2007WM Structured Academic Controversy Learning Plan Should the Electoral College Be Abolished? Racquel Parra [Pick the date] [Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.] Table of Contents Context .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Rationale ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Grade Level ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Time .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Objectives ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Information ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Skills .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Additional Objective for Targeted Student ........................................................................................... 4 Assessment ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Content and Instructional Strategies ............................................................................................................ 4 Perennial Issue .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Case Issue .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Preparation ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Hook .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Round One: Present Positions .................................................................................................................. 5 Round Two: Reverse Positions .................................................................................................................. 5 Group Discussion ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Wrap-Up.................................................................................................................................................... 5 Begin Homework Assignment in Class ...................................................................................................... 6 Materials ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Differentiations ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Adaptations ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Pre-Reflection ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Sources .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Structured Academic Controversy: ROUND ONE.......................................................................................... 8 Structured Academic Controversy: ROUND TWO......................................................................................... 9 Data Collection Sheet: ROUND ONE ........................................................................................................... 10 Data Collection Sheet: Round Two ............................................................................................................. 11 Assignment: What do you think? ................................................................................................................ 12 2 Context This lesson will be taught as part of Unit III: The Political Process. The students will already know that the President is not directly elected by the people, but rather by delegates to the Electoral College. They will also understand that each state’s population roughly determines the number of delegates each state sends to the Electoral College (the number of delegates is equal to the number of Representatives and Senators each state has in Congress; the District of Columbia has three electoral votes). Overview As stated above, the President is not directly elected by the people, but rather by delegates to the Electoral College. The number of delegates is equal to the number of Representatives and Senators each state has in Congress, and the District of Columbia has three electoral votes. In 48 states and D.C., the candidate that receives the most votes in a state receives all of the votes from electors in that state. In Maine and Nebraska, one elector is chose by each congressional district, and two electors are chosen by the statewide popular vote. Using this system, the candidate who wins the popular vote may lose the election. This has happened four times in our nation’s history, and most recently in the 2000 Presidential Election. Rationale The Structured Academic Controversy is used to foster within students an understanding of controversial public issues. In this type of activity, the students examine both sides of an issue and then have the opportunity to create their own informed position. The SAC also helps students improve discussion skills in a highly structured environment. This student-centered approach helps students retain information more successfully, and engages them more than teacher-centered learning. This particular question can be effectively explored in a SAC because it is a yes or no question, and there are multiple and competing evidences available. Grade Level This lesson is designed for Standard and Honors sections of a 12th grade Virginia and United States Government course. Time This lesson should take about 80 minutes of class time. Objectives Information Students will be able to demonstrate an understanding of the role of the Electoral College in our nation’s political process by writing a letter to their Congressperson that identifies at least three 3 reasons why they feel the way they do about the Electoral College. (GOVT.1g, GOVT.6b, GOVT.18e, NCSS.V, NCSS. X) Skills Students will be able to look their classmates in the eye as they present evidence, given various arguments for and against the abolition of the Electoral College. Given a worksheet created by the teacher, students will be able to paraphrase arguments from their data sheet. Additional Objective for Targeted Student The student will demonstrate on-task behavior through successful completion of the graphic organizer, participation in the SAC, and creation of a letter to his Congressperson. Assessment The teacher will circulate during the activity to ensure the students contribute at least one argument to the discussion of each position. For homework, the students will write a letter to their Congressperson encouraging them to consider their position. This will count toward their homework grade. The unit test will include a few of questions meant to evaluate the students’ understanding of the lesson. Content and Instructional Strategies Perennial Issue Does the government reflect the will of the people? Case Issue Should the Electoral College be abolished? Preparation Create heterogeneous cooperative learning pairs. Make sure the desks are set up in groups of four. As the students enter the room, tell them who their partner is, and have them sit with them. Hook (10 minutes) http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/electoralcoll.htm (this 3 minute video explains the Electoral College in simple terms) 4 Explain to the students that they will be participating in a lesson called a “Structured Academic Controversy” to examine the evidence for and against abolition of the Electoral College. Explain to them that this has become a controversial issue since the 2000 Presidential Election went to George W. Bush instead of Al Gore, because, although Gore won the popular vote (more votes overall), Bush won the 270 votes needed in the Electoral College. Many people had a problem with this because if the Electoral College did not exist, Gore would have been elected instead since he won more votes across the nation. Round One: Present Positions (20 minutes) Assign Positions (2 minutes): Each pair within each four-person group will be assigned one of two positions based upon which data sheet they receive from the teacher. To make monitoring the activity easier, assign the positions in a consistent manner. For instance, the teacher can give all of the students who are facing the door the “yes” position and give all of the students who are facing the windows the “no” position. Research Positions (10 minutes): o Tell the students they have 5 minutes to read their data set. Encourage them to underline key points. o Give each student a red and green colored pencil and 4 star stickers to use to complete the graphic organizer. Once each pair has completed reading their data set, have them spend about 5 minutes paraphrasing the evidence. Make sure they are prepared to each present at least one position to the pair representing the other side. Present Positions (8 minutes): o Explain to the students that they are expected to listen carefully and take notes as the other side presents their evidence. Tell them they should sit up straight and look their classmates in the eye as they are speaking. Make sure they understand that this is not a debate (there are no winners or losers), and that after a team has presented its evidence the listening team will have the opportunity to ask clarifying questions. These questions should not be argumentative. For instance, “What did you mean by…?” or, “Can you explain ______ differently?” are both acceptable forms of questions. o Give the “yes” team 3 minutes to present their evidence. Remind the class that each student must present at least one piece of evidence. o Next, allow the other side 30 seconds to ask any clarifying questions they may have. o Repeat Steps 2 and 3, but have the teams switch roles. Round Two: Reverse Positions (20 minutes) Have students repeat the same steps listed above for Round 1. This time, the students will research the opposite positions, using new evidence provided by the teacher. Group Discussion (5 minutes) Have the students spend about 5 minutes discussing how they actually feel about the issue. This discussion may or may not lead to a consensus. Wrap-Up (8 minutes) 5 Have at least one member of each group contribute to a class discussion on if and how the group reached a consensus. Also, have a few students answer the question “What did you learn today?” and pass out the assignment sheet. Read it with the students and answer any questions they may have. Begin Homework Assignment in Class (15 minutes) Students will work individually to write a persuasive letter to their Congressperson (for assignment details, see assignment and rubric on final page) Materials Laptop with Internet connection Speakers Projector Hook video clip 90 Copies of the Data Retrieval Chart (one for each student in each of 4 classes) 90 Copies of Assignment Sheet (one for each student in each of 4 classes) 45 copies of each of two “yes” data sets 45 copies of each of two “no” data sets 30 red and 30 green colored pencils 120 star stickers Differentiations Because this is a cooperative learning activity and the students will be placed in heterogeneous pairs, students should not experience difficulty completing the assignment. If only one or two pairs struggle, each pair could be placed with another pair that is completing the work with ease. This will allow the successful students teach the struggling students while at the same time reinforcing their own understandings. Cooperative learning will be used often in my classroom. Students with below grade level reading abilities can be exposed to new or challenging vocabulary in a crossword puzzle as a bell ringer at the beginning of class. This lesson could be adapted for higher achieving or gifted students. Instead of using bullet-pointed information, the teacher could use op-ed articles and challenge the students to find the arguments themselves. As a further challenge, the students could be asked to come up with their own way to use their newfound knowledge. They could be permitted to write a letter to their congressperson, a letter to a local newspaper, or create a petition to generate community support for their position. They could also be encouraged to do further research on a particular piece of evidence they find interesting. Adaptations None of my students has an IEP, but four students have Section 504 Plans for ADHD, and my targeted student also displays several characteristics of ADHD. The targeted student seems to display more on-task behavior when he is allowed to interact with his peers, so the interactive nature of this lesson should benefit him. In addition, because the student has difficulties staying in his seat and fidgets 6 often, I will enlist his help in passing out materials. This lesson is highly structured and has minimal transition time, which should help students with ADHD. These students may need to be informed about the lesson and major points before hand. If this will be beneficial, I will send the materials home with them the class before. During the lesson, I will tell the class how long they have for each task before they begin, and for longer tasks (letter to their Congressperson), I will also let the students know when they have about half the allotted time remaining. Each student with ADHD will be working with a peer without ADHD, so additional time should not be necessary. For this lesson, I will implement the intervention of adding structure to a task. Research by Raggi and Chronis (2006) indicates that this intervention helps make tasks more manageable and enjoyable. To implement this, I will post a schedule of the day’s activities on the blackboard. Also, I will give explicit instructions, one at a time. For instance, instead of telling the students to read their data set, underline key points, and paraphrase the arguments all at the same time, I would first tell them to spend five minutes reading their information and underlining key points. After having done so, I would instruct them to spend another five minutes paraphrasing the arguments on their color-coded graphic organizer. The color on the graphic organizer should help with within-task stimulation, which is another intervention discussed by Raggi and Chronis (2006). The students will be given star stickers and red and green colored pencils to further focus their attention. Pre-Reflection I think the biggest challenges I will encounter with implementing this lesson will be maintaining order and keeping all of the students on task. Many of the students tend to drift off in class, but I hope that the heavily structured nature of this lesson will counter this. I also believe that the graphic organizer and fast-pace of the lesson will help the students focus their ideas and their attention. I am also concerned that the students will have trouble paraphrasing the information and talking directly to one another. This is a skill I hope the students will acquire through practice. In addition, I am interested to see how the students work together in assigned pairs, since the classes tend to segregate themselves by gender and/or ethnicity. I hope that the students will experience several cooperative learning activities and become more comfortable and desegregated before I teach this lesson in the spring. I am particularly interested in how one student will perform in pairs because he is very introverted and always works by himself in activities meant for work with a partner. I plan to approach him before the lesson to find out whom he would feel most comfortable working with because it is important that he acquire the social skills necessary to interact with others, although I recognize the need to ease him into social situations. Sources http://www.fairvote.org/e_college/problems.htm http://www.fairvote.org/e_college/faithless.htm http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/electoralcoll.htm Raggi, V. L., & Chronis, A. M. (2006). Interventions to address the academic impairment of children and adolescents with ADHD. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 9(2), 85-111. 7 Structured Academic Controversy: ROUND ONE Should the Electoral College be Abolished? YES! If a state is not considered “in play,” candidates tend to ignore it. The Electoral College does not encourage campaigning in non-competitive states. Since the Electoral College employs a winner-take-all method, candidates have little incentive to campaign in a state that strongly favors them or their opponent. For instance, Virginia was “in play” in the 2008 Presidential Election and Barack Obama visited the state 17 times between January and November, while he only visited Louisiana (a Republican stronghold) once in that period. Four times in our nation’s history, men who did not receive the popular vote won the presidency. In 2000, Al Gore won the popular vote, but George W. Bush won the Electoral College votes and, with it, the presidency. Everyone should have an equally weighted vote. The Electoral College favors smaller states, which have more electoral votes per person. For instance, Wyoming has three votes and a population of about 515,000. Texas has 34 votes and a population of about 23.5 million. Texas has 11 times the votes and 47 times the population, so individual votes in Wyoming count more than individual votes in Texas. The winner-take-all rule leads to lower voter turnout in states where one party dominates, because members who support the other party’s candidate know their vote will not matter. Should the Electoral College be Abolished? NO! Constitutional amendments to abolish or change the Electoral College have been proposed more than 700 times during the past two centuries. None has come close to being adopted, indicating the understood value of the system. In only four of the nation’s 54 presidential elections since 1789 has the electoral vote winner not been the winner of the popular vote. In those four elections, the vote margin between the two candidates has been small. If one-person-one vote democracy is important, we should not abolish the Electoral College, but the Senate. States have the same number of electors as they have members of Congress, in rough proportion to their population. However, each state has two Senators regardless of the size of the population. The Electoral College was created to preserve the role of the states in governing our federal nation. We are a nation of states, not autonomous citizens. The states created the central government, the central government did not create the states. 8 Structured Academic Controversy: ROUND TWO Should the Electoral College Be Abolished? NO! The Framers of the Constitution did not believe political contests should be determined by majority rule. They worried that blind majoritarianism could be as menacing to liberty as a king or dictator. If the Electoral College were abolished, America would never again see a president with a clear majority of the popular vote, only a plurality, since its elimination would result in the end to the two-party system. The Electoral College gives us immediate clarity. In a close vote without the Electoral College, the first count would undoubtedly be contested, and there is no telling how many recounts it would take to placate (appease, calm) everyone. Our elections would be decided by lawyers and judges, rather than the people. The Electoral College contributes to the unity of the nation by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president. Candidates have an incentive to work to unify states and regions rather than focus on regional differences. Other geographically large nations such as China, India, and the Soviet Union have all experienced severe regional differences that have created governing problems. Should the Electoral College Be Abolished? YES! In many states, electors are not obligated by law to vote for the candidate their state has selected. In other states, electors only incur small fines for going against the will of the people. Since the founding of the Electoral College, 156 electors have not cast their vote for the candidates they were designated to represent. The House of Representatives can choose the president. If no candidate receives a majority (270) of the electoral votes, the House chooses the President, and the Senate chooses the Vice President. If the two chambers of Congress have different political majorities, then they may pick members of opposing parties. Opposition between the two could cause government instability. Because few people will support a party they do not believe will win, voters frequently vote for the “lesser of two evils,” rather than the person they think is best for the job. The Electoral College reinforces the two-party system, because third-party candidates cannot enter the race without taking support from one of the two major parties. 9 Data Collection Sheet: ROUND ONE Should the Electoral College Be Abolished? Use the boxes below to take notes about your data sheet, and about the evidence provided by the team representing the other position. Each box should contain one argument, written in your own words. Please place a next to the evidence you will present to the other side. YES! NO! 10 Data Collection Sheet: Round Two Should the Electoral College Be Abolished? Use the boxes below to take notes about your data sheet, and about the evidence provided by the team representing the other position. Each box should contain one argument, written in your own words. Please place a next to the evidence you will present to the other side. YES! NO! 11 Assignment: What do you think? (complete for homework): Should the Electoral College Be Abolished? Write a letter to your Congressperson explaining your position on the controversial issue discussed in class today. Include both of the following: 1. at least three pieces of evidence in support of your position 2. at least one piece of evidence from the other side. Explain why you disagree with that evidence. Rubric Criteria 2 Points Accuracy Content is accurate; all aspects of question are addressed Evidence Content is detailed with thoughtful explanations; shows relation of concepts; clearly defines concepts of question asked Grammar, usage, and mechanics Contains no more than 2 minor errors in grammar and usage; contains no more than 2 minor errors in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation 1 Point Contains 1 or 2 minor errors in factual information; missing at least 1 aspect of the question asked Vague, broad, and sweeping statements are used to illustrate concepts; lacks detail or explanation of relevance Contains 3 – 4 errors in grammar and usage; contains 3 – 4 errors in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation ½-0 Points Content is inaccurate No detail or explanation is given Contains 5+ errors in grammar and usage; contains 5+ errors in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation 12