HCOL 40033 Nature of Values: Empathy Fall 2014 T 14:00-15:50 REE 202 Instructor: TA: Office: Dr. Wendy Williams: w.s.williams@tcu.edu SCHAR 3108C Course Description In this seminar-style course, students explore and experience empathy in its individual, interpersonal, and civic modes. Readings in literature, psychology, sociology, and philosophy supplement students' semester-long service-learning projects, which involve partnership and regular service with a local service agency. During class meetings, we discuss readings and service-learning projects to the end of synthesizing both a coherent theory of empathy as well as a practical understanding of it. Course Purpose In (1) requiring critical thinking and real-world problem solving, (2) engaging students’ abilities to synthesize ideas across disciplinary perspectives, and (3) focusing on expression through discussion and debate, this course fulfills the competencies set out for an Honors College Colloquium course. Prerequisites Honors College Completion of Lower-Division Honors OR Enrolled as an Andrews Scholar in Colloquia Learning Outcomes At the end of fifteen weeks of instruction, students enrolled in Nature of Empathy should be able to: Define the following terms: Empathy High-level empathy Sympathy Theory of mind Compassion E-S theory Pity Perspective taking Low-level empathy Mirror neurons Emotional contagion Empathic concern Empathic/personal distress Cognitive empathy Emotional/affective empathy Altruism Egotism Pro-social behavior Sex difference Gender difference Intercultural empathy Understand the intellectual, scientific, and historical origins of the concept of empathy. Understand how various disciplines in the social sciences and humanities approach the study of empathy. Understand how many of these approaches overlap with one another. Identify and articulate their own experiences of empathy as demonstrating the value of human life. Comprehend the role of empathy in edifying notions of civic responsibility and in assessing the ethical dimensions of individual, professional, and civic life. Demonstrate an ability to meaningfully participate in effective civic engagement, group and follower-leader dynamics, and ethical decisionmaking through the service-learning project. Student Action Steps Students will undertake a broad study of the history and current trends in the study of empathy from a variety of approaches. Students will practice problem-solving skills in critical interpretation and analysis of diverse ideas through texts and service learning experiences. Students will identify and compare the representation of human life as reflected through the products of human culture with the products of lived experience. Students will examine and compare the implications of various ethical systems that follow an understanding of empathy in social and civic contexts. Students will, through practical experience, develop an understanding of different modes and contexts of leadership and collaboration. Students will use knowledge derived from reading and on-the-ground experience to identify and solve problems in the service community. Students will solve real-world and conceptual problems that concern empathy from the perspectives and traditions of various disciplines. Students will discuss and debate issues pertinent to empathy in class with students from diverse disciplines by thoughtfully weighing opposing opinions. Textbook and Readings Required books: De Waal, Frans, The Age of Empathy, Harmony Books, 2009 Kent, Hannah. Burial Rites, Little, Brown and Company, 2013 Note: Students are in charge of ordering books either online or through the TCU bookstore. The TCU bookstore will no longer be filling bulk orders for this course; they will order them on an individual student basis. Required readings: Available for download through eCollege. Assessment You can view your grades throughout the semester in the eCollege gradebook. Final grades will be calculated using the following scale: Salient categories that determine course grade outcome include: (1) participation in reading and attendance (2) timely submission of assignments (3) demonstration of thorough knowledge of the material (4) level of critical analysis (5) conformation to assignment criteria A: 90-100 - A-level work represents an outstanding level of achievement in these categories. B: 80-89 - B-level work represents a very good level of achievement in these categories. C: 70-79 - C-level work represents an acceptable level of achievement in these categories. D: 60-69 - D-level work represents a fair to poor level of achievement in these categories. F: below 60 - F-level work represents an unacceptable level of achievement in these categories. Assessment will be based on the following components: Participation………………..……………….………………………………….……….... 