Situation 1

advertisement

Clinical Trial Contracting

Negotiations to Compliance

N C U R A W E S T E R N R E G I O N A L M E E T I N G

P r e s e n t e r s :

E r i k L i u m , P h . D .

D i r e c t o r , I n d u s t r y C o n t r a c t s

U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a S a n F r a n c i s c o

L e w i s B a r b i e r i

D i r e c t o r , O f f i c e o f R e s e a r c h a n d C o n t r a c t A n a l y s i s

U n i v e r s i t y o f A r i z o n a , T u c s o n , A Z

Overview

P R I M E R

 F O C U S O N I N D U S T R Y F U N D E D C L I N I C A L T R I A L S

INDUSTRY-SPONSORED

INVESTIGATOR-AUTHORED

NOT FOCUSING ON DEVICE TRIALS

A D D ’ L F O C U S O N C O M P L I A N C E

I N T E R A C T I V E S E S S I O N

The Basics

R E G U L A T O R Y B O D I E S

P A R T I E S A N D F U N C T I O N S

T Y P I C A L C O N T R A C T I N G S I T U A T I O N S

Regulatory Bodies

• W H I C H B O D I E S G O V E R N C L I N I C A L T R I A L R E S E A R C H ?

• W H I C H R U L E S A N D R E G U L A T I O N S C O N T R O L S A I D

R E S E A R C H ?

• H O W A R E T H E S E R E Q U I R E M E N T S I M P L E M E N T E D A N D

E N F O R C E D ?

Clinical Trial Phases

After promising treatments are explored in animal and/or laboratory studies, researchers perform clinical trials. Once the drug, device or procedure enters the clinical trials process, it must go through several phases:

Phase I

Phase II

Phase III

Phase IV trials determine the safety of a new treatment trials determine efficacy and dosing for a new treatment trials study whether a new treatment is better than standard treatment trials find more information about a new treatment that has been already approved for use in patients

Institution Review Board – “IRB”

 An Institutional Review Board is a group that has been formally designated to approve, monitor, and review research involving humans with an aim of protecting the rights and welfare of the subjects.

 FDA Regulations state the requirements for Institutional Review

Boards

 These requirements are stated in the Code of Federal Regulations:

21 CFR Part 56, subparts A-D

 At any time, the FDA can audit/inspect an Institutional Review Board for compliance with said regulations and issue findings on the audit

Health Insurance Portability and

Accountability Act – “HIPAA”

 HIPAA establishes regulations for the use and disclosure of Protected

Health Information (PHI).

PHI is any information about health status, provision of health care, or payment for health care that can be linked to an individual. This is interpreted rather broadly and includes any part of a patient’s medical record or payment history.

 Entities must disclose PHI to the individual patient within 30 days upon request. They also must disclose PHI when required to do so by law, such as reporting suspected abuse to state child welfare agencies.

 Entities may also disclose PHI to facilitate treatment, payment, or health care operations or if the covered entity has obtained authorization from

the individual.

When a covered entity discloses any PHI, it must make a reasonable effort to disclose only the minimum necessary information required to achieve its purpose.

FDA Investigator Financial Disclosure

 This disclosure requires that the Principal Investigator certifies that s/he does not have a significant financial holding in the company with which he wishes to contract.

 This helps to avoid conflict of interest situations in which the Investigator’s data may be called into question because of financial interest in the company.

 Financial Arrangements that require disclosure include:

Compensation made to the investigator in which the value of compensation could be affected by study outcome.

A proprietary interest in the tested product, including, but not limited to, a patent, trademark, copyright or licensing agreement.

Any equity interest in the sponsor of a covered study, i.e., any ownership interest, stock options, or other financial interest whose value cannot be readily determined through reference to public prices.

Any equity interest in a publicly held company that exceeds $50,000 in value.

Significant payments of other sorts, which are payments that have a cumulative monetary value of

$25,000 or more made by the sponsor of a covered study to the investigator or the investigators' institution to support activities of the investigator exclusive of the costs of conducting the clinical study or other clinical studies, (e.g., a grant to fund ongoing research, compensation in the form of equipment or retainers for ongoing consultation or honoraria) during the time the clinical investigator is carrying out the study and for 1 year following completion of the study.

Clinical Trial Contracting

• W H O A R E T H E P A R T I E S T O A C L I N I C A L T R I A L ?

• W H A T T H E P A R T I E S N E E D T O N E G O T I A T E ?

• W H A T I S T H E A P P R O V A L P R O C E S S F O R T H E F I N A L

D O C U M E N T ?

Clinical Trial Overview

Sponsor

• Develops Protocol

• Provides Contractual and Budgetary guidelines to Contract Research Organization (CRO)

CRO

• Negotiates Investigator Budget with University

• Negotiates Clinical Trial Terms and Conditions with University

• Pays University through funding supplied by Sponsor

• Monitors study sites for source document comparison and Case Report Form Retrieval

University

• Sends invoices to CRO

• Sends final data to Sponsor or CRO Designee

• Indemnified by Sponsor (usually through a Letter of Indemnification)

Common “sticking points” between Sponsors/CROs and

Universities in Contract Negotiation

Confidentiality

• Protection of

Sponsor

Confidential

Information

• Maintenance of

Patient Records

Intellectual

Property

• Sponsor Protocol

• University Idea

• Who should own it?

