“Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005Proponents Intentions and the Effects of the Act” Presented by: Matthew F. Glarrow PSC 499- Senior Capstone Outline Overview/Brief Summary of Chapters 7, 11 & 13. Historical Perspectives/ Inherited Traditions. Major Changes in the U.S. Bankruptcy Code over the last half century. Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 and its proponents, effects, and changes. Did the legislation accomplish what its authors and proponents thought it would? Conclusion Chapter 7- Liquidation Debtor files a petition for relief Debtor surrenders all nonexempt assets to Trustee Trustee sells/auctions debtor’s assets Creditors are paid from the money generated from the sale of the debtor’s assets Creditors are paid by “priority-distribution rules” Chapter 11- (Corporate) Reorganization Debtor files a petition for relief, listing all creditors, and assets. Creditors are stayed from collecting money from the debtor until a Plan is implemented. In most cases, the debtor operates as the Trustee of the case and continues to run the business (under court supervision). Debtor is required to file monthly financial reports with the court (allows court to supervise). Plan of Reorganization Ch.13- Adjustment of Debts of an Individual with Regular Income Debtor files a petition for relief. Designed to help debtors develop a repayment plan, learn how live financially stable lives and repay their debt. Debtors repay their debts over a 3 or 5-year court supervised repayment plan. Debtors repay more debt under Ch. 13 than they would under Ch. 7. (2/3 don’t complete plansee “A”) Historical PerspectiveThe Early English system and traditions the US inherited 1542- 1st known bankruptcy law in England 1570Debtor’s Prisons 1869- Debtor’s Act Major Changes in The United States Bankruptcy Code 1800- The First Act Bankruptcy Act of 1876 1898- first relief for companies against their creditors 1900-mid-1970s Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994 Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1999 BAPCPA ’05- Proponents and their expectations for the Act Lobbyists for credit card industryConsumer Credit Industry House Report 109-031 on “Factors Supporting Bankruptc Reform” Senator Charles Grassley’s (Iowa, Republican) comments on the bill BAPCPA ’05- Legislative Changes in the U.S.B.C. Code Ch. 7 “means test” Ch. 11- mandatory pre-filing credit counseling Ch. 13- mandatory completion of debtor education class prior to receiving discharge Lengthened amount of time allowed between filings in all chapters (see notes) Automatic Stay (see notes) Additional Documents & SchedulesSTUDENT LOANS Effects of the LegislationDid it accomplish what it was “supposed to?” “About 95% of people who could have filed before October 17, still qualify under the new law” Barry Frost, NJ USBC Trustee. USBC, MDA Comparative Filings Jan. 1999-Dec. 2006 Middle District of Alabama Ch. 13 Sept. ‘04- Sept. ‘06 Middle District of Alabama Pre and Post BAPCPA Sept 2004 - Sept 2006 Ch. 13 Filings 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Ch. 13 Filings 440 428 394 365 342 275 319 331 352 380 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 341 442 416 771 98 149 175 150 203 237 242 328 285 346 312 Middle District of Alabama Ch. 13 Comparative Filings Oct. ‘04- Sept. ‘05 Middle District of Alabama Ch. 13 Filing Comparison 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep FY 2004 428 394 365 342 275 319 331 352 380 341 442 416 FY 2005 771 98 149 175 150 203 237 242 328 285 346 312 Middle District of Alabama Ch. 7 Sept. ‘04- Sept. ‘06 Middle District of Alabama Pre and Post BAPCPA Sept 2004 - Sept 2006 Ch. 7 Filings 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 Oct-05 Nov-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Ch. 7 Filings 333 321 331 332 282 396 508 420 375 349 336 440 625 1629 32 37 48 87 123 139 103 126 91 103 93 Middle District of Alabama Ch. 7 Comparative Filings Oct. ‘04- Sept. ‘05 Middle District of Alabama Ch. 7 Filing Comparison 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep FY 2004 321 331 332 282 396 508 420 375 349 336 440 625 FY 2005 1629 32 37 48 87 123 139 103 126 91 103 93 Lowest Bankruptcy Rates in 2005 (Households per consumer bankruptcy filing) *According to the American Bankruptcy Institute *National Average is 60.16 * “The American Bankruptcy Institute survey ranked all 50 states and the District of Columbia.” Rank State Households per consumer filing 1 2 3 4 5 Indiana Ohio Utah Tennessee Oklahoma 34.41 37.19 39.52 39.7 40.86 Highest Bankruptcy Rates in 2005 (Households per consumer bankruptcy filing) *According to the American Bankruptcy Institute *National Average is 60.16 * “The American Bankruptcy Institute survey ranked all 50 states and the District of Columbia.” Rank State Households per consumer filing 51 South Carolina 123.16 50 Alaska 122.64 49 Vermont 119.61 48 District of Columbia 115.93 47 Hawaii 109.54 Bankruptcy Filings By StateHighest in 2005 (Contents from derived from Table F, provided by the United States Bankruptcy Courts) # of filings State/ District Circuit 60,533 CA/ C 9 56,591 IL/ N 7 52,189 FL/ M 11 51,222 OH/ N 6 50,409 MI/ W 6 *26,411 AL/ N 11 *8,871 AL/ M 11 Bankruptcy Filings By StateHighest in 2006 (Contents from derived from Table F, provided by the United States Bankruptcy Courts) # of Filings State/ District Circuit 58,594 CA/ E 9 54,268 OH/ N 6 52,251 IL/ N 7 50,125 MI/ E 6 44,507 OH/ S 6 *22,354 AL/ N 11 **7,310 AL/ M 11 Conclusion The United States Bankruptcy process and Code are unique and unlike any other system of debt relief in the world. The U.S., on the whole, has a problem with excessive individual/ consumer, and corporate insolvency problems. Credit card companies spent a lot of money to push the BAPCPA of 2005 through Congress and its effects were minimal, as compared to those painted by lobbyists of the consumer credit industry. Statistics prove the filing numbers across the country are back on the rise. However, the BAPCPA of 2005 is not the answer to the debt issues of individuals and companies (or small businesses) in America.