20% Attendance and participation will comprise 20% of your total grade. Each unexcused absence will result in a 20-point reduction in your participation grade. If you are sick or cannot attend due to family emergency, please produce documentation within seven days of the missed class to avoid penalization. Also, let me know in advance if you have to arrive late or leave class early, and do not do this regularly. Note: 4 unexcused absences will result in automatic failure of the course. 4 excused absences will result in an I grade and a chance to make up missed classes. The quality of your experience in this class depends on your reading the material carefully. At the beginning of each class, I will call on a few students to summarize, synthesize, or analyze the material for the day. Students may refer to, but not read, notes to provide answers. Your ability to demonstrate knowledge of the material will factor into your participation grade. Other factors included in your participation grade: contributing substantively and regularly (at least twice per class) to the conversation, and paying attention. Anecdotal responses are welcome and count towards participation; however a high participation grade requires substantive comments also. Substantive comments refer to text, draw connections between theories/units, provide useful commentary/analysis of the ideas being discussed. Note: Please keep your cell phones turned off and your laptops closed during class. Participation will be graded on the following criteria: Attends class regularly Pays attention—texting, reading, and using the laptop for non-class related purposes distracts others and will significantly reduce your participation grade Summarizes material well when called upon Comes to class prepared, having read all the material Participates substantively and regularly to class discussion, demonstrating knowledge of the material Participation grades will be assigned twice during the semester. Here’s how your participation grade will be figured: Everyone starts with an 80 by attending class and contributing substantively at least twice per class. Subtract 20 points for every unexcused absence. Subtract 1 point for lack of contributing to the discussion (max 2 points per day). Subtract 2 points for inappropriate behavior in class (not paying attention to other students, texting, reading non-class related material, using the laptop for non-class related purposes, disrespectful interaction, etc.) (max 4 points per day) Add/subtract 1-5 points for in-class summaries (max 5 points per day). Add 2 points for every excellent response (refers to or quotes the text, synthesizes ideas from across texts or units, offers a unique/alternative idea or analysis) (max 4 points per day). *Note: all students who lead discussion receive full credit for participating (barring inappropriate behavior) and can receive additional points for excellent responses. Aesthetics unit assignment: The aesthetics assignment is part of your attendance grade. For this assignment, you will attend a visual or performing arts event—a play, ballet, opera, art exhibition, etc. by 10/7 and report (on the TD and in class) on your experience in light of the reading on aesthetics due for class on 10/7. This assignment is worth two days’ attendance. An unexcused absence on this day will result in a 40 point deduction from your participation grade. Discussion Facilitation…..….………..…………………………………………………… 15% In groups, students will lead class discussion two times during the semester. Discussion facilitation groups should draw from the readings to highlight key ideas, ask questions, and stimulate discussion aimed at understanding and critiquing the weekly readings vis-à-vis the course objectives. The discussion will draw connections between theory and personal experience to the end of forming an intellectual and practical understanding of the material. DF groups will include a visual aid (PowerPoint/Prezi) to guide discussion. Visual aids should include relevant images, music, film/tv clips, etc., connecting the unit’s themes with contemporary society and culture. Groups also may wish to create classroom activities to encourage participation. Groups are encouraged to meet in person to prepare before class. DF groups will incorporate the threaded discussion by summarizing key points and continuing the TD conversation. You may ask questions that were not answered on the TD, ask follow-up questions, and/or ask questions that invite further discussion. Include students’ names on PPT/Prezi slides when using TD responses. *Note: Do not lecture, and do not read slides. The aim is discussion. Part of your responsibility will be to keep the conversation on topic and use the class time well. Individuals in the DF group may divide the work to present but all students in the DF group should complete all the reading for the unit. Upload presentation materials to the Dropbox on eCollege at least 12 hours before the class period. Materials should include a PPT/Prezi (or link) and an explanation of how the work was divided. Each person should write a paragraph explaining