Astronomy, Radio Sources and Society Extragalactic radio sources and their importance for astronomy Leiden 10-13 June 2013 Ron Ekers CSIRO, Australia 1 George Miley The largest, the furthest, the most powerful, and to some of us the most fascinating objects known in the Universe are to be found among the radio sources associated with some elliptical galaxies and QSO’s. In recent years it has become apparent that they are also objects of considerable beauty. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys, 1980 2 50th Anniversary of the Discovery of Quasars January 7, 2013 AAS Long Beach Mt Palomar3 200” Geese Hoyle, Burbidge and Narlikar Linear size distribution of radio galaxies a b 3CR radiogalaxies Linear plot with linear bins ↕ Log plot with log bins Ekers & Miley 1977 5 The Scientific Method Developed during the 17th century – Develop an hypothesis – Make predictions – Verify with observations (or discard hypothesis) Eg Newton's theory of gravity – – – – at the time Newton died it was still merely a hypothesis It explained everything from planets to falling apples It was verified by the return of Halley’s comet in 1758 Since than it made many predictions 23May2007 Halley Lecture Astronomy Most astronomy papers today are explanations of observed phenomena. Predictions usually fail and it is considered normal practice to adapt the theory to fit the observations. These theories may not be wrong, but without predictions we have no reason to accept them Many examples in our interpretation of radio galaxies The role of the sceptic in science 7 Where we are going from here Some of the enabling technology Martin Rees and the Wireless Internet Radio Galaxies from the beginning QSO 50th anniversary Blackholes Some Extragalactic Radio Source Highlights Galaxy formation and the early Universe 8 Cambridge One-Mile Telescope: 1962 9 First Cambridge Earth Rotation Synthesis Image June 1961 North pole survey 4C aerials 178 MHz Computations and graphical display used EDSACII 7 years after Christiansen 10 Benelux Cross 1963 Joint Netherlands – Belgium OEEC (now OECD) agreement Christiansen et al design 100x 30m + 1x 70m dish 21cm 1.5km Science Goals for Benelux Cross Oort - OECD Symposium (1961) – Primary goal » Enough sensitivity and resolving power to study the early universe through source counts Westerbork: 1970 Hogbom (Cambridge) + Christiansen (Sydney) Benelux cross WSRT 12 x 25m dishes – Two moveable – 10 redundant spacings – Self calibration Add 2 more 25m dishes later 13 LOFAR: The Low Frequency Array Oort Workshop 1997 George Miley proposal to ASTRON Arnold van Ardenne already thinking about SKA-low and the aperture arrays Actively promoted by George – Low Frequencies are Cheap! 14 LOFAR WILL EXPLORE NEW PARAMETER SPACE • Lowest Radio Frequencies (< 50 MHz) (Wavelengths > 3 metre) – Neglected cradle of radio astronomy • Bill Erickson – a hero – Coherent radiation processes – Oldest synchrotron electrons – “Fossil” – Absorption • Huge Simultaneous Fields (tens of degrees with large-sky monitor triggering) – Searches for rare variable and transient sources and cosmic air showers – “Synoptic” telescope • High Dynamic Range Radio Spectroscopy at 110 – 230 MHz – Search for fingerprint of reionization • Neutral hydrogen (HI) at z ~ 11 to z ~7 DESIGN OF LOFAR DRIVEN BY FEW KEY PROJECTS From Cambridge to The Netherlands 1970 then to Australia 1996 Steven Hawking: black holes radiate Small black holes evaporate in less than the age of the Universe Martin Rees: a radio pulse might be observable when they disappear John O’Sullivan: and collaborators build a special instrument to look for the exploding black holes using Dwingeloo and Westerbork – “there has to be a better way!” Fourier Transform on a chip – IEEE 802.11 wireless internet standard June 2013 Ekers, Radio Sources & Society 16 Cygnus A strongest radio source in sky Hey 1946 – – – – source with variable intensity time scale of seconds to minutes must be small diameter the first “radio star” What was it? – no optical counterpart – was the whole galactic plane was made of such stars? – no theory linking diffuse galactic