The Taboo of Disclosure
DVD, Book, e-Book and Booklets
http://tinyurl.com/911dvds
http://tinyurl.com/911ftb
Sold at Close to Cost Price:
DVD
– 50p
E-book - Free Download
Booklets (4) – 30p
Paperback - £8
2
wheredidthetowersgo.com
3
Introduction
In this presentation, we will look at how important
knowledge and research is covered up.
We will start off with a blatant example of how
Academia ignores “problematic” physical evidence,
despite claiming to be interested in it.
We will then look at something I have spoken about
a number of times – key aspects of what happened
on 9/11, as catalogued by Dr Judy Wood.
We will look at how these events were caused by
something with similar characteristics to a known
technology.
We will name that technology.
We will briefly look at its possible relevance to the
Crop Circle phenomenon.
4
This Could Be Upsetting
to Some People…
Due to importance – of the evidence I
will be discussing, I will be clearly
naming certain individuals – because
of what they have said, or because of
what they have not said.
This will not make me popular – so I
am faced with the problem of being
unpopular in this “happy family” of
researchers – but my goal is…
TO TELL THE TRUTH
AS I KNOW IT
5
Ignoring, Misquoting, Getting it Wrong
I will then present the data that shows that,
all too often, a number of well-known
researchers behave “erratically” when it
comes to discussing already-explained 911
phenomena – which seem to have a direct
relevance to their own fields of research.
I will attempt to show that this activity goes
beyond “lack of knowledge” of the topic, goes
beyond ego and goes beyond a simple “lack
of awareness”.
I will conclude that these researchers are
themselves, in some cases knowingly,
participating in a cover up.
I have called this The Taboo of Disclosure.
6
Starchild Skull
Starchild Skull - Physical
Evidence Wilfully Ignored
I wanted to show this as an example of how
the mainstream handle certain “difficult”
topics.
Whilst we can expect this sort of behaviour
from mainstream academics, I will also
illustrate similar behaviour by so-called
open-minded “Alternative Knowledge”
researchers.
This first example pertains to the Starchild
Skull, which was featured in a UFO Hunters
Documentary which aired in 2009.
In this clip, some of the statements about
the DNA are a bit out of date, but that does
not matter in relation to what it illustrates.
David Aguilar
8
Academia Runs Away From the Evidence
In the clip, when Aguilar is pontificating wisely about
the evolution of alien life. He says
"I'd love to bring one of these guys into a real lab and have
everybody take a look at it"
They then show him the Starchild Skull lithographic
copy. Burnes suggests it could be a human hybrid.
Aguilar says
"prove it".
Is that that same as saying “Yikes! Actually, I DON’T
want to take this into the lab and have everybody
look at it because I would be ‘finished’”?
9
Running Away from The Evidence
This example shows how someone expresses
apparent interest in the evidence, then runs in the
opposite direction when shown a clearly compelling
example of world-changing evidence.
In the case of the video clip, it is sort of
understandable - as a Harvard Scientist is involved.
We will, in studying evidence from the events of
9/11, see very similar behaviour in (supposedly)
more open-minded researchers – not embedded in a
University System.
10
Some Key Evidence from the
Events of 911
Dr Judy Wood – She Opened the Box
In approximately November 2006, Dr Judy Wood
started to become more well known in relation to
evidence that she had posted on a website
regarding the destruction of the WTC Complex on
911. She had already been studying those events
for about 5 years.
She had already determined that some type of
energy phenomenon must have been at work –
because the evidence she catalogued could not
be explained fully by any other mechanism.
Over the next 18 approximately months,
approximately, she completed further research,
eventually determining some aspects of how the
towers were destroyed.
It is these aspects which many researchers either
ignore, misquote, “cannot understand” or
“muddle up” with other things.
12
Is This A Building Which Is Collapsing?
13
source: HereIsNY
source: GJS
Video Clips of Towers Turning to
Dust (Video Clip)
14
What Technology Can do this?
Steel turns to dust….
http://www.drjudywood.com/
15
What Technology Can Do This?
80-90% of 2 if the worlds tallest buildings disappeared in 20
seconds… Where is the rubble?
http://www.drjudywood.com/
16
A Similar Technology…
The Hutchison Effect
“The Hutchison Effect -- An Explanation – by Mark A. Solis -February 16, 1999. (Edited for this slide)
First of all, the Hutchison Effect is a collection of
phenomena which were discovered accidentally by John
Hutchison during attempts to study the longitudinal waves
of Tesla back in 1979. The Hutchison Effect occurs as the
result of radio wave interferences in a zone of spatial
volume encompassed by high voltage sources, usually a
Van de Graff generator, and two or more Tesla coils. The
effects produced include:
Levitation of heavy objects,
Fusion of dissimilar materials such as metal and wood
Anomalous heating of metals without burning adjacent
material
Spontaneous fracturing of metals (which separate by
sliding in a sideways fashion),
Temporary and permanent changes in the crystalline
structure and physical properties of metals.
The levitation of heavy objects by the Hutchison Effect is
not the result of simple electrostatic or electromagnetic
levitation. Challengers should note that their apparatus
must be limited to the use of 75 Watts of power from a 120
Volt AC outlet, as that is all that is used by Hutchison's
apparatus to levitate a 60-pound cannon ball.
