New Mexico’s Tax System: How It Works and Why It Matters to You 1 A Good Tax System Should: • Provide stable, adequate revenue to consistently fund state services; • In a manner that is: Balanced (promotes stability) Fair (distributes the burden broadly) Accountable (no hidden loopholes; transparent) Administrable & Efficient (minimally expensive to collect, enforce and comply with) 2 Thirty-eight states levy three general taxes: property, sales and income taxes. The “three-legged stool” approach to revenue policy is generally consistent with good tax policy principles. Income tax Property tax Sales & excise tax 3 New Mexico’s stool has four legs Sales and excise taxes Property tax Income tax Extraction taxes 4 Revenue : The money the state collects through taxes and interest on investments that pays for all state services Rents & Roylt's 7% Severance Taxes 7% Rents & Roylt's 9% New taxes & Misc. 6% GRT and Comp. 35% Income tax 26% Interest 12% FY 2003 Revenue = $3.9 B Selective Sales 7% New taxes & Misc. 2% Severance Taxes 8% Income tax 28% GRT and Comp. 34% Interest 12% Selective Sales 7% FY 2007 Revenue = $5.5 B 5 STABLE sources of revenue: • Personal income taxes (PIT) – because they grow with population • Gross receipts taxes (GRT) – because they also grow with population and personal income; and, everyone purchases goods that are taxed 6 UNSTABLE revenue sources: • Extraction taxes – because these are subject to global market conditions outside of the control of New Mexico politics • Corporate income taxes (CIT) – because so much of the CIT in NM is also driven by oil and gas companies, whose profits, and therefore the taxes they pay, depend on the unstable oil and gas market 7 State revenue changes 2003 2007 The percentages of taxes that contribute to state revenue changed in important ways from 2003 – 2007: The percentage of revenue from personal income tax (PIT) decreased because of tax cuts made in 2003; The percentage of revenue from extraction taxes – oil and gas – increased because of higher oil and gas prices; The percentage of revenue from corporate income tax increased – again because of higher profits realized by oil and gas companies; estimates are that more than half - or $200M of the current CIT revenues are oil and gas related. 8 Changes in the Stable Sources of State Revenue 2003 and 2007 GRT & Comp., 35% GRT & Comp., 34% PIT, 23% All Other, Unstable sources 42% Estate, 0.40% 2003 PIT, 20% All Other, Unstable sources 46% Estate, 0% 2007 In 2003, Personal Income Taxes were a greater share of revenue. The impact of the PIT 2003 tax cuts can be seen in the 2007revenue pie. In addition, the state eliminated estate taxes. GRT taxes also declined some, and the reliance on “unstable” revenue sources increased. 9 Changes in the Unstable Sources of State Revenue 2003 and 2007 Severance Taxes, 8% Severance Taxes, 7% Interest, 12% Interest, 12% Rents & Royalties, 7% CIT, 3% Stable revenue 71% 2003 stable revenues, 64% Rents and Royalties, 9% CIT, 7% 2007 Oil and gas growth impacts several areas of state revenue, including rents and royalties, severance taxes and Corporate Income Taxes that are levied on companies that are oil and gas related. Corporate incomes taxes have risen from $100 M in 2003 to $400 M in 2007. Nonetheless, changes in the corporate tax laws to tax ALL businesses doing business in NM would be a good source of revenue. (Called “combined reporting”). 10 Summary so far…. • Much of the state’s revenue is from taxes • There are different types of taxes • Some taxes are more stable, or dependable, than others • Recent changes in NM’s tax laws have resulted in greater dependence on unstable taxes 11 Once revenues are collected, the legislature spends the money… 12 There are 2 ways the legislature spends the revenue, or tax dollars that are collected: (1) by creating the “general fund budget” which appropriates money for the state agencies; and (2) through tax expenditures – these are laws that provide exemptions, credits or deductions from taxes. The most familiar “tax expenditure” is the deduction for mortgage interest. If the state did not allow this deduction, then it could collect more taxes – thus, the mortgage deduction is an “expenditure” of tax dollars. Many of the laws allowing tax expenditures are never reviewed by the legislature once they are passed, so the expenditures continue year after year. 13 General Fund Spending ($5 Billion for FY 2007) All State Services Are Funded By Taxes: Other Government 