Contents of the course - Solvay Brussels School

advertisement
International Finance
Lecture n° 4
FDI Theory and Strategy
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
1
Why do firms become multinational?
• Five categories of strategic motives:
–
–
–
–
–
Market seekers
Raw material seekers
Production efficiency seekers
Knowledge seekers
Political safety seekers
• In markets where oligopolistic competition: subclassified into
proactive and defensive investments
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
2
Why do firms become multinational?
• Markets imperfections : a rationale for the existence of
multinational firms
– Imperfections in the market for products translate into market
opportunities for MNEs.
• Sustaining and transferring competitive advantage
– First step: Identification
– The competitive advantage must be firm-specific, transferable,
and powerful enough to compensate the firm for the potential
disadvantages of operating abroad.
– It implies for an MNE to have one or several of the following
elements, that would give them an edge over their local
competitors to exploit these market opportunities.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
3
Why do firms become multinational?
• Sustaining and transferring competitive advantage
– The superiority of a MNE may come from :
• Economies of scale and scope
• Managerial and marketing expertise
• Advanced technology
• Financial strength
• Differentiated products
– Competitiveness of the Home Market
• It can increase firm’s competitive advantage in operating abroad.
• Referred to as the “diamond of national advantages”.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
4
Why do firms become multinational?
– “Diamond of national advantages”:
• Factor conditions : availability of appropriate factor production
• Demand conditions : demanding customers increase marketing and
quality control skills.
• Related and supporting industries
• Firm strategy, structure and rivalry : a competitive home market
forces firms to fine tune their strategy and operational
effectiveness.
– Global competitions in oligopolistic industries may substitute
for domestic competition : telecom, high-tech, cosmetics...
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
5
Why do firms become multinational?
– The OLI paradigm and internalisation
• Creates a framework to explain the prevalence of FDI over other
forms of international expansion.
• The conditions for a successful investment require a competitive
advantage to be :
– O : owner-specific : can be transferred abroad. Ex. Product
differentiation.
– L : location-specific : will be exploitable in the targeted market.
Ex. Market imperfections or competitive advantage.
– I : internalisation : the competitive position is preserved by
controlling the entire value chain in the industry. Ex. Proprietary
information and human capital control in research-intensive
industries.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
6
Where to Invest ?
– In theory, a firm should search the best location world-wide to take
advantage of market imperfections and enjoy its competitive
advantages.
– In practice, firms have been observed to follow a sequential search
pattern. This relates to two behavioral theories of FDI :
• Behavioral approach : firms tend to invest first in countries that
are not too far in psychic terms and for limited investments.
Psychic distance is defined in terms of cultural, legal and
institutional environment. As firms learn, they are willing to take
more risks, both in terms of distance and size of investments.
• International network theory : sees MNE as a member of an
international network with nodes based in each of the foreign
subsidiaries, competing with each other and influencing the
strategy and the reinvestment decisions.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
7
How to Invest Abroad ?
• Modes of Foreign Involvement
– Exporting versus Production Abroad
• Exporting : none of the risks faced with FDI
• Disadvantages of exporting : inability to internalise and exploit the
results of R&D investments.
• Risk of losing markets to imitators and global competitors.
– Licensing and Management Contracts vs. Control of Assets Abroad
• Licensing : popular method to take advantage of foreign markets
without committing sizeable funds. Political risk is minimized.
• Disadvantages of licensing : license fees lower than FDI profits
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
8
How to Invest Abroad ?
• Licensing and Management Contracts
– Other disadvantages :
• Possible loss of quality control
• Establishment of a potential competitor
• Risk of technology stolen, or becoming outdated
• High agency costs
– In practice, MNE’s use licensing with foreign subsidiaries or with joint
ventures.
– Management contracts are similar to licensing in terms of cash-flows,
and reduce political risk since repatriation of managers is easy.
– Cost effective of licensing with regard to FDI depends on the price host
countries will pay for the services.
– Since MNE continue to prefer FDI, the price is assumed to be too low
(due to the lack of synergies in licensing?)
– MINI - CASE : Benecol’s global licensing agreement.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
9
How to Invest Abroad ?
