Part 2


1. Using prep time effectively

2. Case construction

3. Thinking of arguments

4. Info about trials


5-10 minutes: walk to debate room, individual thinking/ brainstorm time

10-15 minutes: share your ideas, no interruptions

15-25 minutes: discussion and case construction

25 – 30 minutes: writing out any left over notes

30 minutes: debate!


Start thinking about the topic immediately

Listen patiently to your team mates ideas

Be open to changing your mind

Take good notes during discussion time

Have someone keep an eye on the time

Case construction (broadly)
Problem → Solution → Principle

Case construction in depth
Prepping properly – a formula


1. Why is this a thing?

Why are we having this debate

What is the context?

What is the imperative?

Is there a problem we need to solve?

2. What is our solution?

Definition

Model

Stance


3. Who are we in this debate?

Core principles/ values?

Ideology?

Philosophy?

Eg. Clash between individual freedom and group rights pro individual freedom = Liberalism
Put more simply – what would John Rawls say?

Affirmative: That we should legalise drugs

Harm minimisation and government regulation

OR

Libertarian
Affirmative: This house supports humanitarian intervention


Universal rights
Cosmopolitanism

Why can’t you be both?

Can you be both?


3. What is the clash?

What are the core principles/ values of the opp?

Eg. Individual freedom vs group rights/ state intervention = Liberalism vs. Utilitarianism vs. Communitarianism vs. Socialism

4. List your arguments (finally!)

5. Rebuttal ideas

Take those 6 steps, discuss them and put them together into a case

1. Context/Imperative

2. Definition and Model

3. Team Values/ World View

4. Clash of the debate

5. Arguments – aim for 4/5

6. Rebuttal


Forgotten Stakeholders: Who are the stakeholders?
Who would benefit/who might be harmed?

Counter-intuitive arguments: What are the main arguments against the proposal and what assumptions do they rely on?

Outcomes of your case?

What will the community reaction be? Will there be a backlash?

What will the practical effects be immediately?

What will the long term consequences be?

How does this affect other countries?



Any argument that ‘its just wrong’

Eg. Polygamy, incest

Doesn’t mean you can’t use morality but needs to be thought through further with analysis
‘Their model just won’t practically work’

There is a fine distinction between a good & reasonable argument on efficacy and a crap & petty argument on practicality

Eg: Good to say a proposal to fix Zimbabwe by assassinating Mugabe ‘won’t work’ because the nature of politics there means someone will just take his spot, not so good to say it ‘won’t work’ because no government would do it, or he would be hard to find an kill


Opportunity Cost Arguments:
 ie. we shouldn’t do this because it will cost lots of money that could go to other stuff like health and education

However..

There is a place for this type of argument but it needs to be targeted – specific to the debate

The alternative use of money is mutually exclusive with the other team’s model and will solve the problem

Eg. legalising drugs is a good idea because instead of wasting money on a ‘war on drugs’ we can help addicts and actually reduce demand, better solving the problem


Don’t stress

Don’t be a selfish team member, share your ideas with the people speaking before you

Judges can tell when you are being a little biatch

Keep an eye on the basics, structure & timing

You are allowed to use a timing device


We will email you with the list of teams and judges by tomorrow


You must confirm you attendance by this Friday the 16 th of March
You must pay registration by the 27 th of March, $355 if you have sponsorship and $485 for everyone else

NOTE: Once you have confirmed your attendance you are committing to being a part of the contingent and will be expected to pay your registration in the event you pull out last minute.

Good luck with trials