how they contributed to the group work; one group member will compile these paragraphs into one Word document and upload this document separately. The visual component may be uploaded individually or as one collective PPT/Prezi, depending on how your group decides to present material. *Note: If you know in advance that you will be absent on your DF day, please make arrangements to swap days with another student in class. You may email the class via eCollege to make your request to other class members. If you have prepared for your DF and must miss class due to illness or emergency, please contact your group members and me to make alternate arrangements. You will receive a 0 for the assignment if you fail to show up for class and do not make other arrangements on a DF day. PowerPoint/Prezi Guidelines Use 1-2 styles of font only Avoid using all caps Keep it simple Use large enough font that all in the class can read Avoid wordy slides (0-20 words per slide) Use different text and background colors (i.e., don’t use yellow text on a yellow background image.) Include visual images o Note the Picture Superiority Effect: Three days after hearing or reading a set of facts, most people will remember about 10% of the information. Add a photo or a drawing, and recall jumps to 65%. Include relevant information Include discussion questions Make text readable, clear, error-free Don't read your slides View “Death by PowerPoint”: http://www.slideshare.net/thecroaker/death-by-powerpoint Note: slides are for the audience, not the speaker. Discussion Facilitation will be graded on the following criteria: Addresses the major themes of the week’s assigned reading Brings other class members into the discussion Divides work equally between group members Presents material in an interesting manner Does not read slides or lecture but facilitates conversation Effective visual aid includes videos or other related media Incorporates threaded discussion effectively Provides thought-provoking discussion questions Facilitates class discussion by controlling the discussion Uploads materials 12 hours before class Threaded Discussion……..…………………………………………………………....….. 20% Students should respond to the threaded discussion prompt on eCollege 24 hours before class and to two other students’ responses before the beginning of class. Responses may be informal but should demonstrate knowledge of the reading by synthesizing material and referring to the texts. Grading periods: 9/2-9/30 (5 TDs) and 10/7-12/2 (7 TDs) The Threaded Discussion will be graded on the following criteria: Does not generalize, uses examples/evidence to back up claims Demonstrates understanding of all the material read by synthesizing and referring to texts Offers original input, avoids repeating ideas Posts on time Responds to initial post and to two peers’ responses Responds to peers substantively, respectfully (does not merely agree or disagree) Here’s how your Threaded Discussion grade will be figured: Everyone starts with a 90 at the beginning of each Grading Period. Subtract 10 points if the student does not respond to the weekly prompt and does not reply to 2 of their classmates prior to that week’s class discussion. Subtract 5 points if the student does not respond to the weekly prompt, but does reply to 2 of their classmates on time. Subtract 2 points for each missing classmate-reply. Subtract 3 points for posting late. Add 2-3 points for every excellent response/reply (refers to or quotes the text, synthesizes ideas from across texts or units, offers a unique/alternative idea or analysis) Service Learning Project …………………………………..…………………….……. 25% Early in the semester, you will form Service Groups (the same as your Discussion Facilitation groups) ideally matching your individual interests and talents with the community center’s needs. As a class, we will brainstorm SL project ideas with a representative of Como Community Center, and then divide into groups and plot out SL project action plans. Each group will submit one SL project proposal that outlines the specific goals of your project, how the project meets the needs of the center (explained by the CCC representative), the roles of each group member, an action plan (a description of how you will attain the project goals), and a budget. Proposals should be 1-2 pages total. If funds are needed for projects, students will discuss with each other and with me options for obtaining them. Upload proposals to the Dropbox on eCollege by 9/9 at 2:00 PM. You can find in DocSharing an example of a good proposal. (Yours needn’t be this long.) Late proposals will result in a 2-point deduction in your SL project grade. The Service Learning project assumes completion of a minimum of 12 hours of individual service to CCC. Aim to complete at least 4 hours by 9/9 and serve at CCC at least once before your scheduled activity. You can earn hours by helping with an after-school program, doing your project work at CCC, and volunteering to