Population Aging and Intergenerational Transfers: Introducing Age into National Accounts Andrew Mason, University of Hawaii and East West Center Ronald Lee University of California at Berkeley An-Chi Tung, Academia Sinica, Taiwan Mun Sim Lai, University of Hawaii and East West Center Tim Miller, University of California-Berkeley May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 1 • Support from NIA R37-AG11761, and will be supported by parallel NIA grants to Lee (Berkeley) and Mason (Hawaii). May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 2 Comparative International Scope • Main NIA funded project, Lee and Mason; teams for each country. – – – – – – – United States Taiwan Japan Indonesia Chile Brazil France • Additional countries funded by UNFPA, Ogawa at Nihon Univ. – – – – China India Philippines Thailand • Individuals in additional countries may participate with own funding May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 3 Lifecycle Deficits—aggregate, not per capita Figure 1(a). Consumption and Labor Income, Aggregate Values, Taiwan, 1998, 250 Labor Income NT$ Billions . 200 Reallocations 150 Consumption 100 50 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 Age May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 4 90+ TABLE 1 Resource Reallocation Across Age and Time Mechanism Institution Family Market Public Sector Capital House Car Consumer Durables Inventories Education Factories Inventories Farms Social Infrastructure (Hospitals, Roads, Airports, Govt. Bldgs) Transfers Child Rearing College Costs Gifts Bequests Support of elderly Government Debt Public Education Medicaid, Medicare Social Security Food Stamps AFDC Borrow/Lend (Intertemporal Exchange) Familial Loans "Transfers" with a quid pro quo Credit Markets (mortgages, credit cards, bond issues) Government Loans May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 5 Theoretical roots in • • • • Samuelson overlapping generations Gale Willis Lee May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 6 Project Objectives • Develop a National Transfer Account system that measures aggregate economic flows across age groups – Market and non-market transactions – Public and private (familial) – Asset reallocations and transfers • Estimate current and historical accounts • Projections May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 7 Project Objectives • Estimate current and historical accounts in varying social, economic, and political contexts • Develop projection models that can be used to assess the effects of economic change, aging, family systems, and public policy • Study the evolution of support systems • Study the macroeconomic consequences of aging and alternative support systems May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 8 Additional objectives, questions • Intergenerational equity as affected by changing public programs (pensions, privatization, health care, education, etc.) • Broad descriptive generalizations about directions of flows across age over time and social structure, through different channels. • Integrated picture of various channels through which children and the elderly derive resources – public and private transfers, and saving and investment. • Describe income reallocation through non-market mechanisms. May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 9 Some Estimation Issues • Consumption age profile – Available estimation methods problematic (Engel, Rothbarth, collective models) – Education and health can be reliably estimated • Productivity age profile – Earnings may not reflect age variation in productivity – Seniority wage system in Japan, for example. May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 11 Hope that description of patterns and changes will generate new stylized facts and provoke new questions • Next slide is an example: sudden and dramatic shift in the direction of public transfers in the US between 1940 and 1970. May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 12 May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 13 Preliminary Results • US in 2000 and Taiwan in 1998 • Data – – – – National Income and Product Accounts Administrative records for public agencies Household surveys of income, expenditure and assets Population surveys and censuses • Methodology described in the paper • Method covers stocks and flows; here just look at flows May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 14 Figure 2. Lifecycle of Production (labor earnings) and Cons, Per Capita, US 2000 and Taiwan 1998 Relative to Average Production Age 20 to 40 . 1.6 1.4 Production, US 1.2 1.0 Consumption,US 0.8 0.6 Consumption, Taiwan 0.4 Production, Taiwan 0.2 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90+ Age May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 15 Differences in lifecycle profiles are large 1. In Taiwan low labor income due to low labor force participation among women in their mid-40s and late 50s. 2. In US consumption of elderly high relative to non-elderly • • Health spending by US elderly is very high Non-health spending by US elderly is also much higher May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 16 Figure 4. Lifecycle Deficits, Taiwan 1998 and US 2000, per capita 1.0 US 0.5 Taiwan -0.5 -1.0 Age Note: The lifecycle deficit is the difference between per capita labor income and consumption. Expressed relative to the simple mean of average production for those 20-40. May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 17 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0.0 0 Lifecycle deficit . 