G674 These children have equal access to education, but does this mean they will enjoy similar lifestyles as adults? What do these pictures indicate about the ways in which we think about social class? Which of the following things might you use to judge a person’s class? Neighbourhood Job Pay Education Wealth Accent Clothes Parental background Use of leisure time Political party support This is a synoptic unit. You need to therefore be prepared to bring in references to things you discussed at AS in relation to class (as well as in the Crime Unit)... You need to re-familiarise yourself with the work of people like Willis, Savage, Devine... What is it? What does it stand for? How many categories does it have? What system did it replace? How would you categorise: Car Mechanic (employer) Self-employed builder Teacher Solicitor Headteacher Waiter/waitress What difficulties do you face doing the above? Workers are no longer divided exclusively in terms of manual and non-manual labour. It introduces a category for unemployed people (New Right theorists would call this the underclass). In a big change from earlier scales, women are no longer categorized by the occupation of their husbands or fathers. Is social class just about occupation? Doesn’t include people so rich they don’t need to work. Doesn’t take into account status differences: Officially, a headteacher would be in the same category as a teacher. What evidence is there that social class is a source of inequality? Discuss: What does the table tell us about the relationship between housing and class? NS-SEC Owned outright % Owned with mortgage % Rent from social sector % Rent privately % 1 14 77 2 6 2 20 65 1 14 3 14 68 6 12 4 17 59 13 11 5 26 54 7 13 6 17 38 30 16 7 16 43 27 14 8 12 2 73 13 Source: ONS; 2004 Clear distinctions in ownership and rental in the contemporary UK. Patterns of home ownership reflect patterns of income. How might where you live impact your social capital? How might it impact other areas of your life? Differences in annual income are significant; based on occupation, but not reflecting on amount of hours worked per week. Group Avg. Pay Avg. (£) Hours worked Managers & senior officials 42,164 39 Professional occupations 33,741 36.3 Technical occupations 27,627 38.5 Administrative/secretarial 17,560 37.5 Skilled trades 21,060 42.6 Sales/customer services 14,912 38.8 Process, plant, machinery work 19,113 44.8 Source: ONS; 2006 Mortality by social class gradient (using Registrar General Scale) Death rate of Class 5 is twice that of class 1 Someone in class 1 lives on average 7 years longer than someone in class 5 The risk of dying before the age of 5 is twice as high for children born in class 5 than those born in class 1 Long standing illness is around 50% higher among class 5 than class 1 Since the early 1980s the health gap between those at the top of the social scale and those at the bottom has been rising Lower grade civil servants had higher rates of death from all causes and specifically coronary heart disease When controlling for all factors (smoking obesity, leisure time, height) lower grades still had a risk factor of 2;1 compared to highest grade Concluded stress associated with lack of control was a significant factor Read for HWK: http://www.abc.net.au/science/slab/stress/wh ithall.htm A Sociology Exam in which you have to answer four essay questions in ninety minutes, following a precise structure for each question. A Sociology Exam in which you answer four unstructured essay questions from a choice of twelve in up to four hours. How does this relate to the Whitehall Study? Do you agree that people of a lower social class are likely to have less control over their own work? Do you agree that this leads to stress? Are there any other factors that might mean people from the lower social classes experience more stress (and therefore more ill health in general)? Unemployment and low pay Poor education Inadequate housing multiple disadvantage Poor environment Poor health High levels of crime “There is a strong socio-economic gradient to almost all patterns of disease and ill-health. The lower your socio-economic position, the greater your risk of low birthweight, infections, cancer, coronary heart disease, respiratory disease, stroke, accidents, nervous and mental illnesses.” In 1992… 60% of students from managerial/professional backgrounds achieved 5+ GCSEs, compared to 16% from unskilled/manual backgrounds, In 2002… Figures rose to 77% from managerial/prof. and 32% from unskilled/manual… Why types of capital can be gained in education and how? Why do you think children from lower social class backgrounds don’t do so well? What might happen if these figures were more equal? How can doing well at school influence your social status and/or social class position? The Sutton Trust Study (2008) Class differences in attainment occur as a result of early experiences in a child’s life. Students from poorer backgrounds who make it onto A Level programmes usually have an equal chance of gaining uni placements with those from more affluent backgrounds. However, students who gain their A Levels in private education are more likely to gain places at more prestigious universities. How might the type of school a person attends influence their social status and class position? How might it impact their life chances? Come up with a strategy of five ways in which Northampton College could do better in improving the chances of students from poorer backgrounds to succeed... Connor & Dewson (2001) found that only one in five boys from working-class backgrounds go on into higher education. Savage & Egerton (1997) found that ability does not wipe out class advantage. Only half of the ‘high ability’ working-class boys in their study made it into the service class (e.g. not manual labour work). 