help with other groups' activities. SL hours may be done at any time during the semester and may or may not be connected with your project work. For example, you may spend 7 hours at the center on your specific event or program, 2 hours helping with an after-school program, and 3 hours supporting other groups’ projects. You will receive a list of service opportunities and dates and will sign up for and commit to the days and events you select. Through service, aim to develop relationships and learn the spirit and vision of the community: ask questions, get to know people, find out how you can best serve and learn. Important Note: If you spend money on materials to be used during your volunteer hours at Como Community Center you must complete each of these steps for reimbursement: Contact Lauren Nixon to set up a time to fill out a reimbursement form Provide a copy of your receipt to turn in with the form Inform class accountant of funds spent If you have any further questions about reimbursement, email Lauren Nixon at l.e.nixon@tcu.edu You will not receive academic credit for your service. Rather, your grade will be based on your projects. However, you will incur a deduction of five points from your SL project grade for every service hour left uncompleted. Please submit completed SL time sheets to the Dropbox on eCollege by 12/9 at 2:00. You will keep track of your own hours—no signatures are needed on the time sheets. Time sheets are available on eCollege Doc Sharing. Each student will write a 2-3 page reflection paper describing SL project work. Papers should describe the SL project goals, the process of attaining goals, and areas of success and failure. Papers should connect course themes to SL experiences and project work. Papers should also describe your individual contribution to the project and the number of hours spent at CCC throughout the semester. Please number pages in your final papers, include a title, use 12 point font, and double space pages. You can find an example of a reflection paper on DocSharing. This example is a group effort; your papers will be written individually and will be 2-3 pages. Each group will give a presentation that describes the semester project and connects the group’s work at the community center to the course’s theme. Presentations should be engaging and professional and should synthesize theories and experiences of empathy to the end of edifying an ethic of civic responsibility. Presentations should last 10-12 minutes and incorporate a visual aid. Presentations will take place on 12/9. Submit final project papers and presentations to the Dropbox on eCollege 12/9 by 2:00. You can view the fall 2013 class Prezi here: http://prezi.com/je6ibnj2hqyo/doyou-know-como/. This example was an entire class effort; your presentation will reflect only the work of your group. You can find spring 2014 project papers uploaded to DocSharing on eCollege. The Service Learning Project will be graded on the following criteria: Reflection Paper o Meets 2-3 page requirement o Numbers pages, includes a title, uses 12 point font, double spaces pages o Outlines SL project goals o Describes individual’s contribution to the project and number of hours spent at CCC. o Describes the process of attaining goals (including individual’s contribution) o Discusses areas of success and failure o Connects course themes to SL experiences and project work Presentation o Incorporates an effective visual component o Is interesting, professional, and informative o Meets time requirements o Clearly connects course themes to SL experiences o Includes a statement of civic responsibility Please see PowerPoint/Prezi Guidelines under the Discussion Facilitation section. Research Paper………..………………………….………………………………….……. 20% Students you will explore one aspect of empathy in relation to their own field of study or interest. You may approach projects from a historical, anthropological, literary, philosophical, psychological, scientific, or other standpoint. Research any topic related to empathy that suits your interests. Papers should be 4-5 double-spaced pages. Use the documentation style required in your field of study, number the pages, include a title, and use 12 point font. All projects should include at least four credible sources and should have a clear thesis (answers a question, solves a problem). If you are a videographer or creative writer and wish to do a creative project instead of a research paper, please discuss this option with me. Papers due: 11/18 at 2:00 PM. Upload to eCollege The Final Research Project will be graded on the following criteria: Employs a lucid writing style Meets 4-5 double-spaced page limit Uses a documentation style correctly Numbers pages Includes a title Uses 12 point font Includes at least four credible sources Has a clear thesis Relates to empathy Reflects excellent research quality CCC Continuing Projects Como’s website: http://www.comocommunitycenter.com/ Login info for Como’s