Presentation-by-Professor-Ashutosh-Singh

advertisement

Welcome to the Experience Sharing Session on

Delisting F&Vs from APMCs: Uttarakhand

Perspective

1

Ashutosh Singh MBA, Ph.D.

College of Agribusiness Management

GBPUA&T, Pantnagar-263415 India email: drashutoshcabm@gmail.com

I NDIA …….. A LAND OF OPPORTUNITIES

52% cultivable land as against 11% world wide

Unsurpassed Natural Advantages

All the 15 major climates of the world

46 out of the 60 soil types

17% animal, 12% plant and 10% fish genetic resource of the world

Second largest producer of fruits and vegetables

Aims to double its horticulture production to 350 million tonnes by 2015

Horticulture contributes nearly 28 per cent of GDP and 54 per cent of export share in Agriculture from the cultivated area share of 8.5% only

Tremendous scope of increasing production and exports in Horticulture

The marketing of F&V in India is changing drastically

Change from the traditional markets to modern formats

Entry of Reliance Fresh, Choupal Fresh, Namdhari’s Fresh, Premium

Farm Fresh etc.

2

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

G ROUND R EALITY - A C ONTRAST

The largest grower of fruits – 15% of world output

Low share of global Exports at 0.5%

The second largest grower of vegetables – 11 % of world output

Low share of global exports at 1.7%

High Cost of Production fruits, vegetables & flowers

Low farmer income

Cold storage facility available for only 10% of produce

Farmer sells immediately due to perishability & absence of proper infrastructure to keep it for longer period

Post Harvest wastage of fruits & vegetables – 18 to 30% valued at over Rs

45,000 crores

Losses as above in India is more than consumption of same in UK

Farm gate price 25% of domestic consumer retail price against 50% in developed countries.

3

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

W HAT A F ARMER T HINKS ?

Agrees that a lot is being done for ‘Reviving Agriculture’

But of what use if he can not be facilitated to sell his produce?

Wish to have ………

A Remunerative Price for his blood and sweat

Decide over his Buyers

At a Place and Time Convenient to him

Escape the fleecing of multiple intermediaries

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

4

A GRICULTURAL M ARKETS IN I NDIA

 No. of Regulated Markets – 7246

 No. of Principal Market Yards- 2433

 No. of Sub Market Yards - 4813

 No. of Rural Primary Markets - 21238

 No. of Wholesale Markets 6,539

Availability of Markets

 Average area Served by a Market

 Av. Area Served by a Regulated

Market

 Area served per Regulated Market

Area Served

115 sq. km

454 sq. km

Varies from 103 sq km in

Punjab to 11,215 sq km in

Meghalaya

Average approx. 80 Km  Recommendations by National

Farmers Commission - Availability of

Markets within 5 km radius

College of Agribusiness Management

As on 31.3.2011 CSO, Govt. of India

05/09/2014

5

S TATE WISE P ROGRESS OF A MENDMENTS IN APMC ACT

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

6

U TTARAKHAND : S NAP SHOTS

Statistics

Geographical Area- 53484 Sq. Km.

Population- 1.01 Crore

Decadal Growth Rate – 19.17 %

Density of Population- 189/Sq. Km.

Urban to Total Population- 30.49 %

Sex Ratio (Females/ 1000 Males)- 963 against 940

Literacy Rate- 79.60 against 74% NA

Per Capita Income-Rs. 90843 (FY 2012-13) against Rs. 74920 NA

4.6 million ha (86%) is hilly area and 0.74 million ha (14%) is plain area.

Only about 14 percent of the geographical area is cultivable

Agriculture contributes 23.4% in State Domestic Product

The average size of land holding in the state is 0.95 ha against

NA of 1.57 ha.

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

7

APMC SET UP IN U TTARAKHAND

 25 PMYs, 31 SMYs, 27 WMs

 Revenue generated 61.31 Cr in

11-12 and 90.32 Cr. in 12-13

 3 WSM under Mini Mission-III at Dehradun, Haldwani,

Haridwar

 Established Uttarakhand

Horticulture Marketing Board

 FCI has 02 Lakh MT storage capacity in the state with utilization level of 82%

 Total 15 cold storages (1 in Cooperative, 2 in Public and 12 in

Private sector)

 One CA storage of 1000 MT for

Apples in Naugaon, Uttarkashi

8

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

APMC J OURNEY S O F AR ….

To ensure selling of agricultural produce only in the government regulated markets

APMC Act has helped mainly the medium and small farmers to access orderly market places

Farmers have to transport their produce over long distances

Most of these markets have limited facilities — only 9 per cent offer cold storage, and only 33 percent have grading facilities.

