A Quality IEP Process for PreK Programs Session 1 A GENDA 2 Session 1 Gathering Information and Developing Present Level Statements Writing Measurable Annual Goals Writing Short Term Objectives /Benchmarks Session 2 Implementing the Individual Educational Plan/Developing an Activity Matrix Monitoring and Reporting Progress Reviewing and Revising the IEP P URPOSE 3 OF T RAINING To provide guidance to early childhood professionals in writing and implementing quality IEPs, in accordance with the requirements of IDEA 2004. To integrate evidence-based practices into the IEP process, including the Division of Early Childhood/Council for Exceptional Children Recommended Practices. http://www.dec-sped.org/ To support the inclusion of children with disabilities to learn, play, and grow along side their typically developing peers. 4 P URPOSE OF THE IEP Handout 1 – Your district’s IEP form The IEP is a legal document used in educational planning to: Identify the priorities for the child, by the IEP team. Translate priorities into actions that enhance the child’s development, learning, and participation at home, school, and in the community. Identify a child’s unique needs and how the school will address them, in collaboration with the family. KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 Identify how specially designed instruction and related services will be provided to support the child in accessing the general education curriculum. L INKED S YSTEM 5 Gathering Information Progress Monitoring IEP Goal Development Implementation M EMBERSHIP OF THE IEP T EAM 6 Required members: One or both of the child’s parents/legal guardians General education teacher of the child Special education teacher/provider of the child An administrator/district representative who has the authority to make commitments on behalf of the school district Any member of the school staff, other than the child’s teacher, who is qualified to provide or supervise the provision of specially designed instruction An individual who can interpret the instructional implication of evaluation results Optional members: Other individuals whose expertise may be desired by the family or school, with parent consent 7 Accessible IEPs for All PARENT P ERSPECTIVES ON THE IEP 8 Developing the IEP T HE IEP: A 6-S TEP P ROCESS 9 1. Gathering Information and Developing Present Level Statements (PLAAFPs) 2. Writing Measurable Annual Goals (MAGs) 3. Writing Short Term Objectives (STOs)/Benchmarks 4. Implementation of the IEP/Development of Activity Matrix 5. Monitoring and Reporting Progress 6. Reviewing and Revising the IEP 10 1. G ATHERING I NFORMATION AND D EVELOPING P RESENT L EVEL S TATEMENTS B EFORE W E G ET S TARTED 11 Idaho State Dept. of Education Commitment to working together as a team Knowledge of child development (CDC Checklists ) Understanding of IDEA 2004, the Florida Statutes, and State Board of Education Rules Florida Early Learning Standards www.flbt5.com Curricula adopted by the program and aligned with standards A well-planned, organized, developmentally appropriate classroom environment 12 D EVELOPING K NOWLEDGE OF THE C HILD Interests and Preferences (i.e., favorite materials and toys, activities, peers) KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 Development and Learning Integrated Skills including accommodations (e.g., pace, modality preferences, successful strategies) or modifications How the child integrates his or her skills in all domains during play and daily activities and routines 13 G ATHERING I NFORMATION Handout 3 – Resources for Developing IEPs KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 Where do we develop this knowledge? The team should gather information about the child from: Significant people in the child’s life Developmental and medical history Informal, portfolio, authentic assessment data and observations conducted in natural settings Appropriate standardized and curriculumbased measures and checklists R ESOURCE FOR G ATHERING AND S HARING I NFORMATION 14 Florida’s Transition Project Forms (www.tats.ucf.edu) “Getting to Know Me” – parents share information about their family, their child’s preferences, self-help skills, communication skills, what works when child is upset, etc. “Teacher to Teacher” – information exchanged between sending and receiving teachers 15 D ISCUSSING K EY E LEMENTS After gathering the information, the team should engage in discussions focusing on: KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 • Identifying family