Adolescent Intimate Partner Violence: Personality Characteristics & Treatment Implications Anthony F. Tasso, Ph.D. Fairleigh Dickinson University Abusiveness in Adolescent Relationships Jealousy Possessiveness Splitting Violence towards non-dating family/peers Rush into relationships Blame Forced isolation Abusiveness ranges from one-time incident to repeated violence Physical, verbal, and sexual abuse Abusive Characteristics (Dutton, 1998) Overcontrolled vs. Undercontrolled Impulsive vs. Instrumental Undercontrolled & Instrumental – psychopathic traits Undercontrolled & Impulsive – Borderline traits Overcontrolled & Impulsive or Instrumental – Avoidant or psychopathic traits Typologies of Adolescent Dating Violence (Foshee et al., 2007) Adolescent females Type 1: Patriarchal terrorism response Type 2: Anger response Type 3: Ethic enforcement Type 4: First-time aggression response Adolescent males Type 1: Escalation prevention Remaining: disparate abusive subtypes Typologies of Adolescent Dating Violence, cont. Conclusions Highlights the range of abusive proclivities, motives, patterns Suggests non-gender specific abusive perpetration Limitations Self-reporting Lack of “patriarchal terroristic” male abusers Implications: no “typical” adolescent perpetrator Developmental Antecedents of Abusive Personalities Psychological Societal Factors Factors Origins of Rage (Dutton, 1998) Melanie Klein & Joan Riviere (1964) – Love, Hate, and Reparation -rage due to extreme ambivalence following protracted frustration resulting in defensive projection, splitting, denial, and omnipotence Eugene Monick (1991) – Castration and Male Rage: The Phallic Wound -rage due to “castration” from father, mother, and/or society Attachment Rage (Dutton, 1998) John Bowlby (1963) and Mary Ainsworth (1978) Attachment’s 3 principles: 1) alarm activates attachment behavioral system 2) when activated need physical contact 3) prolonged activation causes anger *Unhealthy attachment results in sense of shame Attachment Rage-Anger Born Out of Fear (Dutton, 1998) Response to protracted separation Protest Despair Detachment Shame and Anger (Wallace & Nosko, 2002) (Lewis, 1971, 1987; Morrison, 1989; Nathanson, 1987, 1989, 1992; Kohut, 1978; Miller, 1981) -Piers & Singer (1953) “behind the feeling of shame stands not the fear of hatred but fear of contempt which, on and even deeper level of the unconscious, spells the fear of abandonment” - Erich Fromm (1956) – “the awareness of human separation, without the reunion by love, is the source of shame” Societal Factors Objectification Socialization Generational/Cyclical Media (television, video games, print, etc.) “Tough Guise” (Katz, 2000) Treatment/Intervention - Goals Accountability (intrinsic vs. extrinsic) Emotional Regulation Education of Dynamics of DV Proactive Problem Solving Treatment (Sonkin & Dutton, 2002) - Client/patient feels safe for personal exploration - Explore current relations with attachment figures - Explore transference w/ therapist Treatment, cont. Recreation of genuine social settings “Group mandated” accountability Group cohesion Emotional/affective/behavioral contagion “Vicarious detoxification” of shaming experiences Some confrontation needed Contact Information Anthony F. Tasso, Ph.D. Department of Psychology Fairleigh Dickinson University 285 Madison Ave (M-AB2-01) Madison, NJ 07940 Phone: (973) 443-8094 Fax: (973) 443-8562 Email: atasso@fdu.edu