Private Sector is willing to invest in agriculture sector but regulations such as the APMC Act pose a major hurdle

As a consequence, private investment in agriculture and allied sectors has remained negligible

Many of the APMCs don’t have adequate infrastructure to support efficient trading

9

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

H AS THE APMC BEEN ABLE TO SERVE THE PURPOSE ?

Limited interest have been served of small farmers

In many states, the regulated markets are non-functional.

Out of 35 states and UTs only 17 has amended it by November

2012.

The catchment area of regulated markets also varies drastically ranging between the plain, hilly and NE states

Impose substantial taxes on buyers over and above the commissions and fees

Only registered traders/commission agents can transact in the markets

Without amending APMC Act, the entry of private players is restricted, No Contract farming, No Farmer-Consumer Market

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

10

F OCAL P OINTS FOR T ODAY …

Will it enable farmers to sell directly to consumers/buyers and avoid traders/commission agents?

Does the farmer sell at the APMC market even today?

Will the buyers get F&V at a cheaper price?

Revenue generated by Mandi Board?

Is there any threat from corporate buyers to procure directly from the farmers?

How will they reach farmers immediately?

What happened in Bihar and Andhra Pradesh ?

11

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

F&V S UPPLY C HAIN C ONSTRAINTS

Predominantly marginal or small farmers – Hence small marketable surpluses and limited bargaining power

Poor availability of markets & monopolistic tendencies of APMCs

Inadequate infrastructure in wholesale markets/ rural primary markets

Lack of fair price discovery mechanism

Multiple and exploitative intermediaries – low returns

Fragmented supply chain, poor cold chain & high post-harvest losses

Lack of cleaning, grading, standardization, packaging & quality certification facilities

Limited access to market information and marketing opportunities available

Leading into:

Low Exportable Produce

Farmers getting very less share in consumers’ rupee

12

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

Pictures speak better than words……………

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

13

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

14

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

15

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

16

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

17

T RANSPORTATION OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

18

F&V SUPPLY CHAIN : I NDIA V / S D EVELOPED COUNTRIES

India

Farmer

Consolidator

Commission agent

Trader

Wholesaler

Retailer

Consumer

Developed countries

Farmer

Wholesaler/Retailers

College of Agribusiness Management

High wastage and low margins

Consumer

High investments –

Low wastage - better margins

19

05/09/2014

F&V PRODUCTION SCENARIO IN U TTARAKHAND

Year

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

Fruits Vegetable

Area (000’ha) Production

(000’MT)

Productivity

(MT/ha)

Area (000’ha) Production

(000’MT)

Productivity

(MT/ha)

171.71

193.80

197.62

200.73

200.85

725.27

723.60

752.56

802.12

805.67

4.22

3.73

3.80

4.00

4.01

81.82

82.60

86.87

89.29

88.03

1077.55

997.20

1023.45

1066.71

1059.57

13.16

12.07

11.78

12.00

12.03

Source: NHB, 2012

20

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

F RUIT PRODUCTION SCENARIO IN U TTARAKHAND

(000'MT)

Fruits

Mango

Citrus

Apple

Pear

Peach

Plum

Khumani

Wallnut

Litchi

2009-10

120.8

126.6

114.0

102.78

47.34

40.01

30.67

20.56

15.7

2010-11

135.3

134.5

135.9

105.45

48.56

40.56

31.34

21.19

18.7

% growth over previous year

12.00

6.2

19.21

2.59

2.57

1.37

2.18

3.06

19.10

20011-12

147.79

138.45

122.65

108.10

49.68

41.22

32.26

21.82

19.01

Source: Directorate of Horticulture, Uttarakhand 2012-13

% growth over previous year

9.23

2.93

-9.74

2.51

2.30

1.62

2.93

2.97

1.65

21

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

Tomato

Pea

Cabbage

Reddish

Frenchbean

Onion

Cauliflower

Okra

Brinjal

V

EGETABLE PRODUCTION SCENARIO IN

U TTARAKHAND (000'MT)

Vegetable

95.60

71.0

68.1

55.34

38.45

40.50

34.6

24.6

24.6

2009-10 2010-11

97.1

86.9

70.5

56.45

39.54

38.0

34.0

27.1

25.9

3.52

2.00

2.83

-6.17

-1.73

Growth over previous year

(%)

1.56

2011-12

102.39

22.39

78.05

10.16

5.28

72.70

57.96

40.05

39.27

36.67

27.90

27.04

Source: Directorate of Horticulture, Uttarakhand 2012-13

3.12

2.51

2.56

3.34

7.85

Growth over previous year

(%)