18
Col John Alexander Knows.
http://www.johnbalexander.com/biography
J Alexander – 26 Apr 2004 on
American Antigravity
LT GEN Dick Trefry, Military Asst to
19boss
President GHW Bush, and my
as US Army The Inspector General
Weird Fires
See: http://tinyurl.com/911hestudy/
20
Bent Beams
See: http://tinyurl.com/911hestudy/
21
Levitation Effects on 9/11
Dr Judy Wood has catalogued some of the results of levitation
effects seen on 911 (I came across one or 2 others).
http://www.drjudywood.com/
John Hutchison Levitation
Demonstration 01 Nov 2008 –
at his Vancouver Apartment
Shortly after 9/11 (How did
the NYPD car get inverted?)
22
Levitation Effects on 9/11
See: http://tinyurl.com/911hestudy/
File no 9110506 - Michael Macko (P4 - P5) I realized I couldn't
get out from under the collapse. I dove under an ESU truck
that was facing north on the west side of West Street. I dove
under that and waited for the building to come down. When
the building did come down, I actually thought I was trapped,
and the truck was blown off me, pushed off me, I guess. It was
not there. At that point I was just really shocked and didn't
know what was going on at that point. I didn't know -- I was
really, really shocked.)
File No. 9110075 - RENE DAVILA - While we're walking I
realize that we only have two people. I see my vehicle. The
seats are covered. I've still got my bag. I hold it like a trophy.
Like people collect basketballs. I haven't touched -- whatever
the force was, it was so strong that it went inside of the bag.
23
More Taboo – Weather and 9-11
Hurricane Erin – Closest to NYC about
8am on 9/11/01
See http://www.drjudywood.com/
24
The Path of Hurricane Erin
Why did it travel more or less in a straight
line towards New York City after it passed
Bermuda?
25
6 Magnetometers in Alaska and the First
“Impact” – What Caused the Readings?
8:46 am WTC 1 Gets Hole
26
Connecting 9/11 to the
UFO/ET Issue
Sequestered Advanced Technologies
Area 51 – the size of Switzerland – What is there?
Other mysterious areas include:
Dugway Proving Grounds (Utah, USA)
Dulce, New Mexico
Pine Gap (Australia)
Denver Airport
Colonel Corso’s Book “The Day After Roswell” suggests
certain technologies were “given” to certain
companies. Don Schmitt has suggest Battelle
(Memorial) Institute may have been given a sample of
the “morphing metal”.
Anti-gravity, free energy and advanced space travel
technology all seem to have been developed.
The evidence from 9/11 shows effects of antigravity
and advanced energy technology – no question.
William Pawlec’s testimony from year 2000 – only
released last year by Steven Greer under the
Disclosure Project umbrella – mentions a “shadowy”
but powerful group seemed to “step in” to various
projects Pawlec was involved with.
28
SAIC-Science Applications
International Corporation
Mentioned by a number of Disclosure Project
Witnesses as significant benefactors of Black
Budget Programs
Named as a party in Dr Judy Wood’s Qui Tam case
(science fraud) as they were paid for contributions
to the NIST reports (helped including equations in
some of the documents).
Manufacturers of Directed Energy Weapons
Systems/Components
SAIC In charge of ground zero security from
13.11.01
Another Specialty is Psychological Operations…
This brings us to…
29
Links between NIST and Contractors
that Do Directed Energy R & D
The National Institute for Standards in
Technology produced about 10,000 pages of
reports regarding the destruction of the
WTC.
They used several big Defence Contractors
such as SAIC, ARA. Also Boeing will have
needed to supply data.
NIST should have known that Applied
Research Associates (ARA) is a ‘significant
manufacturer of directed energy weapons
and/or components thereof’
SAIC – Science Applications International
Corp.
Boeing – Manufacturer of Aircraft used in
ABL
30
Kirtland AFB Responds to
Wood / Leaphart
“You report phenomena
that we cannot explain
here, either because we
don't have enough data or
because the phenomena
are not within our area of
expertise.”
Kirtland AFB did not say “Al
Qaida dunnit”.
31
Cover Up, Muddle Up,
Misquote, Trash, Decoy,
Ridicule - Insult
Steve Jones, Bill Deagle
and Nuke Attacks
OK. What I would emphasize is that we have learned that with
evidence we can learn a great deal so if there is an event and we won’t even name a city lets just say an American city blamed on Iran, certainly there will be 9/11 truthers nearby and
I hope they realize the importance of collecting a sample
[right] whether that’s dust … [also radiation] right - having a
radiation detector handy if you’ve got one – whether it’s Geiger if you send me a sample I’d be glad to look at it and I’m sure you
would too, Bill. So, if there is such an event the point – the
reason I’m emphasizing this is because it’s a bit of a warning if
there are perpetrators thinking about – such another 9/11 they’d
better think twice because 9/11 truthers are out there – we’re
watching. We will get samples – we know what to do – evidencebased studies – we can do very quickly and we can put an end
to lies - on the next 9/11 if it [inaudible] … which I hope we’ll
avoid… is what I’m trying to say…
33
The Energy Connection
Steve Jones & Cold Fusion
Steve E Jones is a Physicist from Brigham Young
University who started talking about 9/11 in
2005, just after a set of technical reports about
the destruction of the WTC were published.
