PROS & CONS OF HISTORY SO, WHAT IS HISTORY History is the study of the past BUT so is archeology so what sets history apart from other disciplines? History is the study of the past primarily through written documents, pictures, and various publications TOOLS OF HISTORIANS Historians have two sorts of documents that they consult: Primary Source Documents: Documents written during the time under study; These sources were present during an experience or time period and of fer an inside view of a particular event. i.e. original documents, government records, creative works Secondary Source Documents: Documents that interpret and analyzes primary sources. These sources are one or more steps removed from the event. These sources were made after the fact/event occurred. Historians consult primary sources about a person, era or event and attempt to interpret the evidence. i.e. textbooks, encyclopedias, magazines, books SO, WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT PRIMARY OR SECONDARY AND WHY? Chat with your neighbor for a second on which is most important and why you believe it to be. SO, WHAT ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF TOOLS OF HISTORIANS Of the identified sources below try to determine which are primary and which are secondary and why they are. Private letters, diaries, memoirs Poems and novels Drawings, paintings, and cartoons Photos & films Newspapers Statistics Government Records Oral Records PRIVATE LETTER, DIARIES, & MEMOIRS Private letters, diaries, and memoirs: Pros Provide an up close picture of the effect of historical events on the lives of people who firsthand experience them If the source wasn’t intended for the public the content might tell us more or unexpected info about the author or the time Tells us about the personality of the author Cons If the document was intended for the public then it might be contrived or false; contains the bias of the author Only present one viewpoint rather than the perspective of many If recalled later then the details may be blurred or inaccurate Only see what is included but not excluded POEMS, NOVELS, DRAWINGS, PAINTINGS, & CARTOONS Pros Can provide a glimpse of the spirit/culture of the time i.e. speech, dress, atmosphere Can an of fer an emotional side that allows the reader to better understand the circumstance and individuals of a time Examples of the art style of the time Cons Not solely concerned with providing a factual account because it is more concerned with artistic expression Only shows one specific aspect of a period Subject to the bias of the author/creator Can be used as propaganda FILMS, PHOTOS, & SOUNDRECORDINGS Ex: Archival Footage, Photos or Movies Pros Can capture moments in history in vivid detail and give a unique glimpse into the past Excellent examples of propaganda Reflect aspects of culture like dress, etc. Cons Can be edited or parts omitted Can either highlight or downplay certain details Creators impression or perspective always present in the piece NEWSPAPERS Pros Provides a daily record of events of the time Tells a story about society or specific aspects of its culture Cons A product of the societies in which they are produced Subject to censorship of the leader Might be used as propaganda STATISTICS Ex: Census Info Pros Raw factual evidence when reliable Open to interpretation, free of personal and cultural bias Cons Can be manipulated by the gov. Might only represent a limited sample of population Stats are always produced for a specific purpose Only reflects what the government has interest in recording or wants you to know GOVERNMENT RECORDS Ex. Birth Records, Deeds, Court Docs, Mil Records, Tax Records Pros If never intended for the public can give a good glimpse into the inner-workings of a government Purely factual, solid, and reliable Cons If release was anticipated could have been manipulated to conceal truth Only reflects what the government has interest in recording or wants you to know ORAL HISTORY Pros Provides first-hand knowledge of historical events Provides important historical evidence about people, especially minority groups Preserves details that might not be included in written accounts Shows opinion by people who experienced the time period Cons If the person interviewed is older or time has passed, recollection might be sketchy; accuracy may be an issue Experiences in the present might influence accounts of the past Personal opinion, culture always present Tend to justify own actions/inaction or paint self in a positive light FOR HOME WORK Choose a controversial person or event in history. Find 3 sources: 2 primary and 1 secondary Analyze the sources and then formulate a summary about your person or event based on the evidence present in the sources. Be sure to examine whether or not there is a consensus amongst your chosen sources. What does dissension tell us about your selection? Be mindful of both the pros and cons in each document chosen and highlight them in your summary. Your summary should be one to two pages type written. One inch margins, times new roman font double spaced. EXAMPLE: ABRAHAM LINCOLN The United States 16 th President Often referred to af fectionately as “Honest Abe” Often credited as the quintessential abolitionist for his ending of slavery in the United States Assassinated in 1865 by southern rebel Regarded as one of the greatest presidents in American history ABE LINCOLN’S PRIVATE LETTER TO HORACE GREELEY 1862 "My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I refrain, I refrain because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause." "Letter to Horace Greeley" (August 22, 1862) LINCOLN-DOUGLASS DEBATE SPEECH I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything .” Fourth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, September 18, 1858 ABE LINCOLN’S PRIVATE LETTER TO JAMES BROWN "I believe the declara[tion] that 'all men are created equal' is the great fundamental principle upon which our free institutions rest; that negro slavery is violative of that principle; but that, by our frame of government, that principle has not been made one of legal obligation; that by our frame of government, the States which have slavery are to retain it, or surrender it at their own pleasure; and that all others --individuals, free-states and national government ---are constitutionally bound to leave them alone about it. "Letter to James N. Brown" (October 18, 1858) LINCOLN’S WORD ON SLAVERY IN HIS HOME TOWN "We are proclaiming ourselves political hypocrites before the world, by thus fostering Human Slavery and proclaiming ourselves, at the same time, the sole friends of Human Freedom.“ Speech at Springfield, Illinois" (October 4, 1854 ) LINCOLN THE GREAT EMANICIPATOR HOW SHOULD WE RECALL ABE LINCOLN? Based on what was read in Lincoln’s speeches concerning the issue of slavery should we regard him as an abolitionist or not?