Twitter, Facebook, and Gmail accounts: Username: comocommunitycenter@gmail.com Password: como3-93 Como wix website page (just to visit): http://www.comocommunitycenter.com/ Wix login to edit: wix.com Username: comocommunitycenter@gmail.com Password: como3-93 Contacts for Como Community Center Aaron Muhammad Case Management Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Fort Worth 3218 E. Belknap St. Fort Worth, TX 76111 Office:817-877-3729 Cell: 817-584-8434 Fax: 817-877-3626 amuhammad@fortworthkids.org Carol Brown Como Community Center Coordinator 4900 Horne St. Fort Worth, TX 76107 carol.brown@fortworthtexas.gov Tel: 817-871-5030 On iWork Pages Compatibility Issues Attention Mac Users: Although DOC(X) format files (from Microsoft Word) are compatible with Pages, the Pages default format is not compatible with Word. What does this mean? If you upload a file to eCollege that you composed in Pages without properly exporting it as a DOC, I cannot open it. So, if you are a Pages user, please be sure to export your Pages file as a DOC before uploading it to eCollege. To export a document in Pages, click “File” from the top menu in Pages and then click “Export.” Click the “.DOC” icon and press “Export.” Note: Exporting a Pages document as a DOC file can cause formatting issues. Another option is to export your file as a PDF. Classroom Policies The following policies have been instituted to ensure an optimal learning experience for all students. Absences: You are responsible for material missed during an excused or unexcused absence; make arrangements with another class member to get information missed in class. Late work policy: If you submit work incorrectly (forget attachment, email instead of upload to eCollege, etc.) or late (but within 2 hours of the due date and time), your work will receive a 5 point grade deduction. If you submit more than 2 hours late, your work will receive a 10 point grade deduction per day. University Mission Statement To educate individuals to think and act as ethical leaders and responsible citizens in the global community. John V. Roach Honors College Mission Statement The John V. Roach Honors College at TCU assists high-achieving students in reaching their full intellectual potential through challenging academic endeavors, a unique residential component, and community involvement. The College promotes critical thinking and creative inquiry, an understanding of world cultures, and synthesis of ideas across disciplines. The College fosters student collaboration and strives to ingrain inquiry as an authentic, integral, and enduring aspect of students’ identities. The College not only enriches the intellectual life of the University but also promotes lifelong involvement with local, national, and global issues. Statement of Disability Services at TCU Texas Christian University complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 regarding students with disabilities. Eligible students seeking accommodations should contact the Coordinator of Student Disabilities Services in the Center for Academic Services located in Sadler Hall, 1010. Accommodations are not retroactive, therefore, students should contact the Coordinator as soon as possible in the term for which they are seeking accommodations. Further information can be obtained from the Center for Academic Services, TCU Box 297710, Fort Worth, TX 76129, or at (817) 257-6567. Academic Misconduct (Sec. 3.4 from the Student Handbook) –Any act that violates the academic integrity of the institution is considered academic misconduct. The procedures used to resolve suspected acts of academic misconduct are available in the offices of Academic Deans and the Office of Campus Life and are listed in detail in the Undergraduate Catalog (Student Policies>Academic Conduct Policy Details; http://www.catalog.tcu.edu/current_year/undergraduate/). Specific examples include, but are not limited to: Cheating Copying from another student’s test paper, laboratory report, other report, or computer files and listings; using, during any academic exercise, material and/or devices not authorized by the person in charge of the test; collaborating with or seeking aid from another student during a test or laboratory without permission; knowingly using, buying, selling, stealing, transporting, or soliciting in its entirety or in part, the contents of a test or other assignment unauthorized for release; substituting for another student or permitting another student to substitute for oneself. Plagiarism The appropriation, theft, purchase or obtaining by any means another’s work, and the unacknowledged submission or incorporation of that work as one’s own offered for credit. Appropriation includes the quoting or paraphrasing of another’s work without giving credit therefore. Collusion The unauthorized collaboration with another in preparing work offered for credit. TCU Campus Resources for Students Many resources exist on the TCU campus that may be helpful to