Chapter 5: Lithography Virginia Tech C05 - 1 Introduction The mechanism to print 2-D patterns to a thin film layer on the wafer surface. Masks are glass plates (soda lime or quartz glass) that contain the patterns. The patterns are first transferred from the mask to photoresist (PR), a light-sensitive polymer. After opening windows in the PR, the pattern is transferred to the thin film using etching techniques. Complexity of a fabrication process is often measured by the number of photolithographic masks used in the process. Virginia Tech C05 - 2 Introduction The concept is simple – Spin on a thin layer of light-sensitive photoresist – Selectively expose it to UV light Causing chemical bonds to either form or break – Develop to selectively remove the lighter weight PR The resist may be used as a mask for either etching or for ion implantation Because of constraints of resolution, exposure field, accuracy, throughput, and defect density, the implementation is not so simple – Very expensive – Very complex Virginia Tech C05 - 3 Introduction • Steps in the mask fabrication process: Designing 2D layout using CAD tools Transfer data to pattern generator (mask maker) Only Glass Pattern generation on the mask plate coated with Cr&PR Etching PR and then Cr Inspection Glass plate with Cr Stripping PR Virginia Tech C05 - 4 Introduction Mask Maker Virginia Tech C05 - 5 Introduction • Steps in the photolithography Clean wafer Hard Bake deposit film (oxide, nitride, metal, …) Etch the deposited film Coat with PR Remove PR Typical for 1800 Series PR: Soft Bake: 110°C for 1min on a hotplate Hard Bake: 110°C for 3min on a hotplate PR1813 1.3µm @ 4krpm & 30sec PR1827 2.7µm @ 4krpm & 30sec Soft bake Align masks Expose Pattern Develop PR Virginia Tech C05 - 6 Introduction Hotplate Spinner Virginia Tech C05 - 7 Introduction Mask Aligner Virginia Tech C05 - 8 Introduction UV 1 5,6 2 6 3,4 Virginia Tech C05 - 9 Introduction Some common PRs: 1800 series (for thin) will be developed in MF 319 9200 series (for thick) will be developed in AZ 400 7,8 9 Be aware that there are two different types of PR: Positive PR: exposed areas will be developed Negative PR: exposed areas will not be developed Virginia Tech 10 C05 - 10 Alignment Markers Once a photolith process is done, the pattern developed is used to perform some additional process selectively on the wafer – Etching trenches in Si or SiO2 – Making metalization runs – Implantation of dopants Then the wafer will come back for another photolith step Alignment markers are registration patterns that mate from one mask to another so that the multiple pattern sets match one another. Virginia Tech C05 - 11 Introduction Virginia Tech Positive resists provide better controllability for small features. Positive resists are easier to work with and use less corrosive developers and chemicals. Positive resists are the dominant type of photoresists today. C05 - 12 Clear Field and Dark Field Masks Most photolith engineers prefer clear field masks when possible – Easier to detect pattern on the wafer itself as there is more clear glass in the mask Virginia Tech C05 - 13 Introduction Demands placed on this process for – Resolution: smaller device structures – Exposure field: ever-increasing chip sizes – Placement accuracy: aligning with existing layers – Throughput: manufacturing cost – Defects: yield and cost Virginia Tech C05 - 14 NTRS Lithography Requirements Virginia Tech C05 - 15 Introduction The National Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors defines the future needs Note especially – The driving force is the reduction of feature size – For every factor of two in reduction of area, there is a reduction of 0.7 in the linear dimensions – The reduction is required every three years – The most commonly quoted feature size is not as small as isolated MOS gate lines – Critical dimension (CD) control must improve (about 10% of minimum feature size) – Alignment accuracy must be about 1/3 of minimum feature size – The printing area increases with time since we must print one full die at a time Virginia Tech C05 - 16 Introduction About 1/3 of the cost of a wafer cost (about $1000 for an 8-inch wafer) is associated with lithography; we have only a few hundred dollars per wafer to spend – Optical lithography is used down to 0.13 m (130nm) generations – For smaller dimensions, X-ray, direct ebeam, or extreme UV (EUV) processes are used. Virginia Tech C05 - 17 Basic Concepts We generally separate lithography into three parts – The energy source (photons or electrons) – The exposure system – The resist The exposure tool, which includes the light source and the exposure system, creates the best image possible on the resist (resolution, exposure