Determining the Feasibility of Merging the Village of Shorewood Police Department and the Village of Whitefish Bay Police Department By David M. Banaszynski Overview of the Research Project – Business Problem “The combined harsh realities of escalating government expenses, stagnant local tax revenues, and a dwindling population base can no longer be viewed just as a short term imbalances but rather as structural problems requiring fundamental changes in the way we approach local governance.” (The Onondaga Citizens League, 2006, p.3) Overview of the Research Project In 2005, The Maximus Group was hired to examine consolidation between Villages of Shorewood, Whitefish Bay, Fox Point and Bayside Findings: • Combined Shorewood – Whitefish Bay Police Department would save: • Shorewood $563,410 • Whitefish Bay $23,300 (Maximus, 2005, p.46) Possible Outcomes Available • • • • Do nothing and continue to work as the two departments Continue to do business as separate departments but build a joint police station Identify certain functions or functional units within the departments that could be combined Complete merger of the two departments Description of the Organizations Shorewood Founded in 1900 4th oldest suburb 1.3 square miles Population July of 2005 was 13,192 No industry Whitefish Bay Founded in 1892 2nd oldest suburb 2.1 square miles Population July of 2005 was 13,508 No industry Consolidated Fire Service and Health Department (Shorewood History Home, 2004, para1) (Whitefish Bay Wisconsin, 2006, p2, para4) Description of the Organizational Units Shorewood Whitefish Bay Chief of Police 1 1 Lieutenant 3 2 Sergeant 3 4 Det. – Sgt. 1 0 Detective 1 2 Patrol Officer 16 15 Total 25 24 (Personal communication, 2007) Description of the Organizational Units - Buildings Shorewood Built in 1929 With Fire Dept. 5400 square ft. (Zimmerman Design Group, 2007) Whitefish Bay Built early 1960’s With Village Hall 5800 square ft. (Personal communication, 2007) History of Police Departments Unlike England, American police systems followed the style of local and municipal governments (Uchida, 2004) 12,656 local law enforcement agencies 451,737 sworn police officers (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2003) History of Police Consolidation 2007 1980 1973 2003 1980 1898 (Sunnyside Chamber, 2007, para.1; Stockton, 2006 ) Consolidation in Wisconsin 1949 - Sauk Prairie Police Department: Sauk City and Prairie du Sac 1993 - Everest Metro Police Department: Weston and Schofield Police Departments 1969 - City’s of Abbotsford and Colby joined forces 1995 - Fox Valley Metro Police Dept: Villages of Kimberly and Little Chute (Sauk Prairie Police, n.d.; Peterson, 2004 ) Driving Forces for Consolidation Economies of Scale Duplication of Efforts or Services Effectiveness Efficiency Accountability Harmony Unified Command Structure (Wisconsin Chiefs, 2004; Peterson, 2004, p.1) Restraining Forces to Consolidation “The political and social pressures linked to the desire for local selfgovernment offer the most significant barrier to the coordination and consolidation of police departments” (President’s Commission, 1967) Method of Research From the research question, four investigative questions were developed. • Economic feasibility • Maintaining or increasing the current service • • levels Reduction of duplicated police operations, services and equipment Department structure and staffing levels of a combined department Results and Analysis (Findings) The Findings Results and Analysis Staff Levels Wisconsin Departments City Population Total officers Officers per 1000 Stevens Point 24,403 44 1.80 Sun Prairie 24,585 44 1.79 Neenah 24,678 38 1.54 Mount Pleasant 25,514 35 1.37 Superior Average 27,080 25,252 58 44 2.14 1.73 (OJA, 2005) Results and Analysis Staff Levels Midwest Average Population Average Total officers Officers per 1000 Ratio Indiana 28,348 50 1.75 Iowa 26,873 40 1.51 Michigan 27,008 36 1.32 Minnesota 27,074 35 1.28 Ohio 26,598 44 1.66 Wisconsin 25,252 44 1.73 Midwest Average 26,816 43 1.59 Shorewood 13192 