Module 2 Kentucky Victim Assistance Academy Lessons 2.4 – 2.6 DRAFT KVAA 1 Learning Objectives 2.4: From trial to sentencing Explain the trial by jury process Explain the types of witnesses and what they can testify to during trial Explain the different types of verdicts that can be determined by a jury or judge Explain the penalty phase purpose and process Explain the sentencing process DRAFT KVAA 2 Identify the purpose of the pre-sentence investigation, who conducts it and who has access to the information Identify the purpose of the victim impact statement, the content, who can make it and how it can be presented to the court. Understand the difference between probation and shock probation and the process to receive both. Define restitution. DRAFT KVAA 3 Trial by Jury Process Selection of Jurors Prosecutors Opening Statement Defendant’s Opening Statement ◦ May reserve until later in trial Presentation of Evidence by the Prosecution Prosecution Rests Its Case Defense opening statement if reserved Defense May Introduce Evidence Possible Rebuttal by Prosecutor Preparation of Jury Instructions Closing Arguments ◦ Defense ◦ Prosecution Jury Deliberation Verdict Sentencing Phase DRAFT KVAA 4 Witnesses Qualifications of Witness: Competency KRE 601 Oath or Affirmation required KRE 603 Permissible Types of Testimony: Lay witnesses vs. Expert witnesses KRE 701, KRE 702 Hearsay KRE 801-804 Personal knowledge required KRE 602 DRAFT KVAA 5 Verdict Requirements: ◦ Unanimous (RCr 9.82) ◦ Returned in open court (RCr 9.82) Types (KRS 504.120, 532.055) ◦ Guilty ◦ Not guilty ◦ Not guilty by reason of insanity at the time of the offense ◦ Guilty but mentally ill at the time of the offense DRAFT KVAA 6 Activity: Mock Trial DRAFT KVAA 7 Penalty Phase Sentencing hearing: KRS 532.055 ◦ Prosecution presents evidence relevant to sentencing ◦ Defense may introduce mitigation evidence ◦ Jury determines punishment ◦ Jury determines concurrent or consecutive DRAFT KVAA 8 Pre-Sentence Investigation Must be ordered by Judge prior to sentencing Prosecutor and defense attorney must get report Defense counsel has right to make statements on defendant’s behalf and present mitigating information Judge must examine and consider report before sentencing RCr 11.02, KRS 532.050 DRAFT KVAA 9 Victim Impact Statement Victim’s Right to VIS Statement goes to officer responsible for preparing PSI report Included in PSI report Considered by judge prior to sentencing/release Some Judges allow oral victim impact statements May contain but not limited to: Nature and extent of harm Need for restitution Whether victim has applied for compensation for financial loss Recommendation for an appropriate sentence KRS 421.520 DRAFT KVAA 10 Imposition of Sentence Sentence must be within range provided by law KRS 532.055 Judge may reduce sentence recommended by Jury KRS 532.070 Judge must consider probation, probation with an alternative sentencing plan or conditional discharge unless it is prohibited KRS 532.010, 533.020, RCr 11.02 Judge must consider PSI and VIS DRAFT KVAA 11 Entry of Judgment By Judge whether guilty or not guilty If guilty includes ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Plea Verdict/findings Whether entitled to bail/amount Day of execution of a death sentence Concurrent/consecutive sentences RCr 11.04 DRAFT KVAA 12 Probation Imposed by judge at sentencing. All must be considered for unless prohibited by other laws. Restitution shall be ordered if victim suffered monetary damage Restitution has priority over restitution to government agencies Shock probation KRS 439.265, 439.267 ◦ Motion must be made within 30 to 180 days after incarceration ◦ Violent offenders and sex offenders not eligible KRS 533.010 et. seq., 439.265, 439.267 DRAFT KVAA 13 Restitution Shall be ordered Not subject to suspension or non-imposition If pre-trial diversion, probation, shock probation, or conditional discharge is granted, restitution shall be a part of the sentence/agreement If incarcerate and paroled, restitution shall be a condition of the parole KRS 532.032 DRAFT KVAA 14 Questions? DRAFT KVAA 15 Learning Objectives 2.5: Appeals and Post-conviction process Identify who can appeal the verdict of the court Explain the appellate court process Identify other possible post conviction proceedings DRAFT KVAA 16 Who can appeal? Person convicted of a crime Argument – trial proceedings did not comply with the law (not guilt or innocence) Appellate (higher) court reviews claimed legal error(s)based upon the record made at trial Court does not review new or additional testimony or evidence Appellate court determines: ◦ If there was sufficient evidence or ◦ If trial was conducted properly DRAFT KVAA 17 Overview Kentucky criminal trial process in 10 EASY steps Discretionary Review District Court Cert petition Circuit Court Direct Appeal 11.4 2 60.02 WRIT HABEAS CORPUS DRAFT KVAA 18 Kentucky Appellate Courts Circuit Court Kentucky Court of Appeals Kentucky Supreme Court DRAFT KVAA 19 The Players Office of the Attorney General ◦ To appear before the appellate courts on felony appeals in state courts ◦ About 650—750 briefs a year (25 attorneys) ◦ Other motions, hearings, filings as appropriate Department of Public Advocacy ◦ Handles appeals after trial is over (separate from DPA trial group) ◦ Very rarely private counsel DRAFT KVAA 20 Process 1) Notice of Appeal is filed with trial court 2) Record is prepared and made available to Appellant’s attorney & for Appellee. 