priorities • Describing the routines and activities of the child’s environments • Identifying and prioritizing unique educational needs • Determining the natural routines that support embedded learning opportunities • Describing supports or accommodations to ensure access to all aspects of the curriculum • Considering how annual goals scaffold the child’s progress to reach long range goals 16 S PECIAL FACTORS TO C ONSIDER FOR P ROVIDING F REE A PPROPRIATE P UBLIC E DUCATION (FAPE) Factor 1: Behavior Factor 2: Limited English Proficiency (dual language learners) Factor 3: www.nichy.org Blindness and Visual Impairment • Does the child’s behavior interfere with his or her learning or the learning of others? • What impact does the child's limited English proficiency have on his or her development and learning? • Is it appropriate for the child to receive instruction in Braille and to use Braille in the classroom? 17 www.nichy.org S PECIAL FACTORS TO C ONSIDER FOR P ROVIDING FAPE Factor 4: Communication Needs • Does the child have a need for language/communication services to support him or her in interactions with peers and adults or in accessing all aspects of the curriculum? Factor 5: Assistive Technology • Would an assistive technology device or service improve the child’s access to the general curriculum and enable him or her to participate more fully at school, home, or in the community? Gathering Information Handouts 3 and 4– (Case Study 1 and Getting to Know Me/BDI-2 ) 18 JOSÉ J ACKS A CTIVITY 19 H ANDOUT 5 Divide into groups of 3-5 people. Each group should have a set of jacks and a Jacks Activity Handout. Identify a leader to read the instructions to the group and complete the activity. When completed, the groups will share their charts, PLAAFP, and MAG. How important were the baseline data in creating your PLAAFP and MAG? 20 KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 PLAAFP – Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance A summary statement which describes the child’s current academic achievement and functional performance in the areas of need identified from the evaluation and all information gathered. The purpose is to identify and prioritize the specific needs of a child and to establish baseline performance in the general curriculum which is used to develop individualized, meaningful, and measureable goals. For preschool children, the PLAAFP should state how the disability affects the child’s participation in appropriate activities. 21 T HE PLAAFP S HOULD : Handout 6 and 7 – Standards and CDC Checklist Be stated in terms that are specific, measureable, and objective Provide baseline data for each need KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 Prioritize and identify needs that will be written as goals Describe current performance, not past Describe the child’s performance in “appropriate activities” 4 C OMPONENTS OF PLAAFP 22 1. Based on: Current child performance, work samples, observations, assessments, parent input, anecdotal records, etc. 2. Child’s Strengths as they Relate to Possible Interventions: Including a description of specific skills, how frequently the child uses the behavior, baseline data, etc. 3. Effects of the Disability on Child’s Progress in Appropriate Activities: Specific prerequisite skills the child is lacking, learning or processing difficulties, communication needs (assistive technology) or impulse or behavior concerns that impede learning, including frequency and duration (consider skills and behaviors of typically developing peers). 4. KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 Priority Educational Need: Using the child’s strengths and identifying what skills are needed to be successful in school and life. Written in broad terms that should lead to the annual goals. 23 F LORIDA’ S F IVE IEP D OMAINS Curriculum and Learning Social/Emotional Behavior Independent Functioning Health Care Communication FL DOE, 2000 24 BDI-2 Adaptive, Motor A LIGNMENT OF IEP D OMAINS , S TANDARDS , AND BDI-2 Early Learning Standards Physical development (gross and fine motor, self-help) IEP Domains Independent Functioning Communication Language and Communication (Listening and Understanding, Communicating and Speaking, Early Reading, Early Writing) Communication Cognitive Approaches to Learning (Eagerness and Curiosity, Persistence, Creativity and Inventiveness, Planning and Reflection) Cognitive Development and General Knowledge (Mathematical, Scientific and Social Studies, Arts) Curriculum and