There is quite a bit about Steve Jones in (the
late) Dr. Eugene Mallove’s book about the Cold
Fusion Cover Up Fire From Ice.
A year 2000 documentary called “Heavy
Watergate” (available on Google Video) has
this about Steve Jones, however…
34
Perception Management.
(US Department of Defense)
The photo on the right was used in Steve Jones 1st Feb
2006 USVC Presentation
Original Photo
Steve Jones’ Version35
Architects and Engineers for
9/11 “Truth”
It seems to be true that if people have heard something
other than the official story of 9/11, they have heard
something to do with Thermite and Molten Metal etc
I am often asked about this and why they have not
mentioned Dr Wood’s research or court case.
The group was set up in approximately April 2007 –
around the time that Dr Wood filed her RFC and court
case – indeed, AE911 filed their own RFC – which did
NOT explicitly mention Thermite!! (Google “Thermite
Free RFC”)
In recent times, it has been marginalising members
who mention Dr Judy Wood and the research
discussed here.
36
Another AE911 Supporter has their
Profile Information “Edited”
Scott Krajca had remarks relating to the
research of Dr. Judy Wood into the destruction
of the WTC deleted from the “biography”
section of his profile. When he saw that this
had happened, he asked for his profile to be
deleted.
37
Richard Gage Accuses Dr Judy Wood of
Practicing “Witchcraft”
On 08 May 2011, Ralph Winterrowd, on his
RBN show, asked Mr. Richard Gage – leader of
AE911 “truth” - about the evidence referenced
above. (The link here is for the full show, about
which there was doubt if he would be able to do
the broadcast. ) Mr. Gage’s response was
interesting .
“There are dozens of nuts out there with PhDs…”
“…now when Judy Wood is not going to acknowledge
any of that evidence and just hand wave it away, then
she’s not practicing science, she’s practicing witchcraft.
Go ahead…”
It is somewhat amusing to hear Mr. Gage fall
short of calling Dr. Judy Wood a “nut”, but he
then later, without apparent reservation,
accuses her of practicing "witchcraft"
38
UK 911 Forum – Ian Neal and
Tony Gosling
Ian Neal, one of the founders of the UK 9/11 campaign
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=137493#
137493
My emphasis:
"Secondly Judy Woods is a really bad public presenter of science.
I’ve watched her DVD presentations and I guarantee that a vast
majority of her academic peers would agree with me that the
way she presents her arguments in a lecture format is very
poor indeed (and that’s being kind). "
I asked Ian Neal how he could GUARANTEE this. Had he
collected e-mail responses from a questionnaire sent to Judy
Wood’s peers?
(This is a lie. He can make no such guarantee and didn’t have
copies of e-mails). Ian Neal thinks presentation is more
important than evidence – packaging is more important than
substance – and truth.
39
UK 911 Forum – Tony Gosling
On at least one past occasion a talk I gave was posted
by a friend on the UK 911 forum. In the “events”
section.
It was (at one point) moved from the events section
(i.e. off the front page) and into the “controversies”
section (this is meant to be a 9/11 truth website!) It
appears to have been moved back later
Gosling stated:
Judy Wood, Directed Energy Weapons, Aliens.
Andrew's a good speaker but too easy to ridicule
hence 'controversies'. Rather than wailing why doesn't
someone post this talk to the email list?
http://groups.google.com/group/uk-911-truth
40
Simon Shack Hytten –
September Clues Forum
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
by simonshack on June 25th, 2012, 7:12 pm
Oh mamma mia - not again!
....
Dear El Diablo, let me try and spell this out in simple fashion.
What the 'Judy Wood' entity does is gatekeeping 101: her role is to REINSTATE THE
CREDIBILITY OF THE (totally fake) 9/11 IMAGERY, and to provide some sort of explanation to
the outlandish/impossible collapse dynamics that those absurd video animations visually
transmit into your brain: both 110-story WTC buildings collapsing in a cloud of dust! Top
Down!!!
The two WTC towers (and, in fact, the other seven buildings wiped off the map that day)
were much more likely safely brought down with conventional, foolproof explosives - such as
those used all the time to bring down buildings all over the world. In this case, however, a
smokescreen was raised around them so that no one could see (or film) ANY DETAIL of the
proceedings.
I'll stop here for now. Please reply to this post of mine before you spam any other
links to "Judy Wood's" blatant disinformation bullcrap on this forum. Thanks.
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?t=807&p=2371640
41
Crop Circles and 911
Other Soil Effects – Iron Spheres
Photomicrograph (100 X) of 10-40 micron diameter,
spherical, magnetic particles of the type regularly
found in crop circle soils. EDS reveals these spheres
to be pure iron; the fact that they are magnetized
reveals they were formed in a magnetic field.
http://www.bltresearch.com/magnetic.php
43
WTC Dust – Iron Rich Microspheres?
Perhaps Steven E Jones et
al knew what to cover
up? He claims these are
signature of the use of
Thermite!
“Iron-rich spheroid from
the USGS Particle Atlas of
World Trade Center
Dust.”