field, depth of focus, uniformity and lack of aberrations) – Optimization of the photoresist with the settings on the exposure tool transfers the aerial image from the mask to the best thin film replica of the aerial image Virginia Tech C05 - 18 Light Source Historically, light sources have been arc lamps containing Hg vapor A typical emission spectra from a Hg-Xe lamp Low in DUV (200-300nm) but strong in the UV region (300-450nm) Virginia Tech C05 - 19 Light Source A much smaller set of wavelengths used to expose the resist – to minimize optical distortion associated with the lens optics. – to match the properties of the resist Pick the wavelength that is heavily absorbed and causes changes in resist chemical properties Two common monochromatic selections are the g-line at 436 nm and the i-line at 365 nm. Virginia Tech C05 - 20 UV Light Sources To expose < 250nm wide lines, we need to use shorter wavelength light – Two excimer lasers (KrF at 248 nm and ArF at 193 nm) – These lasers contain atoms that do not normally bond, but if they are excited the compounds will form; when the excited molecule returns to the ground state, it emits UV light – These lasers must be continuously strobed (several hundred Hz) or pulsed to pump the excitation; can get several mJ of energy out Virginia Tech C05 - 21 Excimer Lasers Low reliability due to etching of the electrodes and the optical windows by the energitic F ions Virginia Tech C05 - 22 E-beam Source Field Emission Gun (3), which provides the source of the electron beam, is a W or LaF6 filament. Condenser Lens (7) are pairs of electromagnets that are used to collimate the beam of electrons. Beam Booster, composed of Anode (5), Vacuum Tube (6), Apertures (8), Alignment Coils (9a, b, c), Stigmator (13), and Isolating Valve (15) is used to determine the energy of the electrons and to remove the electrons moving off-axis. Objective Lens (10,11) is another set of electromagnets that focuses the electron beam onto the specimen (12), also containing the Deflecting System (14), which is another set of electromagnetics that sweep the electrons across the field of view and off of the sample . http://cmi.epfl.ch/metrology/img/LEO1550/LEOColumn.gif Virginia Tech C05 - 23 X-Ray Source High energy electrons collide with a metal. The transfer of energy results in the release of x-rays (short wavelength photons). Virginia Tech C05 - 24 Exposure System There are three classes of exposure systems – Contact – Proximity – Projection Virginia Tech C05 - 25 Exposure System Contact printing is the oldest and simplest The mask is put with the absorbing layer face down in contact with the wafer This method – Can give good resolution – Machines are inexpensive – Cannot be used for high-volume due to damage caused by the contact – Still used in research and prototyping situations Virginia Tech C05 - 26 Wafer Exposure Systems Proximity printing solves the defect problem associated with contact printing – The mask and the wafer are kept about 5 – 25 m apart – This separation degrades the resolution – Cannot print with features below a few microns – The resolution improves as wavelength decrease. This is a good system for X-ray lithography b/c of the very short exposure wavelength (1-2 nm). Virginia Tech C05 - 27 Projection/Step and Repeat For large-diameter wafers, it is impossible to achieve uniform exposure and to maintain alignment between mask levels across the complete wafer. – Masks are now called reticules Projection printing is the dominant method today – They provide high resolution without the defect problem – The mask is separated from the wafer and an optical system is used to image the mask on the wafer. – The resolution is limited by diffraction effects – The optical system reduces the mask image by 4X to 5X – Only a small portion of the wafer is printed during each exposure – Steppers are capable of < 0.25 m – Their throughput is about 25 – 50 wafers/hour Virginia Tech C05 - 28 Optics Basics We need a very brief review of optics If the dimensions of objects are large compared to the wavelength of light, we can treat light as particles traveling in straight lines and we can model by ray tracing When light passes through the mask, the dimensions of objects are of the order of the dimensions of the mask We must treat light as a wave Virginia Tech C05 - 29 Snell’s Law and Reflectivity n1 sin(q1) = n2 sin(q2) 1 = T+R+A, where T is transmission R is reflection A is absorption http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/SnellsLaw.html If q1 = p/2, q2 = sin-1(n1/n2) R = [(n1-n2)/(n1+n2)]2 Virginia Tech C05 - 30 Refractive index of SiO2 Transmission through two air-glass surfaces is less than 93.1%. R = 3.5 in air l= 365nm