Learning Personal Social Social Emotional (Prosocial Behaviors, Self-Regulation, Self-Concept) Social Emotional Information from interview questions Physical Development (Health) Health 25 S AMPLE B ASELINE D ATA S TATEMENTS During large group activities (i.e. circle, story time, music) Cindy is able to sit and listen to the teacher for approximately 3 minutes, as reported by direct classroom observation. Typically developing 4-year-old children sit and listen to the teacher and participate in group activities lasting 10-20 minutes (FL EL Standards). KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 Throughout the day, Stacie uses physical gestures and one-word statements to make her wants and needs known (mine, want, drink) as reported in language samples and classroom observations. A child Stacie’s age should be using 3-5 word sentences (FL EL Standards). L INKING THE PLAAFP TO E ARLY L EARNING S TANDARDS 26 To link the PLAAFP to standards: Goosens, 2008 Compare the PLAAFP with the developmental content areas listing individual standards, benchmarks, and indicators Look for future skills that might be required Ask: “How is the disability keeping this child from mastering that indicator or standard?” and “What is needed to enable this child to master the goal?” 27 KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 S AMPLE PLAAFP I NDEPENDENT F UNCTIONING Based on: structured observation, work sample analysis, and parent input Child Strengths: Katie is a 4 year old who imitates other children, actively participates, is independent (in preparing and cleaning up), shares materials, and enjoys art. Effects of the Disability: Katie has difficulty holding writing utensils between her thumb and forefingers and is unable to copy lines, circles, and simple figures. In art, Katie paints with her brush by only using down strokes. Katie’s fine motor control prevents her from being able to make representational artwork like that of other children her same age. 4-year-olds begin to draw a person, with a circle for a head and two vertical lines for legs, minimally. Priority educational need: Katie needs to use a 3 point grasp to hold writing utensils to create numbers, letters, pictures, and shapes. 28 KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 S AMPLE PLAAFP COMMUNICATION - PA R A G R A P H F O R M Based on a language sample, informal observation, and parent input, 3-year-old Emily uses single words, signs, and a few two and three-word combinations to communicate her wants and needs at home and at school. She initiates social interactions with her peers and labels objects in her environment. During a 20 minute play period with peers, Emily used 18 single word utterances (5 utterances also included a sign) and 1 two-word combination (“my shoe”). When 2-word combinations were modeled for Emily, she imitated only the last word of the phrase. Typically, children Emily’s age use 3 to 5 word sentences to communicate. Emily’s parents would like her to increase the length of her sentences so that more adults and children in Emily's life better understand her wants, needs, and thoughts. 29 KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 W HAT DO YOU THINK OF THIS PLAAFP? Chris is able to build simple block structures. He can cut on a line when assisted with hand placement on scissors and copy vertical and horizontal lines. He switches the writing utensil between his right and left hands frequently during all activities. Writing Present Level Statements Handouts 3 and 4– (Case Study 1 and Getting to Know Me/BDI-2 ) 30 JOSÉ T HE IEP: A 6-S TEP P ROCESS 31 1. Gathering Information and Developing Present Level Statements (PLAAFPs) 2. Writing Measurable Annual Goals (MAGs) 3. Writing Short Term Objectives (STOs)/Benchmarks 4. Implementation of the IEP/Development of Activity Matrix 5. Monitoring and Reporting Progress 6. Reviewing and Revising the IEP 32 2. W RITING M EASUREABLE A NNUAL G OALS S OME P ROBLEMS WITH IEP G OALS : 33 GrishamBrown, J., & Hemmeter, M.L. (1998). Goals are failed test items Goals are restatements of curriculum objectives or indicators from standards Goals divide the child’s needs by discipline rather than written holistically for the child. Goals don’t facilitate the use of an embedded learning approach during routines, daily activities, and play Goals don’t reflect skills necessary to function in the daily environment IEPs don’t follow recommended practices and IDEA 2004 regulations 34 M EASUREABLE A NNUAL G OALS Measureable Annual