This is about 20 μm in
diameter – comparable to
Spheres in the Crop Circle
Soil Sample found by WC
Levengood.
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosive_residues.html 44
Colin Andrews, Cheesefoot Head,
Pat
Delgado
http://www.colinandrews.net/CheesefootHead-PatSection.html
The unusual events at White Crow
occurred on the night of Saturday/Sunday
17-18th June, 1989, when six people
climbed up Cheesefoot Head hill and sat in
a crop circle at midnight.
Pat Delgado, Colin Andrews and
Timothy Good discuss events at
Cheesefoot Head. Copyright: Colin
Andrews 1989.
Standing at the southern position with Colin, I was controlled to reach
out and sweep energy from the sound into Colin’s body. I do not know
why. Colin then left me and returned to the group at the top of the
circle. I turned towards the sound and my arms were being pulled
over the crop with an even greater force and my body felt it was being
pulled upward and forward out of the circle at some perilous angle.
With all the strength I could muster I managed to withdraw my arms,
gradually sink down and turn around so I was now facing north. I
eventually laid down on my stomach and began to inch my way up the
centre of the sloping circle floor, grabbing at bunches of flattened
barley stems and pushing with my knees and feet.
45
Pat Delgado and Freddy Silva Levitated
My progress was slow because whatever the short distance I made
forward, a force kept pulling me back half that distance. I was becoming
totally exhausted and at that moment I wondered what I was fighting
against. There was nothing tangible but I was under the control of some
force of incredible strength. I hung on as best I could. I called out to Colin
to come and help me. I remember instructing him to come down the
eastern edge of the circle in a crouching position which he did until he
was level with me. We inched our way towards each other until we
grabbed hands and it was then that both of us began to be pulled back
and downwards. Fighting against this force we managed to break away
from it and crawl to the side of the circle and, still crouching, we quickly
worked our way back to the group at the north side.
For some minutes we sat there answering questions as to what had
happened when suddenly some force levitated me to a height just
brushing the flattened crop and floated me to the east side of
the circle. Now I was feeling really scared. What force could
have moved me a distance of about three metres while still in
the same sitting position? It was here I called to Colin and the others
to join me. After a few minutes we all decided to leave the circle.
46
Residual Effects – in Crop
Circles and at the WTC.
Bankers Trust / Deutsche Bank
Building – Opposite WTC
Why repair a building then dismantle it?
Soon after 9/11/01
28 July 06
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ3.html#BT
48
Hosing Down WTC Site -
th
17
Jan 2008
49
“Ghost” Crop Formations
2003 Formations still visible in 2004 early crops (May).
Photos by Busty Taylor. (West Stowell and Avebury
Avenue, Wiltshire)
This seems to be more evidence that board stomping
would not cause to appear.
http://www.busty-taylor.com/cropper/2004w001.htm
50
Disclosure… and Alfred
Webre, Steven Greer, Nick
Pope, Richard Hoagland and
Richard Dolan
Alfred Webre & Leuren Moret # 1
Alfred Webre an International
Lawyer, peace and
environmental activist,
prominent in the naissant field
of Exopolitics. In 2000, he
published a book called
“EXOPOLITICS: Politics,
Government, and Law in the
Universe”
Leuren Moret - who claimed
to be a Geoscientist who has
travelled the world to discuss
and expose the dangers of
radioactive contamination
caused by the use of Depleted
Uranium in modern artillery
shells.
52
Leuren Moret
Claimed to be a
Geoscientist at
Lawrence
Livermore…
But this document
just says she was a
“Senior Scientific
Technologist” for
less than 1 year.
53
http://www.archive.org/stream/LeurenKMoret-RealJobAtLawrenceLivermoreNationalLaboratory/MoretAndFulkLivermoreEmployment#page/n0/mode/1up
Alfred Webre & Leuren Moret # 3
During the interview, Alfred Webre was told of the connection between Hutchison
Effect evidence and the effects seen at and near the World Trade Centre on 9/11.
Webre even acknowledges that the Weaponised Free Energy Technology should be
disclosed and used for Peaceful Purposes, thus:
At the 33:30 mark, Dr. Wood says:
“I don’t know if it’s the exact same thing as the Hutchison Effect, but what I’ve
learned from this is that… here is something that does the same thing that we
see...”
Alfred Webre says “yes” and Dr. Wood continues, “…so we know it’s possible.”
Webre says “right”.
At around 44:25 in the long recording referenced above, Dr. Wood suggests “an
amazing technology was used [on 9/11]” and Webre says “yes”. Webre also
appears to agree when Dr. Wood suggests that the technology could be used for
good things – he states that her suggestion is a “very profound statement”. Webre
then suggests (around 45:30) that behind the black budget projects there are
these
“advanced technologies which have been developed, at taxpayer expense, for
weapons applications, which could as easily be applied to new energy applications
that would be to the benefit of the biosphere.”
He says “whatever technology did this should be disclosed”. John Hutchison also
expresses his wish for the technology to be disclosed and that his method of
“doing this” is to appear in TV documentaries about the subject and talk about his
work and experiments.
54
Alfred Webre & Leuren Moret # 4
As you have heard, it seems Webre did NOT
want to disclose information about the
technology – and not want Dr Judy Wood’s
name to be mentioned?