students: Mary Couts Burnett Library (257-7117); Center for Academic Services (257-7486, Sadler Hall. 1022); the William L. Adams Writing Center (257-7221, Reed Hall 419); Student Development Services (257-7855, BLUU 2003); and Office of Religious & Spiritual Life (257-7830, Jarvis Hall), Campus Life (257-7926, Sadler Hall 2006), and the Counseling, Testing, and Mental Health Center (257-7863, Brown Lupton Health Center). Class Calendar 8/26 Course Overview Introduction to Como Community Center Guest: Aaron Muhammad, Como Community Center WATCH in class: “One Square Mile” documentary Discuss syllabus, discussion groups, hours of service 9/2 Introduction to Service Learning READ: Rachel Naomi Remen, “Helping, Fixing, or Serving” http://www.shambhalasun.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2328 READ: Roser Batlle, “Service Learning and Empathy” http://roserbatlle.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/service-learning-and-empathy2.pdf READ: “Learning Across Boundaries,” PDF, eCollege WATCH: Roy Bunker, “Learning from a Barefoot Movement” http://www.ted.com/talks/bunker_roy.html WATCH: Ernesto Sirolli, “Want to Help Someone? Shut up and Listen” http://www.ted.com/talks/ernesto_sirolli_want_to_help_someone_shut_up_and_listen. html WATCH: Brené Brown, “The Power of Vulnerability” https://www.ted.com/talks/brene_brown_on_vulnerability WATCH: Brené Brown, “Listening to Shame” http://www.ted.com/talks/brene_brown_listening_to_shame In class: choose accountant, fundraising specialist (work done in these roles count toward service hours) In class: choose SL and Discussion Groups (note discussion leadership days), discuss projects TD (Threaded Discussion) DUE 9/9 Defining Empathy Discussion Group A SL Proposals due at 2:00 READ: Coplan and Goldie, “Introduction” to Empathy Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, pp. ix-xxxi, PDF, eCollege READ: Sarah Songhorian, “Review of Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives,” PDF, eCollege READ: Karen E. Gerdes, “Empathy, Sympathy, and Pity: 21st Century Definitions and Implications for Practice and Research,” PDF, eCollege READ: Matravers, “Empathy as a Route to Knowledge,” Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, available online, TCU library WATCH: Joan Halifax, “Compassion and the True Meaning of Empathy” http://www.ted.com/talks/joan_halifax.html WATCH: Brené Brown, “The Power of Empathy” http://www.thersa.org/events/rsashorts/the-power-of-empathy TD DUE 9/16 Empathy and the Body Discussion Group B READ: Nathalia Gjersoe, “The Moral Life of Babies” http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/12/babies-moral-life READ: Frans de Waal, The Age of Empathy WATCH: Frans de Waal, “Moral Behavior in Animals” http://www.ted.com/talks/frans_de_waal_do_animals_have_morals# TD DUE 9/23 Empathy and the Mind Discussion Group C TAKE EQ-SQ Test http://personality-testing.info/tests/EQSQ.php The Neuroscience of Empathy READ: Marco Iacoboni, “Within Each Other: Neural Mechanisms for Empathy in the Primate Brain,” PDF, eCollege (this one is tough for non-science majors; do your best and try to get the main idea) READ: Vittorio Gallese, “Commentary on ‘Toward a Neuroscience of Empathy: Integrating Affective and Cognitive Perspectives,’” PDF, eCollege http://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/pubs/pdffiles/Neuropsychoanalysis%202007.pdf READ: Decety and Meltzoff, “Empathy, Imitation, and the Social Brain,” PDF, eCollege Empathy and Autism READ: Simon Baron-Cohen, “Does the Autistic Child have a ‘Theory of Mind’?” http://autismtruths.org/pdf/3.%20Does%20the%20autistic%20child%20have%20a%20th eory%20of%20mind_SBC.pdf READ: Liz Becker, “Autism & Theory of Mind: Just Whose Mind are we Referring to Here?” http://www.autismsupportnetwork.com/news/autism-theory-mind-just-whose-mindare-we-referring-here-38992322 WATCH: Temple Grandin, “The World Needs all Kinds of Minds” http://www.ted.com/talks/temple_grandin_the_world_needs_all_kinds_of_minds Empathy, Psychology, and Pathology WATCH: Simon Baron-Cohen, “Zero Degrees of Empathy” http://www.thersa.org/events/video/archive/simon-baron-cohen WATCH: Jim Fallon, “Exploring the Mind of a Killer” http://www.ted.com/talks/jim_fallon_exploring_the_mind_of_a_killer.html WATCH: Milgram Experiment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcvSNg0HZwk WATCH: Stanford Prison Experiment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZwfNs1pqG0 LISTEN: “Blame” http://www.radiolab.org/story/317421-blame/ WATCH: Daniel Goleman, “Why aren't we more compassionate?” http://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_goleman_on_compassion TD DUE 9/30 Empathy and Society Discussion Group D READ: Elizabeth A. Segal, “Social Empathy: A Model Built on Empathy, Contextual Understanding, and Social Responsibility That Promotes Social Justice,” PDF, eCollege READ: Richard D. Kahlenberg, “Should we Teach Empathy in