Goals (MAGs) are statements that describe what a child with a disability can reasonably be expected to accomplish within a 12-month period in the child’s education program. Goals must be related to meeting the child’s needs that result from the child’s disability, thus enabling the child to be involved in and progress in appropriate activities. KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 Well written goals are functional, measureable, can be generalized and embedded in naturally occurring routines and daily activities, including transitions and play. 35 M ETHOD TO P RIORITIZE IEP G OALS The team should identify and discuss all of the possible goals. • Are the skills identified as a priority for all team members? • Are the skills developmentally and individually appropriate? • Are the skills necessary for the child’s participation in most daily activities or the general curriculum? 36 M ETHOD TO P RIORITIZE IEP G OALS ( CONT.) • Are the skills related to or aligned with the general curriculum and state early learning standards? • Will intentional and individualized instruction be provided throughout the day (across activities, materials, and staff) for the child to acquire and use the skill? • Do the skills provide a scaffold for the child’s progress to reach long term goals? C OMPONENTS OF M EASUREABLE G OALS 37 Timeframe Usually in weeks, months, or by a certain completion date KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 Child’s name Goal is written for the child Conditions Specifies the accommodations, description of the assessment method, and/or the manner in which progress will be measured Behavior Clearly identifies the performance that is being monitored – observable and measureable – written in positive terms Criterion Identifies how much, how often, and to what standards the behavior must occur to demonstrate the goal has been reached S AMPLE G OAL 38 By June, 2011, when provided with writing utensils (e.g., crayons, markers, pencils) during activities such as art and small groups, Katie will hold the writing utensils using a 3 point grasp to create representational artwork (shapes, letters, figures) in 4 out of 5 opportunities per week. Timeframe: Child’s name: Conditions: KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 Behavior: Criterion: 39 G OALS AND O BJECTIVES R ATING I NSTRUMENT (R-GORI) Handout 8 - R-GORI Checklist Tool for writing quality IEP goals composed of 4 areas: PrettiFrontczak, K. and Bricker, D. 2000 • • • • MEASURABILITY FUNCTIONALITY GENERALITY INSTRUCTIONAL CONTEXT 40 G OALS AND O BJECTIVES R ATING I NSTRUMENT (R-GORI) MEASURABILITY PrettiFrontczak, K. and Bricker, D. 2000 • Does the target behavior have a beginning and an end and can it be seen and/or heard (i.e., is it observable, is it an action)? • Can you measure the child’s performance over time either qualitatively or quantitatively (i.e., determine mastery level)? 41 M EASURABILITY E XAMPLES MEASUREABLE NOT MEASUREABLE Spontaneously or upon request, Jacobi names at least 20 letters of the alphabet. Jacobi knows the letters of the alphabet. Travarius responds with a verbal or motor action to group directions provided by an adult. Travarius participates during group activities. Kelli greets peers by vocalizing, Kelli gets along with peers. verbalizing, hugging, patting, touching, or smiling. 42 G OALS AND O BJECTIVES R ATING I NSTRUMENT (R-GORI) FUNCTIONALITY PrettiFrontczak, K. and Bricker, D. 2000 • Does the child need the target behavior to participate in all/most daily activities? • Does the child need the target behavior to complete all/most daily activities? 43 F UNCTIONALITY E XAMPLES FUNCTIONAL NOT FUNCTIONAL Jacobi will walk 15 steps independently. Jacobi will walk on a balance beam for five steps alternating feet. Travarius will remain with the activity for the duration of the activity. Travarius will sit at circle for 15 minutes. Kelli will use words, phrases, and sentences to communicate with others. Kelli will produce the p/b/t sounds in isolation. W HICH OF THESE ARE FUNCTIONAL GOALS ? 44 Dinnebeil & McInerney April, 2010 1. Four year old Talisha will verbally respond to another child who asks her a question. 2. Five year old Robin will string 5, 1” beads on a string, by herself. 3. Five year old Justin will follow 2-step directions provided by a familiar adult. 