Chapter 16

advertisement
Chapter 16
Interactions between Speech Sound
Disorder and Dyslexia
Beate Peter
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
1
Introduction
• Written language is acquired several years after spoken
language
• This is true for all types of representing speech sound with
symbols (logographic symbols, alphabetic script,
syllabaries)
• In English, the relationship between alphabetic symbols
and speech sounds is extraordinarily complex
• The purposes of this chapter:
– Describe the core and associated characteristics of dyslexia
– Show how dyslexia and speech sound disorder (SSD) are related
– Consider possible subtypes and shared substrates in dyslexia
and SSD
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
2
The Written Code of English
• “pleaf,” “meng,” “shextine”: these are all
pseudowords you can decode if you know the
regular orthography of English
– Unambiguous phoneme/grapheme relationship for
“m, n, f”
– Two symbols, one sound for “sh” (digraph)
– One symbol, two sounds: “x”
– Rules:
• The magic e makes the vowel say its name (“makes,”
“name”)
• When two vowels go walking, the first one does the talking
(“sea,” “road,” “rain”)
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
3
• More complex grapheme/phoneme relationships
– One phoneme can be represented by several
graphemes
• /i/ can be represented with “ea” (“sea”), “ee” (“see”), “ie”
(“believe”), “ei” (“receive”), or “e” + consonant (C) + “e”
(“cede”)
– One grapheme can stand for several phonemes
(although this occurs less frequently)
• “th” before a vowel is used to represent both /θ/ (“thistle”)
and /ð/ (“this”)
– English has a deep (“opaque”) orthography
– Examples for shallow (“transparent”) orthographies
are Spanish and Italian
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
4
• English contains many sight words that must be memorized because they
do not follow standard rules
– “have,” “done,” “gone” all defy the magic e rule
– “bread” defies the rule about the two vowels going walking
– “caught,” “sought,” “draught,” “laugh,” and “should” are full of silent letters
and other irregularities
• Reasons for these irregularities
– English has many grandparents
•
•
•
•
Anglo-Saxon: “answer”
Vikings: “horse,” “wagon,” “sell”
French: “indict,” “jury,” “sovereign”
Latin and Greek: “-tion,” “bio-”
– English orthography does not reflect historical changes in pronunciation
patterns
• “knee,” “knife,” “honor” used to be pronounced without silent letters
• “Thus an intelligent child who is bidden to spell debt, and very properly
spells it d-e-t, is caned for not spelling it with a b because Julius Caesar
spelt the Latin word for it with a b.” (George Bernard Shaw, 1942)
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
5
• Mastery of any alphabetic writing system requires
– Phonemic awareness so that units of sound can be associated
with units of spelling
– Knowing that letters are arranged in directional sequences
– Knowing that printed words represent sentences and concepts
– Knowing how to hold a book
• Mastery of English also requires
– Learning the complex sound/letter relationships
– Automatized recognition of sight words by shape
– Understanding that each word consists of at least one syllable
and that each syllable contains one vowel (both in sound
structure and spelling)
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
6
Dyslexia
•
Dyslexia is specific disability that interferes with the acquisition of written
language
– at the word level,
– characterized by deficits in accurate and/or fluent word recognition, decoding, and spelling.
– These difficulties are not associated with variations in cognitive ability or quality of reading
instruction,
– and they are thought to have a neurobiological origin. (International Dyslexia Association)
•
What dyslexia is NOT:
– A 10-year-old boy who had been kept from going to school and could not read in 4th grade.
(Lack of access to instruction)
– A girl in 5th grade who could read words without problems but could not answer questions
about paragraphs she read. (Perhaps poor inferencing skills or memory problems)
– A girl in 6th grade who also had difficulty following orally presented information. (General
comprehension deficit)
•
•
In the past, poor readers only qualified for extra help if their reading scores were
lower than their verbal or nonverbal IQ scores (discrepancy criterion).
Alternative: Response to Intervention (2004 Reauthorization of the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) )
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
7
Associated Behaviorally Observed
Deficits
• NOTE: Not all associated traits might be present in the same
individual!