Is the best way to “disclose” something, not to
talk about it?
AW
…just run through [in] 5 minutes why you think HAARP was the instrument
that caused the molecular dissociation and the controlled … disappearance
of the World Trade Centre.
LM
Well, it was really Judy Wood’s presentation which had the physical
evidence and the photos which are not available – they haven’t been …
AW
Without… without referring to Judy Wood – in your own words – why do
you think HAARP caused it?
55
Alfred Webre Wanted to Sue Me!
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:57:37 -0700
Subject: Judy Wood & Andrew Johnson - Apology and article retraction requested
- Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
From: CAMPAIGN < peace@peaceinspace.org>
To: "Dr. Judy Wood" < lisajudy@nctv.com>
Dear Judy and Andrew Johnson - Hi! In the course of 9/11 research tonight I came across an
article by Andrew Johnson that I find defaming, a distortion of reality, inaccurate, paranoid,
hostile, attacking, libelous, slanderous, back-stabbing and offensive.
================
Dr. Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson: I ask you, have you no sense of common decency?
If I do not hear back from one or both of you within a reasonable time, I reserve the right to
bring legal action against Andrew Johnson for libel (I have solicitors in the UK), and/or to
publish this letter and related journalistic articles.
I request an apology and a retraction of the above referenced article for the reasons set out
in this letter.
I do not have an email address for Andrew Johnson and am serving him with this letter via
Skype.
In Light and cooperation, Alfred Webre
Tel 604-733-8134
56
Notes on Dr Steven Greer
Former ER Doctor
Had a Near-Death Experience (in his teens)
There is no doubt that the Disclosure Project was a
remarkable effort and compilation of evidence etc
(it’s what drew me in to re-examining the UFO issue).
In 1997, during in their time working on “UFO
matters”, Steven Greer, Sheri Adamiak Congressman
Stephen Schiff and Colin Andrews were all diagnosed
with Cancer. Adamiak and Schiff died and Greer and
Andrews were successfully treated.
In his “Disclosure” Book (500 pages) released in
2001, the write up and descriptions of some of the
witnesses he interviewed mention SAIC a total of
about 6 times
57
Dr Steven Greer knows about
SAIC
Seaspower and Aero2012
These are Steven Greer’s “Free Energy” initiatives
Seas-power (Space Energy Access Systems) started in
2001 following Disclosure Project
Sounded great! Use secrets known about UFO tech to
find, develop and market energy technologies which
were either "fuel-less", "over unity" (i.e. they output
more energy than they consume)
Website www.seaspower.com was created in Sept
2001.
Contained for example an agreement for inventors to
“sign” if they had a device they wanted to
develop/market.
This agreement was quite comprehensive.
59
Seaspower and Aero2012
Website Comparison
In May 2007, Aero2012 was launched, compare websites...
http://www.aero2012.com/en/why.html
Why AERO? An Overview for Inventors
An historical overview of over-unity electric
generators and other unconventional energy
innovations shows that for at least 75 years,
human society could have had a replacement for
fossil fuels and the internal combustion engine. The
fact that such energy breakthroughs are not in use
today is ample evidence that the hurdles to the
widespread use of such technologies is less about
inventing such a system - or even about adequate
funding - and primarily about 'something else'.
Since the time of Tesla, inventors have been
discovering ways to extract energy from the space
around us. And yet we all still drive cars using
gasoline, and live in homes powered mostly by
coal-fired public utilities.
http://web.archive.org/web/20060519071232/ww
w.seaspower.com/whyseas.htm
Why SEAS? An Overview for Inventors
An historical overview of over-unity electric
generators and other unconventional energy
innovations shows that for at least 75 years,
human society could have had a replacement for
fossil fuels and the internal combustion engine.
The fact that such energy breakthroughs are not
in use today is ample evidence that the hurdles to
the widespread use of such technologies is less
about inventing such a system - or even about
adequate funding - and primarily about
'something else'. Since the time of Tesla, inventors
have been discovering ways to extract energy
from the space around us. And yet we all still
drive cars using gasoline, and live in homes
powered mostly by coal-fired public utilities.
60
Steven Greer and Aero2012
Greer posted a 1 to 2 hour presentation.
In this 1 or even 2-hour presentation, Dr. Greer did not even
show a video, photos or PowerPoint slides of any research
or anything relevant to his earlier projects – it was just a
discussion of his experience and ideas for the future. We
heard from no one else whom he had met or worked with in
the previous 6 years or so. As can be seen if you watch the
videos, he merely a has large screen TV with a shot of the
Aero2012 website on it.
By May 2011, the Aero2012 website was offline…
61
9/11 and Steven Greer - 1
In an article entitled “Transformation of Risk” originally posted
on the Disclosure Project Website, Greer wrote:
This overview explains how the current risks of environmental
global warming, air pollution and public health challenges,
energy resource scarcity and competition, global terrorism and
current electric grid obsolescence and vulnerability are
transformed by these out-of-the-box technologies.
On P157 of "Forbidden Truth, Hidden Knowledge“
he says:
"At a subtle level of electromagnetism, you can transmute
elements, and also transfer something from one place to
another - and infect or harm someone electronically. This is a
very lethal application of a science that could be used to heal
people. Unfortunately, right now, the worst elements of
humanity currently possess these technologies.
