Green Ribbon Commission BU Renewable Energy Strategy June 15, 2015 Our Opportunity The Market Strategy Our Opportunity The Market Strategy Our Opportunity The Market Institution Top 15 Universities Strategy Green Power Usage Green Power (kWh/yr) % of Total Electricity Use Resources 1 University of Pennsylvania 200,183,000 2 Georgetown University 152,370,500 130% Various 3 University of Oklahoma 134,898,600 76% Wind 4 The Ohio State University 133,631,369 23% Wind 5 Carnegie Mellon University 115,637,466 98% Solar, Wind 6 Oklahoma State University 100,360,039 7 Northwestern University 96,720,800 38% Solar, Wind 8 Drexel University 96,678,000 100% Solar, Wind 9 University of Utah 85,926,100 28% Solar, Wind 10 University of Tennessee, Knoxville 80,020,000 32% Biogas, Small-hydro, Solar, Wind 11 University at Buffalo 78,392,000 36% Solar University of Wisconsin 68,673,740 15% Wind 13 The City University of New York 64,000,000 14 University of Missouri 56,963,935 22% 15 American University 56,315,885 113% 12 51% 100% of Demand Wind 71% 50% of Demand Wind 15% 30% of Demand Wind Biomass, Solar, Wind Source: EPA Solar, Wind State of Solar The Market Strategy State of Solar The Market Strategy System Pricing 3/Watt $ 2013 Average System Price Source: GreentechSolar State of Solar The Market Strategy US Generation 36% Solar of New US Generation In Q1-Q3 of 2014 Source: SEIA State of Solar 30% The Market Strategy Renewable Energy Investment Tax Credit Generating Capacity for Solar PV in the Northeast Source: US EIA State of Solar 30% The Market Strategy Renewable Energy Investment Tax Credit Generating Capacity for Wind in the Northeast Source: US EIA State of Solar The Market Strategy Boston Properties 113 51580 mtCO2e $ weeks savings/week 950 Winter Street Waltham, MA State of Solar The Market Strategy State of Solar The Market Strategy Considerations Financial Model Build/Own/Maintain Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) State of Solar The Market Strategy Considerations Financial Model Build/Own/Maintain Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) No Upfront Cost Immediate Savings Buy the Power Long Term Agreement Enable Project Financing State of Solar The Market Strategy Considerations Financial Model Build/Own/Maintain Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) Initial Cost/kWh Escalation Rate Price Floor Buyout Schedule Incentives Risk State of Solar The Market Strategy Considerations Renewables On Site Solar Wind Renewables Off Site Inside MA Inside NE Outside NE State of Solar The Market Strategy State of Solar The Market Strategy Drivers 1. Reduce Annual Elect. Costs 2. Reduce Exposure to Price Volatility 3. Retain Renewable Energy Credits Where possible 4. Maximize Value through Aggregation State of Solar The Market Strategy Process Learning Curve Proactive vs Reactive AASHE SSCC NECSC DOER EPA Green Power Peers Developers Brokers Boston Properties State of Solar The Market Strategy Process Feasibility Study Bldg. by Bldg. Evaluation Solar Resource Interconnection Infrastructure Roof Condition Structural Capacity PV System Reqs. Balance of System Reqs. Economic Analysis State of Solar The Market Strategy Process Three RFPs 1. CRC 2. BUMC/BMC 3. Large Off Site State of Solar The Market Strategy Developing Projects Feasibility Study Phase I Phase II 1.7MW 2.0MW State of Solar The Market Strategy Developing Projects 100 Ashford Street 750 kW Roof-mounted 790,000 kWh Annually State of Solar The Market Strategy Developing Projects CILSE 112 kW Roof-mounted 140,000 kWh Annually State of Solar The Market Strategy Developing Projects BUMC/BMC 610 Albany 710 Albany 0.53MW 0.45MW State of Solar The Market Strategy Developing Projects Large Scale Off Site American/GW Example OSU Example GRC Renewable Energy Purchasing Network American Source: Ohio StateUniversity University State of Solar The Market Institution Scale of Opportunity Strategy Green Power Usage (kWh/yr) GHG Reduction 51% 63% 100% of Demand Green Power % of Total Electricity Use Annual Savings $1.5 – $3.5 Million Annual Savings Total Saving Wind $38 - $88 Various Million Wind WindTotal Solar, Saving Wind Resources 1 University of Pennsylvania 200,183,000 2 Georgetown University 152,370,500 130% 3 University of Oklahoma 134,898,600 76% 4 The Ohio State University 133,631,369 5 Carnegie Mellon University 115,637,466 GHG 23% Reduction 98% 6 Oklahoma State University 100,360,039 7 Northwestern University 96,720,800 38% 8 Drexel University 96,678,000 100% Solar, Wind 9 University of Utah 85,926,100 28% Solar, Wind 10 University of Tennessee, Knoxville 80,020,000 32% Biogas, Small-hydro, Solar, Wind 11 University at Buffalo 78,392,000 University of Wisconsin 68,673,740 13 The City University of New York 64,000,000 14 University of Missouri 56,963,935 22% 15 American University 56,315,885 113% 12 71% 50% of Demand 44% 36% GHG 15% Reduction 15% 30% of Demand 36% $0.6 - $1.7 Million Wind $14 - $44 Solar, Wind Million SolarTotal Annual Wind Savings Saving Wind $0.4 - $0.8 $8 - $20 Biomass, Solar, Wind Million Solar, Wind Million Source: CFR EPA w/BU analysis sustainability@BU.edu