Documentary Films What is your understanding of documentary? 1 Roger and Me (1989) was a huge success leading to more films, a career in documentary film-making and so far his two greatest documentary successes are: Bowling for Columbine (2002) and Fahrenheit 9/11 (2004) See www.michaelmoore.com 2 3 Q? What kinds of pleasures are being promised here? 4 Born 1954 Flint, Michigan, United States Father & Grandfather worked in GM plant Dropped out of Uni. to become journalist & political activist, first in Flint, then in San Francisco where he was fired & used his settlement money, as well as selling his house, to finance his first film .. Roger and Me (1989) Michael Moore 5 Explicitly intended to defeat George W. Bush’s attempt to gain presidency for 2nd time by exploring his role in the events surrounding 9/11. To date, it has made more money than any other documentary film ever: $119,194,771 (lifetime gross) *Ranked 5th most controversial film* Sicko ranks 4th most successful documentary with $24,540,079 Bowling for Columbine (United Artists) ranks 6th most successful documentary & achieved $21,576,018 & *22nd most controversial film* Moore’s films are openly rhetorical ie. up-front about wanting to persuade their audiences of a particular position. Controversy 6 Mobilising US political opinion? 7 The massive commercial success of Fahrenheit 9/11 & Bowling for Columbine was a revelation to many in an era when it was argued that documentary was outmoded. At the same time, there was a growing appetite for ‘nature’ or ‘wildlife’ documentaries (eg. BBC’s The Blue Planet 2001) & drama-docs such as ‘Touching the Void’ (UK 2003) ‘Postdocumentary times’ (Corner 2002) 8 John Corner, an academic expert on documentary argues that we are now in a ‘postdocumentary culture of television’ and also refers to a ‘new ecology of the factual’ (2002) In its traditional, serious sense, documentary is said to be weakened by 3 things: Extensive borrowing of its realistic ‘look’ Strengthening of a performative, playful element within factual programmes 3. Shift in the broader culture towards more emphasis on individual consumers 1. 2. John Corner 9 Recording of events Interviews (Marilyn Manson, Charlton Heston) Other materials eg. Charts, maps, cartoons, archive footage, use of statistics Voiceovers and music More controversially, the ‘performance’ of documenting Some of Moore’s techniques ... 10 How are spectators to assess his presence and performance in these films? How fair & accurate are the arguments he puts together, both explicitly and implicitly (ie. cartoons, music, etc)? Key Questions ... 11 Clearly his presence is a key component in the success of his documentaries, using smart comments and humour Performs the role of ‘Joe-Ordinary’ with his scruffy appearance, baseball cap & commonsense questioning style This strategy was particularly effective at the time when multimillionaire George W. Bush was presenting himself as ‘JoeOrdinary’ Puts him in touch with a large and involved fanbase (partly from his 1990s TV programmes TV Nation 1994/1995) In September 2008, Moore released his first free online film, Slacker Uprising, documenting his personal crusade to encourage more Americans to vote in presidential elections, as a thank you to his loyal followers since Roger & Me Some of the extraordinary footage in F9/11 came from ‘embeds’ – US soldiers in Iraq who trusted him from his previous work and contacted him about the abuses and sights they had seen Moore’s performances 12 Some objections to Moore as a performer in his documentaries include: He hogs the limelight That he ‘stages’ encounters such as with Charlton Heston in Bowling for Columbine Can be perceived as a threatening presence; willing to say anything to anyone (for performance purposes) The documentarist openly showing how his film has been constructed and therefore changed in the making Criticisms of his work 13 His style of ‘setting people up’, knowing they will look ridiculous on screen raises ethical issues This can also stop discussion of more complex debates eg. The systematic gendering of violence in Bowling for Columbine (See Katz, Jay 1999, Tough Guise: Violence, Media and the Crisis in Masculinity) All these issues relate to how far Moore can be said to present fair and accurate arguments Criticisms continued ... 14 But ... This is not the same as his right to argue and present a position as a documentarist. Watch for this distinction: some still assume that documentaries should have the same aspirations as news which is not the same genre. However, there is an obligation to be as fair and accurate as possible , even when arguing passionately! 15 Finally, for you to follow up ... List the number of issues Moore deals with in F9/11 or Bowling for Columbine Explore the statistics he cites using anti-Moore websites (eg. www.bowlingfortruth.com) as well as his rebuttals on his website How far do you agree with the criticisms of Moore’s performances and methods? 16