From Bench to Bedside Step 1: First-time application of DESWT in a rodent model of ischemic HF (pilot trial); redesign of device Step 2: In-vitro validation Step 3: Reproduction of results of pilot trial in a rodent large scale trial (320 rodents); human fitting studies Step 4: Reproduction of the results of the rodent large scale trial in a large animal (pig) model; human fitting studies Step 5: Phase I clinical trial with external data monitoring Pilot Trials Trials show promising results, exceeding comparable stem cell trials. Main problem: size of the applicator 8 Weeks Later: Cardiac Shock Wave Applicator CardioGold® CG050 CRT – Cardiac Regeneration Technologies, Woodstock, USA (manufactured by MTS-Europe GmbH, Konstanz, Germany) Electro-hydraulic, focused, ECG-triggering facility EFD: 0.38 mJ/mm2 Frequency: 1-5 Hz 35mm In-vitro Experiments distance bar adapter temp. sensor Shock Wave Devices Water bath – prototype appl. fixation Degassed water, temperature 37°C DermaGold® CP155 (TRT, USA) heater 300 impulses at 0.15 mJ/mm2, 5 Hz In-vitro Experiments Mean cell duplication time Connexine 43 = cell contact, communication Cardiomyocytes (= heart muscle cells) Endothelial cells (= vessel cells) Fibroblasts (= cells of connective tissue) Rodent Large Scale Trial – Results from 320 rats! ___ SWT ___ Controls ‡ 80 70 60 † FS % 50 40 * 30 * ‡ † * 20 10 0 prae MI * post MI * p<.05 to pre MI SWT Group vs. Controls * 6-week FUP †p<.05 to post MI * 14 week FUP ‡ p<.05 Next Step: Large Animal Trial 25 Domestic pigs: Myocardial infarction by LAD ligation 3 Groups: Sham = healthy subjects SWT = LAD ligation with SWT Control = LAD ligation without SWT Timeline: d0 week 4 ▼_______________ LAD lig./sham OP week 8 ▼ _______________▼ SWT/sham OP Termination Ventricular Function LVEF SWT control LV ejection fraction % 100 75 + 68 ± 0.7% 62 ± 9.1% * 50 43 ± 2.5% 25 46 ± 5% * * week 4 week 8 0 d0 * p<.05 vs. pre MI + p<.05 vs. 4 weeks post MI First Human Application – Study Design Title: DESWT - Safety of Myocardial Regeneration by Direct Epicardial Shock Wave Therapy in Combination with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Design: Prospective, Phase I Enrollment: Commenced September 2008, 10 Patients – last patient enrolled June 2009 Primary Endpoint: Safety Secondary Endpoint: Efficacy Study outline: CABG+DESWT 8-week FUP 6-month FUP ▼_______________▼______________▼ First Human Application (Sep. 23, 2008) First Human Application (Sep. 23, 2008) First Human Application (Sep. 23, 2008) First Human Application (Sep. 23, 2008) Primary Endpoint - Safety Death Myocardial infarction Bleeding, including pericardial tamponade Ventricular arrhythmias Bacteriaemia / sepsis Respiratory failure CPR Lesions related to DESWT (cardiac, intrathoracic) Renal failure Liver failure Low cardiac output syndrome CVA (Stroke/Bleeding/TIA) Re-hospitalization Other non-anticipated events fulfilling the definition for AEs/SAEs Secondary Endpoint - Efficacy Myocardial contractility Cardiac MRI Symptoms of heart failure Minnesota Heart Failure Questionnaire Six-minute walk test Serum levels of proBNP Device failures and malfunctions Primary Endpoint AE/SAE´s Perioperative 1 Pat. ventricular arrhytmia 1st. to 3rd p.o. day 1 Pat. prolonged ICU stay, mediastinitis 1 Pat. post-op bleeding (no surgical revision) Follow-Up 3 Pat. rehospitalization (embolism, pneumonia, pacemaker implant) None of the complications device related! Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction * 55.00 * LVEF % 50.00 45.00 40.00 35.00 30.00 25.00 Improvement of wall motion in all patients less late enhancement in all patients 20.00 baseline * P < 0.05 to baseline 8 week FUP 6 month FUP Gavira JJ JTCVS 2006 Left Ventricular Wall Motion Global * Treated areas = infarct * * P < 0.05 to baseline * * Left Ventricular Volumes End Diastolic Volume * End Systolic Volume * * P < 0.05 to baseline * * 6-Minute Walk Test * * P < 0.05 to baseline Minnesota Heart Failure Questionnaire * * P < 0.05 to baseline Conclusion DESWT is SAFE Neo – Angiogenesis VEGF, PIGF, Flt-1 Endogenous angiogenetic pathway activation ? Stem cell homing ? Improvement of LV function Global and regional LV function proBNP surrogate for heart failure Improvement of Symptoms 6-MWT gold standard of symtom assessment in heart failure Patients feel the difference – Minesota Heart Failure Questionnaire Conclusion Safe and simple method for myocardial regeneration Bench to bedside completed Next logical step – prospective randomized trial Continuation of basic research (working mechanism) Continuation of human trials (histology, stem cells) Continuation of animal trials (dose-reaction, working mechanism) Customized device, disposable therapy head Cell cultivation, cell seeding on scaffolds ………