1.5 Implication • Per capita lifecycle deficit of elderly is high in the US as compared to Taiwan • Given the age profile, aging would have a much larger effect on the size of the total deficit of US elderly • Thus, aging in the US would lead to a much greater increase in reallocations – assets, transfers, or both – than in Taiwan. May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 18 NTA Accounting Identity (1) y r(K M ) C I K I M . (2) C yl g l Lifecycle deficit rA S Asset reallocations f g g g Net public transfers f f f Net private transfers Net transfers A=K+M Age reallocations S = IK + IM May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 19 • These flow accounts can be integrated over age/time to generate corresponding stock accounts by age and in aggregate – Credit or debt – Capital – Transfer wealth/debt • The stocks from flows can sometimes be compared to direct measures of stocks as consistency check. May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 20 Figure 5a. Components of Aggregate Age Reallocations, Taiwan, 1998 Reallocations ($NT billions) Bequests Inter Vivos Transfers Public Transfers Asset Reallocation 150 Total Inflows 100 Pub trans 50 Asset realloc Inter vivos 0 bequests -50 -100 Total Outflows -150 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90+ Age May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 21 Figure 5b. Components of Individual Age Reallocations, Taiwan, 1998 Reallocations ($NT thousands) . Bequests 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 -100 -200 -300 -400 Inter Vivos Transfers Public Transfers Asset Reallocation Total Inflows Total Outflows 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90+ Age May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 22 Figure 6a. Components of Aggregate Age Reallocations, US, 2000 Reallocations ($US billions) . Bequests Inter Vivos Transfers Public Transfers Asset Reallocation 150 Total Inflows 100 50 0 -50 -100 Total Outflows -150 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90+ Age May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 23 Figure 6b. Components of Individual Age Reallocations, US, 2000 Bequests Inter Vivos Transfers Public Transfers Asset Reallocation Reallocations ($US thousands) . 70 60 Total Inflows 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 Total Outflows -30 -40 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90+ Age May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 24 Per Capita Asset Reallocations, US 2000 and Taiwan 1998 Note: Values normalized on simple average of per capita consumption for 20-40-year-olds. 1.2 1 US 0.8 0.6 Taiwan 0.4 0.2 May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 88 84 80 76 72 68 64 60 56 52 48 44 40 36 32 28 -0.2 24 0 20 Asset Reallocations/C(20-40) . 1.4 25 Are Asset Reallocations Consistent with Lifecycle Saving Hypothesis? • Yes – Asset income important to the elderly • No – At working ages asset reallocations are positive – Older adults do not dis-save • Maybe – In Taiwan asset reallocations indirectly support consumption by elderly by financing familial transfers May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 26 Figure 8. Finance of Consumption, Old Dependents (Age 65+) Percentage of Consumption . 140 120 13.1 Work 61.8 Asset Reallocations 42.5 Inter Vivos Transfers 33.2 15.1 100 80 60 40 20 0 4.4 35.3 Public Transfers 23.3 Bequests -14.6 -14.1 -20 -40 May 13, 2005 USA (2000) Taiwan (1998) Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 27 Observations • Strong similarities between US and Taiwan – Importance of earnings – Magnitude of bequests • Asset reallocations are important • Heavy reliance on private transfers in Taiwan potential source of vulnerability to population aging. May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 28 Limitations 1. Consumption age profile is hard to estimate • Available estimation methods problematic (Engel, Rothbarth, collective models) 2. Results are only one year analysis • Cannot determine age effect or cohort effect 3. Estimates are preliminary and methodologies are still being refined May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 29 Another illustration of what can be done with historical depth and projections May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 30 Net Present Values of Benefits minus Taxes for Generations • Illustrate historical depth and projections for public sector • Includes only Public Educ, Social Sec, and Medicare • NPVs calculated based on – estimates and projections of age specific taxes paid and benefits received, 1850-2200 – Discounted at 3% real – actual or projected survival May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 31 Net Present Value at birth of expected life time benefits for Social Security, Medicare and Public Education as % of lifetime earnings, for generations born 1850 to 2090 Total May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 32 USA and France: A Comparison (Stephane Zuber) 15 10 5 0 NPVs for the US -5 -10 Education Public Pensions + Health Benefits -15 Combined 18 50 18 60 18 70 18 80 18 90 19 00 19 10 19 20 19 30 19 40 19 50 19 60 19 70 19 80 19 90 20 00 20 10 20 20 20 30 20 40 20 50 20 60 20 70 20 80 20 90 -20 Year of Birth 15 10 5 0 NPVs for France -5 Education -10 Public Pensions + Health Benefits Combined -15 -20 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 18 50 18 60 18 70 18 80 18 90 19 00 19 10 19 20 19 30 19 40 19 50 19 60 19 70 19 80 19 90 20 00 20 10 20 20 20 30 20 40 20 50 20 60 20 70 20 80 20 90 May 13, 2005 Year of Birth 33 18 50 18 60 18 70 18 80 18 90 19 00 19 10 19 20 19 30 19 40 19 50 19 60 19 70 19 80 19 90 20 00 20 10 20 20 20 30 20 40 20 50 20 60 20 70 20 80 20 90 21 00 21 10 21 20 21 30 21 40 21 50 21 60 21 70 21 80 21 90 22 00 18 5 18 0 6 18 0 7 18 0 8 18 0 9 19 0 0 19 0 1 19 0 2 19 0 3 19 0 4 19 0 5 19 0 6 19 0 7 19 0 8 19 0 9 20 0 0 20 0 1 20 0 2 20 0 3 20 0 4 20 0 5 20 0 6 20 0 7 20 0 8 20 0 9 21 0 0 21 0 1 21 0 2 21 0 3 21 0 4 21 0 5 21 0 6 21 0 7 21 0 8 21 0 9 22 0 00 USA and France: Accounting for the differences (1) 35 30 25 20 15 Education 10 10 Spending as Percent of GDP: US Social Security Medicare 5 0 Year 35 30 25 20 15 Education Spending as Percent of GDP: France Public Pensions Health Benefits 5 0 May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller Year 34 The End May 13, 2005 Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller 35