When people worry about these technologies being disclosed, I
say: "Forget about it. The worst elements already have them"!62
http://replay.web.archive.org/20081007071916/http://www.aero2012.com/en/risk.mhtml
9/11 and Steven Greer - 2
Project Camelot interview in 2010
SG: … and it is a matter of perspective. I think that’s why I prefer
to be cautious, cautiously optimistic, put out a positive view on
how we should be interacting with this thing. It is not
irresponsible. I am not insidious. I think that these sort of
characterizations are highly offensive, as I have never attacked
you folks publicly.
I found I was attacked on your blog today. It was unfortunate. But
my perspective, I want to be very clear…
KC: No, no. Your philosophy was attacked. You were not attacked.
SG: Yeah, well, whatever.
KC: Actually, you were complimented.
SG: But I just have to say that that is why we’re wanting to be
cautious because it is so easy for humans… I mean, look what
happened after 9/11. It is so easy for humans to take shreds of
information and then go on a war footing or go on a conflict
footing.
63
http://projectcamelot.org/lang/en/steven_greer_interview_transcript_en.html
Steven Greer Knows about SAIC
From “Testimony of Denise McKenzie, former
SAIC employee, March 2001”, Page 308 – 309,
“DISCLOSURE PROJECT BRIEFING DOCUMENT”
Essentially SAIC is one of the crown jewels of
the super-secret, black project world and is
connected to UFO technologies and covert
funding. Former NSA head Adm. Bobby Inman is
heavily involved with SAIC, it should be noted.
Here again, we see the revolving door between
military and corporate projects described by Dr.
Rosin .
On April 13th 2012, Dr Steven Greer mentions
SAIC when talking about his meeting with
Senator Barry Goldwater. Greer was discussing
the role of Admiral Bobby Ray Inman in UFO
Secrecy
Inman was on the board of directors of SAIC.
http://www.disclosureproject.org/access/docs/pdf/DisclosureProjectBriefingDocumentNoDocs.pdf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDOC94gCkY4
Dr Steven Greer
Admiral Bobby Ray
Inman
64
9/11 and Richard Hoagland
Starting in about 1983, Richard Hoagland has presented some
very interesting information about Mars , the Moon and
especially Iapetus and he (and others) have highlighted a
number of anomalies in various photos which have been sent
back by unmanned probes. Mr Hoagland has posted some
quite fascinating, if at times verbose, articles on his website
“Enterprise Mission ”. He has mainly focused on “spacerelated” research topics and he has covered these at length in
books such as Monuments of Mars and more recently Dark
Mission.
He was a (very verbose) speaker at the Exopolitics 2011
Conference.
In 2008 on “Coast to Coast” Richard Hoagland promoted the
Official “Bin Laden” story whilst talking about new Solar Energy
technology (itself a “limited hangout” in relation to Free
Energy)
In April 2011 he gave a presentation in Amsterdam at the
“Secret Space Program” Conference.
Despite his research being primarily into NASA and Solar
System Anomalies that seem to be in their data, much of the
material that he presented was nothing to do with “Dark
Mission”, Mars, Iapetus or any of those subjects. Rather, the
material he presented was primarily about the events of 9/11.
The presentation spent 1.5 hours on the research of Dr Judy
Wood.
65
9/11 and Richard Hoagland
In 2008 on “Coast to Coast” Richard Hoagland
promoted the Official “Bin Laden” story whilst
talking about new Solar Energy technology (itself a
“limited hangout” in relation to Free Energy)
“This is a revolution that’s here - and all it’s waiting
for is the right president to say ‘this is what we’re
going to do – who wants to get on board’…. This is
the way we change the world, I mean if you look at
CNN, you look at NBC, you look at Fox, you look at
the litany of awful bad news that we’ve been living
with for almost 10 years now – since 2001 – since
9/11. What was the single biggest reason why Bin
Laden ostensibly killed 3000 Americans?”
In his Apr 3rd 2011 presentation , RCH rebuffed a
statement from the audience about Mohammad
Atta’s Passport being found on the ground. That is,
at 1:14:50 RCH states:
…If you believe that, I’ve got a really cool bridge
deal that I… OK?
66
Richard Hoagland
“Judy Wood Hasn’t got an answer”
Initially praising Dr Wood, he states, in his presentation
“following the evidence to its extraordinary and totally (Mr
Spock) illogical conclusion”
He implies Dr. Wood has scientifically followed the evidence
to the conclusions…yet he implies elsewhere that she is
clueless as to what happened. For he later states:
So, Judy’s question which is exquisitely logical is “Where did
these things go?” So far she hasn’t got an answer – but I’m
hoping that some of the insights that we’ve been able to put
together will help in her investigation.
RCH then just abruptly states:
“Here is the mystery of melted steel…”
And he does not state what “help” will be given – he does not,
at this point, state what “his answer” is either. Neither has he
offered any help as he has not contacted Dr Wood – ever!