http://www.mellesgriot.com/products/o ptics/images/fig5_12.gif http://www.ioffe.ru/SVA/NSM/nk/Oxides/Gif/sio2.gif Virginia Tech C05 - 31 Snell’s Law/Antireflective Coatings n1n2 n R n n n2 1 2 2 when the layer thickness,t, is t = (m+1)l/4; m = 0,1,2… n1 n2 n t http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Optical-coating-1.png R = 0 when n = (n1n2)1/2 Virginia Tech C05 - 32 Young’s Single Slit Experiment sinq = l/d http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/optics/lightandcolor/diffraction.html Virginia Tech C05 - 33 Amplitude of largest secondary lobe at point Q, eQ, is given by: eQ = a(A/r)f(c)d where A is the amplitude of the incident wave, r is the distance between d and Q, and f(c) is a function of c, an inclination factor introduced by Fresnel. Virginia Tech C05 - 34 http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/optics/lightandcolor/diffraction.html Young’s Double Slit Experiment http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/optics/lightandcolor/interference.html Virginia Tech C05 - 35 Diffraction of Light Virginia Tech C05 - 36 Diffraction of Light The Huygens-Fresnel principle states that every unobstructed point of a wavefront at a given time acts as a point source of a secondary spherical wavelet at the same frequency – The amplitude of the optical field is the sum of the magnitudes and phases For unobstructed waves, we propagate a plane wave For light in the pin-hole, the ends propagate a spherical wave. Virginia Tech C05 - 37 Diffraction of Light Virginia Tech C05 - 38 Basic Optics Virginia Tech C05 - 39 Basic Optics Information about the shape of the pin hole is contained in all of the light; we must collect all of the light to fully reconstruct the pattern – If only part of the diffraction pattern is collected and focused on the substrate, the image created is not identical to the one on the mask. The light diffracted at higher angles contains information about the finer details of the structure and are lost Virginia Tech C05 - 40 Basic Optics The image produced by this system is Virginia Tech C05 - 41 Basic Optics The diameter of the central maximum is given by Diameter of central maximum 1.22lf d d focusing lens diameter f focal length λ wavelengt h of light Note that you get a point source only if d Virginia Tech C05 - 42 Basic Optics There are two types of diffraction – Fresnel, or near field diffraction – Fraunhofer, or far field diffraction In Fresnel diffraction, the image plane is near the aperture and light travels directly from the aperture to the image plane. In Fraunhofer diffraction, the image plane is far from the aperture, and there is a lens between the aperture and the image plane. Fresnel diffraction applies to contact and proximity printing while Fraunhofer diffraction applies to projections systems Virginia Tech C05 - 43 Fraunhofer Diffraction We define the performance of the system in terms of – Resolution – Depth of focus – Field of view – Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) – Alignment accuracy – throughput Virginia Tech C05 - 44 Fraunhofer Diffraction Imagine two sources close together that we are trying to image (two features on a mask) – How close can these be together and we can still resolve the two points? The two points will each produce an Airy disk. – Lord Rayleigh suggested that the minimum resolution be defined by placing the maximum from the second point source at the minimum of the first point source. Virginia Tech C05 - 45 Fraunhofer Diffraction Virginia Tech C05 - 46 Fraunhofer Diffraction With this definition, the resolution becomes 1.22 lf 1.22 lf 0.61l d n2 f sin a n sin a n index of refraction of the material between the object and lens a maximum half angle of the diffracted light R For air, n=1 a is defined by the size of the lens, or by an aperture and is a measure of the ability of the lens to gather light Virginia Tech C05 - 47 Fraunhofer Diffraction This is usually defined as the numerical aperture, or NA NA n sin a 0.61l l R k1 NA NA Defined only for point sources as the point source Airy function was used to develop the equation A more generalized equation replaces 0.61 by a constant k1 which lies between 0.6 and 0.8 for practical systems. Virginia Tech C05 - 48 Fraunhofer Diffraction From this result, we see that we get better resolution (smaller R) with shorter wavelengths of light and lenses of higher numerical aperture We now consider the depth of focus over which focus is maintained. We define as the on-axis path length difference from that of a ray at the limit of the aperture. These two lengths must not exceed l/4 to meet the Rayleigh criterion Virginia Tech C05 - 49 Depth of Focus Virginia Tech C05 - 50 Depth of Focus