emission to cosmic rays 17 What is the Non-thermal Radio Emission? A very confusing story Misinterpretation of radio data added to the confusion some radio sources had small diameter (Hey). – Hey was correct but it was incorrectly assumed that all radio emission was the sum of these radio stars It was assumed that the radio stars were like the sun – this was also incorrect. – they were galactic nebula (SNR) and extra galactic (AGN) 18 Cliff Interferometer 1948 Dover Heights, Sydney, Australia Piha and Leigh, New Zealand Cliff interferometer CSIRO, Australia - NZ (1948) Built to identify the radio stars (John Bolton) Identification of the Crab Nebula super novae remnant Discovery of extragalactic radio sources at great distances Centaurus A – NGC5128 and Virgo A – M87 19 NGC5128 Centaurus A Centaurus A ATCA Mosaic Feain et al 2011 The First Radio Galaxies 1949 : The first radio galaxies? “Positions of Three Discrete Sources of Galactic Radio-Frequency Radiation” - (Bolton, Stanley, and Slee, Nature 164, 101) » NGC 5128 and NGC 4486 (M87) have not been resolved into stars, so there is little direct evidence that they are true galaxies. If the identification of the radio sources are accepted, it would indicate that they are within our own Galaxy. January 7, 2013 Kellermann AAS Long Beach 23 Why was it so difficult to accept extra-galactic? Letter from Bolton to Minkowski 20 May 1949 There were no galaxy experts at CSIR and very few in Australia It was easier to assume that the strange galaxies were unusual galactic objects There were no known mechanisms to explain the powerful radio emission if extragalactic 24 Synchrotron Model for Radio Emission 1949 Unsold: sunspots anomalous radiation – non-thermal – plasma oscillations 1950 Alven & Herlofson: – synchrotron radiation from sunspots 1950 Kiepenhauer (visiting Yerkes) – proposed the ISM rather than stars – needed magnetic field and high energy charged particles – He knew there was evidence for both » optical polarization and cosmic rays Mostly ignored in the West but enthusiastically embraced in Russia by Ginzburg and later by Shklovski 25 3C 48, the first radio star Small diameter source catalogue from Manchester – Henry Palmer & George Miley ? Accurate position measured at OVRO 1960 Tom Matthews and John Bolton identify 3C 48 with a stellar object Greenstein, Munch, Sandage 200” spectra – Lots of unidentified spectral lines Alan Sandage AAS paper (Dec 29, 1960), – Remote possibility that it may be a distant galaxy of stars. But there is general agreement … that it is a relatively nearby star. S&T, 21, l48 26 January 7, 2013 Adapted from Kellermann AAS Long 3C 273 identification Parkes lunar occultation January 7, 2013 Kellermann AAS Long Beach Cyril Hazard 27 50th Anniversary of the Discovery of Quasars January 7, 2013 AAS Long Beach 28 200” Mt Palomar Slide prepared by Jan Oort 3C273 Parkes Occultation 1962 Striking difference in radio spectra Component A S = -0.9 Component B S = 0.0 Core – Jet morphology 29 3C273 VLA 5GHz 1998 30 3C273 Optical HST 31 First Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics Gravitational Collapse and Relativistic Astrophysics – Dallas, Texas, Dec 16-18 1963 – only gravity of a massive object in the nucleus of a galaxy could provide the energy Fred Hoyle: – relativists with their sophisticated work were not only magnificent cultural ornaments but might actually be useful to science! – The University of Chicago Press, 1965 32 The Nuclei of Galaxies 1943: Carl Seyfert (Clevland, Ohio) – “Enhanced activity in the nuclei of 6 extragalactic nebulae – No citations for 18 years! 1958: Viktor Ambartsumian (Armenia) – Championed the role of the galaxy nuclei 1961: Vitaly Ginzburg (Russia) – Showed that gravitational energy could power a radio galaxy 33 The Energy Source Old models disappear fairly quickly – Galaxies in collision (Baade & Minkowski) Bad theory – Nuclear energy – Electromagnetic flares Redshift controversy lasts for many years – Many argued that the quasars are nearby Bad theory – New physics was better than the incredible luminosity – But all predictions failed Gravitational energy from a collapsed object – Ginzburg, Hoyle, Fowler, Zeldovich, Novikov..... – This was a paradigm shift – But what kind of condensed object? 