25 1.90 Whitefish Bay 13508 24 1.78 Combined Population 26700 49 1.84 State (Crime in the United States, 2005) Results and Analysis Staffing Requirements to Ratio Metro Police Department at 26,700 Population Midwest Ratio (1.59) = 43 officers Wisconsin Ratio (1.73) = 46 Officers Average Midwest and Wisconsin (1.66) = 44 Officers Results and Analysis Economically Feasible Metro Police Department Budget • Wages, overtime and fringe benefits at 49 sworn • officers = $4,719,892 Average of $96,324 per officer Midwest Ratio = 43 officers (-6) $577,944 Wisconsin Ratio = 46 officers (-3) $207,972 Average of Midwest & Wisconsin = 44 officers (-5) $481,620 (Village of Shorewood and Village of Whitefish Bay Budget – 2007) Results and Analysis Service Levels – Calls for Service Department Calls Average Total Crime For Service Calls/Officer Metro PD Neenah Superior Sun Prairie Mt Pleasant 14,378 293 14,000 368 26,300 453 28,000 636 42,137 1,204 (Personal interviews, 2007) 572 439 1,629 621 752 (Crime in the United States, 2005) Results and Analysis - Duplication Whitefish Bay 2007 budget Administration 2005 2006 2007 % change 05-07 Telephone $ 23,706 $ 23,706 $ 25,275 6.62% Postage $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 0.00% Utilities $ 22,836 $ 29,086 $ 30,540 33.74% Shorewood 2007 budget Administration 2005 2006 2007 % change 05-07 Telephone $ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ 10,500 -4.55% Postage $ 5,500 $ 6,000 $ 6,950 26.36% Utilities $ 23,116 $ 23,837 $ 25,073 8.47% (Village of Shorewood and Village of Whitefish Bay Budgets 2005 – 2007) Wisconsin Population Between 22,000 and 29,500 State WISCONSIN City Population Total officers Officers per 1000 Fitchburg 21,929 39 1.78 Muskego 22,711 36 1.59 Watertown 22,937 38 1.66 De Pere 22,988 32 1.39 Mequon 23,910 36 1.51 Caledonia 24,339 28 1.15 Stevens Point 24,403 44 1.80 Sun Prairie 24,585 44 1.79 Neenah 24,678 38 1.54 Mount Pleasant 25,514 35 1.37 Superior 27,080 58 2.14 West Bend 29,447 56 1.90 24543 40 1.64 Average (OJA, 2005) Results and Analysis Staffing Metro Police Department Use the 1.64 officer ratio per 1000 Metro Police Department would have 44 officers Same ratio as the average of the Midwest and Wisconsin combined Reduction would be one less officer per shift based on the staff minimums (OJA, 2005) Results and Analysis Suggested Staffing Models Position Sun Prairie Stevens West Maximus Model Point Lafayette A Model B Model C Chief 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Deputy Chief 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Captain 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 Lieutenant 4 3 4 2 3 3 3 Sergeant 4 7 4 6 6 6 3 Det/Sergeant 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 Detective 4 4 4 3 2 2 2 Police Officer 29 27 29 31 30 29 31 Total Sworn 44 45 45 46 44 44 44 (Personal communication, 2007; Maximus, 2005) Results and Analysis Staffing Change Shorewood Whitefish Bay Chief of Police 1 1 Model A 1 Deputy Chief 0 0 1 1 Lieutenant 3 2 3 -2 Patrol Sergeant 3 4 6 -1 Det/Sergeant 1 0 1 0 Detective 1 2 2 -1 Patrol Officer 16 15 30 -1 Total 25 24 44 -5 Position Position Change -1 Results and Analysis Shift Staffing Shift minimums • • Late Shift and Day Shift of 5 Patrol Officers and 1 Supervisor Early Shift minimums of 6 Patrol Officers and 1 Supervisor Need 27 Patrol Officers 2 School Liaison Officers 1 Full-time Crime Prevention/Community Officer/Court Officer Results and Analysis Metro Police Wage and Benefit Cost Researcher Model A Position Salary Number in Position Total Salary Benefits @45% Total Cost Chief $90,000 1 $90,000 $40,500 $130,500 Deputy Chief $84,023 1 $84,023 $37,810 $121,833 Lieutenant $74,895 3 $224,685 $101,108 $325,793 Sergeant $66,873 6 $401,238 $180,557 $581,795 Det/Sergeant $66,873 1 $66,873 $30,093 $96,966 Detective $64,319 2 $128,638 $57,887 $186,525 Police Officer $59,435 30 $1,783,050 $802,373 $2,585,423 44 $2,778,507 $1,250,328 $4,028,835 Total Whitefish Bay’s July 2007 salary rates for all officers at Lieutenant rank or below at