10% Public Schools 45% Other Health & Human Services 12% Medicaid 12% 60% Higher Education 15% Public Safety 6% 14 To Maintain Current Levels Of Services State Spending Must Increase By At Least 7% Each Year •Inflation increases costs – 6% per year •New Mexico’s population grows by about 1% per year •An aging population utilizes services •Public priorities change and require additional funding (e.g., corrections or full-day kindergarten) 15 What’s happened to the general fund since 2003? FY 2003 FY 2004 % Increase FY 2005 % Increase FY 2006 % Increase FY 2007 % Increase Total General Appropriations Act $3.886B $4.105B 5.6% $4.378B 6.7% $4.678B 6.9% $5.071B 8.40% 16 How have state agency budgets changed since 2003? F Y 2003 o pe ra t ing budge t s ha re o f to tal budge t F Y 2004 o pe ra t ing budge t s ha re o f to tal budge t s ha re o f to tal budge t F Y 2006 o pe ra t ing budge t s ha re o f to tal budge t $ 3.1M 0.1% $ 3.5 M 0.1% $ 6.6 M 0.2% $ 3.4 M 0.1% $ 3.6 M 0.1% J udic ia ry $ 131.5 M 3.4% $ 138.5 M 3.4% $ 147.5 M 3.4% $ 161.5 M 3.5% $ 170.3 M 3.4% G e ne ra l C o nt ro l $ 135.50 3.5% $ 136.2 M 3.3% $ 145.3 M 3.3% $ 150.4 M 3.2% $ 157.6 M 3.1% C o m m e rc e & Indus t ry $ 45.7 M 1.2% $ 47.9 M 1.2% $ 49.5 M 1.1% $ 46.7 M 1.0% $ 49.9 M 1.0% A g. E ne rgy & N a t .R e s o urc e s s $ 59.1M 1.5% $ 59.0 M 1.4% $ 65.0 M 1.5% $ 68.9 M 1.5% $ 72.3 M 1.4% H e a lt h, H o s pit a ls , H um a n S v c A ging & Lo ng Term Care $ 831.2 M $ 20.8 M 21.4% 0.5% $ 914.0 M $ 21.6 M 22.3% 0.5% $ 1,010.3 B $ 23.5 M 23.1% 0.5% $ 1,115.6 B $ 36.8 M 23.8% 0.8% $ 1,212.9 B $ 41.0 M 23.9% 0.8% Human Services Dept . $ 414.5 M 10.7% $ 471.4 M 11.5% $ 544.3 M 12.4% $ 626.2 M 13.4% $ 684.2 M 13.5% (M edical A ssistance) $ 345.8 M 8.9% $ 418.8 M 10.2% $ 486.7 M 11.1% $ 569.6 M 12.2% $ 625.8 M 12.3% $ 38.0 M 1.0% $ 38.0 M 0.9% $ 39.8 M 0.9% $ 43.6 M 0.9% $ 42.7 M 0.8% $ 232.8 M 6.0% $ 248.8 M 6.1% $ 258.70 5.9% $ 273.7 M 5.9% $ 285 M 5.6% $ 14.2 M 0.4% $ 14.3 M 0.3% $ 14.8 M 0.3% $ 13.5 M 0.3% $ 14.1M 0.3% $ 133.2 M 3.4% $ 140.2 M 3.4% $ 150 M 3.4% $ 145.2 M 3.1% $ 165.5 M 3.3% P ublic S a f e t y $ 270.2 M 7.0% $ 280.8 M 6.8% $ 288.8 M 6.6% $ 296.1M 6.3% $ 323.0 M 6.4% Co rrectio ns $ 194.1M 5.0% $ 202.5 M 4.9% $ 207.6 M 4.7% $ 213.9 M 4.6% $ 237.1M 4.7% P ublic Safety $ 69.5 M 1.8% $ 70.9 M 1.7% $ 73.5 M 1.7% $ 74.4 M 1.6% $ 77.1M 1.5% H ighe r E duc a t io n $ 601.7 M 15.5% $ 641.6 M 15.6% $ 671.9 M 15.3% $ 707.7 M 15.1% $ 759.2 M 15.0% P ublic S c ho o l S uppo rt $ 1,788.6 B 46.0% $ 1,863.3 B 45.4% $ 1,986.4 B 45.4% $ 2,119.0 B 45.3% $ 2,280 B 45.0% $ 20.0 M 0.5% $ 20.4 M 0.5% $ 6.9 M 0.2% $ 9.4 M 0.2% $ 14.9 M 0.3% 10 0 .0 % S t a t e B udge t C a t e go ry …... State A gency … … … … .. budget) Le gis la t ure F Y 2005 o pe ra t ing budge t F Y 2007 o pe ra t ing budge t s ha re o f to tal budge t (divisio n ( Inco me Suppo rt) Health Dept. Enviro nment Dept CYFD O t he r E duc a t io n T o t a l A ppro pria t io ns A c t $ 3 ,8 8 6 .6 B $ 4 ,10 5 .1 B $ 4 ,3 7 8 .5 B $ 4 ,6 7 8 .5 B $ 5 ,0 7 0 .8 B N M P e rs o na l Inc o m e ( P I) $ 4 5 .7 B $ 4 8 .6 $ $ 5 2 .4 B $ 5 4 .7 B $ 5 9 .2 B 0 .0 8 5 0 .0 8 4 0 .0 8 4 0 .0 8 4 0 .0 8 6 O pe ra t ing B udge t a s % o f P I 17 What does all of this mean? • The general fund budget has grown at about the same rate as the state economy for the last few years • Most state agency budgets remain the same year-toyear as a share of the total budget for that year • EXCEPTIONS are Medicaid, which has grown every year and HIGHER ED which has decreased as a share of the total - other state agency budgets remain flat • The operating budget, or general fund, remains almost a constant percentage of personal income at about .085% 18 And what does all of THAT mean? • State government is not growing at a rampant rate • Because state agency budgets remain flat, one interest gets pitted against another in the appropriations wars • If we believe the state needs more services, we need to increase the TOTAL operating budget 19 To increase the total operating budget, we can: • Raise taxes • Reduce tax expenditures • Or, do both 20 In addition to spending money on the state agency budgets – or the general fund budget – there are tax expenditures – credits, deductions and exemptions from the tax base. 21 Summary: Exemptions and Deductions from NM Gross Receipts and Compensating Taxes » • • • • • • • • • • • • • Social Policy/ Economic Development: Governmental Family Interstate Trade Family Nonprofit Organizations Family Taxes paid under