32% of MPs attended independent schools; 72% attended university; 43% went to a prestigious university; 27% went to Oxbridge. Conservative MPs more likely to have attended private schooling (59%) From your AS, your could refer to: Medhurst’s research usingThe Royle Family (1999) Stereotyping/negative portrayals of the working-classes (e.g. Shameless, Jeremy Kyle). What studies/evidence did we look at in the previous unit that might suggest Social Class inequalities in relation to Crime & Deviance? The statistics here – and in your text books, workbooks etc. – are out of date. It’s still okay to quote them (preferably noting their date), but you should aim to gain up to date statistics and contemporary examples to use alongside them in the exam. It is an expectation that you demonstrate some awareness of contemporary issues and how they relate to your studies – examples of different types of inequality in the UK are in the news every single day... In small groups, research news and campaign sites to find at least three examples of social class inequality in the contemporary UK... ...You will present your findings to the class. Social Class Explanations & Inequalities Inequality is necessary, inevitable and functional. Discuss (Pairs): Functionalists like Durkheim and Parsons believe that inequality is functional. In what ways could inequality possibly help a society to function? Unequal distribution is justified because it is beneficial to society: Some jobs are functionally more important than others and some people more able. The most important jobs in society are the most highly rewarded. This will motivate people to compete to achieve them. Society is a Meritocracy. In pairs, decide on the ten most functional jobs for society. Justify your answers. Ext: - Identify what you think are the five ‘least’ functional jobs. Do the rates of pay for these jobs reflect how functional they are? If they don’t, then it may suggest: a) Davis and Moore are wrong – and functionalists are wrong: inequality is not functional or... b) Our society is not working properly Within all complex societies, social inequality and difference are inevitable and help maintain social order and prevent anomie (Durkheim) Social systems must be hierarchical, in order to keep order and maintain a healthy society (Parsons) Tumin (1963) questions what is meant by ‘functionally important jobs’. Marxists accuse them of ignoring divisions and conflict between classes. People don’t necessarily need extra rewards to go through the self-fulfilling process of training. Stratification can de-motivate rather than motivate many people. Everyone in society has a role to fulfil. Different financial rewards for different roles encourage everyone to fulfil their potential. Is this a good or bad thing? 750-1000 Words Discuss: Based on your learning so far at A Level, how do you think the Marxists would view inequality? How should wealth be divided between social classes? If the total UK wealth was represented by 100 coins, how should we divide them between five social class groups? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOJ93tA bPP0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oj2LA8r EqQ4 The bourgeoisie exploit the working class through the system of wage labour. Capitalists pay workers less than the value of what they produce in order that they make a profit (surplus value). The working class get poorer and the ruling class get richer. Inequality grows. Ownership of the means of production gives people the power to determine their own salaries as well as those of their workers. The capitalist system, which relies on social inequality, is legitimised by the state. The state controls our thoughts through the Ideological State Apparatus (ISA) e.g. media, religion, education. (Althusser; 1977) This creates a false class consciousness. “Workers of the world unite; you have nothing to lose but your chains.” “The ruling ideas of every age have been the ideas of its ruling class.” “Religion is the opium of the masses.” “Philosophers seek to explain the world, the point is to change it.” Focus on explaining the growth of the middle classes, and on the different types of capital: Social, Economic and Cultural. What are examples of the three types of capital? Who has access to them? In what ways do they advantage some social groups over others? Exploitation of workers by rulers is part of society’s natural development. Capitalism is a necessary step on the way to communism. A full class consciousness will develop as a result of exploitation, oppression and ideological control. The middle-class will disappear as society becomes more polarised. As middle-class jobs become more de-skilled, most will fall into the proletariat (Braverman; 1974) The living standards of the working class in many capitalist countries has improved rather than worsened. Communist societies that exist today still produces inequality (although not to the same extent as capitalism). Marx does not explain the big differences in income of groups of workers e.g. doctors and unskilled workers. Burnham argues that it is an outdated view of the capitalist economy. Referred to as the “ghost of Marx”. Property and capital are important dimensions of social privilege, but there are other crucial factors… Social inequality is the product of class (economic position), status (social standing within community) and party (power and politics). 1. 2. 3. 4. Would the following four people occupy high or low class, status and party positions? Black female MP White, working class plumber who helps run local boy’s football team 35 year old ‘Euromillions’ winner (worth £35m) Elderly man on state pension A social class is determined by a person’s market situation and work situation. Market situation = income related Work situation = conditions of service (e.g. hours worked, perks, status of employment) There is a lot of social mobility, preventing rigid classes from forming Pairs: Explain as many as you can! The relationship between Class, income and occupation is not always as clear as others have said: The price of labour, as with any other commodity, depends on supply and demand. If a skill is in short supply and high demand, you can charge a high price for it. Feminism & Postmodernism Social class inequalities and differences are related to gender inequalities and differences – you cannot treat them separately. Note: Marxist Feminists would have more to say here…we’ll cover them later in the unit… Pakulski & Waters (1996) Social class is dead Globalisation means that there are not class divisions; only status divisions. People can now buy the image they want to portray, and do not see themselves in terms of social class. Outline and Evaluate the Marxist view on Social Class Inequality [40]