top pay. (Whitefish Bay Budget, 2007) Results and Analysis Potential Savings Shorewood/Whitefish Bay Combined Total (Wages/Fringe): $4,574,425 Minus new combined sworn officers (Wages & Fringe) $4,028,835 Savings $ 545,590 If Split evenly, savings of $ 272,795 Total Whitefish Bay Budgeted in 2007 Half of new salary/benefits Whitefish Bay Savings $2,219,371 $2,014,418 $ 204,953 Total Shorewood Budgeted in 2007 Half of new salary/benefits Shorewood Savings $2,355,054 $2,014,418 $ 340,636 2007 Wages and Fringe Benefits Only (Village of Shorewood and Village of Whitefish Bay Budgets 2007) Trustee Survey Results Rank your concerns about consolidation with one (1) representing your greatest concern or fear. answer options Three Four Five Six Rating Average Response Count One Two Loss of local control 3 3 2 1 1 0 2.4 10 Loss of local identity 2 3 2 0 2 1 3 10 Start-up cost 2 2 2 1 1 2 3.3 10 Longer response times 2 1 2 1 3 1 3.5 10 Loss of services 1 1 0 5 2 1 3.9 10 On-going cost 0 0 2 2 1 5 4.9 10 Trustee Survey Results How successful were the following consolidations? North Shore Fire Department - 8 of 10 Trustees rated it “Very Successful.” North Shore Dispatch Center - 7 of 10 Trustees rated it “Very Successful.” Shared DPW Equipment - 5 of 10 Trustees rated it “Very Successful.” Trustee Survey Results I would like our Village to look at the following: Yes No Response Count A complete merger of the two departments. This merger would allow for a single operating unit within both communities. 4 6 10 Identify certain functions or functional units within the departments that could be combined such as investigative services, records, training and equipment. 9 1 10 Continue to do business as separate departments but build a joint police station for the purpose of eliminating redundancy of equipment, outdated buildings and giving each department the space needed for a modern police department to function properly. 7 3 10 Do nothing and continue to work as the two departments are working now. 1 9 10 answer options answered question 10 Trustee Survey Results Would you be interested in forming a joint committee to further study this issue? 100% of the Trustees that responded wanted to further study this issue. Conclusion It is feasible to merge the Shorewood and the Whitefish Bay Police Departments. • Actively pursue consolidation • Use the IACP retreat model Conclusion It is economically feasible to consolidate • Appoint a Management Committee • Develop a cost allocation plan • Develop a revenue allocation plan • Look at cost allocations used • Health Services, • North Shore Dispatch Services • North Shore Fire Services. • Use allocation formula to determine final savings Conclusion There is duplication of equipment. • Joint Equipment Committee • Study of similar equipment used • Possible future equipment and capital needs • Limit future purchase of equipment Conclusion Service levels remain the same and or improve. • Examine core services • Determine the level of service • Staff to match these expectations • Recommend Model for staffing • Full-time Police School Liaison Officer • Full-time Crime Prevention officer • 24 hour clerical staff Conclusion There are cost savings from a joint building • Appoint a Facilities Committee • Assist in a space needs study • Determine a location • Assist in scheduling the construction • Dispose of duplicate equipment Conclusion Restraining forces must be addressed • Appoint a Operations Committee • Major restraining forces to consider: • loss of local control • loss of local identity Conclusion Operations Committee to: • Officers to design: • Department patch • Squad design • Visit: • Sauk Prairie Police Department • Everest Metro Police Department • Fox Valley Metro Police Department Final Conclusion The function of this research was to determine the feasibility of a consolidated police department between the Village of Shorewood and the Village of Whitefish Bay. It is feasible and this merger would be in the best interest of both communities. Questions or Comments?