• Auditory perception of nonspeech sounds that were presented
rapidly
• Phonological processing skills (dissect words into parts, deleting
sounds, moving sounds)
• Phonological short-term memory: nonword repetition tasks
• Retrieving word forms from long-term memory, e.g., in rapid
naming tasks
• Slowed processing speed
– Children with dyslexia had slower response times than typical controls
during motor, visual, lexical, grammatical, and phonological measures
as well as in rapid naming (Catts, Gillispie, Leonard, Kail, & Miller,
2002)
– Everyone seems to have a built-in speed limit across various timed
tasks and children with poor reading scores have slower speed limits
than children with average reading scores (Peter & Raskind, 2011)
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
8
Associated Anatomical and Physiologic
Deficits
• Brain structures
– Grey matter
• Abnormal neuron migration to cortical layers
• Planum temporale in left and right hemisphere equal in size (typically, it is
smaller in the right hemisphere)
– White matter
• Left hemisphere in temporoparietal tracts
• Corpus callosum
• Brain functions
– Underactivation in the left fusiform gyrus (occipitotemporal system)
where visual information is processed to facilitate word recognition
– Underactivation in the left superior temporal gyrus (temporoparietal
system (where phonological information is processed)
– Underactivation or overactivation in the left inferior frontal gyrus
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
9
Brain activation in typical readers
Inferior frontal gyrus,
including Broca’s area
(articulatory
recoding)
Temporoparietal
system, including
planum temporale,
angular gyrus
(phonological
processing)
Occipitotemporal
system, including
fusiform gyrus (word
recognition)
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
10
Brain activation in readers with dyslexia
Inferior frontal gyrus,
includes Broca’s area:
over- or
underactivated
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
11
Genetic Findings
• Strong evidence of a genetic etiology
• Causal gene(s) not yet identified
• Nine major candidate regions on
chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 6, 15, 18, and X
• New regions continue to be identified
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
12
Demographics of Speech Sound
Disorder and Dyslexia
• Miles: first-grader with massive difficulties in speech and
also in learning to read: coincidence or due to the same
deficit?
• SSD
– 15.6% of three-year-old children (Campbell et al., 2003).
Criterion: 75% intelligible speech
– 3.8% in 6-year-old children (Shriberg et al., 1999). Criterion: 1.14 SD in a 20-item articulation test
– 1.1% in Australian 1st – 6th graders, using teacher report and SLP
report (McKinnon et al., 2007)
• Dyslexia
– 5% to 9% of school-age children (reviewed in Francks et al.,
2002; Pennington & Bishop, 2009; Peterson et al., 2007)
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
13
Simple view of reading (Gough & Tunmer, 1986
Good word
recognition
Poor word
recognition
Good listening
comprehension
(Beyond single
words:
Comprehend text
better when it is
read to them)
Dyslexia
Poor listening
comprehension
Specific
comprehension
deficit (hyperlexia)
Mixed
comprehension
deficit
Subtypes by reading skill
Intact word recognition but impaired decoding: “phonological dyslexia
Intact decoding but impaired word recognition: “surface dyslexia”
Both skills impaired: “deep dyslexia”
Sight words can be trained; persistent difficulty with decoding is seen more
frequently in children with dyslexia
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
14
SSD and Dyslexia Comorbidity
• SSD alone (not including childhood apraxia of speech, CAS): no
elevated risk of developing dyslexia in school years (Lewis et al.,
2004)
• CAS alone: substantial difficulties with reading and spelling (Lewis
et al., 2004)
• SSD + phonological deficits: substantial difficulties with reading and
spelling, regardless of whether language impairments were seen
(Bird et al., 1995)
• SSD that persists into the school years: lower scores in reading,
reading comprehension, spelling, and math, compared to children
whose SSD had resolved prior to entering school (Nathan et al.,
2004)
• SSD + language impairment: substantial difficulties with reading and
spelling (Sices et al., 2007)
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
15
Substrates Common to Speech
Production and Literacy Skills
• Phonological awareness and processing
• Sequential processing (possibly)
• It is possible that there is a shared genetic
etiology
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
16
Connections
• It is possible that certain SSD subtypes are
more susceptible to reading difficulties.
Chapter 15 focuses on SSD subtypes.
• Chapter 22 describes professional settings
where speech-language pathologists join
service teams working with children who
struggle with reading and spelling
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
17
Concluding Remarks
• SLPs frequently work with children with SSD
and/or language impairment who also struggle
with written language
• Good coordination among the team of service
providers can enhance treatment efficacy, for
instance when the underlying deficit is in
phonological awareness and processing
• Additional research is needed to better
understand the biological aspects of SSD and
dyslexia comorbidity
NOVA
Comprehensive Perspectives on Child Speech Development and Disorders
18
Download