• Joint Venture vs. Wholly Owned Subsidiary
– Partially owned foreign business : termed as foreign affiliate (case
of a joint venture). Foreign business owned at more 50%: foreign
subsidiary
– Key success factor of a joint venture : find the right local partner.
– Some advantages of a local partner :
• Better understanding of the local market;
• Provision of competent management, and/or appropriate local
technology;
• Enhanced contacts and reputation, eased access to the local financial
markets.
– Potential disadvantages :
• Risk of conflicts and difficulties, divergent views, decreased control
over financing or over production rationalisation;
• Increased political and reputation risk, if the wrong partner is chosen.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
10
How to Invest Abroad ?
• Greenfield investment vs. Acquisition
– Greenfield investment : establishing a production or service
facility starting from the ground up.
– Cross-borders acquisitions : quicker, could be more cost-effective
in gaining competitive advantage such as technology, brand names,
logistic and distribution.
– Disadvantages of cross-borders acquisitions :
• Problems of paying a too high price (but some undervaluation cases,
too, especially in crisis situation),
• Difficulties on the post-acquisition process, and the merger of different
corporate cultures.
• Additional difficulties from host governments intervention in pricing,
financing, employment guarantees…
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
11
How to Invest Abroad ?
• Strategic alliances - different stages :
– Simple exchange of share ownership (as a takeover defense);
– Establishment of a separate joint venture to develop and
manufacture a product or a service (common in high-tech
industries);
– Joint marketing and servicing agreement (often forbidden by
national laws)
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
12
Multinational Capital Budgeting
• Multinational Capital Budgeting
– Same theoretical framework
– The net present value criteria can be applied based on the expected cash
flows of the project, like in case of a domestic investment.
• Complexities of budgeting a foreign project
– Parent cash flows must be distinguished from project cash flows, each
contributing to a different view of value;
– Financing mode, remittance of funds, tax systems, differing inflation
rates and foreign exchange rate movements must be taken into account;
– Political risk and government interference should be included in the
analysis
– Terminal value is more difficult to estimate, because of various potential
purchasers, in host country or abroad, public or private.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
13
Multinational Capital Budgeting
• Project versus Parent Valuation
– Strong theoretical statement to analyse the project from the point of
view of the parent, since it is the ultimate basis for dividend payments
and other reinvestment decisions.
– However, this violates the rule that, in capital budgeting, financial cash
flows should not be mixed with operating cash flows.
– Evaluation of a project from a local viewpoint serves some useful
purposes and should be subordinated to evaluation from the parent’s
viewpoint. In practice, firms use both viewpoints for evaluation.
• General rules
– Almost any project should be at least giving the same return to that on
host government bonds, that is generally the local risk-free rate
including a premium reflecting the expected inflation rate (Ex. 33% in
India).
– Multinational firms should invest only if they can earn a risk-adjusted
return greater than their locally based competitors.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
14
Multinational Capital Budgeting
• Illustrative case : Cemex enters Indonesia
– Discussion case for the following cession
• Project valuation sensitivity analysis
– First valuation is made on a set of “most likely” assumptions.
– Next, and in particular in uncertain environments, a sensitivity analysis
is required, under a variety of “what if” scenarios.
– For example, in international projects :
• Political risk : what if the host country imposed controls on dividend
payment, what if funds are blocked?
• Foreign exchange risk : how is the value of the project affected by a
x% decrease (increase) in the host currency rate? What about the
relative impacts of competitiveness and cash flows changes?
• Other sensitivity variables : change in the assumed terminal value,
the capacity utilisation rate, the initial project cost...
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
15
Multinational Capital Budgeting
• Real Option Analysis
– For investments that have long lives, cash flows returns in later years,
or higher levels of risks compared to the current business of the firm,
are often rejected by the DCF approach.
– When MNE’s evaluate competitive projects, DCF analysis fails to
capture the strategic options that an investment may offer.
– Real option analysis overcomes this weakness by applying option
theory to capital budgeting decisions. It is a cross between decision-tree
analysis and pure option-based valuation.
– Very useful when analysing investment projects that can take very
different values depending on the decisions made at certain points in
time (defer, abandon, reduce capacity,..). The range of values give the
volatility of the project’s value.
