Zero Read Noise Detectors for the TMT Don Figer, Brian Ashe , John Frye, Brandon Hanold, Tom Montagliano, Don Stauffer (RIDL), Brian Aull, Bob Reich, Dan Schuette, Jim Gregory, Erik Duerr, Joseph Donnelly (MIT/LL) MIT LL No. MS-43282, ESC No. 09-1097 Outline • Motivation – Why pursue photon-counting technology? – Why use Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes (APDs)? • Moore Detector for TMT • Heritage: LIDAR • Conclusions 2 Outline • Motivation – Why pursue photon-counting technology? – Why use Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes (APDs)? • Moore Detector for TMT • Heritage: LIDAR • Conclusions 3 Why pursue photon-counting technology? • Photon-counting detectors effectively have zero read noise. • In low light applications, read noise can dominate signal-to-noise ratio. • Many applications can become low light applications with higher resolutions. – spectroscopy – time-resolved photometry – fast wavefront sensing and guiding 4 Detectivity (higher is better) SNR S N signal flux signal flux background flux (dark noise) 2 (read noise) 2 F tQE h F tQE inst A Fback , tQE idarkt N 2read inst A h h inst A N tQE N tQE n pix N ,backgroundtQE n pixidarkt n pix N 2read Sensitivit y flux at which SNR 1 Detectivit y Detectivit y 1 1 sensitivit y N , SNR 1 2tQE 1 1 4n pix ( N ,backgroundtQE idarkt N 2read ) 5 noise dominated read tQE . N read n pix Exposure Time to SNR=1 exposure time to reach a particular SNR. Solve SNR equation for t. SNR 2 ( N QE n pix N ,backgroundQE n pixidark ) SNR 4 ( N QE n pix N ,backgroundQE n pixidark ) 2 4 N 2 n pix (QE N read SNR) 2 2( N QE ) 2 SNR 1 and N ,background 0 and idark 0 N read n pix . N QE 6 Example for Planet Imaging • The exposure time required to achieve SNR=1 is dramatically reduced for a zero noise detector compared to detectors with state of the art read noise. read noise FOM 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Exposure Time (seconds) for SNR = 1 Quantum Efficiency 10% 6,600 7,159 8,486 10,148 11,954 13,830 15,745 17,684 20% 2,300 2,674 3,457 4,363 5,312 6,281 7,259 8,244 30% 1,311 1,591 2,141 2,760 3,402 4,053 4,709 5,368 40% 900 1,123 1,547 2,016 2,500 2,990 3,484 3,979 50% 680 865 1,209 1,587 1,976 2,369 2,764 3,161 mag_star=5, mag_planet=30, R=100, i_dark=0.0010 7 60% 544 703 992 1,309 1,633 1,961 2,291 2,621 70% 453 591 841 1,113 1,392 1,673 1,956 2,239 80% 388 510 730 968 1,212 1,459 1,706 1,954 90% 338 448 645 857 1,074 1,293 1,513 1,734 100% 300 400 577 768 964 1,161 1,359 1,558 Why use Geiger-Mode Avalanche Photodiodes (GM-APDs)? • produce easily distinguishable high voltage pulse per photon • have zero “excess noise factor” • allow for hybridization and bonding to nonoptical detecting materials • allow photon counting inside each pixel for high frame rates and time tagging • have demonstrated excellent performance for LIDAR applications 8 Gain of an APD M Ordinary photodiode Linear-mode APD Geiger-mode APD 100 10 1 0 Response to a photon I(t) Breakdown M 1 9 ∞ Geiger-Mode Imager: Photon-to-Digital Conversion Pixel circuit Digital timing circuit photon Digitally encoded photon flight time APD/CMOS array APD Lenslet array Focal-plane Quantum-limited sensitivity Noiseless readout Photon counting or timing 10 Outline • Motivation – Why pursue photon-counting technology? – Why use Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes (APDs)? • Moore Detector for TMT • Heritage: LIDAR • Conclusions 11 Moore Detector Project Goals • Operational – Photon-counting – Wide dynamic range: flux limit to 108 photons/pixel/s – Streaming readout • adaptive optics imaging • multiple target tracking – Time delay and integrate • Technical – Backside illumination for high fill factor – Demonstrate 25 mm pitch imager with streaming, single photon, readout 12 Moore Photon Counting Imager Optical (Silicon) Detector Performance Parameter Phase 1 Goal Format Phase 2 Goal 256x256 1024x1024 25 µm 20 µm zero zero Dark Current (@140 K) <10-3 e-/s/pixel <10-3 e-/s/pixel QEa Silicon (350nm,650nm,1000nm) 30%,50%,25% 55%,70%,35% 90 K – 293 K 90 K – 293 K 100% 100% Pixel Size Read Noise Operating Temperature Fill Factor aProduct of internal QE and probability of initiating an event. Assumes antireflection coating match for wavelength region. 