Any self harming or injuring behavior whose intention is not suicide

advertisement
Chris Buckingham
Ashleigh Bruns
Susan Childers
Jonathan Impellizzeri
Sara Wood
Regent University School of Psychology and Counseling
CES 763 Supervision and Consultation
Consultation Project– April 23, 2009
Psycho-educational Component
Definition of Self Injury Behavior (SIB)
Any self harming or injuring behavior whose intention is not suicide but whose
origins are in the attempt to ground, to ameliorate emotional pain, or to manage
affect. This can include behaviors such as cutting, burning, carving words or pictures
into skin, excessive tattooing and piercing (Derouin, A. & Bravenda, T., 2004;
Whitlock, J., Powers, J. & Eckenrode, J., 2006).
Developmental Issues of Adolescents and Teens A time of increased feelings
of distress & more ways to cope with stress independent of parents [(Arnett, 1999;
Compas, 1987; Petersen, Kennedy & Sullivan, 1991) Whitlock ,et al.] . Life stage
stressors include establishing caring, meaningful relationships, finding acceptance
and belonging in social groups ,and establishment of interpersonal intimacy:
 Eriksonian Adolescence stage (identity vs. role confusion), increased decision
making responsibility ranging from risky to competent (Berg, 2005; Erikson)
 Freudian psychosexual Genital stage: Includes puberty, with sexual interest in
opposite sex, sexual pleasure through genitals (Freud)
 Responsible for self, pushes for independence from parents (Erikson)
 Develops sexual identity, the ability to love, and the desire to work (Erikson;
Freud)
Identifying at Risk Teens & Psychoeducational Procedures

What to look for:
 Adolescents who engage in SIB tend to defy easy categorization
 Teenagers who are at a higher risk are:
1. females
2. those who have experienced sexual abuse or trauma
3. those with eating disorders
4. personality disorders
5. teenagers who have friends who self injure (Plante, 2007)

Empowering the church to address SIB:
 (1) Clergy
 (2) Youth Group Leadership
 (3) Youth Group
Church SIB Protocol
How to handle teens who are engaged in SIB

First Line of Prevention
 Student Waiver Form Signed by Parents
 Youth Workers Being First Aid Trained
 Delegate a church member outside of the Youth Ministry to serve as a point of contact
(POC) i.e. Minister of Pastoral Care and Counseling

Suspicion and Reporting Protocol
 Report all suspicions to the POC and Youth Minister
 POC will contact parents/guardians and provide referrals
 POC will handle the mandated reporting when applicable

Actively Engaging and Reporting Protocol
 Complete a safety check and contact emergency services if necessary
 DO NOT LEAVE YOUTH ALONE
 Contact POC to handle parent/guardian contact, referrals, and any mandated reporting

Youth Group Participation Protocol (for those actively engaging)
 Employ a 3 month probationary period and Safety Contract (including a release for POC
and counselor) overseen by POC
 Utilize adult chaperones as designated by parents/guardians
Issues of Disclosure &
Limits of Confidentiality




Our church is located in Colorado as an example, Colorado clergy are not required to
report privileged communication without consent from both the clergy and the
parishioner. (Colorado Revised Statute (CRS) Ann. ァ 13-90-107(1)(c) and Colo. Stat. Ann. ァ
19-3-304(2)(aa))(Pike, 2008). You would need to check your state’s codes to determine
the state by state variations.
CRS 27-10-103 would inherently exclude a church counselor (MA in Counseling or Social
Work) from being a person able to provide counseling to a minor 15 years of age without
informing the parents first of their actions. In the case of SIB the appointed person
(Pastor of Pastoral Care and Counseling) would need to inform the teens parents
immediately (Lane, 2007).
Mandated reporting will be handled by the POC
ACA Code of Ethics
 (B.1.b.) - Respect for privacy-Counselors respect client rights to privacy.
Counselors solicit private information from clients only when it is beneficial
to the counseling process.
 (B.1.c.) - Respect for Confidentiality-Counselors do not share confidential
information without client consent or without sound legal or ethical
justification
 (B.2.a.) - Danger and Legal Requirements-The general requirement that
counselors keep information confidential does not apply when disclosure is
required to protect clients or identified others from serious and foreseeable
harm or when legal requirements demand that confidential information
must be revealed. Counselors consult with other professionals when in
doubt as to the validity of an exception. Additional considerations apply
when addressing end-of-life issues.
Christian Integration

Possible relationship between self-injurious behavior, sexual self-concept, and
spirituality (Wagner & Rehfuss, 2008).
 During SIB, the emotion of shame, originating from family of origin, is reenacted
to cause harm to the individual
 The self is deceived into thinking not even God could love me
 Impacts self-worth, sexuality, and relationship with God (Watts, 2000).

