The BLACKBIRD, revisited in BLACKSBURG. Presented by: Pedro De Oliveira Michael Libeau on April 21, 2000. Motivation for the project • American intelligence forecasted U-2 vulnerability – Subsonic cruise speed – 70 kft ceiling – 1750 nm range • Improved Russian missile technology plotted (SAM’s) • U-2 being shot down on May 1, 1960 over U.R.S.S. reinforced the idea • Government asked for a new aircraft – low radar cross-section aircraft – Mach 3+ cruising speed (continuous!) – altitudes in excess of 80 kft. One idea… The SUNTAN Project [Jenkins], p. 6 Another idea... Project Oxcart - Archangel II [Jenkins], p. 7 A12 - the definitive idea [Whitford], p. 188 The U2 and the SR-71 Drendel p 36 The several versions Drendel 8 SR-71A General Data • • • • • • • • • • • • Primary function: Strategic Reconnaissance Wing span = 55 ft 7in (16.942 m) Length = 107 ft, 5 in (32.741 m) GTOW = 140,000 lbf (63,500 kgf) Engine@Thrust = 2 J58@32,500 lbf (65,000 lbf SLST) Max speed = Mach 3.31 (World record speed) Rate of Climb = 10,000+ fpm Ceiling = 85,069 ft (also a World record) Range = 2,982 nm at Mach 3, 74,740 ft, on internal fuel Endurance on internal fuel, at loiter speed= 7h, At above range 1h20min over target area Manufacturer: Lockheed (McNamara ordered tooling destroyed) Speed Comparison (“faster than a rifle bullet”) 3.5 3 • Mig-25 engines reported being destroyed after flying at 3.2M. Unofficial maximum speed was 2.8M • XB-70 only dashed at 3.2M - most of the flight was subsonic. • The SR-71 used to fly at 3.0M+ for hours. 2.5 2 Max Leveled Mach 1.5 MIG-25 XB-70 SR-71 0.5 0 Concorde 1 Thrust-to-Weight Ratio Comparison • The Mig-25 fuselage has a much smaller fineness ratio. Mig-25 XB-70 SR-71 T/W Concorde 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Jane’s, 74/75 Wing-Loading Comparison 120 100 80 60 W/S [lbf/ft2] 40 Mig-25 XB-70 SR-71 0 Concorde 20 More on T/W x W/S Comparison MIG-25 SR-71 XB-70 Concorde [Whitford], p. 39 Wing Geometry Comparison Speed increase demands thinner wings. [Whitford], p. 30 Speed increase also demands larger turn radii. [Jenkins], p. 93 Aerodynamic Considerations Another application of the KISS methodology • High fineness ratio bodies • Highly swept double-delta wing. [Whitford], p. 188 Aerodynamic Considerations - FUSELAGE • • High fineness ratio for minimum wave drag Use of chines: – better directional stability: reduction of the side-force – offset the backward movement of the A.C. with Mach number [Whitford], p. 150 [Whitford], p. 150 Aerodynamic Considerations - WING • • Double-delta plan form allows high (t/c) ratio to minimize wave drag Swept keeps most of the wing in Mach cone : 90 sin ( 1 ) 1 cone – For Mach 3.0 flight cone 70.5 – SR-71 wing sweep angle: LE 60 • M Conical camber – moves the center of lift inboard – relieves loading on engine nacelle structure due to outboard wing – reduction in high rolling moment due to sideslip inherent to highly swept wings [Whitford], p. 188 Aero Considerations - VERTICAL TAILS • • All moving tails (+20/-20 deg) Cant angle to – reduce induced rolling moment when dr ≠ 0 – stay on the correct side of the vortices shed by the nacelles - reduced VT deflection at low speed with ≠ 0 Whitford, p. 195 Vortices - I Crickmore p 66 Vortices - II Crickmore p 181 The all-moving VTs. Crickmore p 44 Drendel p 20 Stable or unstable? Drendel p 45 YF-12 needed improved directional stability Drendel p 12 Drendel p 17 Fins must fold for landing. Drendel p 15 Aero Considerations - Aerodynamic Heating • The SR-71, a hot airplane: – 600 F at nose (aerodynamic heating at Mach 3+) – 520 F at the windshield glass – 1200 F at the exhaust nozzle (fuel burned) • • • • 93% of the structural weight built of Titanium alloys Cord-wise corrugations on wing skin The utility of the black paint (lower temps., lower RCS) Nitrogen both in tires and in fuel tank Aero Considerations - Aerodynamic Heating • • • • • Fuel used also as coolant JP-7, a high-flashing point fuel Fuel leakage always a problem Special hydraulic fluids (powders?) to operate at 600 F Special tires, retracted into the fuselage fuel tank area Fuel leakage always a problem Air&Space Magazine, Feb/Mar 99, vol. 13 (6) Propulsion: Turbojet or Ramjet? • At Mach 3 cruise, turbojet engine makes only 17% of total thrust AIAA-69-757, p. 7 Turbo-ramjet: a hybrid propulsion system AIAA-69-757, p. 7 AIAA-69-757, p. 7 Flow must decelerate from supersonic to subsonic before the compressor first stage http://www.airspacemag.com/asm/mag/supp/fm99/oxcart.html Missions • • • • Reconnaissance (it should be RS, Pres. Johnson turned it SR) Interceptor (YF-12) Mother-ship Research Vehicle Typical Reconnaissance Mission Crickmore p 69 A modern ship, but also a mother-ship. Jenkins p 50 The mother-ship delivery. Jenkins p 44 SR-71 in High Speed Research • NASA Dryden currently is conducting high speed flight research using two SR-71 aircraft. • Excellent platforms to carry out research and experiments in a variety of areas (aerodynamics, propulsion,structures, thermal protection materials, high-speed and high-temperature instrumentation, atmospheric studies and sonic boom characterization) • Data from the SR-71 high-speed research program will be used to aid designers of future supersonic/hypersonic aircraft and propulsion systems, including a high-speed civil transport. NASA’s SR-71 and A-12 http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Projects/SR71/home.html Bye-bye, Blackbird. [Jenkins], p. 85 One airplane, several names • • • • • • • A(rchangel)-12 Blackbird Cygnus Habu Senior Crown SR-71 as Strategic Reconnaissance, but also... YF-12 Reference List • Burrows, William E., “The Oxcart Cometh,” Air&Space Magazine, Vol. 13 (6), Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C., Feb./Mar. 1999. • Crickmore, Paul F., “LOCKHEED SR-71 – The Secret Missions Exposed,” BAS Printers Limited, Great Britain, 1993. • Drendel, Lou, “SR-71 Blackbird in action,” Squadron/Signal Publications, Inc., Carrolton, TX, 1982. • “Jane’s All the World Aircraft” from years 68/69, 69/70, 74/75. • Jenkins, Dennis R., “SR-71/YF-12 BLACKBIRDS”, WARBIRDTECH series, vol. 10, Specialty Press Publishers and Wholesalers, 1997. • Johnson, Clarence L., “Some Development Aspects of the YF-12A Interceptor Aircraft,” AIAA Paper No. 69-757, 1969. • Whitford, Ray, “Design for Air Combat”.