34 Black Holes Chandrasekhar (1931) – paper rejected by ApJ – “A star of large mass cannot pass into the white dwarf stage, one is left speculating on other possibilities” Eddington – the authority – “a star would have to go on radiating and radiating, and contracting and contracting….I think there should be a law of nature to stop matter behaving in this absurd way” Oppenheimer (1939) – exercise in abstraction – “the star closes itself off from any communication…only its gravitational field persists” NGC326 – pressing jet Binary Black hole? Martin Rees 1978 – One black hole already pushes credibility – two was a step too far NGC326 – pressing jet Binary Black Hole? Martin Rees 1978 – One black hole already pushes credibility – two was a step too far Binary Black holes? – Evidence for super massive binary black hole mergers and Gravitational wave predictions VLA 1.4GHz Murgia et al, A&A 380, 102-116 (2001) Merritt & Ekers Science (2002) Suspected SMBH binaries 3C75-type sources: wide binaries 38 Periodic outbursts interpreting Pks0637-752 Binary black-hole in bound orbit periodicly plunges through the accretion disk – will maintain its spin axis so gets a new accretion disk each plunge PKS0637-752 – Quasar with Xray/radio jet 39 Hercules A VLA and HST Baum et al (2012) 40 NGC1265 head tail radio source • Head tail radio source • Rosetta stone for radio galaxies - Provided the time stamp - Radio source aging model was incorrect - Fixed by re-acceleration 41 Fornax A on optical image Fornax A Depolarization Fornax A and the ant like feature Need a turbulant magneto-ionic medium RM > 20 rad m-2 Size 14” Eg – – – – Ne = .03 cm-3 B = 2 μG L = 100pc M = 109 Mo Bland-Hawthorne ApJ 447, L77 (1995) – Halpha detection at v = 1610km/s Nov 2010 Ron Ekers NGC6251 Alignment VLBI cores aligned to within a few degrees over scale changes of 5x106 Hence maintains axis for at least 108 years 45 3C273 superluminal expansion predicted & observed 46 Relativistic outflow in AGN M87 • One sided Doppler boost but components have v/c < 1 ! • components are slow moving shocks not measuring bulk flow • evidence for original interpretation is now lost! 47 Centaurus A - closest AGN HIPASS 21cm Continuum Preliminary continuum image, courtesy Mark Calabretta (CSIRO 48 ATNF) Centaurus A ATCA Mosaic 1.4GHz 600kpc continuum full polarization 4 x 750m array configuration 406 pointings, hexagonal grid FOV 45 deg2 θ~45’’ ~0.26mJy/beam (0.1K) Ilana Feain Cen A Mosaic N lobe May 2012 50 Centaurus A composite May 2012 51 Centaurus A middle lobe X-ray XMM Newton May 2012 52 Centaurus A middle lobe radio continuum and HI Morganti May 2012 53 H alpha Ellis and Bland-Hawthorne May 2012 54 LOFAR SCIENCE DRIVER 2: SURVEYS 2.1 ULTRA STEEP SPECTRUM SOURCES – PROBE OF GALAXY AND CLUSTER FORMATION e.g. Blumenthal & Miley 1988 e.g. Blumenthal & Miley 1988 Radio spectrum Cygnus A Larger redshifts > higher frequencies > steeper spectra LOFAR WILL DETECT STEEPEST SPECTRA (MOST DISTANT SOURCES) The evolution of radio galaxies BIG BANG NOW but USS spectra don’t steepen at all… our ATCA observations confirm that high-z radio galaxy spectra are not curved The K-correction interpretation is inconsistent with observations Klamer (Feien) MNRAS (2006) July 2005 Ilana Klamer - ASA 57 Evolution of density fluctuations ρ (1+z)3 ρ=0 Δρ ρclus ρ=0 z=6 27 Nov 1999 R D Ekers 58 z=0 Radio Galaxy - 4C41.17 redshift 3.8 Alignment of radio jets (contours) with other tracers of star formation – VLA radio image HST F702 HST F569 Ly-α van Breugel (1985) 13 July 05 R D Ekers 59 Alignment with Radio Axis Radio PA Dust PA CO PA Predicted an alignment in 4C41.17 Observed Δpa = 8o Klamer et al. 2004 13 July 2005 R D Ekers 60 Survey of CO in High z Radio Galaxies 13 high redshift radio galaxies – 1.4 < z < 2.8 CO (1-0) aligned with radio axis! Emonts, Miley et al 2013 61 The power of science is its ability to make predictions but science itself will evolve in unpredictable ways March 2013 Ekers Conclusion 62