Publication

• When can results be published?

• Why can publication be delayed?

• What about multicenter publications?

Indemnification

• Some Universities cannot reciprocate

Sponsor indemnification, even for University employee’s misconduct.

Contract Process: Clinical Trial Agreements (“CTAs”)

SPS/ORCA Interaction

Routing the Draft

Agreement

• Agreement comes to

Investigator or Contract Office

• Investigator forwards agreement to Contract Office

Tracking the Agreement

• Sponsored Programs logs agreement into University database as a draft

Negotiating the Agreement

• Contract Office contacts

Sponsor for purpose of negotiating terms of CDAs and

CTAs

Negotiating the Agreement

• Works as needed with:

• Investigator

• Office of Technology Transfer

• Office of General Counsel

• Risk Management

Pending Finalization

• Sponsored Programs receives internal routing documents and fully approved budget

Signing the Agreement

• Upon receipt of routing documents, Contracting Office executes the agreement, and forwards copies to Investigator and Study Coordinator

Typical CTA Contracting

Situations

• W H O W R I T E S T H E P R O T O C O L ?

• W H O P R O V I D E S I N D E M N I T Y ?

• H O W A R E T H E P A R T I E S B O U N D T O T H E A G R E E M E N T

T E R M S ?

Situation 1

UA and Pharmaceutical

Company enter into a contractual agreement

Pharma Co writes the

Protocol

Pharma Co offers UA full indemnification

Traditional Sponsored Clinical Trial Agreement

Pharma

Company

Protocol

Indemnity

Contract

University of Arizona

Traditional Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trial

Situation 2

UA and Pharmaceutical

Company enter into a contractual agreement

University PI writes the

Protocol

Pharma Company indemnifies UA: limited to manufacturing defects in the drug and use of the Study results

Pharma

Company

Indemnity

Contract

University of Arizona

Protocol

Situation 3

UA and Coordinating

Institution enter into a contractual agreement

(Subcontract)

Coordinating Institution has an agreement with the

Pharma Company (Prime

Award): Terms flow down to the Subcontract (IP,

Publication,

Confidentiality)

Coordinating Institution PI writes the Protocol

Each Institution is responsible for its own acts and omissions

Pharma Co indemnifies UA for manufacturing defects in the drug and use of the

Study results

Incoming IIR Subcontract through Coordinating

Institution

Pharma

Company

Coordinating

Institution

Protocol

Contract

(Subcontract)

Responsibility

University of

Arizona

Situation 4

UA and Pharmaceutical

Company enter into a contractual agreement

Coordinating Institution has an agreement with the Pharma Company

Coordinating Institution

PI writes the Protocol

Each Institution is responsible for its own acts and omissions as agreed in a letter of responsibility

Pharma Co indemnifies

UA for manufacturing defects in the drug and use of the Study results

Incoming IIR Contract: Other Institution’s Protocol

Pharma

Company

Coordinating

Institution

Protocol

Letter of Responsibility

University of

Arizona

Outgoing IIR Subcontract through UA

Situation 5

UA and Pharmaceutical

Company enter into a contractual agreement

(Prime Award): Terms flow down to the

Subcontract (IP,

Publication,

Confidentiality)

UA has an agreement with the Other Institution

(Subcontract)

University PI writes the

Protocol

Each Institution is responsible for its own acts and omissions

Pharma Co indemnifies

UA for manufacturing defects in the drug and use of the Study results

Other

Institution

University of Arizona

Protocol

Pharma

Company

Compliance Overview…

• F E D E R A L A N T I - K I C K B A C K S T A T U T E

F E D E R A L F A L S E C L A I M S A C T

R E G I S T R A T I O N O F C L I N I C A L T R I A L S

Federal Anti-Kickback Statute …

Purpose:

To protect patients and federal health care programs from fraud and abuse

Summary:

Prohibits the solicitation, receipt, offer or payment of remuneration “in return for” or “to induce” the referral of program related business, arranging for, or recommending, the purchase, lease, or ordering of any item or service reimbursed by a federal healthcare program

Penalties:

Civil:

Fines up to $50,000

Exclusion from federal health care programs

Criminal:

Felony

Up to five years in prison

Fines up to $25,000

20

Anti-Kickback: Trial Risks …

Direct payments to investigators

Incentives for investigators (i.e. exotic meeting locations)

Unbudgeted payments

Financial COI

Study biases (i.e. site selection, prescribing…)

Excess funds

Study merit

21

Anti-Kickback: Trial Risks & Solutions…

Direct payments to investigators

Institutional financial management

Incentives for investigators (i.e. exotic meeting locations)

Institutional contracting

Unbudgeted payments

Institutional financial management

Financial COI

Published and enforced COI policies

Study biases (i.e. site selection, prescribing, …)

IRB and training

Excess funds

Fair market value pricing

Published policies on the disposition of excess funds

Study merit

IRB review and approval

22

Federal False Claims Act …

Purpose:

To counteract fraudulent billing of the federal government

Summary:

Implicates anyone who knowingly submit claims … in order to obtain payment of a false or fraudulent claim by the federal government

Intent to defraud is not required

Qui Tam / Whistleblower Law

Penalties:

Civil:

Treble damages per false claim, plus

Civil penalties of $5,500 to $11,000 per false claim

Criminal penalties:

Predicated on willful violations

23

False Claims: Risks …

 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS):

Medicare basics

Routine clinical services vs. investigational clinical services

Qualified clinical trials

Double billing or billing for items covered by the Sponsor

Secondary Payor (MSP)

24

False Claims: Medicare Basics …

 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS):

Medicare general coverage:

Items and services that are reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury

Clinical Trial National Coverage Determination (NCD)

Coverage:

Items or services provided pursuant to trials if the items or services would otherwise be covered outside of a trial

Routine clinical services of qualified clinical trials

“Standard of Care” is not a defined term

Exceptions apply

25

False Claims: Routine Services…

Routine clinical services (covered):

Items and services covered outside of a trial

Items and services used for direct patient management in a trial

Items or services required solely for the provision of the investigational item or service (i.e. infusion of experimental chemotherapeutic)

Items or services required for the prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of complications related to an investigational item or service

Investigational clinical services (not covered):

Items and services being investigated as a trial objective

26

False Claims: Qualifying Clinical Trials …

 Qualifying Clinical Trials (QCT):

Two-part test:

Part 1: (all three criteria are required)

Trial must investigate an item or service for which Medicare pays

Trial must enroll patients with diagnosed disease

Trial must have therapeutic intent

Part 2: (1 out of 5 criteria required) a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

Trial funded by AHRQ, CMS, CDC, DOD, NIH or VA

Trials supported by cooperatives supported by the agencies listed in “a”

Trials conducted under an IND

Trials conducted under an IND exemption

Trials conducted under the Coverage with Evidence Development process (rare)

27

False Claims: Non-QCT …

Non-Qualifying Clinical Trials

Nutraceuticals / Vitamins

Preventative care studies

Phase I drug studies

Studies funded by non-qualifying government agencies

Some investigator-initiated studies

Routine Clinical Care under non-qualifying studies

Not covered when conducted under a NQT

28

False Claims: Secondary Payor …

 Medicare Secondary Payor (MSP)

Under MSP, a Medicare payment "may not be made . . . with respect to any item or service to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made" under a primary plan.

Example contract language:

Unacceptable: “In the event Site is not reimbursed for routine clinical services contemplated in the Protocol, Site may remit an invoice to Sponsor.“

Acceptable: “Sponsor will be charged for items and services pursuant to the study that are not routine clinical services.

29

False Claims: Solution …

Determine whether a trial is a “Qualified Clinical Trial”

Convert trial protocol into a series of events

Perform a coverage analysis to identify

Routine clinical services

Investigational clinical services

Identify coverage exceptions

Align the informed consent, budget, contract and planned billing practices

Eliminate double billing, and billing for items covered by sponsor

Eliminate contract language implicating MSP

Coordinate with charge capture / billing

30

False Claims: Cases …

 Rush University Medical Center Settlement: Improper Medicare

Billing in Clinical Trials Under September 2000 NCD

On December 8, 2005, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois reached a settlement with Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, under which Rush agreed to repay approximately $1 million to the federal and state governments for inappropriate clinical trials charges submitted to Medicare and

Medicaid. According … these charges relate to services and items provided … to patients enrolled in oncology clinical trials. …voluntary disclosure by Rush to federal authorities.

 University Of Alabama-birmingham will Pay U.S. $3.39 Million to

Resolve False Billing Allegations

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The University of Alabama at Birmingham and two related entities will pay the United States $3.39 million to settle allegations that they violated the False Claims Act with respect to claims submitted in connection with the school's health science research activities.

31

Registration of Trials: FDA …

 FDA Amendments Act (Public Law 110-05)

Definition of clinical trial:

Biologics: controlled, clinical investigations, other than Phase I investigations, of a product subject to FDA regulations

Devices: controlled trials with health outcomes, other than small feasibility studies, and pediatric post-market surveillance

When must registration be completed:

Within 21 days of 1 st subject being enrolled

When must a registration be updated:

Annually or within 30 days of any change in recruitment status or the completion of the study

Penalties:

Civil monetary penalties

Loss of federal funding

More information:

 http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-08-014.html

32

Registration of Trials: ICMJE …

 Int’l Council of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)

Definition of clinical trail:

Any … study that prospectively assigns human participants … to one or more health-related interventions to evaluate … health outcomes.

Interventions include drugs, surgical procedures, devices, behavioral treatments, process-of-care changes, and the like.

When must registration be completed:

Prior to enrolling the 1 st subject

When must a registration be updated:

Every 6 months

Penalties:

Publication of research results may be blocked by affiliate journals (NJM,

JAMA, Lancet, …)

More information:

 http://www.icmje.org/index.html#clin_trials

33

Download