Extension Program Evaluation Dale A. Moore VMTRC School of Veterinary Medicine UC Davis What’s the purpose of evaluation? Improve the program Improve teaching Make a difference Scholarly pursuit Get the higher-ups off your back Meet promotion requirements Goals of This Presentation Discuss “traditional” program evaluation Help you focus your evaluations Learn the different levels of evaluation Help you construct evaluation questions Provide you a tool for data analysis Discuss educational program evaluation using Learning Stage Theory Pre-Test Take out the Pre-Test Take 5 minutes to answer the questions Turn them in to Pat Who will use the results? The public Your extension division Colleagues You and program planning staff … All your stakeholders Who will use the results? Your Audience Do I have the resources to conduct this evaluation project? Time Money People Expertise Or – are the data already available? Levels of Evaluation Perceptions of the program or course Competence with new skills, knowledge, abilities or new attitudes Individual performance – a change in behavior within their environment Industry outcomes What are your outcomes? Mechanisms for Evaluation Direct observation Audience response systems Surveys Telephone or face-to-face interviews Focus groups Expert or peer-review (formative evaluations) Testimonials Industry data Audience Response System Surveys Who is the audience? How are you going to deliver it? Are you going to randomly choose possible responders? What percent response do you need to make it meaningful? Pre- and Post-program delivery to address immediate changes in knowledge/attitudes? Pre-Test --–-- Post-Test Pre-Test --–-- Post-Test Advantages: Get attention at beginning of the program Provide some level of anxiety so that they “look” for the answers during the presentation Gives instructors some measure of learning needs / areas upon which to focus Identify short-term changes in knowledge / attitudes Pre-Test – Post-Test Disadvantages: Takes time away from the program Need to be able to quickly “grade” and analyze your data Need to be able to make adjustments to the program if needed Only addresses short-term learning and not behavior change Adults may not enjoy being graded What kind of questions? Reaction Learning Behavior Results ? What kind of questions/data if the outcome is behavior change? Questions about… Satisfaction with different aspects of the program Speaker effectiveness New knowledge or skills A change in attitude A “commitment to change” New program ideas Question Types Open- ended questions Closed Set of responses Likert scale Numeric responses Categorical responses What are the advantages and disadvantages of each kind of question? Data Analysis How do you go about analyzing responses to different kinds of questions? Comparison of means – Student’s T-test Comparison of proportions Categorical data analysis – Chi-Square Non-parametric like the Sign test Multivariate analyses * EpiCalc2000 – free program from Web; URL in handout Documenting the Impacts of Continuing Education Dale Moore and Hank Slotnick Do you sometimes feel that… despite… • • Results of your needs assessments, and Your best intentions to create an appealing program Those who need to attend the program, don’t? The minds of some who come aren’t open? Objectives Provide the theoretical framework for documenting change Demonstrate applications of the theory Demonstrate a new method of representing change data Background on the Problem Key meta-analytic findings of CME programs: Findings consistent with adult learning: Simple provision of information is often insufficient. Active learning appears to be more effective. Multiple exposures predispose toward success. Most traditional CME does not change physician behavior Why not? Behavioral Change Theories Prochaska & Mezirow & Slotnick Suggest that change occurs in stages In each stage the learner has different needs To become interested in the idea of change • • the learner’s mind must be opened the learner must feel a need to attend to something, something has happened to unsettle them, or they have an immediate problem to solve STAGES OF CHANGE INTERESTED, BUT…. (contemplation) UNAWARE OR UNIMPRESSED (precontemplation) CHOICES:DECISIONS (preparation) ACTION FINE TUNING & MAINTAINING CHANGE (maintenance) Adapted from: Prochaska et al, 1992 Mezirow: Theory of Perspective Transformation 1) Disorienting dilemma 2) Self-examination with feelings dissonance or discomfort 3) Critical re-assessment of assumptions 4) Recognition of discontent and that others have changed 5) Exploration of options for new ways of seeing/behaving 6) Planning a course of action, gathering resources 7) Acquisition of knowledge and skills 8) Provisional trying of new perspective/behavior 9) Building of competence and self-confidence in new activity 10) Integration of new perspective/behavior into one’s life Traditional CE Efforts Potential for mismatch between the intervention and learner readiness Over-emphasis on encouraging