3) Record is made available to Appellate’s Attorney for Appellee. ◦ Appellant’s Attorney reviews record, writes and files the “Brief for Appellant” 4) Appellant may file a reply brief Note: Specific time frame for each step but extensions are frequently requested and granted DRAFT KVAA 21 Process (cont.) 5. Case goes to the court for review of written arguments 6. After review the court will either ◦ Order oral argument ◦ Order no oral argument If argument is granted ◦ counsel will “argue” (present the case) to the court - 15 minutes per side ◦ Judges will ask questions No testimony is given / case decided “on the record” DRAFT KVAA 22 Opinions • • • Court can take up to a year to issue an opinion. Judgment is final after 30 days. Possible results: • Affirm • Reverse • Remand (In part) • Does not have to be unanimous • Majority • Dissenting • Plurality • Losing party may file a Petition for Rehearing or motion for Discretionary Review. DRAFT KVAA 23 Opinions Opinions from the Supreme Court become final on the 21st day after the date of its rendition unless a petition for rehearing has been timely filed. Opinions from the Court of Appeals become final on the 31st day after the date of its rendition unless a petition for rehearing or motion for discretionary review has been filed. CR 76.30(2). DRAFT KVAA 24 DIRECT APPEAL John Doe v. Commonwealth Appellant v. Appellee Matter of right appeal Right to counsel Less than 20 years to Kentucky Court of Appeals Greater than 20 years to Kentucky Supreme Court DRAFT KVAA 25 Frequency of Issue on Appeal Evidentiary Ruling (43.0%) Sufficiency of the Evidence (35.1%) Jury Instructions (29.5%) Sentence/Sentencing Hearing (24.5%) Suppression of Evidence/Statements (14.5%) Prosecutorial Misconduct (12.7%) Judicial Intrusion or Management (9.7%) Jury Selection or Deliberation (7.9%) Suppression of Identification/Line-up (6.2%) Lesser Included Offenses/Merger (3.5%) Speedy Trial (3.3%) Statutory Interpretation (1.2%) Constitutionality of Statute (1.0%) DRAFT KVAA 26 REHEARING John Doe, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Respondent Opinion is rendered Petition for rehearing is sought by the losing party in the appeal Petition goes to the court that issued the opinion NOT a matter of right; must petition Right to appointed counsel DRAFT KVAA 27 DISCRETIONARY REVIEW John Doe, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Respondent Opinion is rendered Petition for discretionary review is sought by the losing party in the appeal Petition is filed in a higher court than the one issuing the opinion. NOT a matter of right; must petition Right to appointed counsel DRAFT KVAA 28 PETITION FOR CERTIORARI TO UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT John Doe v. Kentucky Discretionary review Petition is either granted or denied (“Cert was denied”) VERY VERY FEW are granted Briefing, oral argument, opinion issued DRAFT KVAA 29 POST-CONVICTION pursuant to RCr 11.42 John Doe v. Commonwealth Alleges constitutionally ineffective assistance of defense counsel Movant must show both that ◦ (1) performance was deficient ◦ (2) but for the deficient performance, the verdict would have been different DRAFT KVAA 30 POST-CONVICTION pursuant to RCr 11.42 Proceedings in front of the same judge that presided over the trial Must raise issues that were not and could not have been raised on direct appeal Right to appointed counsel No right to a hearing, but if hearing is denied, may appeal denial If motion is denied, may appeal denial Commonwealth is now in the position of defending the actions of the defense attorney! DRAFT KVAA 31 APPEAL FROM RCr 11.42 Denial of relief or denial of hearing may be appealed to next highest court Eg., John Doe might appeal from the affirmance of the denial of his 11.42 motion! Briefing, oral arguments, opinion issued Petitions for rehearing and discretionary review are possible DRAFT KVAA 32 POST-CONVICTION pursuant to CR 60.02 John Doe v. Commonwealth Seeks to set aside judgment of trial court due to: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Mistake Inadvertence Surprise Excusable neglect Newly discovered evidence Perjury Fraud Void judgment Any other reason that is extraordinary in nature DRAFT KVAA 33 POST-CONVICTION pursuant to CR 60.02 Time limit of one year for most bases for motion Otherwise, must