4. Three year-old Rafi will stack 6, 1.5” blocks, by himself. “S O W HAT ?” T EST 45 KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 To determine if a goal is meaningful, the team asks, “What will the ability to accomplish the goal do for this child?” If the team is unable to provide a good answer to the “So what?” test, then the goal is not functional and another goal should be selected. Example: In 12 months, Abbie will respond to the initiations of others (i.e., stay on topic, ask pertinent questions, make related statements) for 2/3 opportunities during daily activities such as circle time and small groups, as measured on 5 consecutive structured observations. So what? 46 G OALS AND O BJECTIVES R ATING I NSTRUMENT (R-GORI) GENERALITY PrettiFrontczak, K. and Bricker, D. 2000 • Does the skill represent a general concept or class of responses? • Can the skill be generalized or demonstrated across a variety of settings, activities materials, and/or people? 47 G ENERALITY E XAMPLES GENERAL NON EXAMPLES Jacobi will negotiate with peers to resolve conflicts. Jacobi will get along with peers during free play. Travarius will demonstrate understanding of 10 different qualitative concepts. Travarius will understand kindergarten science concepts. Kelli will use sentences to express anticipated outcomes. Kelli will meet 60-month communication milestones. 48 G OALS AND O BJECTIVES R ATING I NSTRUMENT (R-GORI) INSTRUCTIONAL CONTEXT PrettiFrontczak, K. and Bricker, D. 2000 • Can the skill be taught across daily activities? • Can the target behavior be taught/addressed by various team members (e.g., teachers, therapists, parents)? 49 E XAMPLES OF I NSTRUCTIONAL C ONTEXT INSTRUCTIONAL CONTEXT BEHAVIORS NON- INSTRUCTIONAL CONTEXT BEHAVIORS Jacobi will demonstrate 1-to-1 Jacobi will count cheerios on correspondence during her plate at snack. activities and games. Travarius will perform a familiar daily job in the classroom. Travarius will follow steps to feed the fish in the classroom. Kelli will use a three point grasp to write her name. Kelli will use a three point grasp to put clothespins in a bottle. S TRANGER T EST 50 KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 Goals should be written so that anyone who is working with the child, including the parents, can understand the goal and use the information to develop appropriate intervention plans and monitor and report the child’s progress. Example: In 12 months, Abbie will respond to the initiations of others (i.e., stay on topic, ask pertinent questions, make related statements) for 2/3 opportunities during daily activities such as circle and small groups, as measured on 5 consecutive structured observations. 51 W HAT D O Y OU T HINK OF T HIS G OAL ? Remember this PLAAFP?: Chris is able to build simple block structures. He can cut on a line when assisted with hand placement on scissors and copy vertical and horizontal lines. He switches the writing utensil from his right to his left hands frequently during all activities. KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 Goal: In 36 weeks, Chris will improve his fine motor skills within the daily classroom routine to a more appropriate age level by meeting the listed benchmarks. W HICH ONE OF THESE GOALS IS NOT MEASUREABLE ? 52 KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 In 36 weeks, Misty will cooperatively play with peers (do the same activities and talk to one another) for at least 5 minutes during childinitiated activities, across at least 3 activities or routines per day, for 5 consecutive days. By December 1, 2010, when given a verbal direction by an adult, Robin will begin to comply with the direction within 10 seconds. 53 T HINGS TO R EMEMBER Goals which use participation as a criteria or focus on a one-time event are not appropriate. • Blake will participate in the field trip…. • Kenya will participate in the holiday skit… Annual goals must reflect observable behavior that can be objectively measured. KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 • Examples - look, give, count, point, name, say, jump, cut, complete, label, reach, request • Non examples – increase, know, improve, understand, try, appreciate, explore 54 M ORE T HINGS TO R EMEMBER A goal may address several needs identified in the PLAAFP. • Although each concern must be addressed in the IEP, there does not need be a 1-to-1 correspondence between concerns and goals. Goals should be written collaboratively rather than by discipline. KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 • Max will sit with peers while engaged in structured, small-group tasks for 20-30 minutes, twice a day, while wearing a deep-pressure vest. 