From this criterion, we have l / 4 cosq For small q q 2 q2 l / 4 1 1 2 2 q sin q d NA 22 f DOF Virginia Tech l 2 NA 2 k2 l NA2 C05 - 51 Fraunhofer Diffraction From this we note that the depth of focus decreases sharply with both decreasing wavelength and increasing NA. The Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) is another important concept This applies only to strictly coherent light, and is thus not really applicable to modern steppers, but the idea is useful Virginia Tech C05 - 52 Fraunhofer Diffraction Because of the finite aperture, diffraction effects and other non-idealities of the optical system, the image at the image plane does not have sharp boundaries, as desired If the two features in the image are widely separated, we can have sharp patterns as shown If the features are close together, we will get images that are smeared out. Virginia Tech C05 - 53 Modulation Transfer Function Virginia Tech C05 - 54 Fraunhofer Diffraction The measure of the quality of the aerial image is given by MTF I MAX I MIN I MAX I MIN The MTF is really a measure of the contrast in the aerial image The optical system needs to produce MTFs of 0.5 or more for a resist to properly resolve the features The MTF depends on the feature size in the image; for large features MTF=1 As the feature size decreases, diffractions effects casue MTF to degrade Virginia Tech C05 - 55 Change in MTF versus Wavelength Virginia Tech C05 - 56 Contact and Proximity Systems These systems operate in the Fresnel regime – If the mask and the resist are separated by some small distance “g” and a plane wave is incident on the mask, light is diffracted at the aperture edges. – As shown in next slide, there is 1. Small maximum at the edge from constructive interference 2. Ringing caused by constructive and destructive interference To minimize effects, multiple wavelengths of light may be used to expose PR Virginia Tech C05 - 57 Fresnel Diffraction Virginia Tech C05 - 58 Fresnel Diffraction As g increases, the quality of the image decreases – The aerial image can be computed accurately when lg W2 l where W is the feature size – Within this regime, the minimum resolvable feature size is: Wmin lg – Proximity aligner with a 10 m gap and an i-line source can resolve ~ 2 m features. Virginia Tech C05 - 59 Resolution A more exact solution for the theoretical resolution for proximity or contact aligners is given by: 3 z R l g 2 2 Where l is the wavelength of light used to exposure the pattern, g is the distance between the bottom of the mask and the top of the photoresist, z is the thickness of the photoresist (typically 0.8-1.2m). Virginia Tech C05 - 60 Fresnel Number Fresnel diffraction when F ≥ 1 Fraunhofer diffraction when F << 1 2 W F lg Virginia Tech C05 - 61 Depth of Focus http://www.research.ibm .com/journal/rd/411/hol m1.gif Virginia Tech C05 - 62 Summary of the Three Systems Virginia Tech C05 - 63 Photoresists Parameters that determine the usefulness of the resist include: – Sensitivity: a measure of how much light is required to expose the resist - typically 100mJ/cm2 – Resolution where the effects of exposure, baking, developing should not degrade the quality of the image – Chemical and physical properties: it must withstand chemical etching, mild temperature excursions, ion implantation Virginia Tech C05 - 64 Photoresists Photoresists usually contain three components – Inactive resin (usually a hydrocarbon which forms the base material) – Photoactive compound (PAC) – Solvent which is used to adjust the viscosity The most common g- and i-line resists use – Diazonaphthoquinones (DNQ) as the PAC – Novolac as the resin – Propylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate (PGMEA) as the solvent (this has replaced Cellosolve acetate, which is a toxic hazard) Virginia Tech C05 - 65 Basic Structure of Novolac Novolac is a polymer containing hydrocarbon rings with 2 methyl groups and 1 OH group The basic ring structure is repeated to form a long chain polymer Novolac readily dissolves in developer at about 15 nm/s Virginia Tech C05 - 66 Diazoquinone The photoactive part of the molecule is the part above the SO2 Virginia Tech C05 - 67 Diazoquinone The function of the PAC is to inhibit the dissolution of the resin in the developer – DNQ is essentially insoluble in developer prior to exposure to light – When dissolved in the resin, DNQ reduce the resist dissolution rate from ~ 15nm/s to 1-2 nm/s When the resist is exposed to light, the diazoquinone molecule changes chemically and increases the dissolution rate to ~100nm/s. Virginia Tech C05 - 68 Properties and Characteristics of Resists Two parameters are used to define the properties of photoresists – Contrast – Critical modulation