Law, Justice, and Society: A Sociolegal Introduction Chapter 14 Comparative Law: Law in Other Cultures Comparative Law Importance of Comparative Law knowledge of legal systems other than our own provides us with a new understanding and appreciation of our own and will better equip us to identify its strengths and weaknesses Comparative Law Law in Preliterate Bands and Tribes band: small groups of hunters and gatherers tribe: larger groups who augment hunting and gathering with agriculture Comparative Law Law in Preliterate Bands and Tribes (cont.) what is crime? – must be written – a violation of a criminal statute can preliterate people commit crimes? homicide and theft Comparative Law Law in Preliterate Bands and Tribes (cont.) no formal agents of social control exposure to informal pressures to conformity Inuits and self-redress – – ultimate result of most extreme form of selfredress? song duel Comparative Law Law in Preliterate Bands and Tribes (cont.) group response to offender – ostracism and banishment tribal social control: – – Hurons and fines paid by the clan witchcraft and treason were crimes against society; punishable by death Comparative Law Law in the Modern World: Four Traditions civil law common law Islamic law socialist law Comparative Law Law in the Modern World: Four Traditions (cont.) Source: Adapted from percentages provided by Reichel (2005). Comparative Law Common Law originated in England--Normal conquest, 1066 means of unifying England, increasing royal power at the expense of feudal lords fashioned from local customs judge-made law spread throughout world via colonization and war Comparative Law Common Law (cont.) unwritten respects precedent adversarial uses grand and petit juries uses judicial review Comparative Law Civil Law ancient Rome and nineteenth-century France and Germany Twelve Tables in 450 BCE Code of Justinian, 533 CE Napoleonic Code, 1804 CE typically developed after a major social upheaval as a result of distrust of previous status quo Comparative Law Civil Law (cont.) French civil law – – emphasizes communitarian values rather than individualistic crime control system, as opposed to due process (American) written – – codes create the civil law rather than revealing existent laws laws replace, rather than supplement, previous law Comparative Law Civil Law (cont.) precedent is not officially recognized – not binding and considered a tool of last resort inquisitorial rather than adversarial – – – – truth-seeking investigation and interviews led by judge; all parties (including accused) expected to cooperate strong presumption of guilt if case goes to trial presumption of innocence necessary in common law because investigation is not as thorough Comparative Law Civil Law (cont.) – – common law civil rights viewed as unnecessary right to remain silent is a formality with little force traditionally made little use of juries – – – used only for very serious crimes juries consist of three judges and nine laypersons jurors can question all other parties Comparative Law Civil Law (cont.) – penalty phase takes place soon after conviction phase judicial review is used sparingly – – – reflection of democracy appeals can take place; however, authoritative but not binding can rule on points of law and fact Comparative Law Civil Law (cont.) types of crime – – – crimes delicts contraventions no bail Comparative Law Socialist Law originated in 1917 with the Russian Revolution and USSR based on codified Marxist/Leninist ideology it is the only system of law considering itself to be a temporary anachronism devoted to its own demise emphasizes communal values over individual rights; low-tolerance crime control Comparative Law Socialist Law (cont.) Chinese socialist law – socialist law combined with aspects of Confucius written; precedent is not recognized inquisitorial and adversarial – – – mostly inquisitorial emphasis on confessions, such that evidence is never presented to defendants prior to trial can defend themselves in court, hire lawyer or advocate Comparative Law Socialist Law (cont.) – advocates see that procedural law is observed and lenient sentences received quasi-jury system – – – – collegial bench; one to three professional judges and two to four lay people’s assessors no right to remain silent defendant can argue with other actors very punitive Comparative Law Socialist Law (cont.) death sentence – – immediate delayed judicial review is severely limited Supreme People’s Court – – – answerable to Standing Committee of Chinese Communist Party advisory opinions does not hear cases from lower courts Comparative Law Socialist Law (cont.) Higher People’s Court – Intermediate People’s Court – – prefecture level original jurisdiction Basic People’s Court – analogous to U.S. state supreme court U.S. district (felony) court appeals from both prosecutor and defendant Comparative Law Islamic Law written – – – Qur’anic precepts, interpretations, and commentary constitution Shari’a: path to follow consists of Qur’an, commentary, and case laws Saudi Arabia Comparative Law Islamic Law (cont.) four distinctions – – – – based on direct revelation from God attempts to regulate behavior and thought processes does not require uniformity of law taxonomy of crime and punishment Comparative Law Islamic Law (cont.) hybrid inquisitorial/adversarial precedent is absent no use of juries Comparative Law Islamic Law (cont.) crime and punishment – – – Hadd Quesas Ta’azir those crimes with punishments delineated by Qur’an are more serious than other crimes higher standards of evidence for Hadd crimes Comparative Law Islamic Law (cont.) court – – no representation oath swearing judicial review is limited to certain cases – appeals apply only to sentences imposed by lower courts Comparative Law The Rule of Law recognition that there are fundamental principles and values stressing human dignity and value these values and principles are articulated and formalized in writing and contained in revered documents substantive laws and administrative procedures are implemented to hold the state and its agents to those values and principles Comparative Law The Rule of Law (cont.) France Saudi Arabia China Comparative Law Convergence of Systems as world becomes more complex and interdependent, cultures will converge this results in systems of law coming into contact and becoming more similar this is resulting in recognition of the rule of law and individual rights examples: – – International Court of Justice (World Court) European Court of Human Rights Comparative Law Convergence of Systems (cont.) does this apply to socialist and Islamic systems?