action Ask them to take the leap because we say so! Presumes learners minds are open Documenting the Outcomes A taxonomy of outcomes Awareness of problem Knowledge/skill changes and Practice changes Improved herd outcomes Aware Improve Slotnick 2001 Change Taxonomy of Outcomes Taxonomy based on stages in learning episodes Evaluation: Learner decides whether to learn the solution to the problem at hand Learning: Learner gains required skills and knowledge Gaining experience: Learner familiarized with the skills, knowledge & problems. Aware Evaluation Improve Learn Change Gain Experience Documenting Change Hypothesis: It should be possible to document changes in prevalence of learners at different stages in addressing an educational program. How to Document Outcomes Present clinical/practical vignettes. Ask respondents to indicate their ‘learning status’ for each vignette/problem. Vignette example: Mary was a 58-year-old woman who had been in good health generally. She did not exercise regularly and was about 20 pounds over her ideal weight, but her diet was relatively low in fat, she did not smoke, and she had no history of diabetes. She had been taking estrogen and progesterone hormone replacement therapy for 6 years. Her recent blood lipid panel results were as follows: (blah blah blah). She was taking hydrochlorothiazide to treat hypertension, and her mother had experienced an MI at 60 years of age. Mary was seen at the emergency department for a prolonged episode of left shoulder and upper back pain which had begun after dinner that evening. Responses Evaluation: I’m comfortable that I can handle the problem in the vignette; all I might be interested in is information so I can decide when next to update.” Learning: I need to update myself in the skills and knowledge needed to address this problem. Gaining experience: I’ve recently updated skills and knowledge. All I might be interested in is hearing about others’ experiences with similar problems. How to Document Outcomes The AMEE (Slotnick) study Goal: Introduce the idea of estimating prevalence for people at different stages of learning in a lecture setting (90 minutes) Measurement: Practice vignettes were examined pre- and post, some based on issues addressed in the lecture and some not. Analysis: Expected to see stage-to-stage movement for the first set, but not the second. The Triangular Graph Each side represents a response – 3 possible responses. % Response 50 40 30 20 10 0 Evaluation Eval Learning Gain Exp Response Eval Dominated 50% 50% Learning Domin. Learning Gain Exp. 50% Gaining Experience % Response 50 40 30 20 10 0 Eval Learning Gain Exp Evaluation Response 50% Learning 50% 50% Gaining Experience % Response 50 40 30 20 10 0 Eval Learning Gain Exp Evaluation Response 50% Learning 50% 50% Gaining Experience How to Document Outcomes The AMEE study. 3 Vignettes where no changes were expected. Evaluation “The task force chair needs a list of physicians who might be called on in an emergency. She asks you to locate such a list.” Learning Gaining Experience How to Document Outcomes The AMEE study. 4 Vignettes where changes were expected. Evaluation Learning “You and two others are to put together a pencil-and-paper survey questionnaire to determine what doctors know about preventing, diagnosing, and managing anthrax and small pox.” Gaining Experience Dairy Veterinarian Study Dairy Informatics Vignettes Developed 8 practice vignettes: An example - “A 500-cow dairy client is going to expand his operation to add 500 more cows. To help support his application for a loan, the bank has asked him for information on the productivity of the dairy herd, including milk production and herd replacements. The bank would like information for the last 3 years of the dairy’s operation.” Moore’s Study Evaluation Learning Gaining Experience Moore’s Study Evaluation Learn Gain Experience Conclusions Evaluate group changes dependent on stage of learning Documents the changes Provides for parsimonious graphical display of change Currently working on statistical methods Post-Test Take out the PostTest Take 5 minutes to complete Turn in to Pat What did we learn? There are different levels of program evaluation Clearly-defined program objectives lead to easier evaluations There are a number of mechanisms of program evaluation Learning stage theory helps us evaluate WHERE the learner is with regard to making a change Thank you for your attention References Dr. Jack Mezirow: Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning; Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning. Prochaska, J. O. and C. C. DiClemente (1982). "Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change." Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 19(3): 276-288. Slotnick HB. How Doctors Learn: Physicians' Selfdirected Learning Episodes. Acad Med 1999;74:1106-17. Moore DA. Evaluating the stages of veterinary practitioner learning for continuing education needs assessment and program evaluation. J Vet Med Education 2003;30(1):50-56.