transfer function (CMTF) Virginia Tech C05 - 69 Contrast The ability of the photoresist to distinguish between various levels of light intensities. – It is experimentally determined by exposing the resist to differing amounts of light, developed for a fixed time and measuring the thickness of resist remaining after developing. Virginia Tech C05 - 70 Photoresist Contrast Virginia Tech C05 - 71 Photoresist Contrast For positive resists, material exposed to low light will not be attacked by the developer; material exposed to large doses will be completely removed Intermediate doses will result in partial removal The contrast is the slope of this curve and is given by g 1 log 10 Qf QO Typical g- and i-line resists will achieve a contrast of g = 2-3 and Qf values of 100 mJ/cm2 Virginia Tech C05 - 72 Photoresist Contrast The contrast is not a constant, but depends on process variables such as – development chemistry, – bake times, – temperatures before and after exposure, – wavelength of light, and – underlying structure It is desirable to have as high a contrast as possible in order to produce the sharpest edges in the developed pattern Virginia Tech C05 - 73 Photoresist Contrast Virginia Tech C05 - 74 Modulation Transfer Function (MFT) Defined in two points of the lithographic system. – MTF: Measure of the dark versus light intensities in the aerial image produced by the projection system – CMTF: Measure of the exposed versus unexposed regions in the high contract image focused on the PR Q f Q0 101/ g 1 CMTFresist 1/ g Q f Q0 10 1 The CMTF is the minimum optical transfer function necessary to resolve a pattern in the resist – For g- and i-line resists, CMTF 0.4 Virginia Tech C05 - 75 Effect of Resist Thickness Resists usually do not have uniform thickness on the wafer – Edge bead: The build-up of resist along the circumference of the wafer - There are edge bead removal systems – Step coverage Centrifugal Force Virginia Tech C05 - 76 Effect of Resist Thickness The resist can be underexposed where it is thicker and overexposed where it is thinner – This can lead to linewidth variations Light intensity varies with depth below the surface due to absorption I ( x) I 0 exp( ax) where a is the optical absorption coefficient – Thus, the resist near the surface is exposed first A process called bleaching in which the exposed material becomes almost transparent (i.e., a decreases after exposure) – Therefore, more light goes to deeper layers after bleaching the near surface layer of PR Virginia Tech C05 - 77 Photoresist Absorption If the photoresist becomes transparent and if the underlying surface is reflective, reflected light from the wafer will expose the photoresist in areas we do not want it to. – This leads to the possibility of standing waves (due to interference), with resultant waviness of the developed resist We can solve this by putting an antireflective coating on the surface of the substrate before spinning the photoresist increases process complexity Virginia Tech C05 - 78 Standing Waves Due to Reflections Virginia Tech C05 - 79 Standing Waves Due to Reflections http://www.lithoguru.com/scientist/lithobasics.html Virginia Tech C05 - 80 Removal of Standing Wave Pattern (a) (b) (c) Diffusion during a post-exposure bake (PEB) is often used to reduce standing waves. Photoresist profile simulations as a function of the PEB diffusion length: (a) 20nm, (b) 40nm, and (c) 60nm. http://www.lithoguru.com/scientist/lithobasics.html Virginia Tech C05 - 81 Mask Engineering There are two ways to improve the quality of the image transferred to the photoresist – Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) – Phase Shift Masks (PSM) We note that the lenses in projections systems are both finite and circular but most features on the mask are square. – The high frequency components of the pattern are lost and the “squareness” of the corners of the pattern disappear. – Can be taken into account by adjusting feature dimensions and shapes in the masks Virginia Tech C05 - 82 Mask Engineering Virginia Tech C05 - 83 Phase Shift Masks In a projection system the amplitudes at the wafer add so that closely spaced lines interact; the intensity at the wafer is smeared – If we put a material of proper index of refraction on part of the mask, we can retard some of the light and change its phase by 180 degree and the two portions of light interfere and cancel out. The thickness of the PS layer is d l 2n 1 n is the index of refraction of the phase shift material Virginia Tech C05 - 84 Phase Shift Masks (PSM) Intensity pattern is barely sufficient to resolve the two patterns. Virginia Tech C05 - 85 Scanning Projection Aligners Projection aligners have been industry standard for about 20 