13 Moore Photon Counting Imager Infrared (InGaAs) Detector Performance Parameter Phase 1 Goal Format Phase 2 Goal Single pixel 1024x1024 25 µm 20 µm Read Noise zero zero Dark Current (@140 K) TBD <10-3 e-/s/pixel QEa (1500nm) 50% 60% 90 K – 293 K 90 K – 293 K NA 100% w/o mlens Pixel Size Operating Temperature Fill Factor aProduct of internal QE and probability of initiating an event. Assumes antireflection coating match for wavelength region. 14 Moore Detector Project Status • A 256x256x25mm readout integrated circuit is being fabricated. • InGaAs test diodes are being fabricated. • Silicon GM-APD arrays have been fabricated and will be bump-bonded to the new readout circuit. • Photon-counting electronics are being built. • Testing will begin later in 2009. • Depending on results, megapixel silicon or InGaAs arrays will be developed. 15 Overview of Pixel Operation Pixel Architecture 16 ROIC Pixel Layout (2x2 pixels) metal bump bond pad 2 pixels, 50 mm core (active quench, discriminator, APD latch) counters (4 pixels) counter rollover latch 2 pixels, 50 mm 17 InGaAs Development • 3 APD designs grown and fabricated – 2-mm-wide avalanche region (all InP) – 3-mm-wide avalanche region (all InP) – 2-mm-wide avalanche region (InGaAs absorber) • Room-temperature CV measurements made • Devices in packaging for low temperature measurements 18 Outline • Motivation – Why pursue photon-counting technology? – Why use Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes (APDs)? • Moore Detector for TMT • Heritage: LIDAR • Conclusions 19 Si APD/CMOS Development History APD’s 1996 Discrete 4x4 arrays 4x4 arrays wire bonded to 16-channel CMOS readout 32x32 arrays fully integrated with 32x32 CMOS readout not to scale 20 64 x 64 arrays 3D-integrated with 2 tiers of SOI CMOS 256 x 256 arrays 2009 LIDAR Imaging System Microchip laser Geigermode APD array • Imaging system photon starved. Each detector must precisely time a weak optical pulse. Color-coded range image 21 A LIDAR Imaging Detector for NASA Planetary Missions Parameter Current Goal Space-Qualifiable NO YES Scalable to Large Format NO YES CMOS ROIC Timing Resolution 250 ps 250 ps Pixel Size 50 mm 50 mm unknown <10-3 e-/s/pixel Multiplied Dark Current (@140 K) QE (350nm,650nm,1000nm)a Operating Temperature Radiation Limit Technology Readiness Levelc • • • • 45%,65%,5% 45%,65%,10% 293 K 90 K – 293 K unknown 50 Krad(Si)b 2 4 High field multiplier Medium low field Low field absorber These arrays will be fabricated for back-illumination with bump bonding, enabling high performance in a space-qualifiable focal plane. The design of the ROIC will be finished by the end of 2009, with fabrication starting in early 2010. Funding: $546,000 Duration: 3 years (2008-2010) 22 32x32 APD/CMOS Array with Integrated GaP Microlenses 23 Laser Radar Brassboard System (Gen I) Taken at noontime on a sunny day • 4 4 APD array • External rack-mounted timing circuits • Doubled Nd:YAG passively Q-switched microchip laser (produces 30 µJ, 250 ps pulses at = 532 nm) • Transmit/receive field of view scanned to generate 128 128 images 24 Conventional vs LIDAR Image Conventional image 25 3D Imaging of Model Airplane Single Frame 3D Display of Processed Image, Probability of Detection Color-code Color-code: 1 m range display Airplane hanging on 6 mm rope • Multiple-frame coincidence processing of ~3-4 frames removes isolated dark counts • Image quality excellent due to low optical cross-talk between pixels 26 Rotatable 3D Images of Multiple Objects Color-coded by Distance Color-coded by Detection Probability • 128x128 images recorded with scanned 4x4 array at 1.06 mm • Coincidence processed to remove background/dark counts • Dark blue equivalent to <2 photon average return (right image) 27 Outline • Motivation – Why pursue photon-counting technology? – Why use Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes (APDs)? • Moore Detector for TMT • Heritage: LIDAR • Conclusions 28 Conclusions • Large-format photon-counting imaging detectors are within reach. • We are funded to make 256x256 and megapixel devices. • A 256x256 detector silicon-based array should be in testing by the end of the year. • The devices will be implemented in a broad range of low light level and LIDAR timing applications. 29