Aggregate Demand & Supply Part II: Supply Aggregate Supply Aggregate Supply = total goods & services supplied Aggregate Supply Curve relates total goods & services supplied to general price level, Y = f(P) disagreement over derivation disagreement over shape Theorists distinguish between short run and long run aggregate supply curves Aggregate S si Just as the aggregate demand curve is not equal to the sum of individual demand curves, so too with supply Individual supply curves are based on ceteris paribus assumption But with general rise in price level, all prices rise, including input prices so ceteris paribus can't hold Aggregate Supply = Results So, aggregate supply is not really derived, it is presented as what happens on the whole, the net result of all firms responses to average changes in the price level Yet, reasoning about the shape of the aggregate supply curve is carried on in terms of the way firms might be expected to act in various situations --based on microeconomic theory about firm decision making Firm Theory Microeconomic theory of the firm, says firms: maximize net revenue or profit rising input prices shift cost curves up and (ceteris paribus) reduce supply falling input prices shift cost curves down and (ceteris paribus) increase supply Let's look at an example: Perfectly Competitive Firm - I Output prices are given, max w/ MC = MR MC price AC p1 given price= MR Q1 Output Perfectly Competitive Firm - II If costs fall, output will rise, with MC' = MR MC MC' price Note: p1 no change in given price! Q1 Q2 Output Perfectly Competitive Firm - III If Output prices rise, output rises MC price AC p2 p1 P=MR Q1 Q2 Output Contradiction Note, reasoning about aggregate supply relates general price changes to output decisions But: FALLING input prices result in increased output RISING output prices result in increased output Solution? Consider response of firms to overall price level what this means is by no means clear, not in micro theory Consider firms' short run capacity in micro terms this is shape of cost curve Consider lags between increases in overall price level and inputs, especially wages(!) Clearly, the reasoning is only partially based on microeconomic firm theory Positive Slope? In general, it is assumed that in the short run firms will INCREASE output as the price level rises but with increasing difficulty as they approach their capacity (i.e., costs increase) determined by fixed production assets Because we are dealing with aggregates, capacity is related, as in Keynesian theory, to "full employment" level of Y Aggregate Supply Curve So, aggregate supply is assumed to look like this: AS P Y Changing slope? At low levels of Y, AS is assumed to be relatively flat AS P excess capacity rationale: easy to increase output, input prices lag, esp. wages Y Changing slope? At higher levels of Y, AS is assumed to be relatively vertical P less excess AS capacity rationale: harder tooutput as input prices , esp. wages Y Wage - Price Relation A central issue here is the relationship between changes in prices and changes in wages do wage changes lag price changes? do wage changes keep up with price changes? e.g., indexed wages? if prices & wages adjust the same, then profit maximization would result in no change in output, --AS would be vertical because ALL wages are almost never indexed, some will fall behind and rising prices will increase profits and result in higher output, e.g., upward slope Shifts in AS curve Anything that changes price - output decisions will shift curve P AS Y Cost Shocks Changes in basic costs, e.g., wages or oil, change costs for most firms P wages costs AS AS oil price costs AS Y Growth & Stagnation Changes in available means of production, eg., labor or capital shifts AS P labor capacity AS AS capital capacity AS Y Public Policies Policies that increase or decrease costs shift AS P EPA costs AS AS regulation costs AS Y --END--