67
Richard Hoagland
“John Hutchison Hasn’t a Clue”
Mr. Hoagland tries to give the impression that he understands
what is behind the effects John Hutchison has created and
states
.. in other words what John Hutchison is doing is “tickling the
force” with his fields and his playing and his […inaudible] not
at that time knowing at all what he was doing but getting
amazing effects because of the interaction back and forth…
the commutivity can flow in both directions - EM fields
produce torsion, torsion produces EM fields. The torsion field
is primary. And there he is - pleased as punch at what he’s
doing even though he hasn’t a clue what he’s doing.
In a broadcast on 04 Apr 2010 with Dr. Judy Wood and Ralph
Winterrowd, John Hutchison states, at around 31:50
I use a different combination of radio waves along with
threshold high voltage and electrostatic operators and I only
use weak magnetic fields to “steer” the electrostatic around
to cause it to conform to certain patterns.
68
9/11 and Richard Hoagland
Hoagland said at one point “Judy is wrong”
and tried to say that “torsion fields” were at
work (Dr Judy Wood has just described the
phenomena and mechanism and not really
given it a specific name).
Hoagland stated John Hutchison was in the
Navy (he was not).
Hoagland stated John Hutchison was “evicted”
from his apartment in Vancouver due to
residents complaints. This was also untrue.
He omitted discussion of Hurricane Erin (even
though he has blogged before about
Hurricanes being “steered”.)
He omitted approximately 12 other important
pieces of evidence.
Richard Hoagland is NOT A QUALIFIED
SCIENTIST – Dr Judy Wood IS!
Read more at
http://www.checktheevidence.com/
69
June 27th 2009, Leeds
From Left to right:
David Griffin, Richard Dolan, Andrew Johnson, Lloyd Pye, Nick Pope, Ian Crane
70
9/11 and Richard Dolan
I met Richard Dolan in June 2009 and discussed
in some detail Dr Judy Wood’s research –
including Hurricane Erin and the Hutchison
Effect
In Sept 2009, during a 77 minute podcast, he
discussed 9/11, but only referred to a “peer
reviewed paper” about “nano-thermite”
Dolan, who lives in New York state (Rochester)
did not mention Hurricane Erin.
He did not mention Dr Wood’s 9/11 Court Case,
Energy Weapons or SAIC (which has been
mentioned by UFO/Disclosure Witnesses as a
benefactor of the Black Budget)
71
9/11 and Richard Dolan
In Sept 2009, during a 77 minute podcast, he discussed 9/11, but only
referred to a “peer reviewed paper” about “nano-thermite”
Dolan refers to the commonly-circulated myth of hot molten metal – which is
discussed in Dr Wood’s books and presentations (many, many people repeat
this myth as if it were true – it is not).
This is a key now, for what is known as thermite or thermate. There’s been a
recent study that came out – published on the web – I’ve read this study and
it’s a very impressive… um… and detailed study dealing with thermitic
pyrotechnics in the World Trade Centre samples.
The dust samples were remarkably consistent and all of them showed signs at a microscopic level of something that absolutely should not have been
there – and what that is, is advanced, highly energetic thermite. Now, regular
thermite is an incredibly effective explosive – and you don’t just find this stuff
lying around.
[Karyn: It would never be used in construction? And they wouldn’t use it for
welding or anything like that?]
No, because it’s used to blow things up…. Thermite, when it’s heated to a
certain temperature causes explosions and that’s why it’s valuable – it’s a
great explosive. The type of thermite that we’re talking about is only
available in the military… it’s thermate … and it’s nano-engineered…in other
words it’s incredibly highly um… integrated with itself….
72
9/11 and Richard Dolan
The problem here is that I personally placed information in Richard Dolan’s
hand (in booklet and DVD form) in June 2009 about The Hutchison Effect and
Hurricane Erin.
Certainly the “technology angle” of this should fit directly into Dolan’s study
of the “Secret Space Programme” and/or a “breakaway civilisation” (which is
what this technology would empower).
On a “Thresholds to Other Realms” Podcast in April 2011, Dolan stated he
was more interested in Dr Judy Wood’s “hypothesis” because of what
Richard Hoagland had said in Amsterdam even though Richard Hoagland is
NOT A QUALIFIED SCIENTIST – Dr Judy Wood IS!
He states that Dr Wood is
“she’s leaning toward much… somewhat more exotic type of physics answers
– whether a particle type beam… what Hoagland brought out was the socalled Hutchison Effect”
Dr Wood published the connection to the Hutchison Effect 3 years earlier
and has never suggested a particle beam was involved.
However, on a Veritas Show broadcast in May 2011, he still keeps mentioning
thermite and what Richard Hoagland said…
Read more at http://www.checktheevidence.com/
73
“Crop Circles”, 911 and Nick Pope
We have now seen some physical
characteristics and evidence connecting the
events of 9/11 and, bizarrely, the formation
of Crop Circles
It is therefore now interesting to listen to
Nick Pope’s description of what he thinks
happened on 911 – and compare it to what
actually happened.
74
“Crop Circles”, 911 and Nick Pope # 2
What is more interesting are Nick’s
comments, in relation to Crop Circles, about
directed energy weapons.