5.44

-10.18

2.95

4.40

22

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

P OST HARVEST LOSSES IN FRUITS AND VEGETABLES

Activity

Malta

S and M Large

Physical losses at the level of farmers

1.12

0.06

Harvesting

Sorting and

Grading

Packaging

2.23

0.14

0.24

Loading 0.19

Transportation 12.78

Unloading 0.98

Weighing and losses at wholesale level

Total loss

0.67

17.23

10.12

0.12

0.08

7.78

0.78

0.09

Losses (in kg.) per quintal

Tomato

S and M Large

Pea

S and M

5.12

0.21

0.84

0.59

19.58

1.28

1.34

28.96

3.23

0.19

0.78

0.56

15.87

1.87

0.98

23.48

3.46

0.19

0.35

0.45

9.78

1.09

0.91

16.23

Large

2.87

0.11

0.24

0.43

6.43

0.89

0.78

11.75

23

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

Experiences in the Other States ……

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

24

P UNE E XPERIENCE

National Initiative for Vegetables in Urban Clusters

Maharashtra State Agricultural Marketing Board

(MSAMB) was to help the farmers’ groups market their products directly in Pune, Mumbai and Nagpur.

MSAMB’s role was to help groups identify potential markets and provide subsidies in setting up kiosks, refrigerated vans and logistic support

68 farmers’ groups are directly selling their products at 226 locations in Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad

Lack of proper marketing and awareness is making it difficult

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

25

A PNI M ANDIS

After studying the concept of “Saturday Market” prevalent in U.K and U.S.A, the Punjab Mandi Board decided to organize “Apni Mandis” 1987 at S.A.S Nagar,

Mohali (Punjab)

The number of farmers participated - 10,278 (1988) which has been increased to 4,14,610 (2012).

Sale of produce - Rs. 2,96,24,761/- (1988) which has been increased to Rs. 82,13,49,474/- (2012)

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

26

R YTHU BAZAAR

Rythu bazaar is run by Government of Andhra

Pradesh for small farmers with small landholdings.

No market fees is collected from the Farmers of Rythu

Bazars.

All facilities are provided to Farmers with free of cost

Rents are being collected from Self-Help Groups & Govt.

Agencies only

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

27

S AMRIDDHII : MBA SABZIWALLAS STRIKE GREEN GOLD

Samriddhii (Jan,2008) is capable of creating livelihood opportunities to ensure economic empowerment of hitherto marginal farmers.

Touched the lives of more than 7,000 farmer families and 500 vendors.

Samriddhii Rs. 7,50,000 (2008-09) - Rs. 2.60 crore (2011-12)

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

28

I NTERVENTIONS : AC CARTS

Keeps vegetables fresh for longer period

Maintain the temperature of 5 to 15 degree Celsius depending on the surrounding temperature

Light weight ( only 70 Kg)

Carry more weights ( can carry upto 200 kg vegetables)

Better display of vegetables ( 10 different compartment)

Easy to pull & push

Space for advertisement – helps vendors in earning more income per month

29

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

C ASE OF A PPLE G ROWERS OF H IMACHAL P RADESH

To assess the awareness and perception level of apple growers towards amended APMC Act

To analyze the impact of amended APMC Act on production practices, post harvest management practices and marketing practices of producers and

To evaluate the efficiency of traditional and modern supply chain.

30

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

A NALYSIS OF M ARKETING C HANNELS

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

31

M ARKETING C OST AND N ET R ETURN UNDER

D IFFERENT M ARKETING C HANNELS IN G ROUP 1

N=58

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

32

M ARKETING C OST AND N ET R ETURN UNDER D IFFERENT

M ARKETING C HANNELS IN G ROUP 2

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

33

G ROWER ’ S S HARE IN C ONSUMER ’ S R UPEE AND P RICE S PREAD

TRADITIONAL C HANNEL

C ORPORATE C HANNEL

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

34

U TTARAKHAND ’ S INITIATIVE

Opening 50 Apnu Bazar

One is operating at Nanurkhera

Three more are planned at Danda Lakore, Maziri Grant and

Garuda

Shed, Godown and Electronic Weighing

No other retail outlet within the 100 meters

No Marketing Fee as against 2% Marketing fee and .5%

Development cess charged in APMCs

Delisting of 93 agriculture produces (fruits and vegetables)

Mandis at least in seven places in hilly areas

Loss of Rs 8-9 crores on the revenue generated

35

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

A PPLE S ERVICE PROJECT OF UTTARKASHI

Pilot basis in April 2007 in Syuri-Nogoan and Dhari-Kafnol village of Uttarkashi

Consortium partners Fresh Food Technology (FFT), Agriculture & Organic Farming

Group (AOFG) and Shri Jagdamba Samiti (SJS) under the financial assistance of SHGW

(A Private Dutch foundation)

