are four levels with instructional gains coming specifically from the two higher levels, colloquially called “Above the Line” https://youtu.be/us0w823KY0g SAMR Examples Student Task Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition Note Taking Taking notes using Microsoft Word Using Google Drive to organized folders for each content Use Google Drive to receive timely feedback Create audio notes and video notes saved and organized Researching Using Google to research information Create a shared Google Doc with a set of links Using Symbaloo to organize and share links Use Skype to conference with experts in the content Create a Powerpoint Collectively create a Google Slide presentation Create a video Publishing Open a pdf document Use a command code to find a specific piece of a document Annotate digitally using Google Docs Create a collaborative document with international writers File Management Student emails documents to a teacher Student shares Google Drive access with teacher Students use an LMS to save and transmit files Students post files to Google+ for public comment Presentation https://www.schooltube.co m/video/87b1480cf13f46e98 4d7/Told%20One%20Lie,% 20Trust%20Was%20Broken Upload a video to youtube for public persuasion Why Does SAMR Matter? Research Sample for SAMR Levels Woodland Inspires Professional Development One of the largest needs to implement Inspire is to give staff the instructional tools to facilitate this change The professional development solutions by Apple are especially impactful Consider this: As I go through the next slide think of the people that you know. Think of friends, family and colleagues Where would they be in this chart? Apple’s Professional Development Flowchart Woodland Inspires Professional Development Quality and depth of professional development will be required: When teachers have only 5 - 14 hours of professional development there is not an increase in student performance When teachers have up to 49 hours a year there was a 20% increase in student performance (Yoon, K.S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W-Y., Scarloss, B., and Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the Evidence on How Teacher Professional Development Affects Student Achievement. Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 033. LMS Learning Management System Key is to have a common web interface for staff and students to develop our collaborative environment for learning All staff would use with students replacing TeacherWeb All students would use: Online materials Online video Online virtual classroom Google Key to have all staff and students using Google Docs for Education Students would receive email only from Woodland accounts Can only communicate with Woodland staff and students Shared word processing, spreadsheets, presentations tools Collaborative document use Would eliminate the need for USB keys and other file transportation tools Woodland Inspires Timeline Year 1 Identify five Kindergarten – 2nd grade teachers Identify twelve 3rd through 5th grade teachers Identify two middle school teams 25 total teachers 625 students impacted Expert Level Training by Apple PD, Google PD and LMS training Woodland Inspires Timeline Year 2 Grade Level Rollout Begins Grades K, 2 and 6 and Continues for the next three years Costs Options Option #1 “Committee Recommended Option Student Computers (K-2 iPad Mini’s, 3-5 iPads, 6-8 Chromebooks) Lease Costs FY16 - $115,020 FY17 - $301, 251 FY18 – $301,251 FY19 - $301, 251 Lease Annual Total Commitment: $1,018,773 Current Annual Lease Commitment: $484,000 New Annual Money added after four years: $534,773 Lease Cost Options Option #2 Student Computers (K-5 iPads, 6-8 Mac Laptops) FY16 - $388,333 FY17 - $338,333 FY18 - $338,333 Lease Annual Total Commitment after 3 years: $1,165,000 Additional annual staffing: $450,000 Total annual Commitment: $1,615,000 Current Annual Lease Commitment: $484,000 New Annual Money added after 3 years: $1,131,000 Costs Options Option #3 Student Computers (Grades 3-5 iPads, 6-8 Chromebooks) Lease Costs FY16 - $103,906 FY17 - $250, 855 FY18 - $230,855 FY19 - $230, 855 Lease Annual Total Commitment: $816,471 Current Annual Lease Commitment: $484,000 New Annual Money added after four years: $332,471 K-2 Continue to provide technology from grants, Woodland Foundation and Technology Annual Budget Additional Committee Recommendations Adopt Learning Management System in FY16 District will begin a parent and community education plan in FY16 Implement Student Google Accounts and Email for Collaboration with Woodland Students and Staff in FY16 Begin Pilot Technology Rollout Evaluate Bandwidth Traffic in FY17 and Technology Department Recommend Upgrades if Necessary Purchase Laptops for Primary and Intermediate Staff in FY17 Committee Recommendations Purchase no New Staff Computers After Primary and Intermediate in FY16-FY19 Evaluate Staff Technology Requirements in FY18 Review Instructional Labs in FY18 During Grade Level Rollout Reallocate iPad Technology to K-5 Grades During Grade Level Rollout Reallocate Asus Laptops to 6-8 Grades Committee Recommendations Charge Families Technology Fee of $60.00 to Cover Maintenance and Accidental Damage Insurance so Devices can go Home. Future Staffing FY17 If 1:1 approved Technology Department would add additional Technician Department is currently lean and we are adding 4000 new devices to manage Teaching and Learning Department would review staff options and consider reallocation of staff where needed Questions