Slides from President Destler's Open Forum presentation

advertisement

Strategic Planning

Open Forum

President Bill Destler

14 May 2014

Forum Agenda

• General comments about the process

• Update on progress to date

• Next Steps

• Major themes likely to be represented in plan

• Audience feedback on likely themes

General Comments

1. Process too fast

– Agility is critical

– 2004 Strategic Plan

• 9 months from first Steering Committee meeting to Trustee approval (October 2003 – July 2004)

• 8.5 weeks for Task Force work (January 5-March 5)

– 2025 Strategic Plan

• 12 months from first Steering Committee meeting to Trustee approval (November 2013-November 2014)

• 7.5 weeks for Part I Task Force work

11 weeks for Part II

General Comments

(2)

2. Participation is limited

 2 open forums (December and May)

 Full day Alumni Assn. meeting

 Discussion Forum on SP Website

 Trustee Strategic Planning Committee

 6 Task Forces (>150 members)

 Open Task Force meetings

 Six Task Force wikis

 Provost’s Town Hall meeting (~ 70 attendees)

 President’s Roundtable (1.5 days)

 Full day April BoT meeting

 2 conversations with Institute of Fellows

 Conversation w/ Imaging Science Adv. Bd.

 Presentations to all governance groups

 President’s AMA on Reddit

 ~ 100 emails to SP email address

 Alumni Survey (891 respondents)

 4 “Salon for Strategic Thinking” meetings

General Comments

(3)

3. The following are the decisions that have already been made:

Progress Update

• Mission and Vision

– Slightly modified since last shared

– Will be modified and shared again once SP draft is completed

• Part I of Task Force Reports received April 28

– Limited set of goals and strategies

– Approximate costs

• Part II due May 20 (was May 12)

– Rationale for each goal

– Executive summary

Next Steps

Late May: Task Force Reports condensed and shared electronically with the community

Early June: Steering Committee consolidates and integrates

Task Force Reports and all other input

Late June: Sub-committee of Steering Committee prepares outline based upon above

July 10 & 11: Trustee meeting dedicated to Strategic Plan

July 15-Sept. 1: Writing sub-group of Steering Committee composes SP draft

Sept. 1-30: Campus input

October: Draft revised

Nov. 14: Trustees approve new Strategic Plan

Emerging Themes

• RIT as a research university

– We are entering the “Research University” category, and we must embrace that descriptor as an important part of our identity

– We will be a unique, mission-driven, distinctively RIT Research

University—one in which all constituents prosper

• RIT as a student-centric university

– Student Success will drive much of this plan—nothing new here

– But the student population, the careers for which we are preparing them, and the packaging of education they are seeking are in constant flux; we must stay ahead of these changes

– And we must anticipate new definitions of student success, particularly with reference to career education (our signature strength and advantage)

Emerging Themes

(2)

• Other major themes that cut across all dimensions

– Interdisciplinarity (most frequently cited theme in all Task Force reports)

– Expanded global reach and identity

– Innovation: culture of experimentation

• Diversity—with a broader meaning

• Traditional: Increase under-represented populations and enhance their educational and professional opportunities

• Expanded: Deploy our remarkable diversity—not only ethnic, racial, and social but also programmatic, intellectual, experiential—as an engine of innovation and creativity

Enabling Themes

• Changes to the way we do things

– Organizational

• Possible change in some organizational models (strategy drives organizational models, not vice versa)

• Accounting processes

• Elimination of silos (academic, administrative, organizational)

– Cultural

• Willingness to take (calculated) risks

• Learning to value experimentation

• Leveraging difference to innovate and solve problems

– Space allocation (including greater deployment of virtual space)

Influences We Can’t Ignore

• Demographics

• Affordability

• Accountability (to students; to parents; to federal/state governments; to accreditors)

• Technology

Emerging and Enabling Themes:

Questions and Comments

Leave a note as you leave.

Download