“I had to refute the bizarre idea that the
formations were caused by the testing of
space-based laser or directed-energy
weapons, and dispel suggestions that media
coverage of the issue had been stifled by use
of D-Notices. “
http://www.colinandrews.net/Government-NickPope.html
75
2012 Olympics and Alien Invasion???
From UK Daily Mail, 07 June 2012:
Keep an eye on the skies for saucers
during the Olympics Games, warns former
MoD UFO expert
UFO expert Nick Pope says massive
summer events like the Olympics would
be a prime time for an alien encounter
Ministry of Defence 'has planned for the
worst outcomes - attack and invasion'
'We should be prepared for even the most
seemingly unfathomable'
Read more: Keep an eye on the skies for
saucers during the Olympics Games, warns
former MoD UFO expert Mail Online.htm
76
Nick Pope and the Alien Invasion
He said: 'The government must - and has
planned - for the worst-case scenario: alien
attack and alien invasion.
'Space shuttles, lasers and directed-energy weapons are
all committed via the Alien Invasion War Plan to defence
against any alien ships in orbit. If UFOs came into our
atmosphere, RAF jets such as the Eurofighter Typhoons,
and missiles such as the Rapiers guarding the Olympic
Games would be well equipped to enter the fray.
'And if the aliens landed, in an unprecedented move, I am
in doubt that the entire Army would be join the fight. The TA
and the Reserves would be called out and conscription
77
potentially introduced. '
Ian Crane
I have known Ian Crane for about 6 years and have spoken to him several
times about the proof and evidence provided by Dr Judy Wood’s 911
research.
Someone alerted me to this talk which is from a Presentation by Ian Crane
given at Conway Hall on 24th Sept 2011.
“Building 7 was indeed a perfect – perfectly executed controlled demolition
- the building came down in it’s own footprint and the pile of rubble was
12.5% the original height of the building – exactly as per the controlled
demolition textbooks. Buildings 1 & 2 which are more than twice the
height of building 7. Just to put it in perspective, building 7 was roughly the
height of the tower at canary wharf... just to put it into perspective.
27:42: Buildings 1 & 2 collapsed into dust. The buildings totally
disintegrated. There is no explanation as to what has caused that – it’s a
big question that’s left open. Take a look at this for a second…
What a shame that Ian either hadn’t researched or didn’t want to mention
Dr Judy Wood’s scientific investigation into what happened to the towers
(even though I have repeatedly mentioned it to him). It is a shame that
this happened in front of the sort of audience he was speaking to.
78
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCxh1dYnoPU#t=26m44s
Conclusions
I have found, from my own research interaction, that 911 is a
or the “Central Blindspot” for almost all speakers and
researchers involved in “Disclosure”.
Linking secret technology, to the destruction of the WTC is
seemingly a “no-no” and there is a comprehensive effort
(examples of which are documented in my book “911 Finding
the Truth”)
A clear pattern has emerged:
Do not mention 911 and the Hutchison Effect and Dr Wood in the
same sentence.
Do not mention 911 and Hurricane Erin
Do not mention SAIC, Dr Wood’s Qui Tam case from 2007
However, it IS OK to mention Thermite, Thermate, HAARP,
Nukes, Mini-Nukes, Fluoride (yes, really!), “secret disclosures”
from unknown sources, remote controlled planes, lasers from
space, particle beams etc etc
79
If you are FORCED to Mention Dr Judy
Wood or the DEW Research…
Characterise it as “just a theory”
Say “Well, it’s plausible”
Say “Well, I think it was a mixture of things that was
used to destroy the towers.”
Don’t talk about the evidence!
Don’t talk about the relationship to cold fusion.
Don’t mention Andrew Johnson’s documentation (as
outlined in this presentation).
“Let’s just be one big Happy Family, OK?”
80
Conclusions - 2
1) From the research of Dr Judy Wood, it's vital for people to
understand the connection between secret, weaponised
"free" energy technology and the events of 9/11 - especially
(but perhaps not exclusively) in the destruction of the WTC.
2) There is a clear, proven link between Cold Fusion research
(Steven E Jones) and 9/11. The link to the Hutchison Effect is
also a vital one. It is also an energy phenomenon which seems
to be related to cold fusion and from there is a link to the
military industrial complex through Col John Alexander (who
worked with Hutchison in 1983). Alexander also acts as a
sceptic in UFO research.
3) The 9/11 Hurricane Erin data revealed by Dr Judy Wood
also implicates the use of weather control in the days prior to
and following 911. This heavily compromises all the supposed
scientific debate about "climate change" in the mainstream. It
also reveals the actions of a secret apparatus of one or more
entities - as yet unknown - and the sort of technology they
seem to have at their disposal.
81
Conclusions - 3
4) Large sections of the "truth movement" have been set up,
controlled and directed - apparently through some wellknown and popular figures who seem (especially) not to be
able to talk about energy and 911 and weather control
without omitting the details or getting them wrong.
5) It seems clear that in other branches of the truth
movement, sophisticated operations of disinformation and
perception management are still in "full swing" - and they are
being successful. The only way to avoid these problems is not
to "join" a "truth movement".
Are you ready to re-evaluate the evidence presented here and
be more critical of those not talking about this?
Or is it “just me” being belligerent / grumpy / egotistical?
YOU DECIDE!
82
Thank you for listening!
www.checktheevidence.com
www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
www.richplanet.net
www.starchildproject.com
www.disclosureproject.org
www.presidentialufo.com