55 L AST T HINGS TO R EMEMBER Goals are not measureable if they do not contain objective conditions and criteria for success • Sophie will engage in problem solving with 85% accuracy. • John will improve his fine motor skills. Measureable annual goals should be based on appropriate activities and linked to standards KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 • Marissa will write her name to teacher satisfaction. • 2 year old Amari will count from 1 to 100 backwards with 80% accuracy. M EASURING P ROGRESS AND R EPORTING TO PARENTS 56 How will the child’s progress be measured? When will the child's progress be measured? How well will the child need to perform to achieve the IEP goals? How often will periodic reports on the child’s progress toward meeting the annual goals be reported to parents? Writing Goals Handouts 3 and 9 Case Study 1 and 2 57 JOSÉ 58 The First IEP: Parent Perspectives I NITIAL IEP M EETING 59 Q UESTIONS A BOUT V IDEO C LIP How did the speech pathologist, as a member of the team, gather information about the child’s development? Did the sample objective contain the 4 components: measurability, functionality, generality, instructional context? OBJECTIVE: When presented with an array of three pictures labeled through partner assisted scanning, Cole will independently indicate preference for an activity by activating a voice output switch at least 5 times a day for 3 consecutive days. T HE IEP: A 6-S TEP P ROCESS 60 1. Gathering Information and Developing Present Level Statements (PLAAFPs) 2. Writing Measurable Annual Goals (MAGs) 3. Writing Short Term Objectives (STOs)/Benchmarks 4. Implementation of the IEP/Development of Activity Matrix 5. Monitoring and Reporting Progress 6. Reviewing and Revising the IEP 61 3. W RITING S HORT T ERM O BJECTIVES /B ENCHMARKS S HORT T ERM O BJECTIVES (STO) AND B ENCHMARKS 62 KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 IDEA 2004 eliminated the requirement to include STOs or benchmarks for each annual goal for preschool children (and any student not taking alternate state assessments). Some LEAs may require them, so it is important to know and follow your district policy. STOs and benchmarks are still considered best practice in monitoring and reporting progress toward the overall goal and teams may use them if they choose. S HORT T ERM O BJECTIVES 63 KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 Define the intermediate steps needed to achieve the goal Are measureable and comprehensive Represent a sequential breakdown of major components of a goal Are general indicators of progress, not a detailed instructional plan Include timeframe, conditions, behavior, and criteria May be sequential or parallel Are written so that each goal has a minimum of two STOs 64 E XAMPLE OF STO S GOAL: In 36 weeks, Kennedy will independently walk across a variety of surfaces (e.g., carpet, grass, cement, dirt) for 15 feet at home, at child care, and in the community, 3 times a day for 2 weeks. STO 1: Kennedy will walk for 15 feet , with assistance (holding onto an adult’s hand or railing), across one type of surface, 3 times a day for 2 weeks PrettiFrontczak, K. and Bricker, D. 2000 STO 2: Kennedy will walk for 15 feet , with assistance (holding onto an adult’s hand or railing), across two types of surfaces, 3 times a day for 2 weeks B ENCHMARKS 65 KITS Technical Assistance Packet - 2006 Define major milestones to accomplish a goal Are measureable Define previously established performance levels Are major milestones or precursor steps Are written in sequential or hierarchical order Include timeframe, condition, and behavior Are written so that each goal has a minimum of two benchmarks Do not include criterion – Can the child do the skill or not? 66 E XAMPLE OF B ENCHMARKS GOAL: In 36 weeks, Kennedy will independently walk across a variety of surfaces (e.g., carpet, grass, cement, dirt) for 15 feet at home, at child care, and in the community, 3 times a day for 2 weeks. 1.1 Kennedy will walk for up to 15 feet holding onto parent’s or teacher’s hand, once a day for 2 weeks 1.2 Kennedy will move around the house and the classroom by holding onto the furniture, 3 times a day for 2 weeks. PrettiFrontczak, K. and Bricker, D. 2000 1.3 Kennedy will pull herself up at home and at child care, twice a day for 2 weeks. 