College” http://chronicle.com/blogs/innovations/should-we-teach-empathy-in-college/30044 READ: Jeremy Rifkin, “Empathic Education: The Transformation of Learning in an Interconnected World” http://chronicle.com/article/Empathic-Education-The/65695/ LISTEN: Steve Henn, “Video Game Creators are Using Apps to Teach Empathy” http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2013/11/20/246395383/video-gamecreators-are-using-apps-to-teach-empathy?sc=17&f=1001 LISTEN: Greg Rosalsky, “Pontiff-icating on the Free-Market System” http://freakonomics.com/2013/12/19/pontiff-icating-on-the-free-market-system-a-newfreakonomics-radio-podcast/ READ: “How Evangelicals Won a War and Lost a Generation” http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2014/03/31/how-evangelicals-won-a-culture-war-and-losta-generation/ WATCH: “How 15 People With Down Syndrome Changed The Perspective Of Millions” http://digitalsynopsis.com/advertising/down-syndrome-future-mom/ READ: “Toddlers Assess Fairness and Race of Playmates” http://www.futurity.org/toddlers-see-fairness-race-playmates/ WATCH “Children and race” http://9gag.tv/p/a5QeMr/viral-racismo-enm%C3%A9xico-kids-in-a-room-with-2-dolls-2-different-colors?ref=fbl9 WATCH: Steven Pinker, “The Surprising Decline in Violence” http://www.ted.com/talks/steven_pinker_on_the_myth_of_violence WATCH: Jeremy Rifkin, “Empathic Civilization” http://www.ted.com/talks/jeremy_rifkin_on_the_empathic_civilization.html WATCH: RSA, “An Empathetic Lens & RSA Animate – The Power of Outrospection” http://publicpolicylab.org/2013/03/an-empathetic-lens/ WATCH: Peter Singer, “Effective Altruism” http://www.ted.com/talks/peter_singer_the_why_and_how_of_effective_altruism.html WATCH: Sam Richards, “A Radical Experiment in Empathy” http://www.ted.com/talks/sam_richards_a_radical_experiment_in_empathy.html TD DUE 10/7 Empathy and Aesthetics Discussion Group A Aesthetic experience due today – discuss in class WATCH IN CLASS: “Second a Day Video” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBQ-IoHfimQ READ: David Freedberg and Vittorio Gallese “Motion, Emotion and Empathy in Esthetic Experience” http://www.italianacademy.columbia.edu/art_and_neuro/paper_sp07_FreedbergGalles e.pdf READ: Suzanne M. Peloquin, “Art: An Occupation With Promise for Developing Empathy” http://ajot.aotapress.net/content/50/8/655.full.pdf (click on PDF) WATCH: Denis Dutton, “A Darwinian Theory of Beauty” http://www.ted.com/talks/denis_dutton_a_darwinian_theory_of_beauty.html WATCH: Paul Bloom, “The Origins of Pleasure” http://www.ted.com/talks/paul_bloom_the_origins_of_pleasure.html VIEW: “Photos that Capture The Human Experience” http://news.distractify.com/people/complex-humans/?v=1 TD DUE 10/14 fall break 10/21 Empathy and Morality Guest Lecturer: Dr. Daniel Terry, Director of Sophomore and Junior Year Experience, TCU Transitions, Student Development Services Readings TBD TD DUE 10/28 Empathy and Morality Guest Lecturer: Dr. Daniel Terry, Director of Sophomore and Junior Year Experience, TCU Transitions, Student Development Services Readings TBD TD DUE 11/4 Contesting Empathy Discussion Group B READ: Suzanne Keen, “Contesting Empathy,” Chapter 6 of Empathy and the Novel, available online—TCU library READ: Jesse Prinz, “Is Empathy Necessary for Morality,” PDF, eCollege READ: Adam Morton, “Empathy for the Devil,” PDF, eCollege LISTEN: Snap Judgment, “The Mercenary” http://www.npr.org/programs/snap-judgment/292415156/the-mercenary TD DUE 11/11 Empathy and the Novel Discussion Group C ALL READ: Pam Belluck, “For Better Social Skills, Scientists Recommend a Little Chekhov” http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/03/i-know-how-youre-feeling-i-read-chekhov/ ALL WATCH: Elif Shafak: “The Politics of Fiction” https://www.ted.com/talks/elif_shafak_the_politics_of_fiction ALL READ: Hannah Kent, Burial Rites, 5-152 GROUP C READ: Suzanne Keen, “Contemporary Perspectives on Empathy,” Preface and Chapter 1 of Empathy and the Novel, available online—TCU library TD DUE 11/18 Empathy and the Novel Discussion Group D Research papers due at 2:00 today ALL READ: Hannah Kent, Burial Rites, 153-end GROUP D READ: Suzanne Keen, “The Literary Career of Empathy” and “Empathy and the Marketplace,” Chapters 2 and 4 of Empathy and the Novel TD DUE 11/25 Thanksgiving break 12/2 Empathy and the Future READ: “Changing Our Mind and Changing the World We Made,” Humanity on a Tightrope, 61-130—available online, TCU library WATCH: “I Am” documentary—on reserve, TCU library (music/media desk, 2nd floor) WATCH: “Bill and Melinda Gates on Giving away Money” http://www.ted.com/talks/bill_and_melinda_gates_why_giving_away_our_wealth_has _been_the_most_satisfying_thing_we_ve_done WATCH: “Does Money Make you Mean?” http://www.ted.com/talks/paul_piff_does_money_make_you_mean WATCH: “George Saunders Commencement Speech 2013” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruJWd_m-LgY TD DUE 12/9 Final presentations Final projects due today Upload to eCollege DocSharing by 2:00 today. SPOTS