Introduction to the Legal System

advertisement
UCSD Extension
Class 1 of 3
Jack Friery
Jack Friery © 2008
1


Three meetings
Goals:
◦ Sources of Law
◦ Court System
◦ Classifications of Law

Assignments and Final Exam
Jack Friery © 2008
2




Attorney for over 30 years
Government, large private firm, in-house
counsel, and solo firm practice
Specialize in federal government contract
matters
And, yes, married to a paralegal for over
30 years
Jack Friery © 2008
3




Your name and a bit about
yourself
Why are you taking this class?
Any experience in the legal field?
Expectations for class
Jack Friery © 2008
4
Jack Friery © 2008
5

No one right answer, because how law is defined
depends on the speaker’s personal philosophy
about morality, ethics and truth.
◦ Examples:
 Canon law
 Natural law
 Sharia

Law consists of a body of rules of conduct with
legal force and effect, prescribed by the controlling
authority (the government) of a society.
Jack Friery © 2008
6


Based on English common law,
because the colonists who first came
to U.S. were governed by it
Even after independence, was used as
model—except Louisiana
Jack Friery © 2008
7






Constitutional law
International law
Statutory law
Administrative law
Case law
Common law tradition
Jack Friery © 2008
8

Established by:
◦ U.S. Constitution
◦ Constitutions of
the states
◦ Cases
interpreting
these
Jack Friery © 2008
9


The U.S. Constitution, as amended, is the
supreme law of the land.
Any law—federal or state—violating the
Constitution, if challenged, will be declared
unconstitutional and cannot be enforced.
Jack Friery © 2008
10



The U.S. Constitution sets forth the powers of the
three branches of government and the relationship
between them.
The first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution
are known as the Bill of Rights.
The rights secured by the Bill of Rights are not
absolute and are given form and substance by the
courts.
Jack Friery © 2008
11

Ultimately, it is the Supreme
Court of the United States
that has authority to give
final interpretations of the
Constitution.
Jack Friery © 2008
12


The U.S. Constitution is the
embodiment of the founder’s belief in
the rule of law
It establishes due process of law
◦ Procedural
◦ Substantive
Jack Friery © 2008
13


Each State has a constitution setting the
organization, powers, and limits of the state
government.
The Tenth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution reserves all powers not granted
to the federal government to the states.
Jack Friery © 2008
14
 Common
law
 Treaty law
Jack Friery © 2008
15
Jack Friery © 2008
16


Statutes consist of the laws passed by the
federal Congress and state legislatures
Ordinances are statues passed by a municipal
or county governmental unit
Jack Friery © 2008
17




Bill introduced
Debated
Sent to either Senate or House for approval
Signed by President or Governor
Jack Friery © 2008
18





Passed daily
Filed Chronologically
Sorted by topic
Codified
Found by using topical index
Jack Friery © 2008
19




Bankruptcy law
Corporate law
Patent,
copyright, and
trademark law
Employment
law




Antitrust law
Consumer law
Wills and
probate
administration
Environmental
law
Jack Friery © 2008
20
Jack Friery © 2008
21



To assist the federal or state legislatures in
implementing the laws that they enact, they
often delegate the implementation of the law
to administrative agencies.
The rules, orders, and decisions of
administrative agencies are known as
administrative law.
Examples: EEOC, EPA, Social Security
Administration
Jack Friery © 2008
22


Administrative agencies are created when
Congress passes enabling legislation, which
specifies the name purpose, composition and
powers of the agency are created.
Examples:
◦ OSHA, EPA, FDA, and FTC

Each state also has many administrative
agencies.
Jack Friery © 2008
23

Common law – originated in
medieval England with the
creation of the king’s courts
following William the
Conqueror’s Conquest of
England in 1066.
Jack Friery © 2008
24



The king’s courts sought to establish a set of
customs for the whole country.
Courts developed the common law rules for the
principles underlying judges’ decisions in actual
cases.
Judges attempted to be consistent, and, when
possible, they based their decisions on principles
set forth in earlier cases.
Jack Friery © 2008
25

Later cases that involved similar facts and
issues could be decided with reference to the
earlier cases, or
precedents
Jack Friery © 2008
26



In Latin it means, “to stand on decided cases”
The use of precedent eventually became a
cornerstone of the common law system.
Under the doctrine of stare decisis, the judges are
obligated to follow precedents established by
higher courts within their jurisdiction.
Jack Friery © 2008
27


Stare decisis provides efficiency, consistency,
stability and predictability in our legal system.
Occasionally, courts will depart from precedent, if
the precedent is based on a clearly erroneous
application of the law or if the political and cultural
environment has change so significantly that the
precedent is no longer relevant.
Jack Friery © 2008
28



Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S.
483, 74 S.Ct. 686, 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954)
This is a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court
departed from precedent
The Court decided that separate educational
facilities for whites and blacks, previously held to
be constitutional, were inherently unequal
Jack Friery © 2008
29


Occasionally, there is no precedent on which to
base a decision.
When deciding cases of first impression, courts
consider the following factors:
◦ Legal principles and policies underlying the previous court
decisions or existing law
◦ Social value and customs
◦ Public policy
◦ Data and concepts drawn from the social sciences
Jack Friery © 2008
30



In re Baby M, 217 N.J. Super. 313, 525 A.2d 1128
(1987)
Example of case of first impression
A New Jersey court had to decide whether a
surrogate-parenting contract should be enforced
against the wishes of the surrogate parent.
Jack Friery © 2008
31

Courts of law
◦ The early English king’s courts the remedies that
could be granted were restricted to:
 Land
 Items of value
 Money
Jack Friery © 2008
32

Equity is the branch of law founded on
notions of justice and fair dealing, seeking to
supply a remedy when there is no adequate
remedy available at law.
Jack Friery © 2008
33


Today, courts of equity and courts of law
have been merged so that one court can
award both legal and equitable remedies.
Courts are guided by equitable principles and
maxims when deciding equity cases.
Example: “Whoever seeks equity must do
equity.”
Jack Friery © 2008
34


Common law governs all areas not covered by
statutory law.
The American Law Institute (ALI) drafted and
published compilations of the common law called
Restatements of the Law. The Restatements
summarize and clarify common law rules and
principles.
Jack Friery © 2008
35
Jack Friery © 2008
36


Sometimes referred to as judge - made law
Interpretation of all law including:
◦
◦
◦
◦
Constitution
Statutes
Administrative Law
Common Law
Jack Friery © 2008
37

Case titles
◦ The name of a case gives the names of the parties
to the lawsuit.
◦ Plaintiff’s name appears first
◦ When an appeal is filed, some appellate courts
place the appellant’s name first.
Jack Friery © 2008
38


Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct.
1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
Name, Official Citation, Unofficial Sources,
Year
Jack Friery © 2008
39

Plaintiff
◦ The one who initiates a lawsuit
◦

Defendant
◦ The one against whom the lawsuit is brought
◦
Jack Friery © 2008
40




Can be elected or appointed
Federal judges can are appointed for life
State judges are elected for terms
Commissioners or magistrates are used in
some courts to make decisions on matters
before trial
Jack Friery © 2008
41


The opinion is the court’s statement of its
reasons for its decision, the rules of law that
apply and the judgment.
Most often found in appellate cases
Jack Friery © 2008
42





Unanimous – all agree
Majority opinion – most agree
Plurality opinion – largest group opinion
Concurring opinion – agree but different
reasons
Dissenting opinion – don’t agree with
majority’s decision
Jack Friery © 2008
43

Questions?
Jack Friery © 2008
44
Download