– MINI-CASE : Trident’s Chinese Market entry.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
16
Adjusting for Risk in Foreign Investment
• Defining risk
– One-sided risk : only potential for loss. Example : expropriation,
blocked funds. Often described in probabilities of occurrence,
qualitative in character. Best thought of as “acceptable” /
“unacceptable”.
– Two-sided risk : risk of loss or gain. Example : foreign exchange, host
government economic policies. Often assessed through statistical
analysis, allowing rank-order of investments alternatives.
• Risk measurement origins
– From the market : credit spreads, sovereign spreads.
– From institutions : constructed indices ranking countries on the basis
of their macro risk fundamentals, i.e. political and economic stability.
Inherently subjective.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
17
Adjusting for Risk in Foreign Investment
• Defining Foreign Investments Risks
– Firm-specific risks : micro risks, at project or corporate level
– Country-specific risks : macro risks, affecting the project, but
originated at the country level
– Global-specific risks
– see illustration
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
18
Foreign Investment Risks
Firm-Specific
Risks
Country-Specific
Risks
Global-Specific
Risks
• Business risks
• Transfer risk
• Terrorism
• Foreign-exchange
• War and ethnic strife
• Anti-globalization
risks
• Governance risks
• Nepotism and corruption
• Defective economic and
social infrastructure
• Macroeconomic
disequilibrium
movement
• Cyber attacks
• Poverty
• Environmental
• Sovereign credit risk
safety
• Cultural and religious heritage
• Intellectual property rights
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
19
Adjusting for Risk in Foreign Investment
• Strategies of Foreign Investments Risks Management
– Sensitivity Analysis
– Minimize Assets at Risk
– Diversification
– Insurance
– see illustration
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
20
Risk Management Strategies
Sensitivity Analysis
Minimize Assets at Risk
Simulating business plans
Adjusting discount rate
Adjusting cash flows
Minimize equity in subsidiary
Borrow locally
Diversification
Insurance
Plant location
Source of debt & equity
Currency of denomination
Supply sources
Sales locations
Hedging currency risk
Risk-sharing agreement
Country investment agreements
Investment guarantees
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
21
Adjusting for Risk in Foreign Investment
• Measuring and Managing Foreign Investments Risks
– Business risk : project viewpoint measurement vs. parent viewpoint
measurement (adjusting discount rates or adjusting cash flows), and
portfolio risk measurement
– Foreign exchange risk : see previous lectures
– Governance risk management :
• Negotiate investment agreements
• Investment insurance and guarantees : specific institutions
• Operating strategies after FDI decisions : local sourcing, facility
location, control of transportation, control of technology, control of
markets, brand name and trademark control, thin equity base,
multiple-source borrowing.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
22
Adjusting for Risk in Foreign Investment
• Country-specific risks
– Transfer risk : limitations on the MNE’s ability to transfer funds into and
out of the host country without restrictions. Restrictions usually decided
by a government running out of foreign currency reserves. Most severe
form of restriction is non convertibility.
– Three types of reactions for MNE’s :
• Prior to investment : analyse the risks and their effects in the project
design
• During operations : move funds using various techniques
• If movements of funds are impossible, find the best reinvestment
alternatives in the host country.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
23
Adjusting for Risk in Foreign Investment
• Country-specific risks
– Moving blocked funds : techniques
• Use of alternative conduits
• Adapt transfer pricing of goods and services between parent and
subsidiaries
• Use leading and lagging payments
– and :
• Fronting loans : parent to subsidiary loan channelled through a
financial intermediary in a third country (“link financing”)
• Create unrelated exports : help easing the currency shortage for
the host currency
• Obtain special dispensation : possible for some key industries.
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
24
Country-Specific Risks
Country-Specific Risks: Measurement and Management
Transfer Risk
Cultural Differences
Protectionism
• Blocked funds
• Religion
• Defense industry
• Macroeconomic
disequilibrium
• Nepotism and
corruption
• Agriculture
• Intellectual property
rights
• Infant industry
• Economic
infrastructure
• Sovereign credit
risk
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
25
Adjusting for Risk in Foreign Investment
• Global-specific risks
– Terrorism
– Anti-globalization movement
• The role of international institutions such as the IMF and World
Bank
– Environmental concerns
– Poverty
– Cyber attacks
Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles
26
Download