years – It is easier to correct for aberrations in small regions than in large Scan a small slit across the mask while the wafer is simultaneously scanned – Scanning projection aligners must use 1:1 masks Pattern on the mask is the same size as the one imaged on the wafer. Virginia Tech C05 - 86 Scanning Projection Printer Virginia Tech C05 - 87 Scanning Projection Systems Cost effective and has high throughput – Linewidth control for smaller devices is difficult – As chips became larger, it is more difficult to produce good full wafer masks – With ULVI and WSI, this system could not scale and was replaced by systems that exposed only a single die at a time Virginia Tech C05 - 88 Step-and-Repeat Projection Aligners Exposed a limited portion of the wafer at a time – The image on the wafer is 4-5 times smaller than the image on the mask or reticule. – Masks thus are much larger, and thus repairable to some extent Steppers also allow better alignment because they align on the exposure field rather than for the entire wafer – Wafer can be moved vertically to keep image plane at some location as the PR Virginia Tech C05 - 89 Off-Axis Illumination By changing the angle of incidence of the light on the mask, change the angle of the diffracted light – Although some of the diffracted light is lost in this scheme, much of the higher order diffraction is captured – As the resolution is decreased, it is harder to make these optics work Virginia Tech C05 - 90 Off-Axis Illumination Virginia Tech C05 - 91 Step and Scan A hybrid has been developed called a “step-and-scan”, but is very complex and very expensive. https://www.chiphistory.org/product_content/lm_asml_pas5500-400_step&scan_system_1990_intro.htm Virginia Tech C05 - 92 DNQ/Novolac Resist Process The details of the process are more complex that described earlier Virginia Tech C05 - 93 DNQ/Novolac Resist Process We first must consider adhesion – There can be one or more operations depending on what is under the resist The wafer must be clean before resist is applied It may need to be heated to a few hundred degrees to drive off water Adhesion to Si is not as good as to metals and silicon dioxide – Adhesion promoter, Hexamethyldisilane (HMDS), may be needed Virginia Tech C05 - 94 DNQ/Novolac Resist Process Dispensing the resist can be done either with a stationary or a slowly spinning wafer The solvent evaporates rapidly after dispensing the resist and during the spin – Generally more uniform resist thicknesses are obtained the faster the wafer is accelerated. – The faster the final speed, the thinner the resist. Virginia Tech C05 - 95 DNQ/Novolac Resist Process Exposure times and source intensity are reciprocal—one can reduce exposure times with more intense sources – Exposure time is increase by increasing the bake temperature (due to decomposition of the PAC and thus decreased sensitivity) Post-exposure bake is often done before development because the PAC can diffuse and this will eliminate the standing wave pattern Post-development bake is done to remove standing wave pattern by flowing resist (90100oC) or increase chemical/mechanical strength of resist (120-150oC) Long UV exposure can also be used to cross-link the polymer chains in the remaining photoresist Virginia Tech C05 - 96 http://www.research. ibm.com/journal/rd/ 411/holm4.gif Virginia Tech C05 - 97 Measurement Methods Measurement of – Mask Features and Defects – Resist Patterns – Etched Features – Alignment Measure resist pattern after development – The aerial image is not generally measurable Because of the complexity of the masks, the inspection must be fully automated—manual observation under a microscope is not possible Virginia Tech C05 - 98 Mask Inspection System Virginia Tech C05 - 99 Measurement of Mask Features and Defects Here, light is passed through the mask and collected by an image recognition system Solid state detectors are used to collect the light The information is compared against the database of the mask design or with an identical mask The inspection process is more difficult if the mask contains OPC or is a PSM Often, defects found in this process can be corrected – Lasers can burn off excess Cr or Fe oxide. – Adding absorber to clear areas is harder Virginia Tech C05 - 100 SEM Measurement Virginia Tech C05 - 101 State-of-the-Art Capable of exposing down to ~ 10nm – E-beam lithography – X-ray lithography – Extreme UV lithography E-beam and EUV are performed under vacuum – Throughput is very slow New resist families are required – Most are very difficult to remove after use Research needed on mask material for x-ray and EUV – Glass absorbs – Thickness of metal needed to block x-rays is very thick (20-50m) Virginia Tech C05 - 102