67 A DDITIONAL C OMPONENTS OF THE IEP T HE IEP MUST ALSO C ONTAIN : 68 A statement of: www.nichy.org Special education and related services Supplementary aids and services Program modifications or supports for school personnel Accommodations Service delivery - date, duration, location, frequency Extent of nonparticipation with typically developing peers Educational placement How the child’s progress toward meeting the annual goals will be measured and when reported Consideration of extended school year (ESY) services S PECIAL E DUCATION AND R ELATED S ERVICES 69 www.nichy.org Special education is defined as specially designed instruction to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability. Related services are services that are needed to assist children with disabilities to benefit from special education. Examples include transportation, speechlanguage pathology, audiology services, interpreting services, psychological services, therapeutic recreation, parent training, orientation and mobility services, etc. Programs and services must be based on peerreviewed research, to the extent practical. S UPPLEMENTARY A IDES AND S ERVICES 70 www.nichy.org Outlines the exact nature of specialized services or devices required to enable the child to progress toward annual goals while participating in the general curriculum. Examples include, but are not limited to, electronic communication devices, low-tech devices and aides, preferential seating, peer mediated learning, and computer programs to assist with specific skills. 71 www.nichy.org P ROGRAM M ODIFICATIONS OR S UPPORTS FOR S CHOOL P ERSONNEL Describes modifications and supports needed to help the child advance toward annual goals, provide access to all aspects of the curriculum, and be included with typically developing peers. Examples include, but are not limited to, staff training, physical modifications of the classroom, and individual assistance as determined by the IEP team. A CCOMMODATIONS 72 Handout 10 – Accommodations Individual accommodations are put in place to help children access the general curriculum, meet their IEP goals, or demonstrate what they know. Some examples: www.nichy.org Use visual schedule, visual cues, and social stories Use assistive technology Use a buddy program Use individualized or small group instruction Get child’s attention and stand close when giving instructions S ERVICE D ELIVERY 73 Statement about: www.nichy.org When the services to be provided will begin How often they will be provided Where they will be provided How long they will last 74 E XTENT OF N ONPARTICIPATION www.nichy.org Explanation of the extent, if any, to which the child will NOT participate with typically developing peers in the regular class and in activities already described. 75 E DUCATIONAL P LACEMENTS Each LEA must ensure that, to the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities are educated with children who are nondisabled AND special classes, separate schooling, or other removal of children with disabilities from the regular educational environment occurs ONLY if the nature and severity of the disability is such that education in regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily. www.nichy.org E DUCATIONAL P LACEMENTS 76 www.nichy.org Parents are members of the team that decides the child’s placement. The decision about placement cannot be made until after the IEP team, which includes the parent, reaches consensus about the child’s needs, program, and goals. Placement decisions must be based on a child’s unique needs and IEP, not on administrative convenience, disability/program label, available slots, or allocation of funds. Although the law is clear on this issue, the child’s “label” sometimes drives decisions about services and placement. 77 Accessible IEPs for All P LACEMENT IN THE LRE R EVISIT J ACKS A CTIVITY 78 Handout 11 – Essential Elements of PLAAFPs & MAGs Return to your small groups from the Jacks Activity Look at the PLAAFP and MAG you wrote. Based on what you’ve learned today, do they need to be edited? Edit PLAAFP and MAG as needed. Discuss any special factors that may have influenced the performance of the player (with the PLAAFP and MAG). As a large group, share changes the groups made to their PLAAFPs and MAGs. 79 F OLLOW -U P A CTIVITY See Handout 12 for more information. Complete this follow-up activity and bring to Session 2 or follow the instructions provided by your facilitator. Use the case study on Jillian Morgan provided to develop a PLAAFP and MAG in the personal-social domain. In the next session, be prepared to share how you used the materials from Session 1 in your work. 80 81 C ONTACT I NFORMATION Facilitator information here