other programs Agricultural Family Food Stamps Pre-emption Manufactured Products Family Property for re-sale Lease for re-Sale Family Construction Materials and Services Family Real property family Total Gen. Fund Local $184.6 $45 $23 $114.3 $1,759 $17 $7 $107 $463.3 $13 $48 $266 $3047.2 $45 $30 $12 $76.5 $1,146 $7 $5 $46 $300 $4 $32 $171 $1887 Total $242.2 $75 $35 $190.8 $2,905 $24 $12 $153 $763.3 $17 $80 $437 $4934.3 22 ‼Tax expenditures are important : What’s left after the tax expenditures is the revenue that makes up the state general fund. 23 Tax expenditures are a way of spending money! We need to look at the whole picture – tax expenditures as well as the general fund spending. 24 Adequacy: A tax system should generate adequate, stable revenue to consistently fund state services 25 Because of the PIT cuts in 2003 and the heavy reliance on extraction taxes, our tax system is no longer stable and adequate. In coming years, if revenues are not enough to support state spending…. 26 Taxes Must Be Increased Increase Sales and Excise Taxes ??? New "Sin" Taxes ??? Extraction tax revenue depends on oil and gas NM's flat income tax could be raised Investment incomeas reserves go down, so will investment $$$ 27 OR … Services Must Be Cut Other Government Fewer public health clinics? Less $$$ for Public Schools Public Safetly Medicaid cuts? Eldely? Disabled? Higher Education $$$ reduced 28 OR… We can examine our tax expenditures to make sure they meet our public policy goals. 29 Finally, a good tax system should be FAIR 30 Fairness A tax system should distribute the tax burden broadly, with those in higher income brackets paying more 31 The personal income tax cuts reduced the tax burden of New Mexico’s wealthiest citizens while benefiting middle class and lower income families very little or not at all. 7% State Income Taxes before and after full phase-in of tax cuts 6% 5% Greatest benefit 4.4% 4% 3.5% 4.0% 3.2% 2.9% 3% 2% 5.9% 2.3% No benefit 0.7% 1% -0.3% 1.5% 2.0% 1.4% 0.7% -0.3% 0% -1% lowest 20% $7,800 second 20% $18,300 middle 20% $28,700 fourth 20% $46,000 next 15% $79,100 next 4% $149,000 next 1% $611,000 top 20% Before cut After cut Income Level 32 New Mexico’s tax cuts mirror recent federal cuts BUSH CUTS • Reduces the overall tax burden on the richest 1% of Americans by over 12% • While the bottom 20% of Americans receive only a 3% tax reduction. NM CUTS • Reduces state income taxes for New Mexicans in the top tax bracket by over 30% • Provides no tax relief at all for the bottom 20% of taxpayers. 33 New Mexico and Federal Tax Cuts in 2007: Who Benefits $25,000 $21,204 Federal Tax Cuts 2007 $20,000 $15,000 $13,227 $10,000 $5,000 $3,151 $70 $0 $0 Less Than $16,000 $306 $0 $16,000 $29,000 $597 $38 $29,000 $45,000 $831 $1,737 $638 $158 $45,000 $72,000 $72,000 $138,000 $2,307 $138,000 - $295,000 or $295,000 more Income Level Federal NM 34 What does all of this mean? Understanding the state tax system is critical for all advocates of social programs. Some taxes are better than others. The state general fund is growing at about the rate of state personal income. Tax expenditures are very important because they are often unexamined and are a potential source of revenue that could be available to spend on programs and services. 35 Some policies to consider… A Tax Expenditure Report What is it? A report prepared annually by the tax and revenue department, detailing the tax expenditures, and their costs. Why is it a good idea? Because the legislature and the public need an accountability system for tax expenditures, which should be part of the budget debate process. How much will it cost? The tax department would do this report, so the cost should be minimal. 36 • A state Earned Income Tax Credit What is it? A credit, or payment, that low income working families get when they file their taxes. Why is it a good idea? Upper income tax payers received huge state and federal tax cuts, and a state EITC would help low income earners, making our tax system a little more progressive. How much would it cost? At 10% of the value of the federal EITC, it would cost about $37 M. 37 What You Can Do Educate (colleagues, members, policymakers, the media, neighbors) Advocate for fair, adequate and transparent tax policy. This session, argue for tax expenditure reports so we know how much the credits, deductions and exemptions cost us. Talk to your legislators (to find out who your representatives are and how to contact them go to Get Active at www.nmvoices.org 38