be within a “reasonable time” Only those matters that WERE NOT or COULD NOT HAVE BEEN raised on appeal or in RCr 11.42 May only be used to attack a sentence the defendant is currently serving NO RIGHT to appointed counsel NO RIGHT to a hearing, but denial of hearing is appealable DRAFT KVAA 34 POST-CONVICTION pursuant to CR 60.02 Appeal from denial of CR 60.02 hearing or denial of motion to Kentucky Court of Appeals DR from affirmance of denial of CR 60.02 to Kentucky Supreme Court Briefing, arguments, opinion issued DRAFT KVAA 35 ORIGINAL ACTIONS John Doe, Petitioner vs. Circuit Judge, Nominal Party and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Real Party in Interest Unlike appeals and 11.42, 60.02, this action ORIGINATES in the appeals court May arise at any point in a criminal case NOT an appeal or post-conviction remedy Petition for Writ of Prohibition (tell the judge NOT to do X) or Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Tell the judge he MUST do X) DRAFT KVAA 36 ORIGINAL ACTIONS Seeks immediate action by the appellate court to intervene in a pending case “Take the judge up on a writ” Alleges that (1) immediate and irreparable harm will occur and (2) that harm cannot be corrected on appeal Briefing and oral argument Opinion granting or denying the writ Petition for rehearing/ discretionary review DRAFT KVAA 37 The Federal Court System United States District Court (in Kentucky, we have the Eastern District and the Western District) United States Court of Appeals (Circuit Court; we are in the Sixth Circuit) United States Supreme Court DRAFT KVAA 38 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Filed in United States District Court in the district where the prisoner is held John Doe vs. Warden Civil proceeding in Federal Court Must allege violations of US Constitution Briefing and hearings before a federal judge No right to a hearing All state appeal and post-conviction remedies must be “exhausted” DRAFT KVAA 39 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus granted or denied Appeal from denial of writ or from denial of hearing Appeal to United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Briefing and oral arguments by both parties Opinion affirming, reversing, remanding Petition for re-hearing en banc DRAFT KVAA 40 10 Reasons 10. Changes in Law 9. Public Opinion 8. Media Coverage 7. Victim Notification 6. Victim Advocacy 5. Attorney Turnover 4. Victim Involvement in the Case 3. The Lack of Finality 2. The Guilty Plea 1. The Timetable. DRAFT KVAA 41 A Case Study: 1983 DRAFT KVAA 42 (10) If a defendant seeks appellate review of a conviction and the Commonwealth is represented by the Attorney General, the Attorney General shall make a reasonable effort to notify victims promptly of the appeal, the status of the case, and the decision of the appellate court. Effective: July 15, 2008 KRS. 421.500 DRAFT KVAA 43 Victim Notification Provided By The Office Of The Attorney General Notice of appeal when OAG receives the case Will provide briefs Notice of oral arguments Notice of opinion Appellate Brochure - Printable for distribution to victims http://ag.ky.gov/criminal/appeals/Documents/criminalappealsbrochure.pdf DRAFT KVAA 44 Victim Assistance Provided by the Office of the Attorney General Liaison between appellate attorney and victim throughout the appellate process Court Accompaniment Arrange for meeting with Attorney for the Commonwealth after the argument DRAFT KVAA 45 Online Resources • COURTS.KY.GOV • Court Of Justice Website: Provides a link to Chase School of Law webpage which supplies Kentucky appellate court briefs • Kentucky Supreme Court also has ‘Live Stream’ of oral arguments DRAFT KVAA 46 Questions? DRAFT KVAA 47 Learning Objectives 2.6: Juvenile Court System Identify the criminal jurisdiction of the court Identify the participants Identify the rights of victims DRAFT KVAA 48 Juvenile Court System - Jurisdiction Cases where offender is under 18 Philosophy ◦ Guided by “the best interest of the child” Types of offenders ◦ Status ◦ Public ◦ Youthful DRAFT KVAA 49 Juvenile Court Participants Victim presence and rights DRAFT KVAA 50 Juvenile Court Process Arraignment Detention Hearing Informal Adjustment Pretrial Conference DRAFT Adjudicatory Hearing KVAA Dispositional Hearing 51 Youthful Offender Hearing To determine probable cause ◦ that the transferred offense was committed and ◦ whether transfer to Circuit Court is appropriate Factors to Consider Disposition ◦ If probated as a youthful offender ◦ If sentenced as a youthful offender DRAFT KVAA 52 Questions ? DRAFT KVAA 53 This Instructor Manual was produced by the Justice and Public Safety Cabinet and Western Kentucky University under 2011VFGXK004, awarded by the Office for Victims of Crime, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Instructor Manual are those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. DRAFT KVAA 54