Initially 880 apple growers were covered under social business model

Eliminate well organized intermediaries who controlled the entire process from credit supply for farm inputs, transportation to the marketing of the produce

Engaged small and marginal farmers in the apple value addition business chain

Four collection centers and five grading centres (2 in Naugaon, 1 in Purola, 1 in

Chakrata)

Farmer organizations become equal business partners with the private sector parties and a social investor

Resulted in creating more employment, income, technical skill and local capacity for the apple growing farmers

Apple from Harsil, Taknor, Tyuni, Parola and Naugaon is now being sold in cities like

Delhi, Varanasi, Kanpur and Lucknow 36

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

B USINESS PREPOSITION

During the apple season of 2011-12 880 participating farmers got prices of

Rs 40 to Rs 55 per kg from the collection point companies. A total of 430

MT of apples were procured and these apples were sold to the storage company at the rate of Rs 55 to Rs 65 per kg. FFT Himalayan Fresh Fruit sold these apples between February and April 2012 in the markets of

Varanasi, Delhi, Dehradun and Jaipur at the rate of Rs 75 to Rs 85 per kg. A net profit of Rs 7 lakh (Rs 1.80 per kg) was earned in this regard by the company. The collection centres also earned a net profit of Rs 5 lakh

(Rs 1 per kg)

Out of Rs 1, the collection point joint venture distributed a premium of Rs

0.25 per kg in cash on August 15, 2012, with a shareholding of Rs 0.25 per kg. The remaining Rs 0.50 went to the collection point company for capitalization

Out of the total profit of Rs 7 lakh earned by the FFT Himalayan, a premium of Rs 0.50 per kg was given to the farmers. Besides, a shareholding of Rs 1 per kg was given to the 880 participating farmers.

The farmers got Rs 2 per kg as added price as additional payment for their apples, besides other benefits like immediate cash payments, training support, saving of time and risk in selling apples to the middlemen

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

37

R EACTIONS ON THE MOVE ………..

“APMC is needed for all classes of farmers. While arhatiyas provide finance and assurance of a fair price for agriculture produce, they also provide funds to farmers in dire need. Small farmers cannot afford to hire a vehicle and bring their produce for direct selling; arhatiyas bring these to APMC.”

Sanjay Bhujbal, Arhatiya for vegetables at the Vashi APMC in Navi Mumbai

An APMC yard is an important place for small vendors to sell their produce. However, the

Act must allow free flow of goods across the country. The farmer must have the right to decide the buyer of his produce. The APMC yard must be made modern, with excellent handing facility, ripening and cold chambers”

K Radhakrishnan, Director, Freskins Retail Chain

“Waiving of market fee and cess will put an additional burden of Rs 7.25 crore on the state exchequer. We expect the prices of vegetables and fruit to fall by 10 per cent. The government is yet to implement the Act in its spirit, which seeks to promote contract farming, bring reforms in agriculture, provides for better regulation of marketing agricultural produce and establish a more efficient marketing system.”

Harak Singh Rawat, Agriculture Minister , Govt of Uttarakhand

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

38

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

39

D IGITAL SCREEN AT MANDI GATE

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

40

W HOLESALERS ARE UPLOADING FRUITS AND

VEGETABLES AT MANDI

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

41

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

42

T RADER ’ S P LATFORM

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

43

EXPECTED IMPACT OF DELISTING OF F&V

FARMERS

Access of Farmers to Consumers

Facility for Loans and Advances

Time Consumed in Transaction

Grading and Sorting

Packaging Cost

Transportation Cost

Price Awareness before Sale

Fair Price Realization

Rejection Rate

Fluctuating Demand due to Seasonality

INTERMEDIARIES Squeezed Commission

44

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

MARKETING BOARD

Role in Private Yards

Lack of Consistent Supply

Lack of Post Harvest Handling Infrastructure

PRIVATE PLAYERS

Availability of Quality Raw Material

Consistent Supply

CONSUMERS

Just in Time

Logistic Issues

Economy in Procurement

Private Cartels

Availability of E&V at Cheaper Price

Point of Purchase

45

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

R OAD M AP FOR F UTURE ….

Challenges Strategies

Ensuring Direct Contact between Farmer and Consumer

Limiting the role of Intermediaries

Avoiding Distress sale

Continuous Supply to Processors

Market Intelligence

Contract Farming

 Developing linkages with farmers

 Restricting Marketing Cartels

 Linking small farmers to the modern food retail chains

 Promoting multi mutually independent players

 Farmer’s training in pre and post harvest management practices

 Economical packaging technology for

F&V

 Integrated cold chain & logistics infrastructure

 MIS Support at Village Panchayat level

 Enabling regulations

46

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

THANKS!

College of Agribusiness Management 05/09/2014

47

Download