What is the church to do?
 SIB believers - have own responsibility (Eph. 4, Romans 12:2, James 5:16); the
church has the responsibility to treat the individual with gentleness and
compassion (Eph. 4:2, Col. 3:12, 1 Thes. 2:7, 1 Peter 3:8, Eph. 4:32)
 SIB unbelievers - the church needs to reach out in love, move towards healing &
spiritual reconciliation, and witness if given the chance (Mark 12:28-31, 1 Peter
2:24, John 14:6, Acts 4:12, Eph. 2:8-9, Romans 5:6-11)

7 points for Christian response to self-injurers (Watts, 2000):
○ 1. Eyes of Understanding – witness to suffering and counter invisibility
○ 2. Ears that can hear – listen as a way to move silence into speech
○ 3. A need for re-membering and remembering – walk alongside to remember
○ 4. A need for Christian story telling – learn to love and co-create a new story
○ 5. Liturgy, ritual, and sacrament – suggest expressiveness through the Body
○ 6. Develop other ways of binding – teach centering prayer
○ 7. A need to counter isolation through a caring network – develop support
References
American Counseling Association. (2005). ACA code of ethics. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
Berg, C. (2005). Commentary: Lessons from a life-span perspective to adolescent decision making. In J. E. Jacobs & P. A. Klaczynski (Eds.), The
development of judgment and decision making in children and adolescents. (pp. 241-249). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Publishers.
Best R. (2006). Deliberate self-harm in adolescence: a challenge for schools. British Journal of Guidance & counseling, 34(2), pp. 161-175.
Child Welfare Information. (2008). State statutes results. Retrieved April 6, 2009, from Child Welfare Information Gateway Web Site:
http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/state/index.cfm?event=stateStatutes.processSearch
Derouin, A., Bravender, T. (2004). Living on the edge: the current phenomenon of self-mutilation in adolescents. MCN: The American journal of
maternal child nursing 29(1), pp. 8-12.
Erikson’s Psychosocial Stages Summary Chart. Retrieved April 4, 2009, from http://psychology.about.com/library/bl_psychosocial_summary.htm.
Freud's Psychosexual Stages of Development: Oral, Anal, Phallic, Latency, Genital Retrieved April 5, 2009, from
http://wilderdom.com/personality/L8-5FreudPsychosexualStagesDevelopment.html.
Lane, D. K. (2007). The legal guide for practicing psychotherapy in Colorado. Denver, CO: Bradford Publishing Company.
Levenkron, S. (1998). Cutting: Understanding and overcoming self-mutilation. New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company.
McKerchar, T. L., Kahng, S. W., Casioppo, E., & Wilson, D. (2001). Brief Report function analysis of self-injurious maintained by automatic
reinforcement: exposing masked social function. Behavioral Interventions, 16, 59-63.
Nock, M. K., & Prinstein, M. J. (2005). Contextual features and behavioral functions of self-mutilation among adolescents. Journal of Abnormal
Psychology, 114(1), 140-146.
Plante, L. G. (2007). Bleeding to ease the pain: Cutting , self-injury, and the adolescent search for self. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Pike, C. W. (2008). Colorado Revised Statutes, Retrieved April 18, 2009, from
http://www.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/olls/colorado_revised_statutes.htm
Prinstein, M. J. (2008). Introduction to the special section on suicide and non-suicidal self injury: A review of unique challenges and important
directions for self-injury science. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(1), 1-8.
Ross, S., & Heath, N. L. (2003). Two models of adolescent self-mutilation. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 33(3), 277-287.
Silverman, M. (2007). In this issue. Suicide and life-threatening behaviors (37)4, pp. iii-v.
Watt, J. A. (2000). Developing eyes to see and ears to hear: Ministering to self-injurers. Journal of ministry in addiction and recovery, 7(1), 35-49.
Wagner, J., & Rehfuss, M. (2008). Self-injury, sexual self-concept, and a conservative Christian upbringing: An exploratory study of three young
women’s perspectives. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 30(2), 173–188.
White, V. E., McCormick, L. J., & Kelly, B. L. Counseling clients who self-injure: Ethical considerations. Counseling and Values, 47(3), 220-229.
Whitlock, J. L., Powers, J. L., & Eckenrode, J. (2006). The virtual cutting edge: The internet and adolescent self-injury. Developmental Psychology,
42(3), 307-417.
Yip, K. (2005). A multi-dimensional perspective of adolescents' self-cutting. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 10(2), 80-86.
Zila, L. M., & Kiselica, M. S., (2001). Understanding and counseling self-mutilation in female adolescents and young adults. Journal of Counseling
Development, 79(1), 46-52.
Download