8
Competition . . . brings about the only . . . arrangement of social production which is possible. . . . [Otherwise] what guarantee [do] we have that the necessary quantity and not more of each product will be produced, that we shall not go hungry in regard to corn and meat while we are choked in beet sugar and drowned in potato spirit, that we shall not lack trousers to cover our nakedness while buttons flood us in millions?
FRIEDRICH ENGELS (THE FRIEND AND CO-AUTHOR OF KARL MARX)
Contents
●
Perfect Competition Defined
●
The Competitive Firm
●
The Competitive Industry
●
Perfect Competition and Economic
Efficiency
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
Perfect Competition Defined
●
Four Principal Market Types
♦
Perfect competition
♦
Monopolistic competition
♦
Oligopoly
♦
Pure monopoly
Copyright© 2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning All rights reserved.
Perfect Competition Defined
●
Perfect competition
♦
Many small firms and customers
♦
Homogeneous product
♦
Free entry and exit
♦
Well-informed producers and consumers
Copyright© 2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning All rights reserved.
The Competitive Firm
●
Perfect competition
♦
Firm is a price taker.
♦
Price is set in the market.
♦
Firm is too small to affect the market.
Copyright© 2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning All rights reserved.
The Competitive Firm
● The Firm’s Demand Curve under Perfect
Competition
♦
Horizontal
♦
Can sell as much as it wants at the market price.
Copyright© 2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning All rights reserved.
FIGURE
8-1 Demand Curve for a
Firm under Perfect Competition
$3
A B C
Firm’s demand curve
0 1 2 3 4
Truckloads of Corn
Sold by Farmer Jasmine per Year
(a)
$3
D Industry supply curve
E
S
Industry demand curve
0
S
D
100 200 300 400
Total Sales in Chicago in Thousands of Truckloads per Year
(b)
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
The Competitive Firm
●
Short-Run Equilibrium for the Perfectly
Competitive Firm
♦
Marginal revenue = price
♦
Profit-maximizing level of output: marginal cost = price
♦
MC = MR
Copyright© 2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning All rights reserved.
TABLE
8-1 Revenues, Costs, and
Profits of a Competitive Firm
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
The Competitive Firm
●
D = MR = AR at all levels of output
●
D = MR = AR = MC at the equilibrium level of output
Copyright© 2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning All rights reserved.
FIGURE
8-2 S-R Equilibrium of the Competitive Firm
$3.00
2.25
1.50
0
B
MC AC
D = MR = AR
A
50,000
Bushels of Corn per Year
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
Short-Run Profit: Graphic
Representation
●
The MC = P condition does not show if the firm is making a profit or incurring a loss.
●
Compare price (average revenue) with average cost to calculate profit or loss per unit.
●
The profit-maximizing output may lead to a loss, but if so it is the minimum possible loss.
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
FIGURE
8-3 S-R Equilibrium of
Competitive Firm w/Lower Price
MC AC
$2.25
1.50
0
A
B D = MR = P
30,000
Bushels of Corn per Year
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
Short-Run Profit: Graphic
Representation
●
The MC = P condition does not show if the firm is making a profit or incurring a loss.
●
Compare price (average revenue) with average cost to calculate profit or loss per unit.
●
The profit-maximizing output may lead to a loss, but if so it is the minimum possible loss.
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
Shutdown and Break-Even
Analysis
●
Rule 1: The firm will make a profit if total revenue (TR) > total cost (TC)
●
Should not plan to shut down in either the short run or the long run.
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
Shutdown and Breakeven
Analysis
●
Rule 2: Even if TR < TC, the firm should continue to operate in the short run as long as TR > TVC.
●
If TR > TVC, the firm can at least pay some of its fixed costs.
●
The firm should close in the long run if TR
< TC.
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
TABLE
8-2 The Shutdown
Decision
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
Shutdown and Breakeven
Analysis
●
The competitive firm will produce nothing unless price lies above the minimum point on the AVC curve.
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
FIGURE
8-4 Shutdown Analysis
P
3
P
2
P
1
B
A
MC
AC
AVC
P
3
P
2
P
1
0
Quantity Supplied
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
The Competitive Firm’s Short-run
Supply Curve
●
Horizontal
individual supply curves
market supply curve
●
Method analogous to the construction of a market demand curve from individual demand curves.
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
FIGURE
8-5 Derivation of the
Industry Supply Curve s
$3.00
2.25 c e s
45 50
Quantity Supplied in
Thousands of Bushels
(a)
S
$3.00
2.25
C
E
S
45 50
Quantity Supplied in
Millions of Bushels
(b)
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
The Competitive Industry
● The Competitive Industry’s Short-Run
Supply Curve
♦
A competitive industry has a stable equilibrium at the output where supply equals demand.
♦
The competitive industry (unlike the competitive firm) faces a downward sloping demand curve.
Copyright© 2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning All rights reserved.
FIGURE
8-6 Supply-Demand
Equil. of a Competitive Industry
S
D
$3.75
3.00
2.25
C
E
A
D
S
0 45 50
Quantity of Corn in
Millions of Bushels
72
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
The Competitive Industry
●
Industry Equilibrium in the Short Run
♦
Economic costs include opportunity costs, so zero economic profit means that firms are earning the normal, economy-wide rate of profit.
♦
Freedom of entry and exit guarantee this result in the long run under perfect competition.
Copyright© 2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning All rights reserved.
The Competitive Industry
●
Industry and Firm Equilibrium in the Long
Run
♦
In the long run, firms enter or exit the industry in response to profits or losses.
♦
This shifts the supply curve and the price until profits are zero.
♦
In long-run, competitive equilibrium, P = MC =
AC.
Copyright© 2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning All rights reserved.
FIGURE
8-7 A Shift in the Industry
Supply Curve
$3.00
2.25
D
S
0
(1,000 firms)
S
0
(1,600 firms)
S
1
E
A
F
S
1
D
50 72
Quantity of Corn in
Millions of Bushels
80
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
FIGURE
8-8 The Competitive Firm and the Competitive Industry
$3.00
2.25
Firm
MC
AC a e b
40 45 50
Quantity of Corn in
Thousands of Bushels
(a)
D
0
D
1
$3.00
2.25
D
S
0
Industry
(1,000 firms)
S
0
(1,600 firms)
S
1
E
A
D
S
1
50
Quantity of Corn in
Millions of Bushels
(b)
72
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
FIGURE
8-9 L-R Equilibrium of the
Competitive Firm and Industry
Industry Firm
MC
D
AC
$1.87 m
40
Quantity of Corn in
Thousands of Bushels
(a)
D
2 $1.87
S
2
Quantity of Corn in
Millions of Bushels
(b)
83
M
(2,075 firms)
S
2
D
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
The Competitive Industry
●
The Long-Run Industry Supply Curve
■
The long-run supply curve of the competitive industry is also the industry’s long-run average cost curve.
■
The industry is driven to that supply curve by the entry or exit of firms and by the adjustment of firms already in the industry.
Copyright© 2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning All rights reserved.
FIGURE
8-10 S-R Industry Supply and L-R Industry Average Cost
S
LRAC
B
$2.62
1.50
S
A
0 70
Output in
Millions of Bushels of Corn
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
Perfect Competition and
Economic Efficiency
●
In the long run, competitive firms are driven to produce at the minimum point of their average cost curves.
●
In this case, output is produced at the lowest possible cost to society.
Copyright© 2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning All rights reserved.
TABLE
8-3 Avg. Cost for the Firm and Total Cost for the Industry
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
?
Which is Better to Cut
Pollution: Carrot or Stick?
●
The analysis of perfect competition can be used to show that, if firms are offered a subsidy to reduce their polluting emissions, the industry is likely to increase its emissions, because of free entry.
Copyright© 2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning All rights reserved.
FIGURE
8-11 Taxes vs Subsidies as Incentives to Cut Pollution
T
X
S
D
B
E
A
T
X
S
D
0 Q b
Q e
Output
Q a
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.